Katni Charter of Jayanātha, year 182
Version: (e9ba9b6), last modified (914ca07).
Edition
⟨Page 1v⟩
⟨1⟩ <mangala>svasty⟨.⟩ uccakalpā¿t m?ahārājaughadeva◯⟨s⟩ tasya puttras tat-pādānudhyāto mahādevyāṁ
⟨2⟩ kumā⊔radevyām utpanno mahārāja-kumāra◯devas tasya puttras tat-pādānudhyāto mahā-
⟨3⟩ devyāṁ jayasvāminyām utpanno mahārāja-jayasvāmī tasya puttras tat-pādānudhyāto ma-
⟨4⟩ hādevyāṁ rāmadevyām utpanno mahārāja-vyāghras tasya puttras tat-pādānudhyāto mahā-
⟨5⟩ devyām ajjhitadevyām utpanno mahārāja-jayanāthaḥ kuśalī kalabhikuṇḍake brā-
⟨6⟩ hmaṇādīn kuṭumbinaḥ kārukāṁś ca samājñāpayati viditam bo stu ¿yathaivasma?
⟨7⟩ grāmād a¿ṅ?śāḥ pañca Arkkadāmasya _ vorāleḥ pañca| Avalaptasya
⟨8⟩ catvāraḥ haridattasya ttrayaḥ dāmodarasya ¿dvayaḥ? viṣṇusvāmina dvayaṁ
⟨9⟩ kumāra¿ś?vāminaḥ A¿n?śa-dvayaṁ _ prabhilasvāmine ¿n?śa-ttrayaṁ _ vodasvāmine ¿ṅ?śa-dvayaṁ
⟨10⟩ vāsusvāmine ¿ṅ?śa-dvayaṁ somasvāmine ¿n?śāś catvāraḥ _ rudra_śarmmāya A¿ṅ?śaḥ
⟨11⟩ bhavanandasvāmine ¿ṅ?śaḥ Agnisvāmine ¿n?śaḥ rudradattasvāmine ¿n?śaḥ sūryadattasvā-
⟨12⟩ mine ¿n?śaḥ nāgadinnasvāmine ¿ṅ?śaḥ paṇṇarasvām¿a?ne ¿n?śaḥ⟨.⟩ Ebhir eva yathopari-li-
⟨13⟩ khitaka-brāhmaṇair ata gr̥hītaka kṣattriya phālg⟦(u)⟧⟨⟨(o)⟩⟩(ḥ) A¿ṅ?ś¿o?kāś catv¿a?raḥ si¿ṅ?ha-
⟨14⟩ nāgasyā¿n?śaḥ Ādityava__rmmaṇaḥ A¿n?śa-dvayaM vaiśya śivadāsasya
⟨15⟩ tīhāradevasyā¿n?śāś ¿catvara?
⟨Page 2r⟩
⟨16⟩ 2a¿n?śa-dvayaM śūdra rāmaṇa-◯puttra-dāsasyā¿n?śāś catvāraḥ rudra-
⟨17⟩ dāsasyā¿n?śa-dvayaM Evam ekattra ◯(paṁ)cavi¿n?śatāṁ brāhmaṇādi-puro-
⟨18⟩ gānāṁ yathopari-likhitakānāṁ sva-puṇyābhi¿b?r̥ddhaye puttra-prapauttra-tat-pu-
⟨19⟩ ttrādy-anukkrameṇa candrārka-sama-kālikaḥ sodraṅgaḥ soparikaraḥ A-cāṭa-
⟨20⟩ -bhaṭa-prāveśyaś cora-daṇḍa-varjjitaḥ Agrāhāratvenātisr̥ṣṭas te yūyam e-
⟨21⟩ ṣāṁ samucita-¿śūka?-bhāga-bhoga-kara-hiraṇyādi-pratyāyopanayaṁ kariṣyathā-
⟨22⟩ jñā-śravaṇa-vidheyāś ca bhaviṣyatha⟨.⟩ ye cāsmad-va¿ṅ?śotpadyamānaka-rājāna-
⟨23⟩ s tair iyaṁ dattir nna vilopyā Anumodanīyā yathā-kālañ ca pratipāla-
⟨24⟩ nīyā samucita-rājābhāvya-kara-pratyāyā na grāhyā⟨ḥ⟩⟨.⟩ yaś caināṁ datti⟨ṁ⟩ lo-
⟨25⟩ pay¿a?t sa pañcabhir mmahā-pātakair upapātakaiś ca saṁyukta⟨ḥ⟩ syād⟨.⟩ uktañ ca
⟨26⟩ mahābhārate bhagavatā veda-vyāsena vyāsena {vyāsena} sva-dattām para-dattām bā
⟨27⟩ yatnād rakṣa yudhiṣṭhira mahī⟨ṁ⟩ mahīmatāṁ śreṣṭha d¿a?nāc chreyo nupālana⟨ṁ⟩
⟨Page 3r⟩
⟨28⟩ prāyeṇa hi narendrāṇāṁ vidyate ◯ (nā?)(śubhā) gatiḥ pūyante te tu satataṁ
⟨29⟩ 3 prayacchanto vasundharāṁ ṣaṣṭi(m) ba[rṣa]-◯(sa)[ha](srā)ṇi svargge modati bhū-
⟨30⟩ midaḥ Acche⟨⟨tā⟩⟩ cān(u)mantā ca tāny (e)va narake vased (v)ahubhir vvasudhā bhuktā(|)
⟨31⟩ rājabhis sagar¿a?dibhir yasya yasya yadā bhūmis tasya tasya tadā phalaM
⟨32⟩ sarvva-sasya-samr̥ddhā¿n? tu yo hareta vasundharāṁ śva-viṣṭhā⟨⟨yā⟩⟩ṁ kr̥mir bhūtvā pitr̥bhiḥ
⟨33⟩ saha majjat¿ī? ¿ti?⟨.⟩ ¿sāvvatsara?-śate ¿dvāśīty?-uttare pauṣa-māsa-prathama-pakṣa-
⟨34⟩ -ttritīyasyāṁ likhitaṁ bhogika-phālgudattāmātya-naptrā bhogika-varāhadi-
