Damodarpur Charter of Xgupta

Author of digital edition: Dániel Balogh (daba).

Language: Sanskrit (san) [Southern Brāhmī (unspecified) (brāhmī_southern_unspecified)].

Repository: SIDDHAM (siddham).

Identifier: DHARMA_INSSiddham00056.

File path: XML-Provisional/DHARMA_INSSiddham00056.xml.

Version: 2026-09-16 10:40 (3083d2d), last modified 2026-09-16 09:24 (c200993).

Edition

Seal

⟨1⟩ koṭivarṣādhiṣṭhānādhi(karaṇa)sya

Plates

⟨Page 1r⟩
⟨1⟩ sa(mva) 200 20 4 bhādra di 5 parama-daivata-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-ma(hā)rājādhirāja-śrī-[viṣṇu?]-
⟨2⟩ gupte pr̥thivīpatau tat-pāda-parigr̥hīte puṇḍravarddhana-bhuktāv upari(ka-mahārāja)sya
⟨3⟩ rājaputtra-deva-bhaṭṭārakasya hasty-aśva-jana-bhogenānuvahamā(na)ke ko(ṭiva)rṣṣa-viṣa(ye) ca ta-
⟨4⟩ n-¿niyuktakeha? viṣayapati-svayambh(u/ū)deve Adhiṣṭhānādhikaraṇa[m?] āryyya-(na)gara-(śreṣṭhi)-¿(ri)?(bhu)pāla
⟨5⟩ sārttha-vāha-sthāṇudatta-prathama-kulika-matidatta-prathama-kāyastha-skandapāla-puroge (sa)ṁvya(vaha)rati
⟨6⟩ Āyo(dhya)ka-kula-puttrak¿a-A?mr̥tadevena vijñāpitam⟨.⟩ iha viṣaye samudaya-bāhyāprahata-khila-(kṣe)ttrā-
⟨7⟩ ṇāṁ tri-dīnārika-kulya-vāpa-vikrayo nuvr̥ttaḥ⟨.⟩ tad arhatha matto dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya man-mātuḥ (pu)ṇyā-
⟨8⟩ bhivr̥ddhaye Atrāraṇye bhagavataḥ śvetavarāha-svāmino deva-kule khaṇḍa-phuṭṭa-prati(saṁ)skā(ra-ka)-
⟨9⟩ raṇāya bali-caru-sa¿tr?a-pravarttana-gavya-dhūpa-puṣpa-prāpaṇa-madhuparkka-dīpādy-upa(yo)gā(ya) ca
⟨10⟩ Apradā-dharmmeṇa tāmrapaṭṭīkr̥tya kṣetra-stoka¿n? dātum iti yataḥ prathama-pustapāla-nara(na)ndi-
⟨11⟩ -gopadatta-(bhaṭa)nandinām-avadhāraṇayā yuktatayā dha(rmmādhi)kāra-(bu)ddhyā vijṇāpita[ṁ] (no) kāry(o)
⟨12⟩ viṣaya-patinā kaścid virodhaḥ keva(laṁ) śrī-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-pādānā[ṁ] dharmma-(pha)[la-ṣa]-
⟨13⟩ ḍ-bhā[gā]vāp(t)i[ḥ]⟨.⟩

