Statement that the temple or shrine is that of Rēvaśarmma
Version: (4f56646), last modified (dde297c).
Edition
⟨1⟩ śrī bhāradvājagōtrasya (prapē)ṟē-
⟨2⟩ cupasa(r)mmasya putra(ḥ) rēvaśa(r)mmasya guḍi
Translation by Sastri 1969
The temple of Rēvaśarmma, son of Rēcupaśarmma of Bhāradvāja gōtra.
Bibliography
The inscription was noted in A. R. No. 378 of 1904 and first published by J. Ramayya Pantulu with few metadata and without translation and picture (1948, p. 334, № 608). K. M. Sastri re-edits that edition and provided a translation (1969, p. 344, № 95).
Secondary
Ramayya Pantulu, Jayanti. 1948. South-Indian inscriptions (texts). Volume X: Telugu inscriptions from the Madras Presidency. South Indian Inscriptions 10. Delhi: Manager of Publications. Page 334, item 608.
Sastri, Korada Mahadeva. 1969. Historical grammar of Telugu with special reference to Old Telugu c. 200 B.C. - 1000 A.D. Anantapur: Sri Venkateswara Univ. Page 344, item 95.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Statement that the temple or shrine is that of Rēvaśarmma</title>
<respStmt>
<resp key="contributor">EpiDoc Encoding</resp>
<persName ref="part:jeth">
<forename>Jens Christian</forename>
<surname>Thomas</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp key="creator">intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
<persName>
<forename>J.</forename>
<surname>Ramayya Pantulu</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSTelugu00072.xml</idno>
<availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
<date from="2019" to="2025">2019-2025</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><!-- only the handDesc can be filled in at this stage -->
<msDesc><!-- //// NB: the msIdentifier had to be added for validation purposes ///. It will be edited later with the metadata spreadsheet -->
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/><!-- don't modify this -->
</msIdentifier>
<msContents><!-- describe the intellectual content of an inscription -->
<summary><!-- //// NOT MANDATORY ////--></summary> <!-- offers the possibility to give a summary of the inscription's content -->
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p><!-- The script name(s) will be inserted here at a later stage from the metadata spreasheet. At this stage, you can mention here in a free-text paragraph any characteristics of the writing observed more than once in this inscription that seem unusual/uncommon or otherwise noteworthy given the general characteristics of the script in question. See EGD 11.2. --></p>
<!-- If you need to identify individual hands (EGD §7.5/) in addition to one or more paragraphs of general palaeographic description, wrap <summary> around the <p> or <p>s above, and, outside <summary>, create <handNote> elements for each hand as follows:
<summary><p><p/></summary>
<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand1"></handNote>
<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand2"></handNote>
-->
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:axja" when="2020-11-03" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
<change who="part:jeth" when="2020-07-16" status="draft">Creation of the file</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="tel-Latn">
<p>
<lb n="1"/>śrī bhāradvājagōtrasya <unclear>prapē</unclear>ṟē<lb n="2" break="no"/>cupasa<unclear>r</unclear>mmasya putra<unclear>ḥ</unclear> rēvaśa<unclear>r</unclear>mmasya guḍi
</p>
</div>
<div type="apparatus">
<!--apparatus encoded as per EG §9.1, basic elements for apparatus below-->
<listApp><!-- one <app> for each apparatus entry -->
<app loc="line"><!-- Update the value of @loc.-->
<lem><!-- fill in a lemma here --></lem>
<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!-- update the @source value, fill in variant reading here --></rdg>
</app>
</listApp>
</div>
<div type="translation" source="bib:Sastri1969_01">
<p>
The temple of Rēvaśarmma, son of Rēcupaśarmma of Bhāradvāja gōtra.
</p>
</div>
<div type="translation" resp="part:jeth">
<!--Yet to be provided -->
</div>
<div type="commentary">
<p>
The Sanskrit grammar is not entirely correct (it should be prapē<!-- does this belong to the name? -->ṟēcupasarmmaputrasya). The inscription was on a slab near a shrine, and there is a certain chance that the term <foreign>guḍi</foreign> refers to the shrine and not to the temple itself.
</p>
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<p>
The inscription was noted in A. R. No. 378 of 1904<!-- has to be adjusted to the @target --> and first published by J. Ramayya Pantulu with few metadata and without translation and picture (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:RamayyaPantulu1948_01"/><citedRange unit="page">334</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">608</citedRange></bibl>). K. M. Sastri re-edits that edition and provided a translation (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Sastri1969_01"/><citedRange unit="page">344</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">95</citedRange></bibl>).
</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
<bibl n="siglum"/><!-- one <bibl/> per item of primary bibliography. Every entry mentionned in apparatus should hava a @n to declare its sigla -->
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
<bibl>A. R. No. 378 of 1904<!-- has to be adjusted to the @target --></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:RamayyaPantulu1948_01"/><citedRange unit="page">334</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">608</citedRange></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Sastri1969_01"/><citedRange unit="page">344</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">95</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>
Commentary
The Sanskrit grammar is not entirely correct (it should be prapēṟēcupasarmmaputrasya). The inscription was on a slab near a shrine, and there is a certain chance that the term guḍi refers to the shrine and not to the temple itself.