⟨35⟩ nna-puttra-sāndhivigrahika-manoratheneti| || pūrvva-tāmrapaṭṭitaka-ṣoḍa
⟨36⟩ śa-halān varjja⊔yitvā Eṣa tāmra-paṭṭa Iti| || pūrvvenāsyāghāṭaḥ
⟨37⟩ dehakapā⊔lyāṁ madhūkaḥ⟨.⟩ Uttareṇa (va)ṅgramīṇa-nadī| paścime¿ṇ?a
⟨38⟩ yāvat parvvatasya gohārī-ghaṭṭaḥ⟨.⟩ da[kṣi]ṇenoṅgaragartta Iti(|)
⟨39⟩ Ājñā svayaM||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Katni Charter of Jayanātha, year 182</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Original EpiDoc Encoding for Siddham</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp>Conversion of encoding for DHARMA</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp>intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>DHARMA</authority>
<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00093</idno>
<!--
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier>
-->
<availability>
<licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit thttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.</p>
<p>Copyright (c) 2019-2025 by Dániel Balogh.</p>
</licence>
</availability>
<date from="2019" to="2025">2019-2025</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<msDesc>
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/>
</msIdentifier>
<msContents>
<summary/>
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p/>
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<projectDesc>
<p>The project DHARMA has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC)
under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant
agreement no 809994).</p>
</projectDesc>
<schemaRef type="guide" key="EGDv01" url="https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02888186"/>
<listPrefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="bib" matchPattern="([a-zA-Z0-9\-\_]+)" replacementPattern="https://www.zotero.org/groups/1633743/erc-dharma/items/tag/$1">
<p>Public URIs with the prefix bib to point to a Zotero Group Library named
ERC-DHARMA whose data are open to the public.</p>
</prefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="part" matchPattern="([a-z]+)" replacementPattern="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/DHARMA_IdListMembers_v01.xml#$1">
<p>Internal URIs using the part prefix to point to person elements in the
<ref>DHARMA_IdListMembers_V01.xml</ref> file.</p>
</prefixDef>
</listPrefixDef>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
<change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
<change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">
<p><pb n="1v"/><!--
This is not explicitly stated but I assume that the inscription is on 1verso, 2recto and 3recto.
--><lb n="1"/><g type="mangala"/><!--
The mangala symbol is in fact located outside the margin, but the text is also indented after it so for the sake of simplicity I treat it as inline. Note that there are also marginal page numbers on plates 2 and 3.
