Sanjeli Charter of Bhūta
Version: (3083d2d), last modified (c200993).
Edition
⟨1⟩ (svasti)⟨.⟩ (va)drapālyāḥ parama-bhaṭṭāraka-pādānuddhyā(to) mah(ā)rāja-bhūta◯ḥ kuśal(ī) śivabhāgapure sarvvān eva svān āyuktakān s(ā)dh[i]karaṇ(ā)n v(iṣaya)-pati-kula ⟨2⟩ -putraka-cāṭ¿ā?-bhaṭād(īṁ)⟨s⟩ tad-viṣayāntar-vvicāriṇaḥ samājñā¿b?ayat(i)vidi(ta)m astu vo yathā mayā tantīyakāmrilaka-grāmau soparikara-sodraṅga-sa-bhūta-vāta-pratyāyau parama-daiva ⟨3⟩ ta-pūjyārccanīyā¿n? gurvv(ī)ṁ janitrīṁ rājñī-v¿i?rāḍhyikāṁ mātaram uddiśya tayaiva kāritaka-bhagavat-pādāyatanasya{ṁ} bali-caru-gandha-dhūpa-mālya-dīpa-taila-cchādya-lepya-khaṇḍa-sphuṭita-prati ⟨4⟩ saṁskāraṇāya ⟦(k?)(u)(lapat?)i⟧⟨⟨parivr(ā)ja⟩⟩-bhojyāv ācandrārkkārṇṇava-kṣiti-sthiti-samakālīnāv udakātisarggeṇāgrahārāv atisr̥ṣṭāv⟨.⟩ e(va)ṁ Idānīṁ tat-prāpīyāvasatho¿b?agatānāṁ ca ¿b?arivrājakānāṁ deva ⟨5⟩ -śuśrūṣaka-dāsi-dāsānāṁ ca bhakta-cailādya-praguṇānāṁ ca bhaiṣaja-patthya-bhojana-yogodvahanaṁ karttavyam⟨.⟩ Asyaiva ca bhagavat-pādāyatanasyottara-pūrvvasyā¿n? diśi Āṇukkikā-vāṭaka ⟨6⟩ -(g)r̥ha-maryyādayā suvarṇṇa-kāra-kāritaka-taḍāga-phenākrānta-maryyādayā ca paścāt pañca-vrīhi-piṭaka-vāpaka-kṣetraṁ sa-śaivaraṁ bhaṭṭi-pratyaya-kūpa-kacchaś cānya{ṁ}c ca ⟨7⟩ vāṇijaka-ṣaṣṭhidattena ca ¿svadīya?-gr̥ha-¿vastuṁ? kula-sāmanta-samakṣaṁ dattam anyac cāṭa-bhaṭa-gatyāgamikair ddeva-kula-vāṭakāvāsa-maścaka-grahaṇa-veṇi-veśi-viṣṭyā ⟨8⟩ diṣu na kenacit paribādhayitavyas⟨.⟩ tad yuṣmābhir ājñā-śravaṇa-vidheyair bhūtvā U{ṁ}citayā deva-kula-bhuktyā bhuñjatāṁ pradiśatāṁ samāvāsayatāṁ paripālayatāṁ ⟨9⟩ {ś} ca na kenacid vyāsedhaẖ kāryyas⟨.⟩ tan-nikr̥ṣṭonduraka-bhūtilārakṣika-kāritak(ā)ditya-deva-kula-¿dvayor agrata? bhagavat-pādāyatana-sāmīpye dakṣiṇa-dik-pradeśe tat-pratiṣṭhā ⟨10⟩ pitaka-mātr̥-gr̥hasyā¿b?y anukramācāra-dharmma-sthityā yathārha-saṁvibhāga-¿śaktitar ggandha?-dhūpa-māly¿(o)?pay⟨og⟩ikaḥ pratisaṁskārārtthaṁ ca yogo ¿vodhavyas?tad etad asmat-prī ⟨11⟩ tyā dharmma-g¿o?ravāc cānya-rājabhir apy anumantavyam etāṁ ca dharmma-setu-maryyādāṁ ye ¿laṅghayiṣyantaḥ? t¿a? pañca-mahā-p¿a?taka-saṁyuktā bhaviṣyanti⟨.⟩ bhavati hy apibahubhir vvasudhā bhuktā⟨12⟩ rājabhiḥ sagarādibhiḥyasya yasya yadā bhūmistasya tasya tadā phalaM||kumārāmātya⟨ḥ⟩ kumāranāga⟨ḥ⟩ dūtaka⟨ḥ⟩⟨.⟩ ¿mā?rakṣika-bhūtila-samakṣañ ceti⟨.⟩ sa¿vv?atsare 6 jyeṣṭha śuddha 10
Bibliography
First reported and edited in Mehta & Thakkar 1978. Re-edited in Ramesh [1986] 1973–1974. Discussed in Mirashi 1980, Chakravarti 2008.
Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (2019, № IN00104). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.
Secondary
Goyal, Śrīrām. 1993. गुप्तकालीन अभिलेख/Guptakālīna Abhilekha (Inscriptions of the Gupta Age). Jodhpur: Kusumanjali Prakashan. Items 368-369.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Sanjeli Charter of Bhūta</title>
<respStmt>
<resp key="creator"/>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00104.xml</idno>
<!--
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier>
-->
<availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
<date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<msDesc>
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/>
</msIdentifier>
<msContents>
<summary/>
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p/>
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
<change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
<change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211"><!--
Digitally re-edited by Dániel Balogh. Version of January 2019. Comments below are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly researched or considered opinion.
--><p><!--
Unless otherwise noted, my edition follows Ramesh_1986.
--><lb n="1"/><unclear>svasti</unclear><supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> <unclear>va</unclear>drapālyāḥ parama-bhaṭṭāraka-pādānuddhyā<unclear>to</unclear> mah<unclear>ā</unclear>rāja-bhūta<space type="binding-hole"/>ḥ kuśal<unclear>ī</unclear> śivabhāgapure sarvvān eva svān āyuktakān s<unclear>ā</unclear>dh<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->i</supplied>karaṇ<unclear>ā</unclear>n v<unclear>iṣaya</unclear>-pati-kula<lb n="2" break="no"/>-putraka-cāṭ<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>-bhaṭād<unclear>īṁ</unclear><supplied reason="omitted">s</supplied> tad-viṣayāntar-vvicāriṇaḥ samājñā<choice><sic>b</sic><corr>p</corr></choice>ayat<unclear>i</unclear><!--
Line 1 begins with an indent of about 7 characters, so the broken top left corner does not affect the inscription. Could the corner have been broken off before engraving?
--><!--
Both MT and Ramesh print kuśalī as clear, but in the photo, there is just a barely visible, faint and shallow trace of what may be ī.
--><!--
In l2, Ramesh reads putrakāṁ, emending to putrakāṁś. I see absolutely no trace of ā or ṁ, so I (along with MT) read putraka.
--><!--
In l2, Ramesh reads bhaṭādiṁ, emending to bhaṭādīṁs. MT read bhaṭāṁdi. I agree with R that the anusvāra must have been meant to go with the next character, and I think the vowel there is in fact ī.
--><!--
Both R and MT read samājñāpayati in l2; the text is in fact samājñābayati (and the i is extremely faint, if it's there at all). Compare ba in l3 and bya instead of pya in l10.
