Khoh Final Charter Fragment of Śarvanātha, year 197

Author of digital edition: Dániel Balogh (daba).

Contributor: Dániel Balogh (daba).

Language: Sanskrit (san) [Southern Brāhmī (other) (brāhmī_southern_other)].

Repository: Siddham (siddham).

Identifier: DHARMA_INSSiddham00087.

File path: XML-Provisional/DHARMA_INSSiddham00087.xml.

Version: 2026-07-17 15:30 (3e68bda), last modified 2026-07-17 15:30 (3e68bda).

Edition

⟨1⟩ yathā-kālañ ca pratipālanīyā⟨.⟩ samucita-rājābhāvya-kara-pratyāyāś ca{ḥ}
⟨2⟩ na grāhyāḥ⟨.⟩ ya Imā¿n? datti¿n? lopaye◯t saḫ pañcabhir mahā-pātakair upapāta-
⟨3⟩ kaiś ca saṁyuktas syād⟨.⟩ uktañ ca mahābhā◯rate bhagavatā veda-vyāsena vyāsena
⟨4⟩ sva-dattām para-dattām bā yatnād rakṣa yudhiṣṭhira mahīm mahīmatāñ chreṣṭha dānā-
⟨5⟩ c chreyo nupālana⟨ṁ⟩ ⊔ prāye¿n?a hi narendrāṇāṁ vidyate n¿a?śubhā gatiḥ pūya-
⟨6⟩ nt(e) te tu satataṁ prayacchanto vasundharāṁ bahubhir vvasudhā bhuktā rājabhis sagarādi-
⟨7⟩ bhiḥ yasya yasya yadā bhūmis tasya tasya tadā phala⟨ṁ⟩ ṣaṣṭi-va(r)ṣa-sahasrā-
⟨8⟩ ṇi svargge modati bhūmidaḥ Acchettā cānumantā ca tāny eva narake vase⟨T⟩
⟨9⟩ sarvva-sasya-samr̥ddhā¿n? tu yo hareta vasundharāṁ śva-viṣṭhāyāṁ kr̥mir bhūtvā
⟨10⟩ pitr̥bhis saha majjate likhitaṁ sambatsara-śate sapta-navaty-uttare Aśva-
⟨11⟩ yuja-māsa-divase vi¿n?śatime bhogika-phālgudattāmātya-naptrā bhogika-varāhadinna-puttreṇa mahā-sāndhiviggrahika-manorathena⟨.⟩
⟨12⟩ dūtakaḥ mahāvalādhikr̥ta-śivaguptaḥ⟨.⟩ hali(k)ākara-kumbha-daṇḍa-
⟨13⟩ -pratim¿e?canā(bh)ilekh¿i?ne pi dūtakaḥ Uparika mā¿k?r̥śiva⟨ḥ⟩

Display Options Word Wrap Line Numbers Comments Processing Instructions

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>

<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>

<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>

<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>

<title>Khoh Final Charter Fragment of Śarvanātha, year 197</title>

<resp key="contributor">Original EpiDoc Encoding for Siddham</resp>

<forename>Dániel</forename>

<surname>Balogh</surname>

</persName>

</respStmt>

<resp key="contributor">Conversion of encoding for DHARMA</resp>

<forename>Dániel</forename>

<surname>Balogh</surname>

</persName>

</respStmt>

<resp key="creator">intellectual authorship of edition</resp>

<forename>Dániel</forename>

<surname>Balogh</surname>

</persName>

</respStmt>

</titleStmt>

<authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>

<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>

<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00087.xml</idno>

<!--

If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier>

-->

</publicationStmt>

<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>

<idno/>

</msIdentifier>

</msContents>

<p/>

</handDesc>

</physDesc>

</msDesc>

</sourceDesc>

</fileDesc>

<p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>

</encodingDesc>

<change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>

<change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>

<change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>

</revisionDesc>

</teiHeader>

<body>

<p><!--

This inscription seems to be a perfect second half for %IN00086, but I follow Fleet in editing the two as separate. Fleet admits the apparent connectedness of the text but notes (#Fleet_1888:132n3) that "the edges of [%OB00079] are rounded off more; the copper is of a totally different quality, thickness, and weight; and the characters, though of just the same period, differ very much in details of execution ... there can, on the whole, be no doubt that in [%OB00078] and [%OB00079] we have the first and second plates of two separate grants; not one entire grant." The additional dūtaka mentioned at the end of IN00087 may also be an indication that the two plates belong to disparate grants, since there is no mention of halirākara in %IN00086..

--><lb n="1"/>yathā-kālañ ca pratipālanīyā<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> samucita-rājābhāvya-kara-pratyāyāś ca<surplus>ḥ</surplus><!--

Fleet understands rāja-a-bhāvya, "taxes which by custom should not belong to the king". I'm not sure about this but haven't checked. If we take rājā as standing for rāja, then there should be a hyphen at the end of the line.