--><!--
The mangala symbol looks like a mirrored C.
-->svasty<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> uccakalpā<sic>t m</sic>ahārājaughadeva<space type="binding-hole"/><supplied reason="omitted">s</supplied> tasya puttras tat-pādānudhyāto mahādevyāṁ
<lb n="2"/>kumā<space type="descender"/>radevyām utpanno mahārāja-kumāra<space type="binding-hole"/>devas tasya puttras tat-pādānudhyāto mahā<!--
A top mātrā was originally incised atop the left limb of mā in kumāradevas, then struck out with fine crosshatching. Lovely how such fine details can be made out in this photo. The character may have been inscribed as me or mo first, but this is more probably a random error. See line 19 for me, which has a pr̥ṣṭhamātrā, not a śiromātrā; and see e.g. l8 for mo, which has the upper mātrā extending from the hooked right-hand side of the character.
--><lb n="3" break="no"/>devyāṁ jayasvāminyām utpanno mahārāja-jayasvāmī tasya puttras tat-pādānudhyāto ma<lb n="4" break="no"/>hādevyāṁ rāmadevyām utpanno mahārāja-vyāghras tasya puttras tat-pādānudhyāto mahā<lb n="5" break="no"/>devyām ajjhitadevyām utpanno mahārāja-jayanāthaḥ kuśalī kalabhikuṇḍake brā<lb n="6" break="no"/>hmaṇādīn kuṭumbinaḥ kārukāṁś ca samājñāpayati</p>
<p>viditam bo stu <choice><sic>yathaivasma</sic><corr>yathaitasmād</corr></choice><!--
Jain emends to yathaivāsmād, but I find the eva out of place.
--><lb n="7"/>grāmād a<sic>ṅ</sic>śāḥ pañca Arkkadāmasya <space/> vorāleḥ pañca| Avalaptasya<!--
All names are completely clear and legible; definitely not arkkadāsa, avalipta, or anything suchlike.
--><!--
The punctuation sign is a single, short dash. There is no such sign after arkkadāmasya.
--><!--
Jain does not transcribe the space and the punctuation sign, but lists the allotments of each person as indicated by these.
--><lb n="8"/>catvāraḥ haridattasya ttrayaḥ dāmodarasya <sic>dvayaḥ</sic> viṣṇusvāmina dvayaṁ<!--
Jain transcribes harīdattasya (emending to hari), but the vowel is clearly i. Jain may have been influenced by the size and elaborateness of the mātrā.
--><lb n="9"/>kumāra<sic>ś</sic>vāminaḥ A<sic>n</sic>śa-dvayaṁ <space/> prabhilasvāmine <sic>n</sic>śa-ttrayaṁ <space/> vodasvāmine <sic>ṅ</sic>śa-dvayaṁ<!--
Sic, anśa at the first and second occurrence, aṅśa at the third and elsewhere. (Jain transcribes the second as ṅ, but this is a typo or an error. Dental n pops up repeatedly below too, though many subsequent occurrences are transcribed as ṅ by Jain.)
--><!--
Jain emends vodasvāmin to vedasvāmin, plausible but far from certain since we have some non-Sanskritic names in the list.
--><!--
The spaces in this line are smaller than a regular character, but they are definitely spaces and their function is obviously to demarcate the items of the list.
--><lb n="10"/>vāsusvāmine <sic>ṅ</sic>śa-dvayaṁ somasvāmine <sic>n</sic>śāś catvāraḥ <space/> rudra<space/>śarmmāya A<sic>ṅ</sic>śaḥ<!--
Jain prints vasusvāmin, but it's clearly vāsu.
--><!--
The space after catvāraḥ is small. There is no space after dvayaṁ. The space in the middle of Rudraśarman's name is at least a full character wide and has no apparent explanation.
--><!--
Jain prints the avagraha at the end of l10 as supplied, but it's clearly there.
--><lb n="11"/>bhavanandasvāmine <sic>ṅ</sic>śaḥ Agnisvāmine <sic>n</sic>śaḥ rudradattasvāmine <sic>n</sic>śaḥ sūryadattasvā<!--
Jain apparently reads sūya, with an unclear ya, correcting to sūrya. The text is in fact clearly rya, with a regular r plus subscript y.
--><!--
No more demarcation spaces from this line onward, perhaps because the visargas double as separators.
