Mathura Buddha Image Inscription of GE 230

Author of digital edition: Dániel Balogh (daba).

Contributor: Dániel Balogh (daba).

Language: Sanskrit (san) [Southern Brāhmī (other) (brāhmī_southern_other)].

Repository: Siddham (siddham).

Identifier: DHARMA_INSSiddham00118.

File path: XML-Provisional/DHARMA_INSSiddham00118.xml.

Version: 2026-07-17 15:30 (3e68bda), last modified 2026-07-17 15:30 (3e68bda).

Edition

⟨1⟩ deya-dharmo yaṁ ya(śā)-vihāre śākya-bhikṣuṇyar jayabhaṭṭāyār⟨.⟩ yad atra puṇyaṁ tad bhavatu sarvva-sa-

⟨2⟩ ¿tvanam? anuttara-jñānāvāptaye| saṁvatsaraḥ 200 30|

Display Options Word Wrap Line Numbers Comments Processing Instructions

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>

<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>

<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>

<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>

<title>Mathura Buddha Image Inscription of GE 230</title>

<resp key="contributor">Original EpiDoc Encoding for Siddham</resp>

<forename>Dániel</forename>

<surname>Balogh</surname>

</persName>

</respStmt>

<resp key="contributor">Conversion of encoding for DHARMA</resp>

<forename>Dániel</forename>

<surname>Balogh</surname>

</persName>

</respStmt>

<resp key="creator">intellectual authorship of edition</resp>

<forename>Dániel</forename>

<surname>Balogh</surname>

</persName>

</respStmt>

</titleStmt>

<authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>

<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>

<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00118.xml</idno>

<!--

If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier>

-->

</publicationStmt>

<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>

<idno/>

</msIdentifier>

</msContents>

<p/>

</handDesc>

</physDesc>

</msDesc>

</sourceDesc>

</fileDesc>

<p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>

</encodingDesc>

<change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>

<change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>

<change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>

</revisionDesc>

</teiHeader>

<body>

<p><lb n="1"/>deya-dharmo yaṁ ya<unclear>śā</unclear>-vihāre śākya-bhikṣuṇyar jayabhaṭṭāyār<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> yad atra puṇyaṁ tad bhavatu sarvva-sa<lb n="2" break="no"/><choice><sic>tvanam</sic><corr>ttvānām</corr></choice> anuttara-jñānāvāptaye| saṁvatsaraḥ <num value="230"><g type="numeral">200</g> <g type="numeral">30</g></num>|<!--

In l1 rmo is executed with regular r and subscript ma, and rja is likewise.

--><!--

In l1 Fleet reads yaśā as clear and emends to yaśo.

--><!--

In l1 Fleet emends to bhikṣuṇyā jayabhaṭṭāyāḥ, which is plausible, but I'm not really certain about the reading. The original stone Fleet worked with may be clearer, but on the rubbing, rja is not very convincing; just possibly, the reading could be śākya-bhikṣuṇy-akṣayabhaṭṭāyār. This leaves us with just one non-standard ending instead of two.

--><!--

The punctuation mark before the date is a single dash.

--><!--

For the date, I bow to Fleet's reading of 230, but Dowson reads it as 280, and the second numeral does look much more like 80 than 30 to me. See also next comment on the mark after the second numeral.

--><!--

After the date, Fleet reads a punctuation mark, while Dowson describes it as a faint mark which could be the remains of the numeral 1. From what I can see on the facsimile, it does not resemble either the dash before the date or a numeral 1. It could perhaps be the (p-like) top of a numeral 4, with the (k-like) bottom part lost. I could also imagine a numeral 8 or 9.

--></p>

</div>

<lem/>

</app>

</listApp>

</div>

</div>

</div>

<p/>

</listBibl>

</listBibl>

</div>

</body>

</text>

</TEI>