Earthenware Urn from Payagyi Pagoda
Version: (e58a53b), last modified (c4e1250).
Apparatus
⟨1⟩ rmaḥ • Sastri (ASB 1915, 22) also recognizes the possibility of a prescript r. Luce (PPPB I, 75 n.) reads meḥ, firming up Blagden’s m(e)ḥ (ASB 1915, 21). — ⟨1⟩ ḅaṁḥ ⬦ baṁḥ ASB1915. — ⟨1⟩ ḅaṁḥ ⬦ baṁḥ ASB1915. — ⟨1⟩ rmaḥ ⬦ rmaḥ ASB1915; m(e)ḥ ASB1915; meḥ Luce 1985. — ⟨1⟩ tḅaḥ ⬦ tbaḥ ASB1915. — ⟨1⟩ tḅaṁḥ ⬦ t(b)aḥ ASB1915. — ⟨1⟩ ḅa ⬦ ba ASB1915.
Bibliography
Reported in ASB, which includes a reading of the opening akṣaras. Blagden 1913_–_1914, p. 127 (E) takes note of this urn, but focuses his study on the four (PYU 3, 4, 5 and 6) that share reference to the Vikrama kings. ASB provides complete readings and notes by Blagden and Sastri; in most respects, Sastri is not as compatible with our readings as Blagden. Luce, in Luce 1985, pp. I, 65, 75 n. 24, 127, provides an overview and offers a modified reading. Re-edited here from published photographs.
Primary
Griffiths, Arlo, Marc Miyake and Julian K. Wheatley. 2018–03–26. “Corpus of Pyu inscriptions.” Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1207290. [URL]. Item DHARMA_INSPYU00002.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Earthenware Urn from Payagyi Pagoda</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>author of digital edition</resp>
<persName ref="part:argr"><forename>Arlo</forename><surname>Griffiths</surname></persName><persName ref="part:mami"><forename>Marc</forename><surname>Miyake</surname></persName><persName ref="part:jukw"><forename>Julian Karl</forename><surname>Wheatley</surname></persName></respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>DHARMA</authority>
<pubPlace><!-- Fill in here the place or places where the encoding has been done --></pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSPYU00002</idno>
<availability>
<licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported
Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to
Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View,
California, 94041, USA.</p>
</licence>
</availability>
<date from="2019" to="2025">2019-2025</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><!-- only the handDesc can be filled in at this stage -->
<msDesc><!-- //// NB: the msIdentifier had to be added for validation purposes ///. It will be edited later with the metadata spreadsheet -->
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/><!-- don't modify this -->
</msIdentifier>
<msContents><!-- describe the intellectual content of an inscription -->
<summary><!-- //// NOT MANDATORY ////--></summary> <!-- offers the possibility to give a summary of the inscription's content -->
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p><!-- The script name(s) will be inserted here at a later stage from the metadata spreasheet. At this stage, you can mention here in a free-text paragraph any characteristics of the writing observed more than once in this inscription that seem unusual/uncommon or otherwise noteworthy given the general characteristics of the script in question. See EGD 11.2. --></p>
<!-- If you need to identify individual hands (EGD §7.5/) in addition to one or more paragraphs of general palaeographic description, wrap <summary> around the <p> or <p>s above, and, outside <summary>, create <handNote> elements for each hand as follows:
<summary><p><p/></summary>
<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand1"></handNote>
<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand2"></handNote>
-->
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<projectDesc>
<p>The project DHARMA has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no 809994).</p>
</projectDesc>
<schemaRef type="guide" key="EGDv01" url="https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02888186"/><!-- UPDATE the link once the release is made official -->
<listPrefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="bib" matchPattern="([a-zA-Z0-9\-\_]+)" replacementPattern="https://www.zotero.org/groups/1633743/erc-dharma/items/tag/$1">
<p>Public URIs with the prefix bib to point to a Zotero Group Library named ERC-DHARMA whose data are open to the public.</p>
</prefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="part" matchPattern="([a-z]+)" replacementPattern="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/DHARMA_idListMembers_v01.xml#$1">
<p>Internal URIs using the part prefix to point to person elements in the <ref>DHARMA_idListMembers_v01.xml</ref> file.</p>
</prefixDef>
</listPrefixDef>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:mime" when="2026-03-02">Conversion to DHARMA guidelines</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="pyx-Latn">