--><lb n="12" break="no"/>mine <sic>n</sic>śaḥ nāgadinnasvāmine <sic>ṅ</sic>śaḥ paṇṇarasvām<sic>a</sic>ne <sic>n</sic>śaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Ebhir eva yathopari-li<!--
Jain prints parṇṇasvāmine. There is definitely no i mātrā over the m. The characters after pa may have been intended for rṇṇa, but they are a double ṇ without a repha, followed by a full-size ra.
--><lb n="13" break="no"/>khitaka-brāhmaṇair ata gr̥hītaka kṣattriya phālg<subst><del rend="corrected"><unclear>u</unclear></del><add place="overstrike"><unclear>o</unclear></add></subst><unclear>ḥ</unclear> A<sic>ṅ</sic>ś<sic>o</sic>kāś catv<sic>a</sic>raḥ si<sic>ṅ</sic>ha<!--
Jain prints grahītaka, emending to gr̥hītaka. The reading is in fact gr̥ to begin with.
--><!--
Jain offers no interpretation for ata. The reading is perfectly clear. It may have been meant for ataḥ, but that would serve no purpose here. Perhaps emend to atra?.
--><!--
Jain reads phalgu, emending to phalgune, which doesn't seem to make much sense. He gives the guy's name as Phalgu in his separate list of donees. The first character is clearly phā. The next character does look like lgu, but the u does not extend upward as far as it does in the name phālgudatta in l34, and there seems to be an o mātrā on top of the character. There also seems to be a visarga after the character. I think the most likely solution is that lgu was first inscribed, or at least begun, but the u mātrā was aborted and the o mātrā added.
--><!--
Jain emends to aṁśakāś catvāraḥ, which is very probably the intended meaning. The reading is, however, quite clear.
--><lb n="14" break="no"/>nāgasyā<sic>n</sic>śaḥ Ādityava<space quantity="2" unit="character"/>rmmaṇaḥ A<sic>n</sic>śa-dvayaM vaiśya śivadāsasya<!--
There's no obvious explanation for the space in ādityavarman's name; it must have been meant to leave room for "tvara" in the next line; see also note to l15.
--><!--
The halanta M is full sized, but looks different from a regular ma: the left-hand side is low, while the right-hand stroke is full-height and has a large serif on top (or a line above). The Ms in l16 and onward is even more bizarre.
--><lb n="15"/>tīhāradevasyā<sic>n</sic>śāś <choice><sic>catvara</sic><corr>catvāraḥ</corr></choice><!--
Line 15 is less than half the length of the other lines, squeezed with difficulty into the remaining space at the bottom. Lines slant slightly downward from l12 on, so there would have been no room for a longer l15. Jain notes that this line appears to be a later addition. This is not impossible (the characters also seem less deeply engraved), but the conspicuous space in l14 doesn't seem to serve any other purpose than to leave room for the tops of the characters tvara in this line, which would not have fit in below rmma. This implies that l15 was incised at the same time as the other lines, and moreover, that it was written in ink or whatever before engraving. Then again, see my note to l17: I'm almost certain that the total number of donees was also changed from 24 to 25 after or in the course of the engraving.
--><!--
Jain reads pratīhāradeva. There is definitely no clear pra here. There may possibly be a character before tī, but the scratches there are very faint (more so than anything on this plate) and don't look like pra. In Jain's rubbing there is a curve at the bottom left corner that does resemble a subscript r, but comparing the rubbing and the photo, I am certain that this is the inner edge of the rim, not an incised line.
--><pb n="2r"/><lb n="16"/><num value="2">2</num>a<sic>n</sic>śa-dvayaM śūdra rāmaṇa-<space type="binding-hole"/>puttra-dāsasyā<sic>n</sic>śāś catvāraḥ rudra<!--
The number 2 at the beginning of the line (actually rather outside the margin, to the left of l16) is obviously a page number. It is not transcribed by Jain, unless by the = sign he puts at the beginning of the line, before which he has a footnote saying "This may probably indicate that the number of the plate is 2." Interestingly, Jain does not notice the page number on p3. need a way to deal with foliation - use fw tags?
--><!--
The halanta M is a full-size character that looks rather like a la.
