Ramtek Inscription of a Daughter of Prabhāvatīguptā
Version: (3e68bda), last modified (3e68bda).
Edition
⟨1⟩ [sa ja](ya)ti sajalāmbud(o)darā[bhaḥ] [⏑⏑][sa]miti-[p]rasarājya-[–]na[–⏓] [ra](ṇa?)-(ma?)kha-samayaidhitāṅga-(śo)(bha?)[ḥ] [⏑⏑⏑⏑–]bhaya-lo[la]-dr̥ṣṭi-(dr̥)[ṣṭa]ḥ (mure?)(ṇa) [rā]jarṣi-sa[–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑][––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
⟨2⟩ [⏓–]-[pra]bhāvod(g/dh)ata-(pā)da-(pī)[ṭha]-(pra)[bhā?]-(dhr̥)ti-(sthā)lana[–](ñc)i[–⏓] yasyottamāṅgair bbalayo kriyant[e] (pā)de [sa]-cūḍā-maṇibhir nr̥[pānāM] tasyodadhi-prānta-[⏑]l(a)[⏑–⏓] [⏓–][⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
⟨3⟩ [*] d(e)vateva pratipūjya[mān](ā) (p)itur gr̥[he] [–] (prat)i(ṣ)i[⏑–⏓] [⏓–] [yay]au vr̥d(dh)i(kaṁ) [cāna]lasya prājyājya-s[i]ktasya śikheva [–⏓] tāṁ [–⏑] nābhyunnata- [–⏑–⏓] [⏓–][⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
⟨4⟩ tayoẖ kramād āhata-la(kṣaṇe)(ṣu?) jāteṣu [––⏑⏑–]nvite(ṣu) y(a)[vīya]sī (ca)ndra(ma)saḫ (p)ra(bhe)[va] [.](ā)muṇḍa-nāmnī tana(y?)ā (ba)[bhūva] [⏓–⏑]le(khā/ṇa)mi [⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–][⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
⟨5⟩ (sa)daiva devas tri-samudra-nāthas sa candragu(ptaḫ pari)(pū?)rṇṇa-[v](r̥)ttaḥ [dadau prajā?]nām adhi(pa)s su[tāṁ tā]ṁ śrī-(ru)[dra]senāya (g)[u]ṇā[⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] (ve)[–⏑–] (lī) [⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–][⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
⟨6⟩ su-durvvahāṁ rājya-dhuraṁ samagrāṁ dhurandhara(s)y(e)[va] su-puṅgavasya [⏓–⏑–](syā)[⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [gha]ṭo[tka]co nāma suto [babhūva] [*] m aṅganāpā [⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑][––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
⟨7⟩ tām bhāgineyīm atha rāja-rājo dr̥(ṣ)[ṭvā] [⏑––⏑⏑] veśma-lak(ṣm)ī[M] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–](d)y[.][.] [u]pāsya pāṇi-grahaṇaṁ cak(āra) devendra-(dha/ga)n[–⏑⏑–⏑–] [.](ya)m amā[tya?][––][⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
⟨8⟩ śuddhair vvacobhir vviduṣāṁ man[ā](ṁ)[si] (p)(r?)ī [–⏑––] (mbu)ruhekṣaṇ(ā)[nāM] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓](s) sādhūn dhanaughair yyaśasā ca lokāN (sa) [–⏑––⏑⏑–][ma](h)īpa [⏓–⏑––][⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
⟨9⟩ tasmin kadācit kamanīya-rūpe [⏓–⏑––⏑] purandareṇa (t)[⏓–⏑] (t)[––⏑⏑–](s sa)mānāṁ bhrātā balāt svaṁ gr̥ham ā(n)ināya [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
⟨10⟩ tattraiva yān yān manujendra-pu(t)rī [⏓–⏑] (dha)[rmma-pra?]savān akā[rṣ]īT [⏓–](ṇa te)(ṣā?)(ṁ)[⏑⏑] bhāgam etaṁ [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓] [⏓–⏑––⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
⟨11⟩ prabhāvati-svāminaṁ ca loka-nā[tha]m a(thā)[⏑⏓] puṇyam akṣaya(m) u(dd)iśya mā [***] [a]k[ā](raya)[T] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] jagad-utpattinā[⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
⟨12⟩ suda(r)śanaṁ taḍāgaṁ ca deva(ñ) caiva sudar[śana](M) kadalī-vāṭaka-grāme kārayit[v]āti[bhā?]vatī [****] (pī)ta-keśā puṇyam u[ddiśya][–⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] (pā)[⏓⏓][⏓⏑–⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
⟨13⟩ Arddhaṁ brahmārppa[ṇaṁ] puṇyaṁ [.]r̥ [***] ṇa [–⏑] nī mātā-pitr̥bhy[ām] [⏓⏓⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓](ṣ?)kr[i]yodbhavaM|| (ja)gatas (sth)i[t]i-sa¿ṅ?hāra-kāraṇasyā[m]itauja[saḥ] (ār)ṣ(ama)[⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
⟨14⟩ prāsādaṁ dayi[t](ā)[dh]ātur vvicintya tam aśāśvataM mātur eva samuddi[śya] [pu]ṇyaugham agha-varjjitā śil(ā) [*] [.](ś)ila-saṅ[k]āśaṁ (c)irā(ya) [⏓⏑–⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
⟨15⟩ Āloka-sthāyinī(ñ ce)māṅ kīrttim prakhyāpayiṣyatā tayā [pari]g(r̥)hī[te]na tad-ājñānuvidhā[yin]ā kāvya[ṁ ma]haj jay(a)-[–](daṁ?) [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑]g(ena) (ca?) [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓] [⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Ramtek Inscription of a Daughter of Prabhāvatīguptā</title>