--></p>
<p>vidi<unclear>ta</unclear>m astu vo yathā mayā tantīyakāmrilaka-grāmau soparikara-sodraṅga-sa-bhūta-vāta-pratyāyau parama-daiva<lb n="3" break="no"/>ta-pūjyārccanīyā<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>ṁ</corr></choice> gurvv<unclear>ī</unclear>ṁ janitrīṁ rājñī-v<sic>i</sic>rāḍhyikāṁ mātaram uddiśya tayaiva kāritaka-bhagavat-pādāyatanasya<surplus>ṁ</surplus> bali-caru-gandha-dhūpa-mālya-dīpa-taila-cchādya-lepya-khaṇḍa-sphuṭita-prati<lb n="4" break="no"/>saṁskāraṇāya <subst><del><unclear cert="low">k</unclear><unclear>u</unclear><unclear cert="low">lapat</unclear>i</del><add place="overstrike">parivr<unclear>ā</unclear>ja</add></subst>-bhojyāv ācandrārkkārṇṇava-kṣiti-sthiti-samakālīnāv udakātisarggeṇāgrahārāv atisr̥ṣṭāv<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> e<unclear>va</unclear>ṁ Idānīṁ tat-prāpīyāvasatho<choice><sic>b</sic><corr>p</corr></choice>agatānāṁ ca <choice><sic>b</sic><corr>p</corr></choice>arivrājakānāṁ deva<lb n="5" break="no"/>-śuśrūṣaka-dāsi-dāsānāṁ ca bhakta-cailādya-praguṇānāṁ ca bhaiṣaja-patthya-bhojana-yogodvahanaṁ karttavyam<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Asyaiva ca bhagavat-pādāyatanasyottara-pūrvvasyā<sic>n</sic> diśi Āṇukkikā-vāṭaka<lb n="6" break="no"/>-<unclear>g</unclear>r̥ha-maryyādayā suvarṇṇa-kāra-kāritaka-taḍāga-phenākrānta-maryyādayā ca paścāt pañca-vrīhi-piṭaka-vāpaka-kṣetraṁ sa-śaivaraṁ bhaṭṭi-pratyaya-kūpa-kacchaś cānya<surplus>ṁ</surplus>c ca <lb n="7"/>vāṇijaka-ṣaṣṭhidattena ca <sic>svadīya</sic>-gr̥ha-<sic>vastuṁ</sic> kula-sāmanta-samakṣaṁ dattam anyac cāṭa-bhaṭa-gatyāgamikair ddeva-kula-vāṭakāvāsa-maścaka-grahaṇa-veṇi-veśi-viṣṭyā<lb n="8" break="no"/>diṣu na kenacit paribādhayitavyas<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> tad yuṣmābhir ājñā-śravaṇa-vidheyair bhūtvā U<surplus>ṁ</surplus>citayā deva-kula-bhuktyā bhuñjatāṁ pradiśatāṁ samāvāsayatāṁ paripālayatāṁ<lb n="9" break="no"/><surplus>ś</surplus> ca na kenacid vyāsedhaẖ kāryyas<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> tan-nikr̥ṣṭonduraka-bhūtilārakṣika-kāritak<unclear>ā</unclear>ditya-deva-kula-<choice><sic>dvayor agrata</sic><corr>dvayasyāgrataḥ</corr></choice> bhagavat-pādāyatana-sāmīpye dakṣiṇa-dik-pradeśe tat-pratiṣṭhā<lb n="10" break="no"/>pitaka-mātr̥-gr̥hasyā<choice><sic>b</sic><corr>p</corr></choice>y anukramācāra-dharmma-sthityā yathārha-saṁvibhāga-<choice><sic>śaktitar ggandha</sic><corr>śaktito gandha</corr></choice>-dhūpa-māly<choice><sic><unclear>o</unclear></sic><corr>au</corr></choice>pay<supplied reason="omitted">og</supplied>ikaḥ pratisaṁskārārtthaṁ ca yogo <choice><sic>vodhavyas</sic><corr>boddhavyas</corr></choice><!--
R prints tāntiyaka° for the name of the first village in l2. This does not seem to be a typo, as the name is repeated with this transcription in his commentary. But it is wrong; MT correctly read tantīyaka (though ta looks a bit strange, but it is certainly not tā).
--><!--
Neither R nor MT note that the word parivrāja in l4 is a correction. I cannot make out the original, which seems to have been beaten or polished out. The pa is smudged, and below it there is what looks most like the bottom part of ku, possibly ru or Ā; perhaps it could also be the bottom of ṇṇa. This may have been followed by la or a ligature beginning with t. Nothing is visible under vrā, but the character itself looks awkward - perhaps transformed from an original ca? An i mātrā is clearly but faintly visible over ja, which is again awkward and may have been drawn over an original ti. There is also something below the ja which may, tenuously, be a trace of a subscript na or tha. My best guess at the deleted text is kulapati.
--><!--
The anusvāra of idānīṁ in l4 is in fact over dā because of space constraints.
--><!--
Both R and MT read °opagatānāṁ and parivrājakānāṁ in l4, but the actual incised characters are again b-s.