⟨Page 1v⟩
⟨14⟩ Ity anenāvadhāraṇā-krameṇa Etasmād amr̥tadevāt pañcadaśa dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya Etan-mātu[ḥ]
⟨15⟩ Anugraheṇa svacchandapāṭake (rddha)ṭī-prāveśya-lavaṅgasikāyāñ ca vāstubhis saha kulya-vāpa-dvayaṁ
⟨16⟩ sāṭuvanāśramake pi vāstunā saha kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ paraspatikāyāṁ pañca-kulya-vāpakasyotta(re)ṇa
⟨17⟩ jamvū-na[dyā]ḥ pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ pūraṇavr̥ndikaharau pāṭaka-pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ⟨.⟩ Ity evaṁ khila-kṣettra-
⟨18⟩ sya vāstunā saha pañca kulya-vāpāḥ Apradā-dharmmeṇa bhaga[va]te śvetavarāha-svāmine śaśvat-kāla-bhogyā dattāḥ⟨.⟩
⟨19⟩ tad uttara-kālaṁ saṁvyavahāribhiḥ devabhaktyānumantavyāḥ⟨.⟩ Api ca bhūmi-(dā)na-saṁvaddhāḥ ślokā bhavanti
⟨20⟩ sva-dattāṁ para-dattām vā yo hareta vasundharāṁ sa viṣṭhāyāṁ k¿ri?mir ¿bhbh?ūtvā pitr̥bhis saha pacyate vahubhir vvasudhā dattā
⟨21⟩ rājabhis sagarādibhiḥ yasya yasya yadā bhūmis tasya tasya tadā phalaṁ ṣaṣ¿ṭh?iṁ varṣa-sahasrāṇi svargge modati bhūmidaḥ (|)
⟨22⟩ Ākṣeptā cānumantā ca tāny eva narake vased iti

Seal

⟨1⟩ koṭivarṣādhiṣṭhānādhi(karaṇa)sya

Plates

⟨Page 1r⟩ ⟨1⟩ sa(mva) 200 20 4 bhādra di 5 parama-daivata-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-ma(hā)rājādhirāja-śrī-[viṣṇu?]⟨2⟩gupte pr̥thivīpatau tat-pāda-parigr̥hīte puṇḍravarddhana-bhuktāv upari(ka-mahārāja)sya ⟨3⟩ rājaputtra-deva-bhaṭṭārakasya hasty-aśva-jana-bhogenānuvahamā(na)ke ko(ṭiva)rṣṣa-viṣa(ye) ca ta⟨4⟩n-⟨niyuktaka Iha⟩ viṣayapati-svayambh(u/ū)deve Adhiṣṭhānādhikaraṇa[m?] āryyya-(na)gara-(śreṣṭhi)-¿(ri)?(bhu)pāla ⟨5⟩ sārttha-vāha-sthāṇudatta-prathama-kulika-matidatta-prathama-kāyastha-skandapāla-puroge (sa)ṁvya(vaha)rati

⟨6⟩ Āyo(dhya)ka-kula-puttrak¿a-A?mr̥tadevena vijñāpitam⟨.⟩ iha viṣaye samudaya-bāhyāprahata-khila-(kṣe)ttrā⟨7⟩ṇāṁ tri-dīnārika-kulya-vāpa-vikrayo nuvr̥ttaḥ⟨.⟩ tad arhatha matto dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya man-mātuḥ (pu)ṇyā⟨8⟩bhivr̥ddhaye Atrāraṇye bhagavataḥ śvetavarāha-svāmino deva-kule khaṇḍa-phuṭṭa-prati(saṁ)skā(ra-ka)⟨9⟩raṇāya bali-caru-sa¿tr?a-pravarttana-gavya-dhūpa-puṣpa-prāpaṇa-madhuparkka-dīpādy-upa(yo)gā(ya) ca ⟨10⟩ Apradā-dharmmeṇa tāmrapaṭṭīkr̥tya kṣetra-stoka¿n? dātum iti

yataḥ prathama-pustapāla-nara(na)ndi⟨11⟩-gopadatta-(bhaṭa)nandinām-avadhāraṇayā yuktatayā dha(rmmādhi)kāra-(bu)ddhyā vijṇāpita[ṁ] (no) kāry(o) ⟨12⟩ viṣaya-patinā kaścid virodhaḥ keva(laṁ) śrī-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-pādānā[ṁ] dharmma-(pha)[la-ṣa]⟨13⟩ḍ-bhā[gā]vāp(t)i[ḥ]⟨.⟩

