1<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
·<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
·<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
·<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
5<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
·<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
·<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
· <teiHeader>
· <fileDesc>
10 <titleStmt>
· <title>N. 1481. Inventory of a Śaiva temple at Dieng (9th c. CE)</title>
· <respStmt>
· <resp key="creator"/>
· <persName ref="part:argr">
15 <forename>Arlo</forename>
· <surname>Griffiths</surname>
· </persName>
· </respStmt>
· <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
20 </titleStmt>
· <publicationStmt>
· <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
· <pubPlace>Paris</pubPlace>
· <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSIDENK01481.xml</idno>
25 <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
· <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
· </publicationStmt>
· <sourceDesc>
· <msDesc>
30 <msIdentifier>
· <repository>as per external metadata</repository>
· </msIdentifier>
· <msContents>
· <summary>The inscription opens with a salutation to Śiva and lists gifts presented to/or property belonging to a (temple) of the Daṅ Hyaṅ (Śiva).</summary>
35 </msContents>
· <physDesc>
· <handDesc>
· <p>Kawi script characteristic of the 9th c.</p>
· </handDesc>
40 </physDesc>
· </msDesc>
· </sourceDesc>
· </fileDesc>
· <encodingDesc>
45 <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
· </encodingDesc>
· <revisionDesc>
· <change who="part:argr" when="2026-09-16" status="draft">modified teiheader and applied final file name</change>
· <change who="part:argr" when="2025-11-03" status="draft">encoded the inscription</change>
50 </revisionDesc>
· </teiHeader>
· <text xml:space="preserve">
· <body>
· <div type="edition" xml:lang="omy-Latn" rendition="class:38769 maturity:83213">
55 <ab xml:id="san-Latn"><milestone type="pagelike" n="A" unit="face"/><lb n="A1"/><g ref="sym:doubleBar" type="punctuation">.</g> namaś śivāya <g ref="sym:bar" type="punctuation">.</g></ab>
·<p>devadra<lb n="A2" break="no"/>vya hulun· ḍuA puluḥ
·<lb n="A3"/>karvo sapuluḥ A<unclear>las</unclear>·
·<lb n="A4"/><unclear>ka</unclear>caṅan· ḍuA, padyusan·
·<lb n="A5"/>ḍu<supplied reason="lost">A,</supplied> <unclear>gaṁ</unclear>gun·, karaha pad <unclear>va</unclear><lb break="no" n="A6"/>tu, <unclear>tatas</unclear>· lnaṁ, caranti li<lb break="no" n="A7"/>ma, vūṁ <unclear>pad va</unclear>tu, parsarinasi<lb break="no" n="A8"/>yan· <unclear>ta</unclear>mvaga, sapuluḥ va<lb break="no" n="A9"/>tu, mās· ḍu tahil·, jami<lb break="no" n="A10"/>niga pad vatu, caturaṅgaṁ
60<milestone type="pagelike" n="B" unit="face"/><lb n="B1"/>, kai<unclear>ṁ</unclear>l laki, sajugala <g ref="sym:doubleBar" type="punctuation">.</g>
·<lb n="B2"/>luṁsir ṣavatu <g ref="sym:doubleBar" type="punctuation">.</g> vi<unclear>tādi</unclear>
·<lb n="B3"/>ḍuA vatu, taṇḍa-taṇḍa
·<lb n="B4"/>ḍuAlapan·, suruy· ga<lb break="no" n="B5"/>ḍiṅ·, carmin· <g ref="sym:bar" type="punctuation">.</g> batu cərmi<lb break="no" n="B6"/>n·, vuṁvuṁ vala, karantiga ḍu<lb break="no" n="B7"/>A, ṣaṇḍuk· ḍuA <g ref="sym:doubleBar" type="punctuation">.</g> guci
·<lb n="B8"/>pat vatu, vatu kākkyaṅ·
65<lb n="B9"/>ḍuA, <unclear>ḍā</unclear>ṁ <g ref="sym:bar" type="punctuation">.</g> Eka teja ḍaṁ hyaṁ
·</p>
· </div>
· <div type="apparatus"/>
· <div type="translation" resp="part:argr">