--><!--
For kula-sāmanta-samakṣaṁ, MT's translation is "in the presence of the (hereditary) District Chief", while R gives the paraphrase "in the presence of his pious neighbours". My interpretation would be "in the presence of his family and neighbours".
--><!--
In l7, anyac cāṭa should probably be emended to anyac ca cāṭa.
--><!--
For viṣṭyā in l7, R actually prints viṣṭayā, but this must be a typo (he mentions viṣṭi in his commentary). MT read vindyā here.
--><!--
In l8, bhuñjatāṁ was probably first engraved as bhujatāṁ; the j is at normal height, and ñ is above it.
--><!--
In l8, MT read bhuñjataṁ and pradiśataṁ; R corrects the readings. The ā is very faint in bhuñjatāṁ but quite clear in pradiśatāṁ.
--><!--
The jihvāmūlīya in l9 looks just like ma and was read so by MT. This is probably one more instance of the engraver trying - but sometimes failing - to identify the characters he copies.
--><!--
For kāritak(ā)ditya in l9, MT read kārita-tadanya, taking the i mātrā of di to be a ta inscribed above the line. R prints kāditya as clear, but there is no discernible ā mātrā attached to that ka. The characters tak(ā)di are also quite narrow and very close together, and there may be a faint ā mātrā attached to the ta. So my guess is that this bit was first engraved as kāritāditya, then corrected to kāritakāditya.
--><!--
In l10 MT read mālyapayikaḥ and translate "garland, and (offerings of) drink". R reads mālyopayikaḥ and emends to mālyopayogikaḥ. I think the character was intended to be lyau (to give mālyaupayikaḥ), but left unfinished. It looks like lyā, but it is conspicuously different from lyā in line 1; it is also conspicuously different from lo in l13 of IN00103.
--><!--
In pratisaṁskārārtthaṁ, l10, the second anusvāra is in fact over rā. There is plenty of space above rtthaṁ, but the superscript repha (which looks, here and elsewhere, like an anusvāra connected by a very faint line to the top of the letter) was seen as conflicting with the anusvāra.
--><!--
For vodhavyas in l10, both MT and R read bodhavyas, but the first character is not a proper b; compare bahubhir in the next line. The correction is R's.
--></p>
<p>tad etad asmat-prī<lb n="11" break="no"/>tyā dharmma-g<choice><sic>o</sic><corr>au</corr></choice>ravāc cānya-rājabhir apy anumantavyam etāṁ ca dharmma-setu-maryyādāṁ ye <choice><sic>laṅghayiṣyantaḥ</sic><corr>laṅghayiṣyanti</corr></choice> t<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>e</corr></choice> pañca-mahā-p<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>taka-saṁyuktā bhaviṣyanti<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> bhavati hy api<!--
As R notes, we need to suppy ślokaḥ or a similar word after bhavati hy api in l11.
--></p>
<lg n="1" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">bahubhir vvasudhā bhuktā</l>
<l n="b"><lb n="12"/>rājabhiḥ sagarādibhiḥ</l>
<l n="c">yasya yasya yadā bhūmis</l>
<l n="d">tasya tasya tadā phalaM||</l><!--
The halanta M is a simplified and reduced subscript form.
--><!--
The closing punctuation is a double vertical.
--></lg>
<p>kumārāmātya<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> kumāranāga<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> dūtaka<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied><supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> <choice><sic>mā</sic><corr>Ā</corr></choice>rakṣika-bhūtila-samakṣañ ceti<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> sa<sic>vv</sic>atsare <num value="6">6</num> jyeṣṭha śuddha <num value="10"><g type="numeral">10</g></num></p>
</div>
<div type="apparatus">
<listApp>
<app loc="line">
<lem/>
<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
</app>
</listApp>
</div>
<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
</div>
<div type="commentary">
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<p>First reported and edited in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Mehta+Thakkar1978_01"/></bibl>. Re-edited in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Ramesh1973-1974_01"/></bibl>. Discussed in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Mirashi1980_04"/></bibl>, <bibl><ptr target="bib:Chakravarti2008_01"/></bibl>.</p>
<p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00104</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Goyal1993_01"/><citedRange unit="item">368-369</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>