N. 722. The Sangguran Charter (851 Śaka)

Version: (65b4a42), last modified (65b4a42).

Edition

Main text

⟨Face A: Front⟩

⟨A1⟩ ( Avighnam astu ) śivam astu sarvva-jagataḥ para-hita-nirat¿a?ḥ bhav¿ā?ntu bhūta-(gaṇ)āḥ

⟨A2⟩ doṣāḥ prayāntu nāśām· sarvvatra sukhī bhavatu lokaḥ ma

⟨A3⟩ svasti śaka-varṣātīta 850 śravaṇa-māsa tithi caturdaśi śukla-pakṣa, vu, ka, śa, vāra, hastā-nakṣatra, viṣṇu-devatā, sobhāgya-

⟨A4⟩ -(yo)ga, Irikā divasani Ājñ¡a! śrī mahārāja, rakai paṅkaja dyaḥ vava śrī vijayalokanāmo¿s?tuṅga, tinaḍaḥ rakryān· mapatiḥ I hino (pu si)-

⟨A5⟩ (ṇḍo)k· śrī Īśānavikrama, Umiṅsor· I samgat· momah-umaḥ kāliḥ maḍaṇḍər· pu padma, Aṅgəhan· pu kuṇḍala, kumonakan· Ikanaṁ va-

⟨A6⟩ (nu)A I saṁguran· vatak· vaharu, gavai 2 p¿u?ṅguhan· tapak· mas· su 6 sīmān· susukan· denīkanaṁ punta I manañjuṁ maṅaran· ḍaṅ ācāryya (ḍa)-

⟨A7⟩ [*]li(ci)khya, muAṁ si dahil· ___ (s)y aṅgudī, səpət·, ḍa pu jambaṁ, kəsək·, ḍa pu bhairava, basya, lukiṁ, bhaṇḍa, tamblaṁ, haḍaṁ, cigər·, ḍa pu ruyut·

⟨A8⟩ vilaṁ, kañju, durdig·, suji, sugas·, Arpaṇākna I bhaṭāra I saṁ hyaṁ prasāda kabha__ktyan· Iṁ sīma kajuru-gusalyan· I manañjuṁ, paknānya sīma punpuna-

⟨A9⟩ na bhaṭāra, Umahayva Asiṁ samananā I saṁ hyaṁ dharmma saṅkānaniṁ śiva-caru-nivedya I bhaṭāra prātidina, maṅkana Iṣṭa-prayojana śrī mahā-

⟨A10⟩ rāja muAṁ rakryān· mapatiḥ rikanaṁ vanuA I saṅguran· Inarpaṇnākan· I bhaṭāra I saṁ hyaṁ prāsāda kabhaktyan· Iṁ sīma kajuru-gusalyan· I manañjuṁ

⟨A11⟩ māri vatak· vaharu, parṇnahanya svatantra tan· katamāna deniṁ patiḥ vahuta muAṁ saprakāraniṁ maṅilala drabya haji Iṁ daṅū, miśra para-miśra vulu-vulu

⟨A12⟩ prakāra, paṅuraṁ(,) kriṁ, paḍam·, manimpiki, paranakan·, limus galuḥ, paṅa(ru)han·, taji, vatu tajam·, sukun·, halu varak·, rakadut·,

⟨A13⟩ pinilai, kataṅgaran·, tapa haji, Air haji, malandaṁ, L̥ca, L̥blab·, kalaṁkaṁ, kutak·, taṅkil·, tr̥pan·, salvit·, tuha dagaṁ, juru gusali,

⟨A14⟩ tuhān nambi, tuhān huñjaman·, tuhān juḍi, juru jalir·, pamaṇikan·, miśra hino, vli hapū, vli vaduṁ, vli tambaṁ, vli pañjut·, vli haR̥ṁ, pabisar·, palamak·,

⟨A15⟩ pakaluṅkuṁ, Urutan·, dampulan·, tpuṁ kavuṁ, suṁsuṁ paṅuraṁ, pasuk alas·, payuṅan·, sipat· vilut·, pāṅin-aṅin·, pamāvaśya, puluṁ pa-

⟨A16⟩ ḍi, skar tahun·, panrāṅan·, panusuḥ, hopan·, sambal· sumbul·, hulun· haji pamr̥ṣi vatak· I jro, Ityaivamādi tan tamā Irikanaṁ va-

⟨A17⟩ nuA śīma I saṁguran·, kevalā bhaṭāra I saṁ hyaṁ prāsāda kabhaktyān· Iṁ sīma kajuru-gusalyān· I manañjuṁ Ataḥ pramāṇā I sadr̥bya-hajinya kabaiḥ,

⟨A18⟩ samaṅkana Ikanaṁ sukha-duḥkha kady āṅgāniṁ mayaṁ tan· pavvaḥ, valū rumambat· Iṁ natar·, vipati, vaṅkai kābunān·, rāḥ kasavur· Iṁ da-

⟨A19⟩ lan·, v¡a!k·-capalā, duhilatan·, hidu kasirat·, hasta-capalā, mamijilakan· turaḥniṁ kikir·, mamūk·, mamumpaṁ, ludān·, tūta-

⟨A20⟩ n·, ḍaṇḍa kuḍaṇḍa, bhaṇḍihalādi, bhaṭāra I saṁ hyaṁ prāsāda kabhaktyān· Ataḥ parānani drabya-hajinya, kūnaṁ Ikanaṁ miśra, mañambul·,

⟨A21⟩ mañaṁvriṁ, maṁlākha, maṅubar·, matarub·, maṅapus·, manūla vuṅkuḍu, maṁgula, maṁdyun·, maṁhapū, mamubut·, maṁluruṁ, magavai

⟨A22⟩ ruṅki, payuṁ vlū, mopiḥ, Akajaṁ, magavai , maṅanam-anam·, manavaṁ, manahəb·, mamisaṇḍuṁ manuk·, makala-kalā

⟨A23⟩ kapva ya tribhāgān· dra(b)ya-hajinya, sadūmān· Umarā I bhaṭāra, sadūman· Umarā I saṁ makmitan· sīma, sadūman maparaha I saṁ maṅilala drabya haji,

⟨A24⟩ kapva Ikanaṁ masambyavahāra hana ṅkāna hiniṁ-hīṅan· kv(ai)hanya, Anuṁ tan· knā de saṁ maṅilala drabya haji, tluṁ tuhān· Iṁ sasambyavahāra Iṁ sasī-

⟨A25⟩ ma, yan paṅulaṁ kbo 20 sapi 40 vḍus· 80 Aṇḍaḥ savantayan·, maguluṅan· tluṁ pasaṁ, maṅaraḥ tluṁ lumpaṁ, paṇḍai sobuban·, paḍahi tluṁ taṁ-