⟨Page 1v⟩ ⟨14⟩ Ity anenāvadhāraṇā-krameṇa Etasmād amr̥tadevāt pañcadaśa dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya Etan-mātu[ḥ] ⟨15⟩ Anugraheṇa svacchandapāṭake (rddha)ṭī-prāveśya-lavaṅgasikāyāñ ca vāstubhis saha kulya-vāpa-dvayaṁ ⟨16⟩ sāṭuvanāśramake pi vāstunā saha kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ paraspatikāyāṁ pañca-kulya-vāpakasyotta(re)ṇa ⟨17⟩ jamvū-na[dyā]ḥ pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ pūraṇavr̥ndikaharau pāṭaka-pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ⟨.⟩ Ity evaṁ khila-kṣettra⟨18⟩sya vāstunā saha pañca kulya-vāpāḥ Apradā-dharmmeṇa bhaga[va]te śvetavarāha-svāmine śaśvat-kāla-bhogyā dattāḥ⟨.⟩ ⟨19⟩ tad uttara-kālaṁ saṁvyavahāribhiḥ devabhaktyānumantavyāḥ⟨.⟩ Api ca bhūmi-(dā)na-saṁvaddhāḥ ślokā bhavanti

1. Anuṣṭubh

⟨20⟩ sva-dattāṁ para-dattām vā

yo hareta vasundharāṁ

sa viṣṭhāyāṁ k¿ri?mir ¿bhbh?ūtvā

pitr̥bhis saha pacyate

2. Anuṣṭubh

vahubhir vvasudhā dattā

⟨21⟩ rājabhis sagarādibhiḥ

yasya yasya yadā bhūmis

tasya tasya tadā phalaṁ

3. Anuṣṭubh

ṣaṣ¿ṭh?iṁ varṣa-sahasrāṇi

svargge modati bhūmidaḥ (|)

⟨22⟩ Ākṣeptā cānumantā ca

tāny eva narake vased

iti

Seal

⟨1⟩ koṭivarṣādhiṣṭhānādhi(karaṇa)sya

Plates

⟨Page 1r⟩ ⟨1⟩ sa(mva) 200 20 4 bhādra di 5 parama-daivata-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-ma(hā)rājādhirāja-śrī-[viṣṇu?]⟨2⟩gupte pr̥thivīpatau tat-pāda-parigr̥hīte puṇḍravarddhana-bhuktāv upari(ka-mahārāja)sya ⟨3⟩ rājaputtra-deva-bhaṭṭārakasya hasty-aśva-jana-bhogenānuvahamā(na)ke ko(ṭiva)rṣṣa-viṣa(ye) ca ta⟨4⟩n-¿niyuktakeha?⟨niyuktaka Iha⟩ viṣayapati-svayambh(u/ū)deve Adhiṣṭhānādhikaraṇa[m?] āryyya-(na)gara-(śreṣṭhi)-¿(ri)?(bhu)pāla ⟨5⟩ sārttha-vāha-sthāṇudatta-prathama-kulika-matidatta-prathama-kāyastha-skandapāla-puroge (sa)ṁvya(vaha)rati

1. Anuṣṭubh

⟨20⟩ sva-dattāṁ para-dattām vā

yo hareta vasundharāṁ

sa viṣṭhāyāṁ k¿ri?mir ¿bhbh?ūtvā

pitr̥bhis saha pacyate

2. Anuṣṭubh

vahubhir vvasudhā dattā

⟨21⟩ rājabhis sagarādibhiḥ

yasya yasya yadā bhūmis

tasya tasya tadā phalaṁ

3. Anuṣṭubh

ṣaṣ¿ṭh?iṁ varṣa-sahasrāṇi

svargge modati bhūmidaḥ (|)

⟨22⟩ Ākṣeptā cānumantā ca

tāny eva narake vased

iti

Bibliography

First noticed and edited in Basak 1919–1920, pp. 141–145. Date corrected in Dikshit 1923–1924. Discussed in Basak 1925.

Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (2019, № IN00056). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.