<respStmt>
<resp key="contributor">Original EpiDoc Encoding for Siddham</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp key="contributor">Conversion of encoding for DHARMA</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp key="creator">intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00195.xml</idno>
<!--
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier>
-->
<availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
<date from="2019" to="2025">2019-2025</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<msDesc>
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/>
</msIdentifier>
<msContents>
<summary/>
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p/>
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
<change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
<change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">
<lg n="1" met="puṣpitāgrā"><!--
The edition follows #Bakker_Isaacson_1993 (BI) as revised in #Bakker_forthcoming, unless otherwise noted. For a detailed commentary on readings, restorations and alternatives, see #Bakker_Isaacson_1993:16-25.
-->
<l n="a"><lb n="1"/><supplied reason="lost">sa ja</supplied><unclear>ya</unclear>ti sajalāmbud<unclear>o</unclear>darā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->bhaḥ</supplied></l><!--
L1. BI observe that there may have been room for a maṅgala symbol at the beginning, but such is not found either in IN00178 or IN00179 (being, along with IN00180, the only other known Vākāṭaka stone inscriptions written entirely in verse).
-->
<l n="b"><seg met="--"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->sa</supplied>miti-<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->p</supplied>rasarājya-<seg met="+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/></seg>na<seg met="+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L1. Conjecture °ābho surasamiti°?
-->
<l n="c"><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ra</supplied><unclear cert="low">ṇa</unclear>-<unclear cert="low">ma</unclear>kha-samayaidhitāṅga-<unclear>śo</unclear><unclear cert="low">bha</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ḥ</supplied></l><!--
L1. BI offer raṇa as a "tentative suggestion", but ṇa is at least as clear as the following ma, and traces do suggest ra, so this seems to be a very likely reading.
--><!--
L1. BI do not read śobha in v1b, but I feel śo is almost clear, and bha is quite probable in their photo.
-->
<l n="d"><seg met="----+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg>bhaya-lo<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->la</supplied>-dr̥ṣṭi-<unclear>dr̥</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ṣṭa</supplied>ḥ</l>
</lg>
<lg n="2" met="upajāti"><certainty match="../@met" locus="value"/>
<l n="a"><unclear cert="low">mure</unclear><unclear>ṇa</unclear> <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->rā</supplied>jarṣi-sa<seg met="+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="4" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L1. BI note that the reading mureṇa would mean that this verse is still mythological rather than genealogical, which is problematic because v3 implies that a king or dynasty has been introduced before. Bakker_1997:163 proposes to read dūreṇa, but ū seems unlikely from the photo. Since most of this verse is lost, one could assume that it contained a metaphor that uses Mura as an analogue of someone defeated by a king introduced in the lost part.
--><!--
L1. BI note that rṣi is not quite the form one would expect (compare l13), but still the most likely reading.
--><!--
L1. Bakker_1997:163 proposes to restore samudraguptaḥ in v2a, but Bakker (2012) rejects the idea later on.
