Khoh Initial Charter Fragment of Śarvanātha

Author of digital edition: Dániel Balogh (daba).

Contributor: Dániel Balogh (daba).

Language: Sanskrit (san) [Southern Brāhmī (other) (brāhmī_southern_other)].

Repository: Siddham (siddham).

Identifier: DHARMA_INSSiddham00086.

File path: XML-Provisional/DHARMA_INSSiddham00086.xml.

Version: 2026-07-17 15:30 (3e68bda), last modified 2026-07-17 15:30 (3e68bda).

Edition

⟨1⟩ *svasty⟨.⟩ uccakalpā¿t m?ahārājaughadevas ta◯sya puttras tat-pādānuddhyāto mahādevyāṁ
⟨2⟩ kumāradevyām utpanno mahārāja-kumā◯rade(vas tasya pu)ttras ta(t-pā)dānuddhyāto
⟨3⟩ mahādevyā⟨ṁ⟩ jayasvāminyām utpanno mahārāja-(jayasvāmī tasya) puttras tat-pādānu-
⟨4⟩ ddhyāto mahādevyā⟨ṁ⟩ rāmadevy¿a?m utpanno mahārāja-(vyāghras tasya puttra)s tat-pādānuddhyāto
⟨5⟩ mah¿a?devyām ajjhitadevyām ¿a?tpanno mahārāja-jaya(nāthas tasya) puttras tat-p¿a?dānuddhyā-
⟨6⟩ to mahād¿ā?vyā[ṁ] mur¿ū?ṇḍasvāminyām utpanno mahārā(ja-śarvvanā)thaḥ kuśalī (v)oṭa-
⟨7⟩ santika-dhavaṣaṇḍikārddhe brāhmaṇādīn kuṭumbinas sarvva-kārū¿n?ś ca samājñāpayati
⟨8⟩ viditaṁ vo stu yathaiṣa ggrāmārddho mayācandrārkka-samakālik¿ā?s s¿a?draṅgaḥ-
⟨9⟩ soparikaraḥ A-c¿a?ṭa-bhaṭa-prāveśya⟨ḥ⟩ sarvva-¿karātyagaḥ? ¿dro?tpadyamānaka-¿pi?tyāya-
⟨10⟩ -sametaḥ ¿choḍugomika? etat-puttra-prapauttra-tatputtrādy-anukkrameṇa tāṁbra-
⟨11⟩ -śāsanenātisr̥ṣṭaḥ⟨.⟩ Anenāpi mayānumoditaṁ yathopari-likhitaka-
⟨12⟩ -kkrameṇaiva bhagavatyāḥ piṣṭapurik¿a?-devyāḥ khaṇḍa-phuṭṭa-pratisaṁskāra-
⟨13⟩ karaṇāya vali-caru-sattra-pravarttanāya cātisr̥ṣṭas te yūyam eṣāṁ
⟨14⟩ samucita-bhāga-bhoga-kara-hiraṇyādi-pratyāyopa naya⟨ṁ⟩ kariṣyathājñā-śrava-
⟨15⟩ ṇa-vidheyāś ca bhaviṣyatha⟨.⟩ ye cāsmad-va¿n?śotpadyamānaka-rājānas tair iya⟨ṁ⟩
⟨16⟩ dattir na vilo¿k?yānumodanīyā

Display Options Word Wrap Line Numbers Comments Processing Instructions

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>

<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>

<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>

<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>

<title>Khoh Initial Charter Fragment of Śarvanātha</title>

<resp key="contributor">Original EpiDoc Encoding for Siddham</resp>

<forename>Dániel</forename>

<surname>Balogh</surname>

</persName>

</respStmt>

<resp key="contributor">Conversion of encoding for DHARMA</resp>

<forename>Dániel</forename>

<surname>Balogh</surname>

</persName>

</respStmt>

<resp key="creator">intellectual authorship of edition</resp>

<forename>Dániel</forename>

<surname>Balogh</surname>

</persName>

</respStmt>

</titleStmt>

<authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>

<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>

<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00086.xml</idno>

<!--

If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier>

-->

</publicationStmt>

<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>

<idno/>

</msIdentifier>

</msContents>

<p/>

</handDesc>

</physDesc>

</msDesc>

</sourceDesc>

</fileDesc>

<p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>

</encodingDesc>

<change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>

<change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>

<change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>

</revisionDesc>

</teiHeader>

<body>

<p><lb n="1"/><g ref="sym:unclassified" type="symbol">*</g>svasty<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> uccakalpā<sic>t m</sic>ahārājaughadevas ta<space type="binding-hole"/>sya puttras tat-pādānuddhyāto mahādevyāṁ<!--

The maṅgala symbol seems to be a horizontal dash with a shorter dash above its right half. Both curve slightly downward at the left. It may have been meant to go outside the margin, but the margin is irregular so I take it as inline.