Secondary

Bhandarkar, Devadatta Ramakrishna, Bahadur Chand Chhabra & Govind Swamirao Gai. 1981. Inscriptions of the early Gupta kings. Corpus inscriptionum indicarum 3, revised edition. New Delhi: Archaeological survey of India. Item 47.

Bhandarkar, Devadatta Ramakrishna. 1927–1936. A list of the inscriptions of northern India in Brahmi and its derivative scripts, from about 200 A. C.: Appendix to Epigraphia Indica and record of the Archaeological Survey of India, volumes XIX to XXIII. Calcutta: Archaeological Survey of India. [URL]. Item 1307.

Sircar, Dines Chandra. 1965. Select inscriptions bearing on Indian history and civilization. Volume I: from the sixth century B.C. to the sixth century A.D. 2nd edition revised and enlarged. Calcutta: University of Calcutta. Book III, item 39.

Agrawala, Prithvi Kumar. 1983. Imperial Gupta Epigraphs (गुप्ताधिराजलेखमण्डल). Ancient Indian Epigraphical Sources (प्रत्नाभिलेखसंहिता) 10, pt. 1 / 2. Varanasi: Books Asia, Distributed by Prithvi Prakashan. Item 62.

Goyal, Śrīrām. 1993. गुप्तकालीन अभिलेख/Guptakālīna Abhilekha (Inscriptions of the Gupta Age). Jodhpur: Kusumanjali Prakashan. Items 324-328.

Display Options Word Wrap Line Numbers Comments Processing Instructions

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>

<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>

<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>

<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>

<title>Damodarpur Charter of Xgupta</title>

<forename>Dániel</forename>

<surname>Balogh</surname>

</persName>

</respStmt>

<funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>

</titleStmt>

<authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>

<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>

<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00056.xml</idno>

<!--

If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier>

-->

</publicationStmt>

<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>

<idno/>

</msIdentifier>

</msContents>

<p/>

</handDesc>

</physDesc>

</msDesc>

</sourceDesc>

</fileDesc>

<p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>

</encodingDesc>

<change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>

<change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>

<change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>

</revisionDesc>

</teiHeader>

<body>

<ab><lb n="1"/>koṭivarṣādhiṣṭhānādhi<unclear>karaṇa</unclear>sya</ab>

</div>

<div type="textpart" n="B"><head xml:lang="eng">Plates</head>

<p><!--

Conjectures for the name lost at the end of line A.1 include: Bhānugupta (#Basak_1919-20:142n1); Kumāragupta (Rao Bahadur H. Krishna Sastri in editorial note in #Dikshit_1923-24:193n1; #Sircar_1965:347n5 says Basak had suggested Budhagupta (but unless Basak made this suggestion somewhere other than #Basak_1919-20, Sircar is wrong about this). Sircar (ibid.) himself notes that Upagupta is also a possibility. #Agrawala_1983:123n6 mentions Viṣṇugupta along with the above possibilities; #Bhandarkar_1981:361 argues for Viṣṇugupta, with which #Goyal_1993:324-328 concurs.

--><pb n="1r"/><lb n="1"/>sa<unclear>mva</unclear> <num value="224"><g type="numeral">200</g> <g type="numeral">20</g> 4</num> bhādra di <num value="5">5</num> parama-daivata-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-ma<unclear>hā</unclear>rājādhirāja-śrī-<supplied reason="lost" cert="low">viṣṇu</supplied><lb n="2" break="no"/>gupte pr̥thivīpatau tat-pāda-parigr̥hīte puṇḍravarddhana-bhuktāv upari<unclear>ka-mahārāja</unclear>sya<lb n="3"/>rājaputtra-deva-bhaṭṭārakasya hasty-aśva-jana-bhogenānuvahamā<unclear>na</unclear>ke ko<unclear>ṭiva</unclear>rṣṣa-viṣa<unclear>ye</unclear> ca ta<lb n="4" break="no"/>n-<choice><sic>niyuktakeha</sic><corr>niyuktaka Iha</corr></choice> viṣayapati-svayambh<choice><unclear>u</unclear><unclear>ū</unclear></choice>deve Adhiṣṭhānādhikaraṇa<supplied reason="lost" cert="low">m</supplied> āryyya-<unclear>na</unclear>gara-<unclear>śreṣṭhi</unclear>-<sic><unclear>ri</unclear></sic><unclear>bhu</unclear>pāla<lb n="5"/>sārttha-vāha-sthāṇudatta-prathama-kulika-matidatta-prathama-kāyastha-skandapāla-puroge <unclear>sa</unclear>ṁvya<unclear>vaha</unclear>rati<!--