-->
<l n="b"><seg met="=+-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg><seg met="++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="3" met="upajāti">
<l n="a" enjamb="yes"><lb n="2"/><seg met="=+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg>-<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->pra</supplied>bhāvod<choice><unclear>g</unclear><unclear>dh</unclear></choice>ata-<unclear>pā</unclear>da-<unclear>pī</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ṭha</supplied></l><!--
L2. Bakker_1997:163 offers the reconstruction tīkṣṇa for the beginning of v3. There are plenty of other possibilities.
--><!--
L2. BI print pra as unclear but I see no recognisable trace except a vertical on the right.
--><!--
L2. BI read °odgata as clear; I think °oddhata is at least as likely and perhaps better in context.
--><!--
L2. pā and pī are almost clear.
--><!--
L2. I follow BI in assuming that v3ab is one long compound, thus supplying ṭha- at the end of 3a. However, I think it's also quite possible that 2a was a locative qualifying pāde in 3d, and 2b was a separate plural genitive qualifying nr̥pāṇām. (See also my note below.)
-->
<l n="b">-<unclear>pra</unclear><supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->bhā</supplied>-<unclear>dhr̥</unclear>ti-<unclear>sthā</unclear>lana<seg met="+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/></seg><unclear>ñc</unclear>i<seg met="+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L2. I adopt all BI's readings in v3b for want of a better reading. They propose to resrore prabhā on the grounds that would provide assonance with prabhāva in 3a and be consonant with the frequent usage of (pra)+√bhā in the inscription. In the photo, the illegible character seems to have a loop at the left. Also, pra is unclear, though very likely. In dhr̥ti they show r̥ as clear, but in the photo it looks more like a subscript r, and the character could be well be pra (dh is definitely narrower in dhi later on in this line). Their sthā seems to have a loop at the left and is in my opinion more likely to be ṣṭhā, which would give pratiṣṭhā instead of the unintelligible dhr̥ti-sthālana. But even if we do read pratiṣṭhā, I cannot make sense of lana, which is quite clear. Emend to laya, giving us pratiṣṭhā+ālaya? Or perhaps read lava? Further, the character read as ñci looks more like ñchi, but that would seem improbable in the context. I would hazard reading/restoring X X prabhāvoddhata-pāda-pīṭhe / prabhā-pratiṣṭhā-lava-vañcitānām, interpreting 3b as "(kings) divested (vañcita) of their meagre (lava) glory and status / of the [last] shreds of their glory and status."
--><!--
L2. I must note that the damaged area after (ñc)i is large enough to accommodate four characters. Still, more than two would be metrically imposible - was there perhaps punctuation and space?
-->
<l n="c">yasyottamāṅgair bbalayo kriyant<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->e</supplied></l><!--
L2. I follow BI in restoring kriyante, but given the sandhi in bbalayo, perhaps kriyanta (for akriyanta) is the correct restoration.
-->
<l n="d"><unclear>pā</unclear>de <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->sa</supplied>-cūḍā-maṇibhir nr̥<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->pānāM</supplied></l>
</lg>
<lg n="4" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">tasyodadhi-prānta-<seg met="-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/></seg>l<unclear>a</unclear><seg met="-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L2. BI offer °prānta-balasya as a restoration in 4a, but note that this is palaeographically unlikely. Bakker_1997:163 suggests °prānta-palāyamānām. I think the illegible character before l looks most like va or perhaps vi. (BI also note that this character may have had an i mātrā.) Perhaps vilaṅghitasya? Or vilāsa-something?
--><!--
L3.
-->
<l n="b"><seg met="=+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg><seg met="-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="9" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="5" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="3"/><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/> d<unclear>e</unclear>vateva pratipūjya<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->mān</supplied><unclear>ā</unclear></l><!--
L3. For the lacuna BI offer sā; Bakker_1997:164 offers yā.
-->
<l n="b"><unclear>p</unclear>itur gr̥<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->he</supplied> <seg met="+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/></seg> <unclear>prat</unclear>i<unclear>ṣ</unclear>i<seg met="-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L3. Bakker_1997:164 proposes pitur gr̥hītā, but Bakker (2010) rejects this.