--><lb n="2"/>na grāhyāḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> ya Imā<sic>n</sic> datti<sic>n</sic> lopaye<space type="binding-hole"/>t saḫ pañcabhir mahā-pātakair upapāta<lb n="3" break="no"/>kaiś ca saṁyuktas syād<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> uktañ ca mahābhā<space type="binding-hole"/>rate bhagavatā veda-vyāsena vyāsena</p>

<l n="a"><lb n="4"/>sva-dattām para-dattām bā</l>

<l n="b">yatnād rakṣa yudhiṣṭhira</l>

<l n="c">mahīm mahīmatāñ chreṣṭha</l>

<l n="d">dānā<lb n="5" break="no"/>c chreyo nupālana<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> <space type="descender"/></l>

</lg>

<l n="a">prāye<sic>n</sic>a hi narendrāṇāṁ</l>

<l n="b">vidyate n<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>śubhā gatiḥ</l>

<l n="c">pūya<lb n="6" break="no"/>nt<unclear>e</unclear> te tu satataṁ</l>

<l n="d">prayacchanto vasundharāṁ</l>

</lg>

<l n="a">bahubhir vvasudhā bhuktā</l>

<l n="b">rājabhis sagarādi<lb n="7" break="no"/>bhiḥ</l>

<l n="c">yasya yasya yadā bhūmis</l>

<l n="d">tasya tasya tadā phala<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied></l>

</lg>

<l n="a">ṣaṣṭi-va<unclear>r</unclear>ṣa-sahasrā<lb n="8" break="no"/>ṇi</l>

<l n="b">svargge modati bhūmidaḥ</l>

<l n="c">Acchettā cānumantā ca</l>

<l n="d">tāny eva narake vase<supplied reason="omitted">T</supplied></l>

</lg>

<l n="a"><lb n="9"/>sarvva-sasya-samr̥ddhā<sic>n</sic> tu</l>

<l n="b">yo hareta vasundharāṁ</l>

<l n="c">śva-viṣṭhāyāṁ kr̥mir bhūtvā</l>

<l n="d"><lb n="10"/>pitr̥bhis saha majjate</l>

</lg>

<p>likhitaṁ sambatsara-śate sapta-navaty-uttare Aśva<lb n="11" break="no"/>yuja-māsa-divase vi<sic>n</sic>śatime bhogika-phālgudattāmātya-naptrā bhogika-varāhadinna-puttreṇa mahā-sāndhiviggrahika-manorathena<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied><!--

See comment on IN00084/21 about the name phālgudatta.

--><lb n="12"/>dūtakaḥ mahāvalādhikr̥ta-śivaguptaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> hali<unclear>k</unclear>ākara-kumbha-daṇḍa<!--

Fleet reads halirākara . Sircar's glossary [apparently on the basis of this record alone] does include halirākara, "a fiscal term of uncertain implication; probably a mistake for halikā-kara, plough-tax"). The form halikākara does occur (and the reading is clear) in IN00089/10 and /31 (which Fleet was not familiar with). Here, there are two faint marks to the sides of rā in halirā, which may be remnants of the arms of an original kā so I assume that is what we had here.

--><!--

As for kumbha-daṇḍa, daṇḍa looks like dāṇḍa to me. Furthermore, dā is very small and is in contact with both mbha and ṇda, as if an original kumbhā had been corrected to kumbhadā.

--><lb n="13" break="no"/>-pratim<choice><sic>e</sic><corr>o</corr></choice>canā<unclear>bh</unclear>ilekh<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>ne pi dūtakaḥ Uparika mā<choice><sic>k</sic><corr>t</corr></choice>r̥śiva<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied><!--

Fleet reads pratimecanātilekhine. Ca and nā are completely indistinct in the facsimile. They could be anything. The i mātrā of khi is clear (though a bit different from other i mātrās nearby) but should probably be emended to lekhane, and ati should quite possibly read as abhi, resulting in abhilekhane. Since IN00089/31 has a (differently corrupt) variant on abhilekhane, I assume that to be the original/intended text here.

--><!--

My original idea on seeing this additional dūtaka was that the statement was about issuing a replacement for a lost or damaged second plate, which would indicate that IN00087 is actually the second half of IN00088. However, there is also IN00089, where no such replacement seems to have taken place, but we do have a second dūtaka (the same guy) for halikākara. So in this light, the sentence seems to be evidence that IN00087 is after all from a different charter than IN00086, in spite of the seamless fit of the two.

--></p>

</div>

<lem/>

</app>

</listApp>

</div>

</div>

</div>

<p/>

</listBibl>

</listBibl>

</div>

</body>

</text>

</TEI>