⟨A26⟩ kilan·, (ma)titiḥ sakulit·, Uṇḍahagi satuhān·, macadar pataṁ pacadaran·, parahu 1 masuṁhara 3 tan patuṇḍāna, yāpvan pinikul· dagaṁnya ka-

⟨A27⟩ dy a(ṅgā)niṁ mabasana, ma(sayaṁ), makacapuri, maṅuñjal·, maṅavari, kapas·, vuṅku()u, vsi, tambaga, gaṁsa, timaḥ, paḍat·, pamaja, vuyaḥ, lṅa, bras·, gu(la),

⟨A28⟩ bsar·, kasumba, saprakāraniṁ dval· pinikul· kalima vantal· Iṁ satuhān· pikul-pikulananya Iṁ sasīma (I)kanaṁ samaṅkana tan· knāna de saṁ maṅila-

⟨A29⟩ la drabya haji, saparānanya sadeśanya, ndān· makmitana ya tulis· maṅkai lvīranya, yāpvan· lbiḥ saṅkā rikanaṁ sapaṁhīṁ Iriya, knāna ¡ś!akalbiḥnya de saṁ maṅilala

⟨A30⟩ so(dhā)ra haji tan· (A)dhikāna, Irikanaṁ kāla maṅasəĀkan· Ikanaṁ punta I manañjuṁ pasak·-pasak· I śrī mahārāja pirak· 1 vḍihan· ta-

⟨A31⟩ pis· yu 1, rakryān· mapatiḥ I hino śrī Īśānavikrama InaṁsəĀn· (pasak-pa)sak· pirak· 1 vḍihan· tapis· yu 1, (ra)kai sirikan· pu marai-

⟨A32⟩ ndra, rakai vka pu balyaṁ, samgat· momah-(u)maḥ kāliḥ maḍaṇdər·, Aṅgəhan· InaṁsəĀn· pasak-pasak· pirak· dhā 5 vḍihan· yu 1 sovaṁ-sovaṁ,

⟨A33⟩ tiruAn· ḍa punta taritip·, Amrāti havaṁ vicakṣaṇa, pulu vatu pu paṇḍamuAn·, halaran· pu guṇottama, maṁhuri pu maṅuvil·, vadihati

⟨A34⟩ pu dinakara, makudur· pu balavān·, InaṁsəĀn· pasak-pasak· pirak· dhā 1 4 vḍihan· yu 1 sovaṁ, vaharu rikaṁ kālaṁ pu variga Inaṁsə-

⟨A35⟩ Ān· pasak-pasak· pirak· dhā (1) 4 vḍihan· (y)u 1, samgat· Anakbi dhā 7 8 kain· vlaḥ 1, saṁ tuhān· I vaharu vinaiḥ pasak-pasak·

⟨A36⟩ pirak· dhā 6 kinabai()hanira, tuhān· I vadihati 2 mira-miraḥ saṁ halaṁ pahu(), halaran· saṁ suddhyā(sth)a(,) (tu)hān· I makudur· 2 vatu

⟨A37⟩ valaiṁ saṁ (bhū/ra)te, [**] saṁ variṅin·, paṅura() I vadihati saṁ ra vuṅu, manuṅgu saṁ hovaṅka, paṅuraṁ I makudur· saṁ ra kvəl·, manuṅgu saṁ (ku)-

⟨Face B: Back⟩

⟨B3⟩ lumpaṁ, vinaiḥ pasak-pasak· pirak· 1, vḍihan· yu 1 sovaṁ-sovaṁ, saṁ tuhān· I pakaraṇān· makabaihan· juru (ka)[na](ya)

⟨B4⟩ I hino samgat· guṇuṅan· pu tun·tun·, juru vadvā rarai, saṁ ra guyu, juru kalula pu vali, kaṇḍamuhi saṁ geṣṭa, parujar· I siri-

⟨B5⟩ kan· hujuṁ galuḥ, I vka viridiḥ, I kanuruhan· saṁ rokat, I sbaṁ saṁ vimala, I bavaṁ saṁ jalaṁ, I maḍaṇḍər· saṁ cakra, ryy āṅgəhan· saṁ tu-

⟨B6⟩ han·, I tiruAn· sumuḍan· ḍa punta saṅgama, I hujuṁ saṁ pavudukan· vinaiḥ pasak-pasak· piradhā 2 8 kinabaihanira, saṁ citralekha

⟨B7⟩ I hino pasak-pasak· dhā 2 8 kinabai(han)i(ra), patiḥ juru kāliḥ vasaḥ saṁ kulumpaṁ, kuci saṁ ra kavil·(,) pasak-pasak· dhā 1 4 sovaṁ-so-

⟨B8⟩ vaṁ, parujarnya piṁsor hyaṁ paskaran·, pasak-pasak· pirak· () (5) sovaṁ-sovaṁ, lumaku manusuk· I vadihati saṁ kamala, (l)umaku manusuk· I makudur· saṁ taja-

⟨B9⟩ () I su(su)han· saṁṅ astuti saṁ balā, I tapa haji saṁ pacintān· vinaiḥ pasak-pasak· dhā 1 vḍihan· yu 1 sovaṁ-sovaṁ, patiḥ I kanuruhan· [.]i [****] saṁ ()ta

⟨B10⟩ patiḥ I hujuṁ saṁ kahyunan·, patiḥ I vaharu saṁ nīla, patiḥ I tugaran· saṁ mala, patiḥ (p)amgat· I vaharu saṁ gambo, patiḥ paṅkur· saṁ maṅka, saṁ raṅga vinaiḥ pasak-pasak· dhā 1 vḍi-

⟨B11⟩ han· yu 1 sovaṁ-sovaṁ, patiḥ lampuran· saṁ prasama, pasak-pasak· pirak· 8 vḍihan· hlai 1 parujar patiḥ si manohara pasak-pasak· dhā 1 vḍihan· yu 1, parujar patiḥ I ka-

⟨B12⟩ nuruhan· si jaluk·, si rambət, parujar patiḥ I vaharu si bṅal·, si tañjak·, si cacu, pasak-pasak· pirak· 8 vḍihan· hlai 1 sovaṁ-sovaṁ, (va)[hu]ta I vaharu si ba-

⟨B13⟩ lusyak· si kəndul·, tuha kalaṁ, vinaiḥ pasak-pasak· dhā 1 vḍihan· yu 1 sovaṁ-sovaṁ, piluṅgaḥ si rāji, si bantan·, ¿piṇḍat·? (vi)[naiḥ] vḍihan· hlai 1