--><!--
L3. For the end of 5b, BI offer pratiṣiddha or possibly pratiṣikta; Bakker_1997:164 tentatively restores pratiṣiddha-śakteḥ. BI say the main image is "that of a young girl growing up and increasing in brightness like a flame shooting up from a fire on which ghee has been poured." I might add that perhaps the image is that of the girl growing up in his father's house, then flaring up into a flame _after_ she married into another house (even sikta could be taken as a hint at her marriage). Can this be about Prabhāvatīguptā, or does she only enter the picture later? If we read ṣī instead of ṣi, we could have pratiṣīdamānā or, rejecting pra (which is not recognisable in the photo), viṣīdamānā. This would fit in very nicely with my interpretation, though it must be admitted the character after (ṣ)I has a hook below it, looking like the bottom of k, but possibly a partially preserved dh. On a different note, if I stick with my understanding that this is about her marriage, and accept my take on 5c, then we lack a verbal form saying she got married. This can't fit in c or d, so perhaps restore pitur gr̥hāt, followed by something to this effect?
--><!--
L3. The lacuna between 5b and 5c is again longer than required for the letters - punctuation and/or space?
-->
<l n="c"><seg met="=+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg> <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->yay</supplied>au vr̥d<unclear>dh</unclear>i<unclear>kaṁ</unclear> <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->cāna</supplied>lasya</l><!--
L3. For the beginning of 5c, Bakker_1997:164 offers the conjectures kanyā or śuddhā.
--><!--
L3. BI's reading/restoration vr̥ddhikaṁ cānalasya is unmetrical, and there doesn't seem to be enough space for cāna between ka(ṁ) and la. The word vr̥ddhika is also rather awkward. I have no solution for the problem, but could it be possible to read vr̥ddhikarīṁ? What seems to be an anusvāra over ka may be meant for rī. My proposed rī is itself indiscernible, but it is just possible that there was a long vertical with a circle on top here. We would then need to assume one more character after this, which must be quite narrow and yield a meaning ful word with lasya. On a hunch I would propose kulasya. The substantive qualified by vr̥ddhikarī could be the first two syllables of 5c, and a word meaning fire (e.g. vahneḥ) could be at the end of 5d.
-->
<l n="d">prājyājya-s<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->i</supplied>ktasya śikheva <seg met="+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L3. BI suggest śuddhā as a possible restoration at the end of v5, expecting an adjective qualifying both the flame and the girl. As above, I would (just as tentatively) suggest vahneḥ.
--></lg>
<lg n="6" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">tāṁ <seg met="+-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg> nābhyunnata- <seg met="+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="4" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L3. Again we have more space than required between śikheva and tāṁ - there may have been punctuation and/or space here.
--><!--
L3. To BI's musings that there is no way to decide if nābhyunnata includes the negative na, or an instrumental ending, or even an a-stem in compoun, I would add yet another possibility: that this is a description of the lady's beauty, and we have something+nābhi (nimna-nābhi), followed in compound with unnata+something.
-->
<l n="b"><seg met="=+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg><seg met="-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="9" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="7" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="4"/>tayoẖ kramād āhata-la<unclear>kṣaṇe</unclear><unclear cert="low">ṣu</unclear></l>
<l n="b">jāteṣu <seg met="++--+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg>nvite<unclear>ṣu</unclear></l><!--
L4. BI propose to restore putreṣu guṇānviteṣu in 7b; or, at any rate, a substantive meaning son and a qualifier to that word. There may be faint traces of p after jāteṣu, and ṇā is very plausible, though far from certain, before nvi. Nothing in between is recognisable, though the second character in the lacuna may have had a subscript y, in which case it was not putreṣu.
--><!--
L4. The space between 7b and 7c is again larger than necessary, and there may be visible punctuation here, looking like a horizontal dash after ṣu. Also, nviteṣu is widely spaced and te is extended horizontally, with a large Kannada-type pr̥ṣṭhamātrā.
-->
<l n="c">y<unclear>a</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->vīya</supplied>sī <unclear>ca</unclear>ndra<unclear>ma</unclear>saḫ <unclear>p</unclear>ra<unclear>bhe</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->va</supplied></l>
<l n="d"><seg type="component" subtype="consonant"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="component"/></seg><unclear>ā</unclear>muṇḍa-nāmnī tana<unclear cert="low">y</unclear>ā <unclear>ba</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->bhūva</supplied></l><!--
L4. BI suggest the name may have been Cāmuṇḍā (the shortening permitted by Pāṇini 6.3.36 and common in Vākāṭaka inscriptions). Bakker_1997:164 prefers to restore sā muṇḍa-, taking the name to be Muṇḍā and linking it to Mo(nd)asvāmin in #IN00182:2. The idea is very attractive, but I find sā extremely awkward; if the name had been Muṇḍā, then sā could have been avoided very easily (e.g. muṇḍābhibhānā). The traces of an ā mātrā are indeed quite distinct; the character itself could be just about anything that does not go outside the middle box area.
