Damodarpur Charter of Xgupta
Version: (3e68bda), last modified (3e68bda).
Edition
Seal
⟨1⟩ koṭivarṣādhiṣṭhānādhi(karaṇa)sya
Plates
⟨Page 1r⟩
⟨1⟩ sa(mva) 200 20 4 bhādra di 5 parama-daivata-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-ma(hā)rājādhirāja-śrī-[viṣṇu?]-
⟨2⟩ gupte pr̥thivīpatau tat-pāda-parigr̥hīte puṇḍravarddhana-bhuktāv upari(ka-mahārāja)sya
⟨3⟩ rājaputtra-deva-bhaṭṭārakasya hasty-aśva-jana-bhogenānuvahamā(na)ke ko(ṭiva)rṣṣa-viṣa(ye) ca ta-
⟨4⟩ n-¿niyuktakeha? viṣayapati-svayambh(u/ū)deve Adhiṣṭhānādhikaraṇa[m?] āryyya-(na)gara-(śreṣṭhi)-¿(ri)?(bhu)pāla
⟨5⟩ sārttha-vāha-sthāṇudatta-prathama-kulika-matidatta-prathama-kāyastha-skandapāla-puroge (sa)ṁvya(vaha)rati
⟨6⟩ Āyo(dhya)ka-kula-puttrak¿a-A?mr̥tadevena vijñāpitam⟨.⟩ iha viṣaye samudaya-bāhyāprahata-khila-(kṣe)ttrā-
⟨7⟩ ṇāṁ tri-dīnārika-kulya-vāpa-vikrayo nuvr̥ttaḥ⟨.⟩ tad arhatha matto dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya man-mātuḥ (pu)ṇyā-
⟨8⟩ bhivr̥ddhaye Atrāraṇye bhagavataḥ śvetavarāha-svāmino deva-kule khaṇḍa-phuṭṭa-prati(saṁ)skā(ra-ka)-
⟨9⟩ raṇāya bali-caru-sa¿tr?a-pravarttana-gavya-dhūpa-puṣpa-prāpaṇa-madhuparkka-dīpādy-upa(yo)gā(ya) ca
⟨10⟩ Apradā-dharmmeṇa tāmrapaṭṭīkr̥tya kṣetra-stoka¿n? dātum iti yataḥ prathama-pustapāla-nara(na)ndi-
⟨11⟩ -gopadatta-(bhaṭa)nandinām-avadhāraṇayā yuktatayā dha(rmmādhi)kāra-(bu)ddhyā vijṇāpita[ṁ] (no) kāry(o)
⟨12⟩ viṣaya-patinā kaścid virodhaḥ keva(laṁ) śrī-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-pādānā[ṁ] dharmma-(pha)[la-ṣa]-
⟨13⟩ ḍ-bhā[gā]vāp(t)i[ḥ]⟨.⟩
⟨Page 1v⟩
⟨14⟩ Ity anenāvadhāraṇā-krameṇa Etasmād amr̥tadevāt pañcadaśa dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya Etan-mātu[ḥ]
⟨15⟩ Anugraheṇa svacchandapāṭake (rddha)ṭī-prāveśya-lavaṅgasikāyāñ ca vāstubhis saha kulya-vāpa-dvayaṁ
⟨16⟩ sāṭuvanāśramake pi vāstunā saha kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ paraspatikāyāṁ pañca-kulya-vāpakasyotta(re)ṇa
⟨17⟩ jamvū-na[dyā]ḥ pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ pūraṇavr̥ndikaharau pāṭaka-pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ⟨.⟩ Ity evaṁ khila-kṣettra-
⟨18⟩ sya vāstunā saha pañca kulya-vāpāḥ Apradā-dharmmeṇa bhaga[va]te śvetavarāha-svāmine śaśvat-kāla-bhogyā dattāḥ⟨.⟩
⟨19⟩ tad uttara-kālaṁ saṁvyavahāribhiḥ devabhaktyānumantavyāḥ⟨.⟩ Api ca bhūmi-(dā)na-saṁvaddhāḥ ślokā bhavanti
⟨20⟩ sva-dattāṁ para-dattām vā yo hareta vasundharāṁ sa viṣṭhāyāṁ k¿ri?mir ¿bhbh?ūtvā pitr̥bhis saha pacyate vahubhir vvasudhā dattā
⟨21⟩ rājabhis sagarādibhiḥ yasya yasya yadā bhūmis tasya tasya tadā phalaṁ ṣaṣ¿ṭh?iṁ varṣa-sahasrāṇi svargge modati bhūmidaḥ (|)
⟨22⟩ Ākṣeptā cānumantā ca tāny eva narake vased iti
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Damodarpur Charter of Xgupta</title>
<respStmt>
<resp key="contributor">Original EpiDoc Encoding for Siddham</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp key="contributor">Conversion of encoding for DHARMA</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp key="creator">intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00056.xml</idno>
<!--
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier>
-->
<availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
<date from="2019" to="2025">2019-2025</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<msDesc>
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/>
</msIdentifier>
<msContents>
<summary/>
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p/>
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
<change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
<change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">
<div type="textpart" n="A"><head xml:lang="eng">Seal</head>
<ab><lb n="1"/>koṭivarṣādhiṣṭhānādhi<unclear>karaṇa</unclear>sya</ab>
</div>
<div type="textpart" n="B"><head xml:lang="eng">Plates</head>
<p><!--
Conjectures for the name lost at the end of line A.1 include: Bhānugupta (#Basak_1919-20:142n1); Kumāragupta (Rao Bahadur H. Krishna Sastri in editorial note in #Dikshit_1923-24:193n1; #Sircar_1965:347n5 says Basak had suggested Budhagupta (but unless Basak made this suggestion somewhere other than #Basak_1919-20, Sircar is wrong about this). Sircar (ibid.) himself notes that Upagupta is also a possibility. #Agrawala_1983:123n6 mentions Viṣṇugupta along with the above possibilities; #Bhandarkar_1981:361 argues for Viṣṇugupta, with which #Goyal_1993:324-328 concurs.