⟨B14⟩ sovaṁ-sovaṁ, rāma tpi siriṁ milu pinakasākṣīniṁ manusuk· s¡i!ma, I tugaran· gusti si lakṣita, tuha kalaṁ si yogya, vinaiḥ pasak-pasak· pirak·

⟨B15⟩ 8 vḍihan· (yu) 1 sovaṁ-sovaṁ, I kajavān· […], I pavaṅkuAn·, si surā, I kḍi-kḍi si pahaṁ, I buṁkaliṅan· si tiñjo, Iṁ kapatihan· si piṅul·,

⟨B16⟩ I ḍahu si tambas· vinaiḥ pasak-pasak· pirak· 4 sovaṁ, patiḥ I vuṅa-vuṅa pirak· 4, ri() papanahan· vinkas· si mañjava(t)·, I kajar· kulapati si

⟨B17⟩ kaṇḍi, I tampur· si təṅəran· vinaiḥ pasak-pasak· pirak· 4 sovaṁ, si mañā si kəsək· si vudalū si kudi, matətə(ṅə)n·, si luluk· vinaiḥ pasak· pirak·

⟨B18⟩ 4 vḍihan· hlai 1 sovaṁ, Abañol· si lulut·, si s(p)at·, si hiR̥ṁ, vinaiḥ vḍihan· hlai 1 sovaṁ, Avayaṁ si rahina pirak· 4 vḍihan· yu 1 saṁ boddhi, saṁ mārgga, vi-

⟨B19⟩ naiḥ vḍihan· yu 1 sovaṁ, I tlasniṁ mavaiḥ pasak-pasak· muAṁ vḍihan· I sira kabaiḥ pinarṇnaḥ Ikanaṁ saji I saṁ makudur· I sorniṁ vitāna, maṅārgha ta saṁ pinakaviku

⟨B20⟩ sumaṅask(āra) Ikanaṁ susuk· muAṁ kulumpaṁ, maṇḍiri ta saṁ makudur· maṅañjali I saṁ hyaṁ təAs· maluṅguḥ I sorniṁ vitāna, mān·dlan· pāda humaR̥ppakan· saṁ hyaṁ tə-

⟨B21⟩ As·, masiṅhal· vḍihan· yu 1 tum¡u!t saṁ vadihati, lumkas· saṁ makudur· maṅuyut· manətək· gulūniṁ hayām·, linaṇḍəssakan· Iṁ kulumpaṁ, mamantiṅa-

⟨B22⟩ kan· han·tlū Iṁ vatu sīma, mamaṁmaṁ manapathe saminaṁmaṁnira daṅū, I katguhakna saṁ hyaṁ vatu sīma, Ikana līṁnira, Īndaḥ ta kita kamuṁ hyaṁ I baprakeśvara A-

⟨B23⟩ [ga]sti mahāR̥ṣi pūrvva dakṣiṇa paścimottara maddhya Ūrddha(m adha)ḥ ravi śaśī kṣiti jala pavana hūtāśana yajamānākāśa dharmma Ahorātra sa-

⟨B24⟩ ndhyā hr̥daya, yak()a rāk()asa pisāca pretāsura garuḍa gandharvva catvāri lokapāla, yama varuṇa kuvai(ra) bāśava muAṁ putra deva-

⟨B25⟩ tā pañcakuśika, nandīśvara mahākāla ṣadvināyaka nāgarājā dūrggādevī caturāśra, Ananta surendra, (A)nanta hyaṁ kālamr̥tyu

⟨B26⟩ gaṇabhūta kita prasiddha maṁrakṣa kaḍatvan· śrī mahārāja I mḍaṁ I() bhūmi matarām· kita Umilu manarīra, Umasuk iṁ sarvva-

⟨B27⟩ -sarīra kita sakala sākṣī-bhūta tumon madoḥ lāvan mapaR̥̄, riṁ rahina, riṁ vṅi At· ḍəṅəĀkan· ta Ikeṁ samaya sapatha sumpaḥ pamaṁmaṁma-

⟨B28⟩ mi ri kita hiyaṁ kabaiḥ, yāvat· Ikanaṁṅ vaṁ (du)rācāra tan māgum tan· makmit· Irikeṁ sapatha sinrāhakan· saṁ vahuta hyaṁ kudur·, hadyan· hulun· matuha ra-

⟨B29⟩ rai laki-laki vadvan·, viku grahastha muAṁ patiḥ vahuta rāma Asiṁ Umulah-ulaḥ Ikeṁ vanuA I saṅguran·, sīma Inarpaṇākan·nikanaṁ punta I mana-

⟨B30⟩ ñjuṁ I bhaṭāra, I saṁ hyaṁ prāsāda kabhaktyan· Iṁ sīma kajuru-gusalyan·, I dlāhaniṁ dlāha vavaka ta ya, ṅunivaiḥ yan ḍavuta saṁ hyaṁ vatu sīma, tasmāt· ka-

⟨B31⟩ buAtaknanya, patyanantāta ya kamuṁ hyaṁ, deyantat patīya, tatt a_noliha I vuntat·, tat tiṁhala I likuran·, taruṁ Iṅ adəga(,) tampya-

⟨B32⟩ (l)· I viraṅan·, tutuḥ tuṇḍunya vlaḥ kapālanya sbitakan· vtaṁnya rantann ususnya vtuAkan· ḍalmanya, ḍuḍuk· hatīnya paṅan dagiṁnya Inum· rāḥnya təhər pə-

⟨B33⟩ (da)kan· vkasakan· prāṇantika, yan· para riṅ alas paṅananniṁ moṁ, patukniṁṅ ulā pulīraknaniṁ devamanyu, yan para riṁ tgal· Alappanniṁ glap· sampalaniṁ rākṣasa,

⟨B34⟩ [pa]ṅananniṁ vuIl· si pamuṅuAn·, Araḥ ta kita kamuṁ hyaṁ kuśika gargga metrī kuruṣya pātāñjala, suvuk· lor· suvuk kidul· suvuk kuluAn· suvuk· vai-

⟨B35⟩ (ta)n·, buAṅakan· riṅ ākāśa, salambitakan· I hyaṁ kabaiḥ, tibākan· riṁ mahāsamudra, klammakan· Iṁ ḍavuhan· Alapan· saṁ hyaṁ jalamm er· du-

⟨B36⟩ dutanniṁ tuviran· saṁhapanniṁ vuhaya, ṅkānan matya Ikanaṁṅ vaṁ Anyāya lumbur· Ikeṁ vanuA s¡i!ma I saṁgura, Upadravā riṁ devatā bhrāṣṭa liputanni()