70 <p>Homage to Śiva! Property of the god: twenty slaves; ten buffaloes; two platters for beans (?, <foreign>alas kacaṅan</foreign>); two wash-basins; four items (<foreign>batu</foreign>) of <foreign>gaṅgun karaha</foreign>, <foreign>tatas lnaṅ</foreign>; five <foreign>caranti</foreign>s; four items of <foreign>vūṅ</foreign>; ten items of <foreign>parsarinasiyan</foreign> of copper; two taels of gold; four items of <foreign>jaminiga</foreign>, neatly arranged (?, <foreign>caturaṅgaṅ</foreign>); cloth for a male, one pair; one item of <foreign>luṅsir</foreign>-cloth; two items of <foreign>vitādi</foreign>; eight banners; a comb of ivory; a mirror; mica (or: a mirror of mica); <foreign>buṅbuṅ vala</foreign>; two candles; two spoons; four items of jars; two <foreign>kakyaṅ</foreign> stones; kettle, one; fire for the venerable one.</p>
· </div>
· <div type="commentary">
· <p>Stutterheim rightly remarked that the use of punctuation seems unsystematic. Given the uncertain meaning of much of the text, many word divisions and readings are uncertain. Not without a degree of arbitrariness, some particularly uncertain akṣaras are marked as unclear. It was Schoterman (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Schoterman1981_01"/></bibl>) who proposed the correction of the reading <foreign>kail laki</foreign>, unanimously favoured by his predecessors, into <foreign>kaiṁl laki</foreign>. He noted that the <foreign>anusvāra</foreign> is “clearly visible in the incisions of the inscription” and believed that this spelling is “the result of a very rigorous application of the Skt rules of sandhi, the ‘basic’ form being <foreign>kain laki</foreign> ”. Although I do not find the <foreign>anusvāra</foreign> clear, I provisionally retain Schoterman’s reading.</p>
· </div>
75 <div type="bibliography">
· <p>The text was first established on the basis of the reading by J. L. A. Brandes (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Brandes1913_01"/></bibl>), controlled by using the photography <ref target="http://hdl.handle.net/1887.1/item:4100819">OD 3519</ref> and inspecting the stone at the National Museum at Jakarta (inv. no. D. 11). The result was then checked against Stutterheim’s revised reading (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Stutterheim1938_01"/></bibl>), and finally against other photographs, to yield the edition published in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Griffiths2018_01"/></bibl>, where I did not list all variants between published readings and my own. The present digital edition reproduces that previous publication.</p>
·
· <listBibl type="primary">
· <bibl n="B"><ptr target="bib:Brandes1913_01"/><citedRange unit="item">XCVI</citedRange><citedRange unit="page">227-228</citedRange></bibl>
80 <bibl n="S"><ptr target="bib:Stutterheim1938_01"/></bibl>
· <bibl n="G"><ptr target="bib:Griffiths2018_01"/><citedRange unit="page">276-279</citedRange></bibl>
·</listBibl>
· <listBibl type="secondary">
·
85
· <bibl><ptr target="bib:Groeneveldt1887_01"/><citedRange unit="page">375-376</citedRange></bibl>
· <bibl><ptr target="bib:NBG27_1889"/><citedRange unit="page">131</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">11</citedRange></bibl>
· <bibl><ptr target="bib:Juynboll1909_01"/><citedRange unit="page">232</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">2981</citedRange></bibl>
· <bibl><ptr target="bib:Schoterman1981_01"/><citedRange unit="page">432</citedRange></bibl>
90 </listBibl>
· </div>
· </body>
· </text>
·</TEI>
Commentary
Stutterheim rightly remarked that the use of punctuation seems unsystematic. Given the uncertain meaning of much of the text, many word divisions and readings are uncertain. Not without a degree of arbitrariness, some particularly uncertain akṣaras are marked as unclear. It was Schoterman (1981) who proposed the correction of the reading kail laki, unanimously favoured by his predecessors, into kaiṁl laki. He noted that the anusvāra is “clearly visible in the incisions of the inscription” and believed that this spelling is “the result of a very rigorous application of the Skt rules of sandhi, the ‘basic’ form being kain laki ”. Although I do not find the anusvāra clear, I provisionally retain Schoterman’s reading.