--><pb n="1r"/><lb n="1"/>sa<unclear>mva</unclear> <num value="224"><g type="numeral">200</g> <g type="numeral">20</g> 4</num> bhādra di <num value="5">5</num> parama-daivata-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-ma<unclear>hā</unclear>rājādhirāja-śrī-<supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->viṣṇu</supplied><lb n="2" break="no"/>gupte pr̥thivīpatau tat-pāda-parigr̥hīte puṇḍravarddhana-bhuktāv upari<unclear>ka-mahārāja</unclear>sya<lb n="3"/>rājaputtra-deva-bhaṭṭārakasya hasty-aśva-jana-bhogenānuvahamā<unclear>na</unclear>ke ko<unclear>ṭiva</unclear>rṣṣa-viṣa<unclear>ye</unclear> ca ta<lb n="4" break="no"/>n-<choice><sic>niyuktakeha</sic><corr>niyuktaka Iha</corr></choice> viṣayapati-svayambh<choice><unclear>u</unclear><unclear>ū</unclear></choice>deve Adhiṣṭhānādhikaraṇa<supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->m</supplied> āryyya-<unclear>na</unclear>gara-<unclear>śreṣṭhi</unclear>-<sic><unclear>ri</unclear></sic><unclear>bhu</unclear>pāla<lb n="5"/>sārttha-vāha-sthāṇudatta-prathama-kulika-matidatta-prathama-kāyastha-skandapāla-puroge <unclear>sa</unclear>ṁvya<unclear>vaha</unclear>rati<!--
Agrawala has a "restored" [#mahā-] at the end of line A.2. This is not found either in Basak or in Bhandarkar and Agrawala does not cite any evidence for this. I can't tell from the facsimiles if there may have been any further characters; I stick with Bhandarkar.
--><!--
The correction of niyuktakeha in A.4 is doubtful. Agrawala notes that Basak had suggested °yuktake iha but this is "unnecessary." See also line A.3 of IN00046.
--><!--
In A.4 Bhandarkar reads svayambhū. Agrawala reads svayambhu and notes that Basak had suggested correcting to svayambhū. Given the condition of the plate, I'm noting this as an ambiguous reading.
--><!--
The m supplied after adhikaraṇa in A.4 is probably an editorial addition, not a guess at an illegible character. Compare line A.3 of IN00046. Leaving it as conjecturally read rather than as added for the time being.
--></p>
<p><lb n="6"/>Āyo<unclear>dhya</unclear>ka-kula-puttrak<sic>a-A</sic>mr̥tadevena vijñāpitam<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> iha viṣaye samudaya-bāhyāprahata-khila-<unclear>kṣe</unclear>ttrā<lb n="7" break="no"/>ṇāṁ tri-dīnārika-kulya-vāpa-vikrayo nuvr̥ttaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> tad arhatha matto dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya man-mātuḥ <unclear>pu</unclear>ṇyā<lb n="8" break="no"/>bhivr̥ddhaye Atrāraṇye bhagavataḥ śvetavarāha-svāmino deva-kule khaṇḍa-phuṭṭa-prati<unclear>saṁ</unclear>skā<unclear>ra-ka</unclear><lb n="9" break="no"/>raṇāya bali-caru-sa<sic>tr</sic>a-pravarttana-gavya-dhūpa-puṣpa-prāpaṇa-madhuparkka-dīpādy-upa<unclear>yo</unclear>gā<unclear>ya</unclear> ca<lb n="10"/>Apradā-dharmmeṇa tāmrapaṭṭīkr̥tya kṣetra-stoka<sic>n</sic> dātum iti<!--
For phuṭṭa see also IN00061 and IN00062.
