Inscription near Kurubalakōṭa mentioning Gaṇḍaseṅkali and the Cōḻa
Editors: Jens Thomas, J. Ramayya Pantulu.
Identifier: DHARMA_INSTelugu00079.
Language: Telugu.
Repository: Telugu Inscriptions (tfb-telugu-epigraphy).
Version: (585a60b), last modified (ec27c2b).
Edition
⟨1⟩ svasti śrī gaṇḍa(se)ṅkali⟨2⟩nṟu sōḻapariyya⟨3⟩na pallalō sembaḻi⟨4⟩na sōḻūḷa ca⟨5⟩[ca. 3*]macu
Apparatus
Translation by Jens Thomas
Bibliography
The inscription was noted in A. R. No. 300 of 1922 and first published by J. Ramayya Pantulu in 1948, p. 338, № 625 with few metadata and without translation. K. M. Sastri reprints J. Ramayya Pantulu’s edition and gives a summary: “Mentions a certain Gaṇḍaseṅkali.” (Sastri 1969, p. 338, № 79)
Secondary
Ramayya Pantulu, J. 1948. South-Indian inscriptions (texts). Volume X: Telugu inscriptions from the Madras Presidency. South Indian Inscriptions 10. Delhi: Manager of Publications. Page 338, item 625.
Sastri, Korada Mahadeva. 1969. Historical grammar of Telugu with special reference to Old Telugu c. 200 B.C. - 1000 A.D. Anantapur: Sri Vekateswara Univ. Page 338, item 79.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Inscription near Kurubalakōṭa mentioning Gaṇḍaseṅkali and the Cōḻa</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>EpiDoc encoding</resp>
<persName ref="part:jeth">
<forename>Jens Christian</forename>
<surname>Thomas</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp>intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
<persName>
<forename>J.</forename>
<surname>Ramayya Pantulu</surname>
<!-- J. Ramayya Pantulu is the editor of SII X. He appears to be the editor of all the inscriptions as well.-->
</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>DHARMA</authority>
<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSTelugu00079</idno>
<availability>
<licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported
Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to
Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View,
California, 94041, USA.</p>
<p>Copyright (c) 2019-2025 by Jens Christian Thomas.</p>
</licence>
</availability>
<date from="2019" to="2025">2019-2025</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><!-- only the handDesc can be filled in at this stage -->
<msDesc><!-- //// NB: the msIdentifier had to be added for validation purposes ///. It will be edited later with the metadata spreadsheet -->
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/><!-- don't modify this -->
</msIdentifier>
<msContents><!-- describe the intellectual content of an inscription -->
<summary><!-- //// NOT MANDATORY ////--></summary> <!-- offers the possibility to give a summary of the inscription's content -->
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p><!-- The script name(s) will be inserted here at a later stage from the metadata spreasheet. At this stage, you can mention here in a free-text paragraph any characteristics of the writing observed more than once in this inscription that seem unusual/uncommon or otherwise noteworthy given the general characteristics of the script in question. See EGD 11.2. --></p>
<!-- If you need to identify individual hands (EGD §7.5/) in addition to one or more paragraphs of general palaeographic description, wrap <summary> around the <p> or <p>s above, and, outside <summary>, create <handNote> elements for each hand as follows:
<summary><p><p/></summary>
<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand1"></handNote>
<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand2"></handNote>
-->
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<projectDesc>
<p>The project DHARMA has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no 809994).</p>
</projectDesc>
<schemaRef type="guide" key="EGDv01" url="https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02888186"/><!-- UPDATE the link once the release is made official -->
<listPrefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="bib" matchPattern="([a-zA-Z0-9\-\_]+)" replacementPattern="https://www.zotero.org/groups/1633743/erc-dharma/items/tag/$1">
<p>Public URIs with the prefix bib to point to a Zotero Group Library named ERC-DHARMA whose data are open to the public.</p>
</prefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="part" matchPattern="([a-z]+)" replacementPattern="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/DHARMA_IdListMembers_v01.xml#$1">
<p>Internal URIs using the part prefix to point to person elements in the <ref>DHARMA_IdListMembers_v01.xml</ref> file.</p>
</prefixDef>
</listPrefixDef>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:axja" when="2020-11-03" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
<change who="part:jeth" when="2020-02-26" status="draft">Creation of the file</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="tel-Latn">
<p>
<lb n="1"/>svasti śrī gaṇḍa<unclear>se</unclear>ṅkali<lb n="2" break="no"/>nṟu sōḻapariyya<lb n="3" break="no"/>na pallalō sembaḻi<lb n="4" break="no"/>na sōḻūḷa ca
<lb n="5" break="no"/><gap reason="undefined" unit="character" quantity="3" precision="low"/>macu
</p>
</div>
<div type="apparatus">
</div>
<div type="translation" resp="part:jeth">
<!--Yet to be provided -->
</div>
<div type="commentary">
<p>
The text follows the edition of J. Ramayya Pantulu in <bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:RamayyaPantulu1948_01"/><citedRange unit="page">338</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">625</citedRange></bibl> in absence of a picture.
The dots used in the edition to indicate lost or unintelligible characters can not clearly be attributed to a certain quantity of characters (one dot may indicate one or more lost or unintelligible characters).
</p>
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<p>
The inscription was noted in A. R. No. 300 of 1922 <!-- has to be adjusted to the @target --> and first published by J. Ramayya Pantulu in <bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:RamayyaPantulu1948_01"/><citedRange unit="page">338</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">625</citedRange></bibl> with few metadata and without translation.
K. M. Sastri reprints J. Ramayya Pantulu's edition and gives a summary: <cit><quote>Mentions a certain Gaṇḍaseṅkali.</quote><bibl><ptr target="bib:Sastri1969_01"/><citedRange unit="page">338</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">79</citedRange></bibl></cit>
</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
<bibl n="siglum"/><!-- one <bibl/> per item of primary bibliography. Every entry mentionned in apparatus should hava a @n to declare its sigla -->
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
<bibl>A. R. No. 300 of 1922 <!-- has to be adjusted to the @target --></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:RamayyaPantulu1948_01"/><citedRange unit="page">338</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">625</citedRange></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Sastri1969_01"/><citedRange unit="page">338</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">79</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>
Commentary
The text follows the edition of J. Ramayya Pantulu in 1948, p. 338, № 625 in absence of a picture. The dots used in the edition to indicate lost or unintelligible characters can not clearly be attributed to a certain quantity of characters (one dot may indicate one or more lost or unintelligible characters).