--><lb n="17" break="no"/>dāsasyā<sic>n</sic>śa-dvayaM</p>
<p>Evam ekattra <space type="binding-hole"/><unclear>paṁ</unclear>cavi<sic>n</sic>śatāṁ brāhmaṇādi-puro<!--
Interestingly, paṁ (if that's what it is) is inscribed on the very edge of the hole, while there is some space before and after ca, so pañca would have fit very comfortably even if as much space had been left empty around the hole as in l17.
--><!--
To make matters more interesting, vi actually looks more like rvi. Therefore I'm almost certain that the text originally inscribed was caturvinśatāṁ. Afterward, paṁ was added before ca, and tu was erased completely.
--><lb n="18" break="no"/>gānāṁ yathopari-likhitakānāṁ sva-puṇyābhi<sic>b</sic>r̥ddhaye puttra-prapauttra-tat-pu<lb n="19" break="no"/>ttrādy-anukkrameṇa candrārka-sama-kālikaḥ sodraṅgaḥ soparikaraḥ A-cāṭa<lb n="20" break="no"/>-bhaṭa-prāveśyaś cora-daṇḍa-varjjitaḥ Agrāhāratvenātisr̥ṣṭas<!--
Jain prints agrahāra°; grā is clear.
--></p>
<p>te yūyam e<lb n="21" break="no"/>ṣāṁ samucita-<choice><sic>śūka</sic><corr>śulka</corr></choice>-bhāga-bhoga-kara-hiraṇyādi-pratyāyopanayaṁ kariṣyathā<!--
Jain prints śulka, but the reading is in fact śūka (though śū is not quite identical to that in śūdra, l16); there is certainly nothing like l.
--><lb n="22" break="no"/>jñā-śravaṇa-vidheyāś ca bhaviṣyatha<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> ye cāsmad-va<sic>ṅ</sic>śotpadyamānaka-rājāna<!--
Jain prints °utpaddyamānaka; this is probably a typo, there's no double d..
--><lb n="23" break="no"/>s tair iyaṁ dattir nna vilopyā Anumodanīyā yathā-kālañ ca pratipāla<lb n="24" break="no"/>nīyā samucita-rājābhāvya-kara-pratyāyā na grāhyā<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied><supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> yaś caināṁ datti<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> lo<lb n="25" break="no"/>pay<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>e</corr></choice>t sa pañcabhir mmahā-pātakair upapātakaiś ca saṁyukta<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> syād<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> uktañ ca <lb n="26"/>mahābhārate bhagavatā veda-vyāsena vyāsena <surplus>vyāsena</surplus></p>
<lg n="1" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">sva-dattām para-dattām bā</l>
<l n="b"><lb n="27"/>yatnād rakṣa yudhiṣṭhira</l>
<l n="c">mahī<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> mahīmatāṁ śreṣṭha</l>
<l n="d">d<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>nāc chreyo nupālana<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied></l>
</lg>
<lg n="2" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><pb n="3r"/><lb n="28"/>prāyeṇa hi narendrāṇāṁ</l>
<l n="b">vidyate <space type="binding-hole"/> <unclear cert="low">nā</unclear><unclear>śubhā</unclear> gatiḥ<!--
Vidyate may have been inscribed as vidyato at first.
--><!--
Jain prints nā as supplied. I think it is actually there, but it is practically illegible and closer to the edge of the hole than expected. I may be seeing phantoms, or it may have been added subsequently. While most of the plates are in fantastic condition, the first couple of characters after the hole in this line and the next are quite badly damaged.
--></l>
<l n="c">pūyante te tu satataṁ</l>
<l n="d"><lb n="29"/><num value="3">3</num> prayacchanto vasundharāṁ</l><!--
The number 3 at the beginning of the line (actually outside the margin and slightly below n29) is obviously a page number. It is not noticed by Jain. need a way to deal with foliation - use fw tags?
--></lg>
<lg n="3" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">ṣaṣṭi<unclear>m</unclear> ba<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->rṣa</supplied>-<space type="binding-hole"/><unclear>sa</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ha</supplied><unclear>srā</unclear>ṇi</l>
<l n="b">svargge modati bhū<lb n="30" break="no"/>midaḥ</l>
<l n="c">Acche<add place="below">tā</add> cān<unclear>u</unclear>mantā ca</l>
<l n="d">tāny <unclear>e</unclear>va narake vased<!--
The character tā (not ttā, as transcribed by Jain) is below and to the right of cche.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="4" met="anuṣṭubh"><!--
This is quite unusual, but there is no separation at all between the end of the previous verse and the beginning of this one; they are a single ligature dva (or possibly dba, as read by Jain, but dva seems more likely to me).