--><!--
L4. At the end of v7, yā babhūva is plausible but in the photo, only an ā mātrā is recognisable. Nothing is visible of y; there are faint traces that may be ba.
--></lg>
<lg n="8" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><seg met="=+-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg>le<choice><unclear>khā</unclear><unclear>ṇa</unclear></choice>mi <seg met="-+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L4. There is space for about 4-5 characters between the estimated end of babhūva in v7 and the first extant character, le, in v8. Again, there may have been punctuation in here.
--><!--
L4. I adopt BI's tentative reading lekhāmi (which they only interpret to the extent that it contans the noun lekhā, presumably in a comparison to a sliver of the moon in the continued description of the lady's beauty). However, I personally find khā not very likely; the second extant character seems to be ṇa. If so, then the string leṇami would begin at the fifth syllable of the quarter, not at the fourth. This would mean that there is no lekhā, but an instrumental of a word that contains an r to account for the cerebralisation. (The string could also begin at the third syllable, but I find that less likely both on the basis of available space and because I can't think of a two syllable word ending in la and beginning with r.)
-->
<l n="b"><seg met="=+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg><seg met="-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="9" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="9" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="5"/><unclear>sa</unclear>daiva devas tri-samudra-nāthas</l>
<l n="b">sa candragu<unclear>ptaḫ pari</unclear><unclear cert="low">pū</unclear>rṇṇa-<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->v</supplied><unclear>r̥</unclear>ttaḥ</l><!--
L5. The characters read as pūrṇṇavr̥ttaḥ are spaced widely.
-->
<l n="c"><supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->dadau prajā</supplied>nām adhi<unclear>pa</unclear>s su<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->tāṁ tā</supplied>ṁ</l><!--
L5. BI note that the reading paripūrṇṇa-vr̥ttaḥ, of which they are "fairly confident", may be a pun on the moon. To this I might add that, taken in conjunction with sadaiva, this actually says CG was better than the moon, being always paripūrṇa.
--><!--
L5. As BI observe, the beginning of 9c almost certainly contained a verb meaning "gave", e.g. dadau. In addition, it may have contained the beginning of a feminine adjective in the accusative agreeing with the girl, or, much more likely, a masculine plural genitive such as prajānām (as proposed in Bakker_1997:164).
-->
<l n="d">śrī-<unclear>ru</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->dra</supplied>senāya <unclear>g</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->u</supplied>ṇā<seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L5. BI propose to restore the end of v9 as guṇākarāya. My guess would be guṇānvitāya; other solutions must also be possible; in the photo guṇā is very unclear.
--></lg>
<lg n="10" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><unclear>ve</unclear><seg met="+-+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg> <unclear>lī</unclear> <seg met="--+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L5. BI note that the character after ve may be t, and there may be another t two or three syllables after lī. (lī is damaged but quite recognisable below the mi of the previous line) The tentative second t seems to me to be the second character after lī, and may be n rather than t.
-->
<l n="b"><seg met="=+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg><seg met="-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="9" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="11" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="6"/>su-durvvahāṁ rājya-dhuraṁ samagrāṁ</l>
<l n="b">dhurandhara<unclear>s</unclear>y<unclear>e</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->va</supplied> su-puṅgavasya</l><!--
L6. There is empty space of at least two characters after puṅgavasya, and no trace of punctuation though the surface seems to be undamaged here.
-->
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="4" unit="character"/></seg><unclear>syā</unclear><seg met="--+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L6. Bakker_1997:164 offers prajādhipasyā to restore the beginning of 11c.
-->
<l n="d"><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->gha</supplied>ṭo<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->tka</supplied>co nāma suto <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->babhūva</supplied></l>
</lg>
<lg n="12" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/> m aṅganāpā <seg met="--+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L6. As BI note, a low vertical, probably an u mātrā, can be seen below, probably, the 5th character after pā. The body of the character is indistinct.
-->
<l n="b"><seg met="=+-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg><seg met="++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="13" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="7"/>tām bhāgineyīm atha rāja-rājo</l>
<l n="b">dr̥<unclear>ṣ</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ṭvā</supplied> <seg met="-++--"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg> veśma-lak<unclear>ṣm</unclear>ī<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->M</supplied></l><!--
L7. The space after lakṣmī is again at least two characters wide; it may, possibly, include a halanta M and/or punctuation.