<ab>
<lb n="1"/>
ḅaṁḥ va ḅaṁḥ
rmaḥ
tḅaḥ saṁḥ to tḅaṁḥ ta ḅa hi <!-- MM2AG: how should Sastri's possible r- be handled? can I leave the parentheses as is in Blagden? do parentheses in Blagden also mean supplied as in conventions.rtf? -->
<!-- AG2MM2: this is perennial problem and I don't know what is best practise. Let's agree for the time being that we precisely represent in <rdg> what the source in question has, without interpreting it into our system of editorial conventions. -->
<!-- AG2MM3: as soon as you reach 007-008, our newly established rule will run into trouble, because in the RTFs I believe I have regularized Blagden/Krech readings to a certain extent. -->
<!-- MM2AG: I have not added # to Sastri and Blagden, as their quotations come from the same volume of ASB which has a single xml:id. Would it make sense to tag those readings as resp="#Sastri" source="#ASB"? Added #...1985 to Luce to match xml:id in bibliography. -->
</ab>
</div>
<div type="apparatus">
<listApp>
<app loc="1">
<lem>rmaḥ</lem>
<note>Sastri (ASB 1915, 22) also recognizes the possibility of a prescript <seg type="graphemic">r</seg>. Luce (PPPB I, 75 n.) reads <seg type="graphemic">meḥ</seg>, firming up Blagden’s <seg type="graphemic">m(e)ḥ</seg> (ASB 1915, 21). <!-- MM2AG: changed the page numbers here and in RTF to be more specific: p. 22 for Sastri and p. 21 for Blagden.) -->
</note>
</app>
<app loc="1">
<lem>ḅaṁḥ</lem>
<rdg resp="#Blagden" source="bib:ASB1915">baṁḥ</rdg>
</app><app loc="1">
<lem>ḅaṁḥ</lem>
<rdg resp="#Blagden" source="bib:ASB1915">baṁḥ</rdg>
</app><app loc="1">
<lem>rmaḥ</lem>
<rdg resp="#Sastri" source="bib:ASB1915">rmaḥ</rdg>
<rdg resp="#Blagden" source="bib:ASB1915">m(e)ḥ</rdg>
<rdg source="bib:Luce1985_01">meḥ</rdg>
</app><app loc="1">
<lem>tḅaḥ</lem>
<rdg resp="#Blagden" source="bib:ASB1915">tbaḥ</rdg>
</app><app loc="1">
<lem>tḅaṁḥ</lem>
<rdg resp="#Blagden" source="bib:ASB1915">t(b)aḥ</rdg>
</app><app loc="1">
<lem>ḅa</lem>
<rdg resp="#Blagden" source="bib:ASB1915">ba</rdg>
</app></listApp>
</div>
<div type="translation" xml:lang="eng">
<p><!-- english translation here --></p>
</div>
<div type="commentary">
<p>ASB 1915, § 54, p. 21: “Hmawza E” = “the smallest of the Pyu funeral urns as published in Report for 1913”, reading <seg type="graphemic">baṁ: wa baṁ: m(e): tba: saṁ: to t(b)a: ta (ba) hi</seg></p>
<p>The words <seg type="graphemic">tḅaḥ</seg>, <seg type="graphemic">tḅaṁḥ</seg> and <seg type="graphemic">ḅaṁḥ</seg> give the impression of possibly being morphologically connected.</p>
<p>The words <seg type="graphemic">ḅa hi</seg> also figure in PYU <ref target="DHARMA_INSPYU00001">1</ref>.</p>
<!-- MM2AG: for now changed all <g> to <seg type="graphemic"> except in comments. Where would I use simple <g>? -->
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<!--Blagden 1913-14: 127 (E). — ASB 1913, 14-5; 1915, 21-3. — PPPB I, 65, 75 n. 24, 127.-->
<!--[Todo: markup citedRange elements if necessary]-->
<p>Reported in <bibl><ptr target="bib:ASB"/><citedRange>1913: 14-5</citedRange></bibl>, which includes a reading of the opening akṣaras. <bibl><ptr target="bib:Blagden1913-1914_01"/><citedRange> 127 (E)</citedRange></bibl> takes note of this urn, but focuses his study on the four (PYU <ref target="DHARMA_INSPYU00003">3</ref>, <ref target="DHARMA_INSPYU00004">4</ref>, <ref target="DHARMA_INSPYU00005">5</ref> and <ref target="DHARMA_INSPYU00006">6</ref>) that share reference to the Vikrama kings. <bibl><ptr target="bib:ASB"/><citedRange>1915: 21-3</citedRange></bibl> provides complete readings and notes by Blagden and Sastri; in most respects, Sastri is not as compatible with our readings as Blagden. Luce, in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Luce1985_01"/><citedRange>I, 65, 75 n. 24, 127</citedRange></bibl>, provides an overview and offers a modified reading. Re-edited here from published photographs.</p>
<!-- MM: should Sastri and Blagden be tagged here? Example <name xml:id="Blagden">Blagden</name>. -->
<!--<listBibl type="secondary-bibliography"/>-->
<listBibl type="primary"><bibl><ptr target="bib:CPI2018_01"/><citedRange unit="item">DHARMA_INSPYU00002</citedRange></bibl></listBibl></div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>
Commentary
ASB 1915, § 54, p. 21: “Hmawza E” = “the smallest of the Pyu funeral urns as published in Report for 1913”, reading baṁ: wa baṁ: m(e): tba: saṁ: to t(b)a: ta (ba) hi
The words tḅaḥ, tḅaṁḥ and ḅaṁḥ give the impression of possibly being morphologically connected.
The words ḅa hi also figure in PYU 1.