⟨B37⟩ ḍira muliha ¿riṁ kanaraka?, tibākan· Iṁ mahārorava, klan de saṁ yamabala, palun de saṁ kiṅkara, piṁpitva Ata yan· bimbān· pāpa Ata ya, saṁ-

⟨B38⟩ sāra sajīvakāla, salvirniṁ duḥkha paṅguhanya sarūpaniṁ lara hiḍapannya, (s)akelikniṁ maṁjanma dadya(na)nya, Avūka tan· tammuAṁ sāma, vkasakan· havu kairir·, maṅka-

⟨B39⟩ nā tmahananikanaṁṅ vaṁ Anyāya l(u)mbura Ikeṁ śīma I saṅguran·, I tlas saṁ makudur maṅu(y)u¿k?· masalin ta sira kabaiḥ, kapva maluṅguḥ Iṁ tkan pasək· tumūt· krama saṁ

⟨B40⟩ hana riṁ kon· patiḥ vahuta rāma kabayan· muAṁ rāma tpi siriṁ kabaiḥ, matuha manvam laki-laki vadvan· kaniṣṭamaddhyamottama, tan hana kān(t)un·, Umilu manaḍaḥ riṁ pa-

⟨B41⟩ glaran·, kinuran·-kuran· InaṁsəAn· skul· dandānan·, hinirusan· kla-kla Ambil-ambil·, kasyan· lit-lit· tlu saranak· saṅa-saṅān· haryyas· rumba-ru-

⟨B42⟩ mbaḥ kuluban· tetis· tumpuk-tumpuk· ḍeṁ hañaṁ ḍeṁ hasin· kakap· biluṁluṁ kaḍivas· huraṁ kavan· laya-layar· hala-hala han(t)iga Inariṁ

⟨B43⟩ suṇṭa Atak· pəhan·, piṇḍa gaṅan· Iṁ saron· 8 len· sankā riṁ knas· Ivak· prakāra, Anaḍaḥ ta sira kabaiḥ yathāsu¿k?a maṅinum· siddhu, ciñca, kilaṁ

⟨B44⟩ (tu)Ak· piṁtiga sovaṁ, vinuvuhan· tambul· Inañjapan· k(u)ravu kurima, Asam· dvadval·, kapva madulur malariḥ, Umaṁsə: taṁ jnu, skar·, rujak·, (Ana)bəḥ ta saṁ

⟨B45⟩ (ma)tuvuṁ[,] (maṁḍ)iri ta sira kabaiḥ patiḥ pramu(kha), manambaḥ humarap· I sārah-araḥni() kahanān· śrī mah¡a!rāja, muAṁ rakryān· mapatiḥ, I tlasniṁ manambaḥ maṅi-

⟨Face c: Proper right⟩

⟨c1⟩ [gal· rā](vaṇa)-hasta, sampun· saṅkap· Ika[naṁ]

⟨c2⟩ (I)nig(ə)lakan· maluṅguḥ (sira) muvaḥ vinu(vu)-

⟨c3⟩ [ha]n· tambul· linarihan· piṇḍuA so-

⟨c4⟩ (vaṁ,) Umaṁs(ə): taṁ baṁlus· linarihan· muva[]

⟨c5⟩ matlasan· (s)ira kabaiḥ kapuA muliḥ I-

⟨c6⟩ y umaḥnira, I kahlammanya gumanti Ikanaṁ r[ā]-

⟨c7⟩ (ma) I saṅguran· (mu)Aṁ Ikanaṁ punta I manañjuṁ

⟨c8⟩ lāvan· saṁ Umyāpāra Ikanaṁ susuka

⟨c9⟩ [s]¡i!(ma) vinaiḥ manaḍaha, Ikanaṁ mabaṅo-

⟨c10⟩ [] si lulut· si spat· si hiraṁ kapva

⟨c11⟩ [Umi]ntonakan· guṇanya, Irikanaṁ vṅi manaṁ-

⟨c12⟩ gap· ta sir¡a!vayaṁ maṅaran· rahina, nā-

⟨c13⟩ han· kramanikanaṁ susukan· sīma I sa-

⟨c14⟩ ṅguran·, su⟨⟨a⟩⟩mpun· samprayukta, likhita

⟨c15⟩ citralekha I hino lakṣaṇa

Extra lines at bottom of A and top of B

⟨A38⟩ [*****] (vinai)ḥ pirak· pasak-pasak· vḍihan· yu 1 sovaṁ-sovaṁ, ri s(th)iranya vanu(A) I saṁguran· [********] [*]

⟨B1⟩ prayatnakna [******] lava [******] Atavakadusīrahi kvaiḥ, Aṅuṅguṅ i vka [***] paṅura

⟨B2⟩ [**] lunavuhak· [****] t· Ahalulu [***] vvaye katmuAni putra-putr(i) [**] gvampimmilipuru [**] vka lu

Apparatus

Main text

⟨A3⟩ hastā-nakṣatraEade & Gislén 2000 point out that hastā is a problematic reading, because the lunar mansion expected here is śrāvaṇa, and find it “hard to imagine that this text originally read “Hasta”.” But there is no doubt that hastā is engraved.

⟨A5⟩ Ikanaṁ va⟨A6⟩(nu)A I saṁguran· vatak· vaharuThe correct reading of this passage was furnished by Krom 1931, p. 241, n. 4.

⟨B13⟩ ¿piṇḍat·?piṇḍa (ti) B SThe reading piṇḍat· is clear but a scribal error is suspected. Emend si ṇḍat? Or else si piṇḍat·? Or piṇḍa 2? Or piṇḍa?

Translation

⟨A1–4⟩ May there be no hindrance! May there be prosperity for all people! May the hosts of beings be intent upon the benefit of others! May faults come to perish! May the world be blissful in every respect! Hail! Elapsed Śaka year 850, month of Śravaṇa, fourteenth tithi of the waxing fortnight, Vurukuṅ, Kalivon, Saturday, the lunar mansion Hastā, the deity Viṣṇu, the conjunction Saubhāgya.