Agrawala has a "restored" [#mahā-] at the end of line A.2. This is not found either in Basak or in Bhandarkar and Agrawala does not cite any evidence for this. I can't tell from the facsimiles if there may have been any further characters; I stick with Bhandarkar.

--><!--

The correction of niyuktakeha in A.4 is doubtful. Agrawala notes that Basak had suggested °yuktake iha but this is "unnecessary." See also line A.3 of IN00046.

--><!--

In A.4 Bhandarkar reads svayambhū. Agrawala reads svayambhu and notes that Basak had suggested correcting to svayambhū. Given the condition of the plate, I'm noting this as an ambiguous reading.

--><!--

The m supplied after adhikaraṇa in A.4 is probably an editorial addition, not a guess at an illegible character. Compare line A.3 of IN00046. Leaving it as conjecturally read rather than as added for the time being.

--></p>

<p><lb n="6"/>Āyo<unclear>dhya</unclear>ka-kula-puttrak<sic>a-A</sic>mr̥tadevena vijñāpitam<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> iha viṣaye samudaya-bāhyāprahata-khila-<unclear>kṣe</unclear>ttrā<lb n="7" break="no"/>ṇāṁ tri-dīnārika-kulya-vāpa-vikrayo nuvr̥ttaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> tad arhatha matto dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya man-mātuḥ <unclear>pu</unclear>ṇyā<lb n="8" break="no"/>bhivr̥ddhaye Atrāraṇye bhagavataḥ śvetavarāha-svāmino deva-kule khaṇḍa-phuṭṭa-prati<unclear>saṁ</unclear>skā<unclear>ra-ka</unclear><lb n="9" break="no"/>raṇāya bali-caru-sa<sic>tr</sic>a-pravarttana-gavya-dhūpa-puṣpa-prāpaṇa-madhuparkka-dīpādy-upa<unclear>yo</unclear>gā<unclear>ya</unclear> ca<lb n="10"/>Apradā-dharmmeṇa tāmrapaṭṭīkr̥tya kṣetra-stoka<sic>n</sic> dātum iti<!--

For phuṭṭa see also IN00061 and IN00062.

--><!--

In A.7 Bhandarkar prints tridīnārika; Agrawala prints tridīnārikya and emends to traidīnārikya. Need to check this on a good facsimile or the original.

--></p>

<p>yataḥ prathama-pustapāla-nara<unclear>na</unclear>ndi<lb n="11" break="no"/>-gopadatta-<unclear>bhaṭa</unclear>nandinām-avadhāraṇayā yuktatayā dha<unclear>rmmādhi</unclear>kāra-<unclear>bu</unclear>ddhyā vijṇāpita<supplied reason="lost">ṁ</supplied> <unclear>no</unclear> kāry<unclear>o</unclear><lb n="12"/>viṣaya-patinā kaścid virodhaḥ keva<unclear>laṁ</unclear> śrī-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-pādānā<supplied reason="lost">ṁ</supplied> dharmma-<unclear>pha</unclear><supplied reason="lost">la-ṣa</supplied><lb n="13" break="no"/>ḍ-bhā<supplied reason="lost">gā</supplied>vāp<unclear>t</unclear>i<supplied reason="lost">ḥ</supplied><supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied><!--

In A.11 Agrawala puts square brackets around the second ta of yuktatayā. Bhandarkar does not show this as unclear, so Agrawala may have intended the brackets as a deletion mark.