-->
<l n="a"><unclear>v</unclear>ahubhir vvasudhā bhuktā<unclear>|</unclear></l>
<l n="b"><lb n="31"/>rājabhis sagar<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>dibhir</l><!--
There is a dash at the end of l30 where no punctuation is expected (especially given that no punctuation is used for verse ends). It may be a sort of space filler, but rā could easily have been inscribed here instead.
-->
<l n="c">yasya yasya yadā bhūmis</l>
<l n="d">tasya tasya tadā phalaM<!--
Jain reads °ādibhigyasya, emending his reading. What he reads as gya is in fact rya, with full r plus subscript ya.
--><!--
Interestingly, this halanta M is unlike the previous ones. It is a subscript character reduced in size, but shaped much like a full ma, and it has a line above it.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="5" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><lb n="32"/>sarvva-sasya-samr̥ddhā<sic>n</sic> tu</l>
<l n="b">yo hareta vasundharāṁ</l>
<l n="c">śva-viṣṭhā<add place="inline">yā</add>ṁ kr̥mir bhūtvā</l>
<l n="d">pitr̥bhiḥ <lb n="33"/>saha majjat<choice><sic>ī</sic><corr>i</corr></choice><!--
The added yā is small, simplified in shape (the ya part looks like an anchor), and its lines are thin. It is squeezed in between ṣṭhā and kr̥.
--></l>
</lg>
<p><choice><sic>ti</sic><corr>Iti</corr></choice><supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> <sic>sāvvatsara</sic>-śate <sic>dvāśīty</sic>-uttare pauṣa-māsa-prathama-pakṣa<lb n="34" break="no"/>-ttritīyasyāṁ likhitaṁ bhogika-phālgudattāmātya-naptrā bhogika-varāhadi<!--
Jain prints phalgudatta, but the character is very clearly phā.
--><lb n="35" break="no"/>nna-puttra-sāndhivigrahika-manoratheneti| ||</p>
<p>pūrvva-tāmrapaṭṭitaka-ṣoḍa<!--
Jain prints punctuation after manoratheneti as supplied, but it is in fact very much there: a single horizontal followed by a double vertical.
--><!--
Jain reads °paṭṭitakaṣanda at the end of this line, emending to paṭṭa-takaṣan da, which makes no sense whatsoever and is impossible anyway. His editor notes that "The intended word may probably be nibaddha" (this for Jain's takaṣan). The reading given here is perfectly clear in the facsimile, and makes perfect sense to me, though the verb tāmrapaṭṭayati may be unusual.
--><lb n="36"/>śa-halān varjja<space type="descender"/>yitvā Eṣa tāmra-paṭṭa Iti| ||<!--
Jain again prints punctuation after manoratheneti as supplied, but it is again a single horizontal followed by a double vertical.
--></p>
<p>pūrvvenāsyāghāṭaḥ <lb n="37"/>dehakapā<space type="descender"/>lyāṁ madhūkaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Uttareṇa <unclear>va</unclear>ṅgramīṇa-nadī| paścime<sic>ṇ</sic>a<!--
Jain reads the river's name as Vaṅgumīṇa. The first character may be ta or some other thing. ṅgra is clear.
--><!--
The punctuation sign (which Jain prints as supplied) is a single dash.
--><lb n="38"/>yāvat parvvatasya gohārī-ghaṭṭaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> da<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->kṣi</supplied>ṇenoṅgaragartta Iti<unclear>|</unclear><!--
There seems to be a dash at the end of the line, at headline height, not centreline.
--></p>
<p><lb n="39"/>Ājñā svayaM||<!--
The last line begins below sya of parvvatasya in l38. It is incised with much less care and apparently less deeply than the others.
--><!--
The expression ājñā svayam may be well known, but it's the firs time I see it. Apparently it means that there was no dūtaka, but the sāndhivigrahika (or whoever) came in person to the engravers to order the plates.
--><!--
The closing punctuation is a double vertical.
--></p>
</div>
<div type="apparatus">
<listApp>
<app loc="line">
<lem/>
<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
</app>
</listApp>
</div>
<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
</div>
<div type="commentary">
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<p/>
<listBibl type="primary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>