--><!--
In A.7 Bhandarkar prints tridīnārika; Agrawala prints tridīnārikya and emends to traidīnārikya. Need to check this on a good facsimile or the original.
--></p>
<p>yataḥ prathama-pustapāla-nara<unclear>na</unclear>ndi<lb n="11" break="no"/>-gopadatta-<unclear>bhaṭa</unclear>nandinām-avadhāraṇayā yuktatayā dha<unclear>rmmādhi</unclear>kāra-<unclear>bu</unclear>ddhyā vijṇāpita<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ṁ</supplied> <unclear>no</unclear> kāry<unclear>o</unclear><lb n="12"/>viṣaya-patinā kaścid virodhaḥ keva<unclear>laṁ</unclear> śrī-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-pādānā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ṁ</supplied> dharmma-<unclear>pha</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->la-ṣa</supplied><lb n="13" break="no"/>ḍ-bhā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->gā</supplied>vāp<unclear>t</unclear>i<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ḥ</supplied><supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied><!--
In A.11 Agrawala puts square brackets around the second ta of yuktatayā. Bhandarkar does not show this as unclear, so Agrawala may have intended the brackets as a deletion mark.
--><!--
In A.11-12, I follow Bhandarkar. Agrawala (after Sircar?) has nā[#ttra*] [#vi*]<lb
/>ṣaya-patinā[#ṁ].
--><!--
Line A.13 is engraved below the end of line A.12
--><!--
In A.12-13, I again follow Bhandarkar. Agrawala (after Sircar?) has pādena dharmmapa(ra)<lb
/>(tāvāpti)[#ḥ].
--></p>
<p><pb n="1v"/><lb n="14"/>Ity anenāvadhāraṇā-krameṇa Etasmād amr̥tadevāt pañcadaśa dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya Etan-mātu<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ḥ</supplied> <lb n="15"/>Anugraheṇa svacchandapāṭake <unclear>rddha</unclear>ṭī-prāveśya-lavaṅgasikāyāñ ca vāstubhis saha kulya-vāpa-dvayaṁ <lb n="16"/>sāṭuvanāśramake pi vāstunā saha kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ paraspatikāyāṁ pañca-kulya-vāpakasyotta<unclear>re</unclear>ṇa <lb n="17"/>jamvū-na<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->dyā</supplied>ḥ pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ pūraṇavr̥ndikaharau pāṭaka-pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Ity evaṁ khila-kṣettra<lb n="18" break="no"/>sya vāstunā saha pañca kulya-vāpāḥ Apradā-dharmmeṇa bhaga<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->va</supplied>te śvetavarāha-svāmine śaśvat-kāla-bhogyā dattāḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> <lb n="19"/>tad uttara-kālaṁ saṁvyavahāribhiḥ devabhaktyānumantavyāḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Api ca bhūmi-<unclear>dā</unclear>na-saṁvaddhāḥ ślokā bhavanti<!--
In B.6 Bhandarkar prints saṁvadhāḥ and corrects to sambaddhāḥ. Agrawala prints samvaddhāḥ and corrects to sambaddhāḥ. The original may have anusvāra or m, and ddh or plain dh - need to check.
--></p>
<lg n="1" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><lb n="20"/>sva-dattāṁ para-dattām vā</l>
<l n="b">yo hareta vasundharāṁ</l>
<l n="c">sa viṣṭhāyāṁ k<sic>ri</sic>mir <sic>bhbh</sic>ūtvā</l>
<l n="d">pitr̥bhis saha pacyate<!--
In B.7 Bhandarkar has krimir bbhūtvā; Agrawala has bhbhūtvā and explicitly corrects to rbbh (not to standard rbh), also noting that Sircar's reading is rbhbhutvā.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="2" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">vahubhir vvasudhā dattā</l>
<l n="b"><lb n="21"/>rājabhis sagarādibhiḥ</l>
<l n="c">yasya yasya yadā bhūmis</l>
<l n="d">tasya tasya tadā phalaṁ</l>
</lg>
<lg n="3" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">ṣaṣ<sic>ṭh</sic>iṁ varṣa-sahasrāṇi</l>
<l n="b">svargge modati bhūmidaḥ <unclear>|</unclear><!--
In B.8 I follow Bhandarkar in reading ṣaṣṭhi (which Bhandarkar corrects to ṣaṣṭi); Agrawala just prints ṣaṣṭi.
--></l>
<l n="c"><lb n="22"/>Ākṣeptā cānumantā ca</l>
<l n="d">tāny eva narake vased</l>
</lg>
<ab>iti</ab>
</div>
</div>
<div type="apparatus">
<listApp>
<app loc="line">
<lem/>
<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
</app>
</listApp>
</div>
<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
</div>
<div type="commentary">
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<p/>
<listBibl type="primary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>