⟨A4–9⟩ That was when the decree of the Great King, Lord of Paṅkaja, (called) dyah Vava, Śrī Vijayalokanāma-Uttuṅga, was received by the mapatih Lord of Hino, (called) pu Siṇḍok, Śrī Īśānavikrama, [and] descended to both of the resident (momah-umah) officials—the [one of] Maḍaṇḍər (called) pu Padma‚ the [one of] Aṅgəhan (called) pu Kuṇḍala—ordering with regard to the village of Saṅguran, district of Vaharu, [whose] corvée (gavai) [is] 2 māṣa [and whose] tapak mas income (paṅguhan) [is] 6 suvarṇa, that it be made a sīma38 [and] demarcated by the reverend of Manañjuṅ called Master Ḍa..licikhya with si Dahil, [si] Śyaṅgudī,39 [si] Səpət, ḍa pu Jambaṅ, [ḍa pu] Kəsək, ḍa pu Bhairava, [ḍa pu] Basya‚ [ḍa pu] Lukiṅ‚ [ḍa pu] Bhaṇḍa‚ [ḍa pu] Tamblaṅ, [ḍa pu] Haḍaṅ‚ [ḍa pu] Cigər‚ ḍa pu Ruyut, [ḍa pu] Vilaṅ, [ḍa pu] Kañju, [ḍa pu] Durdig, [ḍa pu] Suji, [ḍa pu] Sugas;40 that it be donated to the Deity of the devotional temple (prāsāda kabhaktyan) in the smithy sīma at Manañjuṅ; that it serve as sīma domain of the Deity for maintenance of anything that is in disrepair in the holy foundation;41 that it be the resource for the daily śivacaru and nivedya (offerings)42 for the Deity.

⟨A9–17⟩ Such was the intention of His Majesty the Great King and the mapatih Lord with regard to the village of Saṅguran when it was donated to the Deity of the holy devotional temple in the smithy sīma at Manañjuṅ, ceasing to be [a part of] the district Vaharu. Its status would be independent, not to be entered by the patihs, the vahutas [and] all those who previously claimed royal revenues: the various miśras,43 all types of occupational groups (vulu-vulu),44 the paṅuraṅ, the kriṅ, the paḍam, the manimpiki, the paranakan, the limus galuh, the paṅaruhan, the taji, the vatu tajam, the sukun, the halu varak, the rakadut, the pinilai, the kataṅgaran, the tapa haji, the air haji, the malandaṅ, the ləca, the ləb-ləb, the kalaṅkaṅ, the kutak, the taṅkil, the trəpan, the saluit, the master of commerce, the master of smiths, the master of the Nambi, the master of the Huñjaman, the master of gambling, the master of harlots, the pamaṇikan, the miśra hino, the vəli hapū, the vəli vaduṅ, the vəli tambaṅ, the vəli pañjut, the vəli harəṅ, the pabisar, the palamak, the pakaluṅkuṅ, the urutan, the dampulan, the təpuṅ kavuṅ, the suṅsuṅ paṅuraṅ, the pasuk alas, the payuṅan, the sipat vilut, the pāniṅ-aṅin, the pamāvaśya, the puluṅ paḍi, the səkar tahun, the panrāṅan, the panusuh, the hopan, the sambal sumbul, the royal servants, the pamrəṣi, the courtiers, and so forth—they may not enter the sīma village at Saṅguran. Only the Deity of the devotional temple in the smithy sīma at Manañjuṅ would have authority over all of its royal revenue.

⟨A18–20⟩ Likewise the [payments for] ‘pain and relief’ (sukha-duḥkha), such as: mayaṅ tan pavvah areca-blossom without betelnut valū rumambat iṅ natar gourd vines that grow in the courtyard vipati untimely death vaṅkai kābunan a corpse covered with dew rāh kasavur iṅ dalan blood spattered on the road vāk-capala rash speech duhilatan slander hidu kasirat spittle that is sprayed hasta-capala rash acts with the hand mamijilakan turahniṅ kikir producing the trace of a file mamūk attacking in fury mamuṅpaṅ rape ludan repeated attack tūtan stalking ḍaṇḍa kuḍaṇḍa punishment and wrongful punishment bhaṇḍihala poisons of all sorts, and so forth: only the Deity of the devotional temple would be the destination of its royal revenue.

⟨A20–23⟩ As for those miśra who mañambul process black dyestuffs mañaṅvriṅ process (red) cawring dye maṅlākha process (brownish red) lākha dye maṅubar make red dye matarub make sheds maṅapus twist ropes manūla vuṅkuḍu stab mengkudu roots maṅgula make sugar maṅdyun make pots maṁhapū make lime mamubut produce turnery maṅluruṅ make castor oil magavai ruṅki, payuṅ vəlū make ruṅki baskets, round (?) parasols mopih work spathe (upih) akajaṅ make awnings magavai kisi make basket works maṅanam-anam weave fabric manavaṅ catch in nets manahəb, mamisaṇḍuṅ manuk catch or snare birds makala-kalā trap [birds], all of the royal revenue from them would be divided in three. One share would go to the Deity. One share would go to the custodians of the sīma. One share would be credited to the claimants of royal revenues.

⟨A24–30⟩ The numbers of those who engaged in trade while present there were limited: those not subjected to the claimants of royal revenue were three master tradesmen per trade, per sīma.45 When buying livestock (the quotas were) 20 buffaloes, 40 cows, 80 sheep, one coop of ducks. When trading with wagons, three yokes; karah workers, three pounding blocks; smiths, one set of bellows; drum [players],46 three places to perform; keepers of packhorses (matitih), one skin; carpenters, one master tradesman; cadar (cloth) makers, four cadar looms; 1 boat with 3 suṅhara that may not have tuṇḍān. If their wares were carried by shoulder-pole—such as cloth vendors, tinkers (vendors of copper utensils), kacapuri makers, transporters, preparers of awar-awar, cotton, mengkudu, iron, copper, bronze, tin, block [salt], steel (pamaja),47 salt, sesame (oil), uncooked rice, sugar, silk, safflower (seeds?)—all types of wares that were carried by shoulder-pole: altogether their shoulder-pole loads would be five bundles per master, per sīma. What was up to that limit would not be subjected to the claimants of royal revenue, wherever those [traders] might go, whatever may be their country (of origin). However, they should keep the present document. If they exceed the limit imposed on them, they will be subjected (to levies) by the claimants of all royal levies (sa-uddhāra haji) proportionally to their excess [but taxation of the excess] should not be disproportional (tan adhikāna).48