--><lb n="2"/>kumāradevyām utpanno mahārāja-kumā<space type="binding-hole"/>rade<unclear>vas tasya pu</unclear>ttras ta<unclear>t-pā</unclear>dānuddhyāto <lb n="3"/>mahādevyā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> jayasvāminyām utpanno mahārāja-<unclear>jayasvāmī tasya</unclear> puttras tat-pādānu<lb n="4" break="no"/>ddhyāto mahādevyā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> rāmadevy<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>m utpanno mahārāja-<unclear>vyāghras tasya puttra</unclear>s tat-pādānuddhyāto <lb n="5"/>mah<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>devyām ajjhitadevyām <choice><sic>a</sic><corr>u</corr></choice>tpanno mahārāja-jaya<unclear>nāthas tasya</unclear> puttras tat-p<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>dānuddhyā<lb n="6" break="no"/>to mahād<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>e</corr></choice>vyā<supplied reason="lost">ṁ</supplied> mur<sic>ū</sic>ṇḍasvāminyām utpanno mahārā<unclear>ja-śarvvanā</unclear>thaḥ kuśalī <unclear>v</unclear>oṭa<lb n="7" break="no"/>santika-dhavaṣaṇḍikārddhe brāhmaṇādīn kuṭumbinas sarvva-kārū<sic>n</sic>ś ca samājñāpayati</p>

<p><lb n="8"/>viditaṁ vo stu yathaiṣa ggrāmārddho mayācandrārkka-samakālik<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>s s<sic>a</sic>draṅgaḥ<!--

Fleet corrects sadraṅga to sodraṅga, but given that the spelling is also found in IN00084 and draṅga is not uncommon for udraṅga, I think this is overcorrection.

--><lb n="9" break="no"/>soparikaraḥ A-c<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>ṭa-bhaṭa-prāveśya<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> sarvva-<choice><sic>karātyagaḥ</sic><corr>kara-tyāgaḥ</corr></choice> <choice><sic>dro</sic><corr>so</corr></choice>tpadyamānaka-<choice><sic>pi</sic><corr>pra</corr></choice>tyāya<!--

Fleet prints drotpadyamānaka and puityāya (sic), correcting to so° and pra°. The first problematic character is very unclear in the facsimile and may be a correction of something else (dro?) to so. The second seems to be pi in the facsimile; Fleet may also have seen an u mātrā under it, or perhaps this too is a correction, perhaps from pi to pra.

--><lb n="10" break="no"/>-sametaḥ <choice><sic>choḍugomika</sic><corr>choḍugomikāya</corr></choice> etat-puttra-prapauttra-tatputtrādy-anukkrameṇa tāṁbra<!--

I adopt Fleet's emendation to choḍugomikāya, but in fact the name may have been intended as in compound with the following.

--><!--

Fleet emends to puttra-pauttra-prapauttra. I think this is unnecessary, the phrasing is identical in all Uccakalpa grants I've processed so far.

--><lb n="11" break="no"/>-śāsanenātisr̥ṣṭaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Anenāpi mayānumoditaṁ yathopari-likhitaka<lb n="12" break="no"/>-kkrameṇaiva bhagavatyāḥ piṣṭapurik<sic>a</sic>-devyāḥ khaṇḍa-phuṭṭa-pratisaṁskāra-

<lb n="13"/>karaṇāya vali-caru-sattra-pravarttanāya cātisr̥ṣṭas<!--

Fleet reads prādharttanāya (correcting of course to pravarttanāya). In the facsimile I see no ā mātrā and find the va credible if misshapen, so I give the engraver the benefit of doubt.

--></p>

<p>te yūyam eṣāṁ <lb n="14"/>samucita-bhāga-bhoga-kara-hiraṇyādi-pratyāyopa naya<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> kariṣyathājñā-śrava<lb n="15" break="no"/>ṇa-vidheyāś ca bhaviṣyatha<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> ye cāsmad-va<sic>n</sic>śotpadyamānaka-rājānas tair iya<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> <lb n="16"/>dattir na vilo<choice><sic>k</sic><corr>p</corr></choice>yānumodanīyā<!--

Line 16 is squeezed in at the bottom of the plate and ends under cā of the previous line, after which point there would have been no room to continue this line.

--><!--

This inscription seems to be a perfect first half for %IN00087, but I follow Fleet in editing the two as separate. Fleet admits the apparent connectedness of the text but notes (#Fleet_1888:132n3) that "the edges of [%OB00079] are rounded off more; the copper is of a totally different quality, thickness, and weight; and the characters, though of just the same period, differ very much in details of execution ... there can, on the whole, be no doubt that in [%OB00078] and [%OB00079] we have the first and second plates of two separate grants; not one entire grant." The additional dūtaka mentioned at the end of IN00087 may also be an indication that the two plates belong to disparate grants, since there is no mention of halirākara in IN00086.

--></p>

</div>

<lem/>

</app>

</listApp>

</div>

</div>

</div>

<p/>

</listBibl>

</listBibl>

</div>

</body>

</text>

</TEI>