-->
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="10" unit="character"/></seg><unclear>d</unclear>y<seg type="component" subtype="vowel"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="component"/></seg><seg type="component" subtype="consonant"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="component"/></seg></l><!--
L7. To make the notation clear, (d)y is recognisable at the end of 13c, but its vowel is not. This is followed by one more character, completely destroyed, which was probably a consonant with an u vowel that belongs to the next quarter.
-->
<l n="d"><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->u</supplied>pāsya pāṇi-grahaṇaṁ cak<unclear>āra</unclear></l><!--
L7. The verse is followed by space of about 2 characters; there may or may not be punctuation at the beginning of that space.
--></lg>
<lg n="14" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">devendra-<choice><unclear>dha</unclear><unclear>ga</unclear></choice>n<seg met="+--+-+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg> <seg type="component" subtype="consonant"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="component"/></seg><unclear>ya</unclear>m</l><!--
L6. As BI note, a low vertical, probably an u mātrā, can be seen below, probably, the 5th character after pā. The body of the character is indistinct.
-->
<l n="b">amā<supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->tya</supplied><seg met="++"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg><seg met="--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="15" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="8"/>śuddhair vvacobhir vviduṣāṁ man<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ā</supplied><unclear>ṁ</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->si</supplied></l>
<l n="b"><unclear>p</unclear><unclear cert="low">r</unclear>ī <seg met="+-++"><gap reason="lost" quantity="4" unit="character"/></seg> <unclear>mbu</unclear>ruhekṣaṇ<unclear>ā</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->nāM</supplied></l><!--
L8. BI propose to restore the lacuna in 15b as prīṇāti nīlā°. As they observe, the structure of the verse is that someone - presumably the king - does something - presumably pleases - a series of X-s by a series of Y-s, with some of the X-s being themselves structures of "the Z of X". Now restoring prīṇāti nīlā° would leave us without a Z of the ladies as well as without a Y to please them with. A Z is required here on account of the genitive (though, as BI note, manāṁsi may apply here too); the Y may have been omitted but this would have been strange. All in all, I'd rather restore prītyā, and assume that the remaining syllables told us what the Z of the ladies was, probably in the plural accusative masculine (°ān ambu°) or neuter (°āny ambu°). Possibly: prītyāśayān amburuhekṣaṇānāM. The verb meaning "please" would then have to have been in pāda c along with the subject, which, in my opinion, is a very plausible structure for the stanza as a whole.
-->
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg><unclear>s</unclear></l>
<l n="d">sādhūn dhanaughair yyaśasā ca lokāN</l><!--
L8. The halanta N is clear: it is a reduced subscript character with a discernible nailhead and with a line above. It is followed by a space of 2-3 characters.
--></lg>
<lg n="16" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><unclear>sa</unclear> <seg met="+-++--+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="7" unit="character"/></seg><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ma</supplied><unclear>h</unclear>īpa</l><!--
L8. I place mahīpa in the metre where BI place it, but I think it is at least as likely that its position is (sa) =.==. mahīpa =*, which would probably mean mahīpatīnām or mahīpatibhyaḥ at the end of the quarter, and only the first one or two characters of the next quarter damaged as opposed to irretrievably lost.
-->
<l n="b"><seg met="=+-++"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg><seg met="--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="17" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="9"/>tasmin kadācit kamanīya-rūpe</l>
<l n="b"><seg met="=+-++-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg> purandareṇa</l><!--
L9. Could the first two characters of 17b be lobhā?
-->
<l n="c"><unclear>t</unclear><seg met="=+-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg> <unclear>t</unclear><seg met="++--+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg><unclear>s sa</unclear>mānāṁ</l><!--
L9. There seems to be a space of about 1 character between 17b and c.
--><!--
L9. The vowel of the first (t) is probably e or ai.
--><!--
L9. BI read my second (t) as (y). I see no y in this gap, but feel that a t is rather clear. Its place may be the second, rather than the third character after the first (t).
-->
<l n="d">bhrātā balāt svaṁ gr̥ham ā<unclear>n</unclear>ināya</l>
</lg>
<lg n="18" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="19" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="10"/>tattraiva yān yān manujendra-pu<unclear>t</unclear>rī</l><!--
L10. BI print tatraiva, but the spelling is tattraiva.