⟨A30–B19⟩ At that time the venerable of Manañjuṅ offered gifts to the Great King: 1 kāṭi of silver, 1 pair of vəḍihan tapis.49 The mapatih Lord of Hino, Śrī Īśānavikrama, was offered as gifts: 1 kāṭi of silver [and] 1 pair of vəḍihan tapis. The Lord of Sirikan, pu Marendra,50 the Lord of Vka, pu Balyaṅ, [as well as] both the resident officials—the [one of] Maḍaṇḍər and the [one of] Aṅgəhan—were offered as gifts: 5 dhāraṇa of silver [and] 1 pair of vəḍihan, per person. The [official of] Tiruan, ḍa punta Taritip, the [lord of]51 Amrāti Havaṅ Vicaksaṇa,52 the [official of] Pulu Vatu (called) pu Paṇḍamuan, the [lord of] Halaran (called) pu Guṇottama, the [official of] Maṅhuri (called) pu Maṅuvil, the [official of] Vadihati (called) pu Dinakara [and] the [lord/official of] Makudur (called) pu Balavān—[they all] were offered as gifts: 1 dhāraṇa, 4 māṣa, of silver, [and] 1 pair of vəḍihan each. The [official of] Vaharu at that time, (called) pu Variga, was offered as gifts: 1 dhāraṇa, 4 māṣa of silver, 1 pair of vəḍihan; the official’s wife: 7 dhāraṇa, 8 māṣa, [and] 1 piece of kain. The masters at Vaharu were given as gifts: 6 dhāraṇa of silver collectively. The 2 masters for Vadihati—[the one] of Mira-Mirah (called) saṅ Halaṅ Pahuṅ [and the one] of Halaran (called) saṅ Suddhyāstha; the 2 masters of Makudur—the [one of] Vatu Valaiṅ (called) saṅ (Bhū/Ra)te, saṅ Variṅin,53 the Paṅuraṅ of Vadihati (called) saṅ ra Vuṅū, [and] the Manuṅgū (called) saṅ Hovaṅka, the Paṅuraṅ of Makudur (called) saṅ ra Kəbəl [and] the Manuṅgū (called) saṅ Kulumpaṅ54—[they all] were given as gifts: 1 māṣa of silver [and] 1 pair of vəḍihan cadar per person. All the overseers of the secretariat (pakaraṇān):55 the overseer of kanayakān (namely) the official of Gunuṅan (called) pu Tuntun, the overseer of junior troops (called) saṅ ra Guyu, the overseer of servants (called) pu Bali; [the herald of Hino, namely] the Kaṇḍamuhi (called) saṅ Geṣṭa, the heralds of Sirikan [the] Hujuṅ Galuh [and] of Vəka [the] Viridih; [the herald] of Kanuruhan (called) saṅ Rokat;56 [the heralds] of Səbaṅ (called) saṅ Vimala, of Bavaṅ (called) saṅ Jalaṅ, of Maḍaṇḍər (called) saṅ Cakra, of Aṅgəhan (called) saṅ Tuhan; [the herald] of Tiruan [the] Sumuḍan (called) ḍa punta Saṅgama; [the herald] of Hujuṅ (called) saṅ Pavudukan—[they all] were given as gifts: 2 dhāraṇa [and] 8 māṣa of silver collectively. The calligraphers [to the Lord] of Hino [were given as gifts]: 2 dhāraṇa [and] 8 māṣa [of silver] collectively; both of the patih juru—the Vasah (called) saṅ Kulumpaṅ [and] the Kuci (called) saṅ ra Kavil: 1 dhāraṇa [and] 4 māṣa [of silver] per person; their heralds, the Piṅsor Hyaṅ [and] the Pasəkaran: 5 māṣa of silver per person. The one coming forward to demarcate (the land) for57 Vadihati (called) saṅ Kamala; the one coming forward to demarcate (the land) for Makudur (called) saṅ Tajam; [the ones coming forward to demarcate the land] for Susuhan (called) saṅ Astuti [and] saṅ Balā; [the one coming forward to demarcate the land] for Tapa Haji (called) saṅ Pacintān—[they all] were given as gifts: 1 dhāraṇa [and] 1 pair of vəḍihan per person. The patih of Kanuruhan … (called) saṅ Jāta; the patih of Hujuṅ (called) saṅ Kahyunan; the patih of Vaharu (called) saṅ Nīla; the patih of Tugaran (called) saṅ Mala; the patih paməgat of Vaharu (called) saṅ Gambo; the patih paṅkur (called) saṅ Maṅka [and] saṅ Raṅga—[they all] were given as gifts: 1 dhāraṇa [and] 1 pair of vəḍihan per person. The patih lampuran (called) saṅ Prasama [was given] as gifts: 8 māṣa of silver, 1 sheet of vəḍihan. The parujar patih (called) si Manohara [was given] as gifts: 1 dhāraṇa [and] 1 pair of vəḍihan. The parujar patih of Kanuruhan (called) si Jaluk [and] si Rambət [as well as] the parujar patih of Vaharu (called) si Bəṅal, si Tañjak [and] si Cacu [were given] as gifts: 8 māṣa of silver [and] 1 sheet of vəḍihan per person. The vahuta of Vaharu (called) si Balusyak [and] si Kəndul, the master of kalaṅ, were given as gifts: 1 dhāraṇa [and] 1 pair of vəḍihan per person. The assistants (called) si Rāji, si Bantan [and] si Ṇḍat were given [as gifts]: 1 sheet of vəḍihan per person. The headmen of neighbouring villages who participated as witnesses of the demarcation of the sīma: at Tugaran, the gusti called si Lakṣita [and] the master of kalaṅ (called) si Yogya were given as gifts: 8 māṣa of silver [and] 1 pair of vəḍihan per person; at Kajavān: [gap in the text]; at Pavaṅkuan: si Surā; at Kəḍi-Kəḍi: si Pahaṅ; at Buṅkaliṅan: si Tiñjo; at Kapatihan: si Piṅul;58 at Ḍahu: si Tambas—[they all] were given as gifts: 4 māṣa of silver each; the patih of Vuṅa-Vuṅa: 4 māṣa of silver; at Papanahan, the vinəkas (called) si Mañjavat; at Kajar, the temple manager (called) si Kaṇḍi; at Tampur, (the one called) si Təṅəran—[they all] were given as gifts: 4 māṣa of silver each. [The persons called] si Mañā, si Kəsək, si Vudalū, si Kudi were those who matətəṅən, [along with] si Luluk—[they all] were given as gifts: 4 māṣa of silver [and] 1 sheet of vəḍihan each.59 The jesters (called) si Lulut‚ si Səpat, si Hirəṅ—[they] were given 1 sheet of vəḍihan each. The puppeteer si Rahina [was given] 4 māṣa of silver [and] 1 pair of vəḍihan. [The other ones, called] saṅ Boddhi and saṅ Mārga were given 1 pair of vəḍihan each.

