Junagadh Rock Inscription 1 of the Time of Skandagupta
Editor: Dániel Balogh.
Identifier: DHARMA_INSSiddham00032.
Hand description:
Language: Sanskrit.
Repository: Siddham (siddham).
Version: (ddbe066), last modified (13a5ebf).
Edition
⟨1⟩ <mangala> (s)iddhaM
I. Mālinī
śriyam abhimata-bhogyāṁ naika-kālāpanītāṁ
atridaśa(pa)ti-sukhārtthaṁ yo (ba)ler ājahāra|
bkamala-nila(ya)nā(yā)ḥ śāśvataṁ dhāma lakṣmyāḥ
c⟨2⟩ sa jayati vijitārttir vviṣṇur atyanta-jiṣṇuḥ||
dII. Mālinī
tad-anu jayati śaśvaT śrī-(pari)kṣipta-vakṣāḥ
asva-bhuja-janita-vīryo rājarājā(dhirā)jaḥ|
b(na)rapati⟨3⟩-(bh)ujagānāṁ māna-darppotphaṇānāṁ
cpratikr̥ti-(ga)ruḍājñā(ṁ) nirvviṣī(ṁ) cāvakarttā||
dIII. Mālinī
nr̥pati-guṇa-niketaḥ skandaguptaḥ pr̥thu-śrīḥ
acatur-udadhi-(jal?)āntāṁ sphīta-paryanta-deśāM|
b⟨4⟩ Avanim avanatāri¿r y?a¿ḥ c?akārātma-saṁsthāṁ
cpitari sura-sakhitvaṁ (prāpta)vaty ātma-śaktyā||
dIV. Āryā
api ca jitam [e]va tena prathayaṁti yaśāṁsi yasya ripavo pi [|]
abāmūla-bhagna-darppā niva[rttitā] mleccha-deśeṣu||
cdV. Upajāti
⟨5⟩ krameṇa buddhyā nipuṇaṁ pradh(ārya)
adhyātvā ca kr̥tsnān guṇa-(doṣa-hetūn)|
bvyap(e)tya sarvān manujendra-putrāṁl
clakṣmīḥ (svayaṁ) yaṁ varayāṁ cakāra||
dVI. Upajāti
(ta)smin nr̥pe (śā)sati naiva kaścid
adha(rmmā)d apeto manujaḥ prajāsu|
b⟨6⟩ (ārtto) daridro vyasanī kadary(o)
cdaṇḍena vā yo bhr̥śa-pīḍitaḥ (s)yā(t)||
dVII. Upajāti
(e)vaṁ sa jitvā pr̥thivīṁ samagrāṁ
abhag(nā)gra-da[rppān] dviṣataś ca (kr̥)tv(ā)|
bsarvveṣu deśeṣu vidhāya gopt¿r̥?⟨r̥̄⟩n
csaṁcintayā(m ā)sa bahu-prakāraM||
dVIII. Upajāti
syāt ko nurūpo ⟨7⟩ matimān vin¿i?⟨ī⟩to
amedhā-smr̥tibhy(ā)m anape(ta-bhā)vaḥ|
bsatyārjav(au)dārya-nayopapa(nno)
c(mādhurya)-dākṣiṇya-(ya)śonvitaś ca||
dIX. Upajāti
bhakto nurak(to) nr̥-v(i)ś(e)ṣa-yuktaḥ
asarvvopadhābhiś ca viśuddha-buddhiḥ|
bAnr̥ṇya-bhāvopagat-āntarātmā{ḥ}
csarvvasya lokasya hite pravr̥ttaḥ||
dX. Upajāti
⟨8⟩ nyāyārjane rthasya ca kaḥ samarthaḥ
asyād arjitasyāpy atha rakṣaṇe ca|
bgopāyitasyāpi (ca) vr̥ddhi-hetau
cvr̥ddhasya pātra-pratipādanāya||