-->
<l n="b"><seg met="=+-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg> <unclear>dha</unclear><supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->rmma-pra</supplied>savān akā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->rṣ</supplied>īT</l><!--
L10. The halanta T is fairly clear, a small subscript form, possibly with a line above and to the right of it.
-->
<l n="c"><seg met="=+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg><unclear>ṇa te</unclear><unclear cert="low">ṣā</unclear><unclear>ṁ</unclear><seg met="--"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg> bhāgam etaṁ</l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="20" met="upajāti"><certainty match="../@met" locus="value"/>
<l n="a"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-++--+-+="><gap reason="lost" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="21" met="anuṣṭubh"><!--
L11. V21 is a ra-vipulā.
-->
<l n="a"><lb n="11"/>prabhāvati-svāminaṁ ca</l>
<l n="b">loka-nā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->tha</supplied>m a<unclear>thā</unclear><seg met="-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L11. As BI note, the unclear (th)ā could also be dhā; they prefer thā because it affords more plausible restorations, such as athādarāt. I would add that the vowel could be o instead of ā (though, as BI note in another context, the arms of o normally curve upward instead of starting out horizontally), so adho is also a possibility. Also, the next character seems to have an i mātrā, which would rule out athādarāt. Bakker_1997:166 offers athālaye.
-->
<l n="c">puṇyam akṣaya<unclear>m</unclear> u<unclear>dd</unclear>iśya</l>
<l n="d">mā <gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/> <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->a</supplied>k<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ā</supplied><unclear>raya</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->T</supplied></l><!--
L11. For the lacuna in 21d, Bakker_1997:166 offers mātuḥ; later (Bakker 2010) elaborated into mātuḥ śubham akārayat.
--></lg>
<lg n="22" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="b">jagad-utpattinā<seg met="-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L11. While BI print the metrical pattern of lost anuṣṭubh lines using only anceps for the whole of the odd pādas (to account for the possibility of vipulās), I prefer to give the simplified pathyā formula.
--><!--
L11. As BI note, utpattinā may be an instrumental or a compound with the latter member beginning with nā.
-->
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="23" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="24" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><lb n="12"/>suda<unclear>r</unclear>śanaṁ taḍāgaṁ ca</l>
<l n="b">deva<unclear>ñ</unclear> caiva sudar<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->śana</supplied><unclear>M</unclear></l><!--
L12. There is a space after taḍāgaṁ, with a smudge in it that is probably an aborted and partially erased character, possibly de.
--><!--
L12. The halanta M is unclear but quite recognisable, a small and simplified subscript character, probably without a line above.
-->
<l n="c">kadalī-vāṭaka-grāme</l>
<l n="d">kārayit<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->v</supplied>āti<supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->bhā</supplied>vatī</l><!--
L12. As BI discuss in detail, Jamkhedkar and Shastri had read kārayitā, assuming a male agent. The restoration kārayitvā is plausible as there is damage immediately below the t (or also acceptable as an emendation), is metrically correct (unlike kārayitā, which would make the second and third syllable simultaneously short), and is plausible in the context.
--><!--
L12. The restoration atibhāvatī is again reasonable; the ā is in fact almost certain.
--></lg>
<lg n="25" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="4" unit="character"/> <unclear>pī</unclear>ta-keśā</l>
<l n="b">puṇyam u<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ddiśya</supplied><seg met="+-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L12. BI propose to understand pītakeśa as an epithet (unattested elsewhere) of Narasiṁha, and the word in apposition to the lady, who has installed (or somethinged) an image of Narasiṁha.
-->
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><unclear>pā</unclear><seg met="=="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg><seg met="=-+-="><gap reason="lost" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L12. The position of the unclear pā in the metrical scheme is of course inaccurate. BI note in their commentary that it is "well after where one would expect verse 25 to have ended", yet in their edition they put it at the beginning of the fourth quarter of v25, which I follow with this caveat.
--></lg>
<lg n="26" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="27" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><lb n="13"/>Arddhaṁ brahmārppa<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ṇaṁ</supplied> puṇyaṁ</l>
<l n="b"><seg type="component" subtype="consonant"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="component"/></seg>r̥ <gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/> ṇa <seg met="+-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg> nī</l><!--
L13. Lines from 13 onward are on the lower block. The vertical space between l12 and l13 is about twice as much as that between lines within a block.
--><!--
L13. The consonant of r̥ may be dh; the character before ṇa may be ka or ra. Bakker_1997:166 offers the conjecture śālinī for the end, later (Bakker_forthcoming?) expanding to kr̥pā-karuṇa-śālinī.