⟨B19–22⟩ After the giving of gifts and vəḍihan to all of them, the offerings for the Makudur were placed below the canopy. The one serving as priest poured water to purify the susuk (tenon?) and the kulumpaṅ (mortise?). The Makudur arose to offer salutation to the holy ‘heart’ and sat down below the canopy, having his feet as support (that is, he knelt), facing the holy ‘heart’, wearing as siṅhəl 1 pair of vəḍihan. The Vadihati followed. The Makudur began to make invocations (uyut) [and] cleaved the neck of the chicken, using the kulumpaṅ as underlay, and bashed an egg on the sīma stone, cursing and making an imprecation on all those whom he traditionally cursed so that the holy sīma stone would be respected. These were his words:

⟨B22–28⟩ ‘Pay heed you gods at Baprakeśvara, Great Seer Agasti, East, South, West, North, Centre, Zenith, Nadir Sun, Moon, Earth, Water, Wind, Fire, Sacrificer (yajamāna), Ether Dharma, Day and Night, Twilight, Heart Yakṣas, Rākṣasas, Piśācas, Pretas, Asuras, Garuḍa, Gandharvas Four Lokapālas: Yama, Varuṇa, Kubera, Vāsava (that is, Indra) And sons of the gods: the Five Kuśikas, Nandīśvara, Mahākāla, the Six Vināyakas, Snake-Kings, Goddess Durgā, The Quadrangular ones (that is, the Aśvins?), Endless (ananta),60 Surendra Endless gods Kāla and Mr̥tyu: Gaṇas and Bhūtas You who are known to have protected (prasiddha maṅrakṣa)61 the palaces of the Great Kings (of the past) at Məḍaṅ [and] in the land of Matarām! You who take part in embodying, entering in all bodies! You all who as witnesses watch far and near, by day and by night, while you listen to the pledge, the sworn oath (śapatha sumpah), the admonition of us to all you gods!

⟨B28–34⟩ If the bad person does not hold firm, does not keep this oath being submitted by the vahuta of the holy kudur (stone), whether [the bad person is] lord or servant, old or young, man or woman, mendicant or householder, as well as patih, vahuta and headmen—whoever disturbs the village of Saṅguran as a sīma offered by the venerable of Manañjuṅ to the Deity of the holy devotional temple of the smithy sīma, up to the future’s future, may he split asunder! All the more so if he shall uproot the holy sīma stone.

Therefore, let him suffer the consequences!62 You, o gods, should just kill him! Your approach when you kill him should be without looking back, not looking to the side, clash with the opponent, slap his left side, [attack anew his right side,] cut down his snout, split his skull, rip open his belly, stretch out his intestines, draw out his entrails, tear out his liver, eat his flesh, drink his blood, without delay finish off [and] bring to an end his life. If he goes to the forest, may he be eaten up by the tiger, bitten by the snake, whirled round and round by divine wrath! If he goes to the field, may he be caught by thunderclap, may his head be torn off by demons, may he be eaten by the Pamuṅvan giants!

⟨B34–39⟩ Please you gods Kuśika, Garga, Metrī, Kuruṣya and Pātañjala, guardian of the North, guardian of the South, guardian of the West, guardian of the East, throw [him] in the air, tear [him] asunder (?) among all gods, throw [him] into the great ocean, drown [him] in the dam! May he be caught by the deities in the water! May he be pulled by sea monsters! May he be snatched by the crocodile! May it be there that he dies, the lawless man who dissolves the sīma village at Saṅguran. May he suffer misfortune among all ancestors (devatā)! May he go to ruins, may he be engulfed in the Ḍira! May he reach the hells! May he be dropped in the Great Raurava! May he be cooked by the forces of Yama! May he be hammered no less than seven times by the Kiṅkaras (servants of Yama)! When he is given shape, it will only be a bad one. He will suffer as long as he lives! May all types of pain be experienced by him! May all sorts of suffering be undergone by him! Every detestable thing among born creatures is what he will become! May he rot without finding rest! May he be left behind [as] fanned ash! Thus will become the lawless man who dissolves the sīma at Saṅguran!’

⟨B39–c12⟩ After the Makudur had made invocations, they all changed clothes. They all sat in the təkan pasǝk,63 following the order of those who are present in the capacity64 of patih, vahuta, kabayān headmen, as well as all headmen of neighbouring villages. Old, young, man, woman, inferior, intermediate, and superior: no one was left behind in taking part in the feasting (manaḍah) at the assembly place.

They were regaled,65 being offered dressed-up cooked rice, being served ladles of (hinirusan) cooked foods (kǝla-kǝla): snacks (ambil-ambil), kasyan, lit-lit, təlu saraṇak, roasted food (saṅa-saṅān), banana core (haryas), mince (rumba-rumbah), boiled vegetables (kuluban), tetis, tumpuk-tumpuk, unsalted dried meat (ḍeṅ hañaṅ), salted dried meat (ḍeṅ hasin), sea bass (kakap), biluṅluṅ (a type of fish), butterfish (kaḍivas), shrimps (huraṅ), kavan (a type of fish), laya-layar (sailfish?), hala-hala, fried (? inariṅ) eggs, suṇṭa, beans, curd. The total of [types of] vegetables (gaṅan) per (banana) leaf was 8, excluding the various small game (kənas) [and] fish. They all feasted to their hearts’ content, drinking siddhu, ciñca, kilaṅ, tuak, three times each, being presented (vinuvuhan) side dishes (tambul) served on a tray (añjap) [such as] coconut mixture (kuravu), dates (? kurima), tamarind (asam) [and] dodol. Side by side, they took drinks (malarih), while unguents, flowers [and] rujak were put forward.66 The tuvuṅ player played.

All the foremost patih rose to pay homage, facing straight in the direction of the Great King and of the mapatih Lord. After they paid homage, they danced [accompanied by] the rāvaṇahasta. After the ones who had been asked to dance were finished (saṅkap), they sat down again. They were presented with side dishes and given drinks two times each. The baṅlus (fish) was put forward while [they] were given drinks again. They all finished and returned to their homes.

Afterwards, the headmen of Saṅguran and the venerable of Manañjuṅ, as well as those who took care of the demarcation of the sīma in their turn were allowed to feast. The jesters si Lulut‚ si Səpat, [and] si Hirəṅ all showed their skill. In the night, they hired the puppeteer called Rahina.67

⟨c12–15⟩ Such were the proceedings of the demarcation of the sīma at Saṅguran. Complete. Written by the calligrapher [to the Lord] of Hino (called) saṅ Lakṣaṇa.

Commentary

The same opening stanza is also found in the Sugih Manek charter. See Kern 1915.

The lowest line of face A and the uppermost two lines of face B are less neatly engraved and much less easily readable than all other lines. Moreover, these three lines turn out to disrupt the originally planned layout. That the text as originally planned flows from the 37th physical line of face A to the 3rd physical line of face B is revealed by comparison with parallel passages in inscriptions of the Sindok corpus (Linggasuntan A33–37, Gulung-Gulung B6–10, Jeru-Jeru A25–27, Turyan A26–28, Masahar B6–8). It remains unclear whether the additional lines form a single insertion or two, and where the lines of text are to be inserted.