dXI. Upajāti
sarvveṣu bhr̥tyeṣv api saṁhateṣu
ayo me praśiṣyān nikhilān surāṣṭrāN|
bAṁ jñātam ekaḥ khalu parṇadatto
cbhārasya tasyodvahane samarthaḥ||
dXII. Upajāti
⟨9⟩ Evaṁ viniścitya nr̥pādhipena
anaikān aho-rātra-gaṇān sva-matyā|
byaḥ saṁniyukto rthanayā kathaṁcit
csamyak-surāṣṭrāvani-pālanāya||
dXIII. Upajāti
niyujya devā varuṇaṁ pratīcyāṁ
asvasthā yathā nonmanaso babhūvu(ḥ)|
bpūrvvetarasyāṁ diśi parṇadattaṁ
cniyujya rājā dhr̥timāṁs tathābhūT|
dXIV. Upajāti
⟨10⟩ tasyātmajo hy ātmaja-bhāva-yukto
advidheva cātmātma-vaśena nītaḥ|
bsarvvātmanātmeva ca rakṣaṇīyo
cnityātmavān ātmaja-kānta-rūpaḥ|
dXV. Upajāti
rūpānurūpair lalitair vicitraiḥ
anitya-pramodānvita-sar¿v?a-bhāvaḥ|
bprabuddha-padmākara-padmavaktro
cnr̥ṇāṁ śaraṇyaḥ śaraṇ-āgatānāM|
dXVI. Mālabhāriṇī
⟨11⟩ Abhavad bhuvi cakrapālito sāv
aiti nāmnā prathitaḥ priyo janasya|
bsva-guṇair anupaskr̥tair udātt(ai)ḥ
cpitaraṁ yaś ca viśeṣayāṁ cakāra|
dXVII. Upajāti
kṣamā prabhutvaṁ vinayo nayaś ca
aśauryaṁ vinā śaurya-mah[ā]rccanaṁ ca|
b(vākya?)ṁ damo dānam adīnatā ca
cdākṣiṇyam ānr̥ṇyam aś(ū)nyatā ca|
dXVIII. Upajāti
sauṁdaryam āryetara-nigrahaś ca
aAvismayo dhairyam udīrṇatā ca|
b⟨12⟩ Ity evam ete tiśayena yasminn
cavipravāsena guṇā vasanti|
dXIX. Upajāti
na vidyate sau sakale pi loke
ayatropamā tasya guṇaiḥ kriyeta|
bsa Eva kārtsnyena guṇānvitānāṁ
cbabhūva n¿r̥?⟨r̥̄⟩ṇām upamāna-bhūtaḥ|
dXX. Upajāti
ity evam etān adhikān ato nyān
aguṇān par(ī)kṣya svayam eva pitrā|
byaḥ saṁniyukto nagarasya rakṣāṁ
cviśiṣya pūrvān pracakāra samyaK|
dXXI. Upajāti
⟨13⟩ Āśritya v¿i?⟨ī⟩ryaṁ (sva-bhuja?)-dvayasya
asvasyaiva nānyasya narasya darpaṁ|
bnodvejayām āsa ca kaṁcid evam
casmin pure caiva śaśāsa ¿duṣṭāḥ?⟨duṣṭān⟩|
dXXII. Upajāti
viśrabdham alpena śaśāsa yo smin
akālena lokeṣu sa-nāgareṣu|
byo lālayām āsa ca paura-vargān
c[⏓–⏑] putrān su-parīkṣya doṣāN|
dXXIII. Upajāti
saṁraṁjayāṁ ca prakr̥tīr babhūva
apūrva-smitābhāṣaṇa-māna-dānaiḥ|
b⟨14⟩ niryantraṇānyonya-gr̥ha-praveśai[ḥ]
csaṁvarddhita-prīti-gr̥hopacāraiḥ|
dXXIV. Upajāti