--><!--

In A.11-12, I follow Bhandarkar. Agrawala (after Sircar?) has nā[#ttra*] [#vi*]<lb

/>ṣaya-patinā[#ṁ].

--><!--

Line A.13 is engraved below the end of line A.12

--><!--

In A.12-13, I again follow Bhandarkar. Agrawala (after Sircar?) has pādena dharmmapa(ra)<lb

/>(tāvāpti)[#ḥ].

--></p>

<p><pb n="1v"/><lb n="14"/>Ity anenāvadhāraṇā-krameṇa Etasmād amr̥tadevāt pañcadaśa dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya Etan-mātu<supplied reason="lost">ḥ</supplied> <lb n="15"/>Anugraheṇa svacchandapāṭake <unclear>rddha</unclear>ṭī-prāveśya-lavaṅgasikāyāñ ca vāstubhis saha kulya-vāpa-dvayaṁ <lb n="16"/>sāṭuvanāśramake pi vāstunā saha kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ paraspatikāyāṁ pañca-kulya-vāpakasyotta<unclear>re</unclear>ṇa <lb n="17"/>jamvū-na<supplied reason="lost">dyā</supplied>ḥ pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ pūraṇavr̥ndikaharau pāṭaka-pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Ity evaṁ khila-kṣettra<lb n="18" break="no"/>sya vāstunā saha pañca kulya-vāpāḥ Apradā-dharmmeṇa bhaga<supplied reason="lost">va</supplied>te śvetavarāha-svāmine śaśvat-kāla-bhogyā dattāḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> <lb n="19"/>tad uttara-kālaṁ saṁvyavahāribhiḥ devabhaktyānumantavyāḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Api ca bhūmi-<unclear>dā</unclear>na-saṁvaddhāḥ ślokā bhavanti<!--

In B.6 Bhandarkar prints saṁvadhāḥ and corrects to sambaddhāḥ. Agrawala prints samvaddhāḥ and corrects to sambaddhāḥ. The original may have anusvāra or m, and ddh or plain dh - need to check.

--></p>

<l n="a"><lb n="20"/>sva-dattāṁ para-dattām vā</l>

<l n="b">yo hareta vasundharāṁ</l>

<l n="c">sa viṣṭhāyāṁ k<sic>ri</sic>mir <sic>bhbh</sic>ūtvā</l>

<l n="d">pitr̥bhis saha pacyate<!--

In B.7 Bhandarkar has krimir bbhūtvā; Agrawala has bhbhūtvā and explicitly corrects to rbbh (not to standard rbh), also noting that Sircar's reading is rbhbhutvā.

--></l>

</lg>

<l n="a">vahubhir vvasudhā dattā</l>

<l n="b"><lb n="21"/>rājabhis sagarādibhiḥ</l>

<l n="c">yasya yasya yadā bhūmis</l>

<l n="d">tasya tasya tadā phalaṁ</l>

</lg>

<l n="a">ṣaṣ<sic>ṭh</sic>iṁ varṣa-sahasrāṇi</l>

<l n="b">svargge modati bhūmidaḥ <unclear>|</unclear><!--

In B.8 I follow Bhandarkar in reading ṣaṣṭhi (which Bhandarkar corrects to ṣaṣṭi); Agrawala just prints ṣaṣṭi.

--></l>

<l n="c"><lb n="22"/>Ākṣeptā cānumantā ca</l>

<l n="d">tāny eva narake vased</l>

</lg>

</div>

<lem/>

</app>

</listApp>

</div>

</div>

</div>

<p>First noticed and edited in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Basak1919-1920_01"/><citedRange>141-145</citedRange></bibl>. Date corrected in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Dikshit1923-1924_01"/></bibl>. Discussed in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Basak1925_01"/></bibl>.</p>

<p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00056</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>

</listBibl>

</listBibl>

</div>

</body>

</text>

</TEI>