Pillar from site 17 at Nagarjunakonda — reign of Siri-Ehavalacāntamūla

Editors: Anonymous editor.

Identifier: DHARMA_INSEIAD00060.

Language: Prakrit.

Repository: Early Andhra (tfb-eiad-epigraphy).

Version: (9fa90aa), last modified (35386f0).

Edition

⟨1⟩ [3+]⟨Fragment left⟩[2×](ca) tethika(na) [2+][2×][1+][1×][1+] ⟨2⟩ [1+]⟨Fragment left⟩lasa ca bhaḍaphulasaṁṭhapasa (°ā)gaṁtukavathave(h)i ⟨3⟩ [1+]⟨Fragment left⟩bhuṁjitavasa °akhayanivikā datā gāma(ṁ) pa⟨4⟩[2+]⟨Fragment left⟩[1×]haṁ kakolūraṁ nelācava(saṁ) ⟨Fragment right⟩[4+] ⟨5⟩ [2+]⟨Fragment left⟩[2×]ya ca °apara(ma) ⟨Fragment right⟩[7+] ⟨6⟩ [1×]s(a) ca °a(khaya)n(i)v(i) dīnārimāsak(ā) divaḍhaṁ sataṁ [1×] ⟨7⟩ supayuta(ṁ) °esā ca °akhayanivī ku[l](ī)kapamukhāya(ṁ) [1×] ⟨8⟩ °anutheya ci(t)i [1×]yaṁ [.]i

Apparatus

⟨1⟩ (ca) tethika(na)[2+][2×][1+][1×][1+](ca) tethika(na) ........... na kā Sircarm • The passage seems parallel to EIAD 56, l. 7 (te)thikanakhati(k)āpa(hā)raḍhikā and 139, l. 3-4 tethikanak(kh)attik(ā)pahārakādi. One could read ? tikā after the gap between two fragments, but supplying a single syllable kha in the gap does not seem sufficient to fill it.

⟨2⟩ bhaḍaphulasaṁṭhapasa (°ā)gaṁtukavathave(h)i ⬦ bhadaphula saṭhapa sa[ma]gandakavathavaki Sircarm • Cf. EIAD 105, l. 10: bhadaphulasaṁṭhapasa.

⟨3⟩ gāma(ṁ) pa ⬦ gāmapa Sircarm.

⟨6⟩ dīnārimāsak(ā)dīnārimāsakā[naṁ] Sircarm • But cf. EIAD 10, l. 6. — ⟨6⟩ sataṁ [1×]sataṁ (bha) Sircarm.

⟨7⟩ °akhayanivī ⬦ °akhayanivi Sircarm. — ⟨7⟩ ku[l](ī)ka- ⬦ ku(li)ka- Sircarm.

⟨8⟩ °anutheya ci(t)i [1×] yaṁ [.]i ⬦ °atatheya ci … yaṁ (hi) Sircarm • The last akṣara is presumably ti.

Translation

... (for) the taithika, the (kṣatrika ?), and for the repair of what was damaged and dilapidated; it should be enjoyed by those who (will) arrive and who (presently) reside. As permanent endowment, the village(s) of ... Kakolūra (and) Nelācavasa ... and aparama... ... a permanent endowment, (consisting in) one and a half hundred of dīnārimāṣakas, is firmly attributed to (...). And this permanent endowment is to be executed by (...) headed by the kulikas ...

Commentary

(3) 1

(5) 2

Bibliography

First described and edited by Rama_Rao1955b and then in Sircarm. Re-edited here from published documentation and after autopsy of the stone covering the lower part of the inscription.

Secondary

No name. N.d. Indian Archaeology: a review. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India. Pages 1954–55: 23.

No name. 1887–. Annual report on Indian epigraphy. Madras; Calcutta; New Delhi: Government of Madras; Archaeological Survey of India. Pages 1954–55: 13, no. B.7.

Srinivasan1979a

Tsukamoto1996

Raghunath2001

Soundara_Rajan2006

Notes

  1. 1. On the uncertain referent of kulika, a figure that maybe connected to the śreṣṭhin, see Sircar1966.
  2. 2. Sircarm sees in °apara(ma) a mention of the Aparamahāvinaseliyas. While it is at first sights tempting to follow him and reconstruct accordingly, both the rest of the text and the findspot of the inscription point to a non-Buddhist context, where the mention of a Buddhist school would be unexpected. We are therefore unable to accept Sircar’s idea.