--><!--
L13. There is space of about 2 characters between 27b and c.
-->
<l n="c">mātā-pitr̥bhy<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ām</supplied> <seg met="==="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="===="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="4" unit="character"/></seg><unclear cert="low">ṣ</unclear>kr<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->i</supplied>yodbhavaM||</l><!--
L13. 13c could be a bha-vipulā (..* for the lacuna) or a ma-vipulā (==*, with a casesura after bhyām, which we have). BI propose to restore arddhaṁ ca, in the ma-vipulā pattern.
--><!--
L13. BI reason that krayodbhava or vikrayodbhava would be less likely and thus restore kriyodbhava, which seems perfectly logical. I would add that the first character of the ligature with kr does not seem to be either s or ṅ, so I believe the most likely candidate is ṣ. Jihvāmūlīya would also be a possibility but that would probably be higher up and would not push the k so far down.
--><!--
L13. The halanta M is simplified subscript, possibly with a line above.
--><!--
L13. For the first time in the inscription, we have clear original punctuation here. It is a double vertical, full height, and almost certainly with a hook at the top left.
--></lg>
<lg n="28" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a" enjamb="yes"><unclear>ja</unclear>gatas <unclear>sth</unclear>i<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->t</supplied>i-sa<sic>ṅ</sic>hāra</l>
<l n="b">-kāraṇasyā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->m</supplied>itauja<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->saḥ</supplied></l>
<l n="c"><unclear>ār</unclear>ṣ<unclear>ama</unclear><seg met="=-++="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L13. Instead of ārṣama, the beginning of 28c could conceivably also be bhūṣaṇa. Bakker_1997:166 is inclined to read ārṣad* instead.
--></lg>
<lg n="29" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="30" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><lb n="14"/>prāsādaṁ dayi<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->t</supplied><unclear>ā</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->dh</supplied>ātur</l>
<l n="b">vvicintya tam aśāśvataM</l><!--
L14. See #Bakker_Isaacson_1993:63 for their reasoning in favour of the restoration dayitādhātur and its interpretation.
--><!--
L14. The halanta M is small and subscript as before, with no line above. There is no punctuation, but there is a space of about 1 character.
-->
<l n="c">mātur eva samuddi<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->śya</supplied></l>
<l n="d"><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->pu</supplied>ṇyaugham agha-varjjitā</l><!--
L14. The end of v30 is quite undamaged but rather dark on the photo; there may be punctuation here, perhaps a single vertical, followed by a small space.
--></lg>
<lg n="31" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">śil<unclear>ā</unclear> <gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/> <seg type="component" subtype="consonant"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="component"/></seg><unclear>ś</unclear>ila-saṅ<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->k</supplied>āśaṁ</l>
<l n="b"><unclear>c</unclear>irā<unclear>ya</unclear> <seg met="=-+-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg></l><!--
L14. BI say the fourth character of v31 seems to be a ligature with a subscript ś or g (or, less likely, t), probably with the vowel i though the circle is smaller than a regular i mātrā.
-->
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg> </l>
</lg>
<lg n="32" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="33" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><lb n="15"/>Āloka-sthāyinī<unclear>ñ ce</unclear>māṅ</l>
<l n="b">kīrttim prakhyāpayiṣyatā</l><!--
L15. There may be a short horizontal dash at the end of 33b.
--><!--
L15.
-->
<l n="c">tayā <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->pari</supplied>g<unclear>r̥</unclear>hī<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->te</supplied>na</l>
<l n="d">tad-ājñānuvidhā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->yin</supplied>ā</l>
</lg>
<lg n="34" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">kāvya<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ṁ ma</supplied>haj jay<unclear>a</unclear>-<seg met="+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/></seg><unclear cert="low">daṁ</unclear></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="====-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg>g<unclear>ena</unclear> <unclear cert="low">ca</unclear></l><!--
L15. I follow BI in putting gena ca at the end of 34b, but I personally think this is not possible; there are only two, at most three characters between what looks like daṁ and this string. As for the reading, it seems to me that na could also be ṇa, and ca could be just about anything with a loopy thing on the bottom left.
--><!--
L15.
--><!--
L15.
-->
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg> </l>
</lg><!--
L15.
--></div>
<div type="apparatus">
<listApp>
<app loc="line">
<lem/>
<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
</app>
</listApp>
</div>
<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
</div>
<div type="commentary">
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<p/>
<listBibl type="primary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>