Bibliography

Reading of a few lines by Cohen Stuart, based on an eye-copy; reading of the whole text, but based on unsatisfactory visual documentation and hence with numerous gaps and uncertainties, by Brandes; the first 7 lines read with small improvements by Damais, based on consultation of photographs; Brandes’ text reproduced, with minor modifications based mainly on Krom’s publications (but ignoring Damais’ improvements), by Sarkar, who consulted no visual documentation. Since all earlier publications of the whole inscription go back to Brandes’ reading that had to rely on unsatisfactory visual documentation, the present digital edition reproduces with only superficial modifications the first truly complete edition (Griffiths et al. 2024) without recording variant readings in previous editions.

Primary

[CS] Cohen Stuart, Abraham Benjamin. 1875. Kawi oorkonden in facsimile, met inleiding en transcriptie. Leiden: Brill. [URL]. Item XXIX, pages XV–XVII, 37.

[B] Brandes, Jan Laurens Andries & Nicolaas Johannes Krom. 1913. Oud-Javaansche Oorkonden: Nagelaten transcripties. Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen 60 (parts 1 and 2). Batavia; ’s-Hage: Albrecht; Nijhoff. [URL]. Item XXXI, pages 42–49.

[S] Sarkar, Himansu Bhusan. 1971–1972. Corpus of the inscriptions of Java (Corpus inscriptionum Javanicarum), up to 928 A. D. 2 vols. Calcutta: K.L. Mukhopadhyay. Volume II, pages 227–248, item XCVI.

[GSE] Griffiths, Arlo, Wayan Jarrah Sastrawan & Eko Bastiawan. 2024. “Restoring a Javanese Inscription to its Proper Place: The Minto Stone (Sangguran Charter) Seen in New Light.” BKI 180 (2-3), pp. 133–211. DOI: 10.1163/22134379-bja10060. [URL].

Secondary

Raffles, Thomas Stamford. 1817. The history of Java, volume I. 1st ed. London: Printed for Black, Parbury and Allen, booksellers to the Hon. East-India Company, Leadenhall Street; and John Murray, Albemarle Street. [URL]. Volume 2, page 59, pages ccxxi–cxxiii.

Raffles, Thomas Stamford. 1830. The history of Java. 2nd ed. 2 vols. London: John Murray. [URL]. Volume 2, page 63, items cxxvii-cxxix.

von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1836–1839. Über die Kawi-Sprache auf der Insel Java, nebst einer Einleitung über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. 3 vols. Berlin: Druckerei der königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Volume I, pages 215–236, volume II, plate IX.

NBG 1876. Notulen van de Algemeene en Bestuurs-vergaderingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen: Deel XIV — 1876. Batavia: Bruining, 1877. Pages 98–100, 106.

Veth, Pieter Johannes. 1878. Java, geographisch, ethnologisch, historisch. Tweede deel. Haarlem: De Erven F. Bohn. [URL]. Pages 31–32.

Brandes, Jan Laurens Andries. 1887. “Beschreven steenen.” In: Catalogus der archaeologische verzameling van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen. By Willem Pieter Groeneveldt. Batavia: Albrecht & Co., pp. 351–391. Page 361.

NBG 1887. Notulen van de Algemeene en Bestuurs-vergaderingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen: Deel XXV — 1887. Batavia: Albrecht & Co., 1888. Page 67.

Verbeek, Rogier Diederik Marius. 1891. Oudheden van Java: Lijst der voornaamste overblijfselen uit den Hindoetijd op Java, met eene oudheidkundige kaart. Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen 46. Batavia; ’s-Hage: Landsdrukkerij; Nijhoff. [URL]. Pages 9, 224, item 441.

Krom, Nicolaas Johannes. 1911. “Gedateerde inscripties van Java.” TBG 53, pp. 229–268. Page 245.

Kern, Johan Hendrik Caspar. 1915. “Over ’t Sanskritvers aan ’t begin der inscriptie van den Minto-Steen.” BKI 70, pp. 223–224. DOI: 10.1163/22134379-90001728. [URL].

Krom, Nicolaas Johannes. 1917. “De herkomst van den Minto-Steen.” BKI 73, pp. 30–31. DOI: 10.1163/22134379-90001670. [URL].

Krom, Nicolaas Johannes. 1931. Hindoe-Javaansche geschiedenis. 2nd edition. ’s-Gravenhage: Nijhoff. [URL]. Pages 201–203.

Chatterjee, Bijan Raj & Niranjan Prasad Chakravarti. 1933. India and Java, part II (Inscriptions). Second edition, revised and enlarged. Greater India Society Bulletin 5. Calcutta: [M.C. Das, Prabasi Press]. [URL]. Page 48.

Damais, Louis-Charles. 1951. “Études d’épigraphie indonésienne, I : Méthode de réduction des dates javanaises en dates européennes.” BEFEO 45 (1), pp. 1–41. DOI: 10.3406/befeo.1951.5509. [URL]. Pages 28–29.

Damais, Louis-Charles. 1952. “Études d’épigraphie indonésienne, III : Liste des principales inscriptions datées de l’Indonesie.” BEFEO 46 (1), pp. 1–105. DOI: 10.3406/befeo.1952.5158. [URL]. Pages 56–57, part A, item 106.

Damais, Louis-Charles. 1955. “Études d’épigraphie indonésienne, IV : Discussion de la date des inscriptions.” BEFEO 47, pp. 7–290. DOI: 10.3406/befeo.1955.5406. [URL]. Pages 102–103.

Damais, Louis-Charles. 1970. Répertoire onomastique de l’épigraphie javanaise (jusqu’à Pu Siṇḍok Śrī Īśānawikrama Dharmmotuṅgadewa): Étude d’épigraphie indonésienne. Publications de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient 66. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient. Page 54, item 170.

Nakada, Kōzō. 1982. An inventory of the dated inscriptions in Java. Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 40. Tokyo: Toyo Bunko. Pages 100–101, part I, item 121.

Eade, J. C. & Lars Gislén. 2000. Early Javanese inscriptions: A new dating method. Handbuch der Orientalistik. 3. Abt., Südostasien 10. Leiden: Brill. Pages 47–48.

Hasan Djafar. 2010. “Prasasti Sangguran (Minto Stone) tahun 850 Śaka (= 2 Agustus 928).” In: Pentas ilmu di ranah budaya: Sembilan windu Prof. Dr. Edi Sedyawati. Edited by Endang Sri Hardiati & Rr. Triwurjani. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan, pp. 224–241.