brahmaṇya-bhāvena pareṇa yuktaḥ
aśaklaḥ śucir dāna-paro yathāvaT|
bprāpyān sa kāle viṣayān siṣeve
cdharmārthayoś cā[py a]virodhanena|
dXXV. Upajāti
yo [–⏑––⏑⏑] parṇadattāt
asa nyāyavān atra kim asti citraṁ|
bmuktā-kalāpāmbuja-padma-śītāc
ccandrāt kim uṣṇaṁ bhavitā kadāciT|
dXXVI. Vaṁśastha
⟨15⟩ Athā krameṇāmbuda-kāla Āgat(e)
an(i)dāgha-kālaṁ pravidārya toyadaiḥ|
bvavarṣa toyaṁ bahu saṁtataṁ ciraṁ
csudarśanaṁ yena bibheda cātvarāT|
dXXVII. Upajāti
saṁvatsarāṇām adhike śate tu
atriṁśadbhir anyair api ṣaḍbhir eva|
brātrau dine prauṣṭhapadasya ṣaṣṭhe
cgupta-prakāle gaṇanāṁ vidhāya|
dXXVIII. Vaṁśastha
⟨16⟩ Imāś ca yā raivatakād vinirgatā[ḥ]
apalāśinīyaṁ sikatā-vilāsinī|
bsamudra-kāntāḥ cira-bandhanoṣitāḥ
cpunaḥ patiṁ śāstra-yathocitaṁ yayuḥ|
dXXIX. Vaṁśastha
avekṣya varṣāgama-jaṁ mahodbhramaṁ
amahodadher ūrjayatā priyepsunā|
bAneka-tīrānta-ja-puṣpa-śobhito
c⟨17⟩ nadīmayo hasta Iva prasāritaḥ|
dXXX. Vaṁśastha
viṣādya(mānāḥ khalu sarvato ja)nāḥ
akathaṁ kathaṁ kāryam iti pravādinaḥ|
bmitho hi pūrvāpara-rātram utthitā
cvicintayāṁ cāpi babhūvur utsukāḥ|
dXXXI. Vaṁśastha
apīha loke sakale sudarśanaṁ
apumā¿ṁ?⟨n⟩ hi durdarśanatāṁ gataṁ kṣaṇāT|
b⟨18⟩ bhaven nu sāmbho-nidhi-tulya-darśanaṁ
csu-darśanaṁ [–⏑⏑–⏑–⏑⏓] [||]
dXXXII. Upajāti
[⏑–⏑––⏑] vaṇe sa bhūtvā
apituḥ parāṁ bhaktim api pradarśya|
bdharmaṁ purodhāya śubhānubandhaṁ
crājño hitārthaṁ nagarasya caiva|
dXXXIII. Upajāti
saṁvatsarāṇām adhike śate tu
a⟨19⟩ triṁśadbhir anyair api saptabhiś ca|
bpra [–⏑––⏑⏑] śāstra-vettā
c(viśve?) py anujñāta-mahā-prabhāvaḥ|
dXXXIV. Upajāti
ājya-praṇāmai¿ḥ? vibudhān atheṣṭvā
adhanair dvijātīn api tarpayitvā|
bpaurāṁs tathābhyarcya yathārha-mānaiḥ
cbhr̥tyāṁś ca pūjyān suhr̥daś ca dānaiḥ|
dXXXV. Upajāti
⟨20⟩ graiṣmasya māsasya tu pūrva-pa(kṣe)
a[⏑–⏑––] (pra)thame hni samyaK|
bmāsa-dvayenādaravān sa bhūtvā
cdhanasya kr̥tvā vyayam aprameyaM|
dXXXVI. Upajāti
āyāmato hasta-śataṁ samagraṁ
avistārataḥ ṣaṣṭir athāpi cāṣṭau|
b⟨21⟩ Utsedhato nyat puruṣāṇi (sapta?)
c[⏑–⏑–] (ha)sta-śata-dvayasya|
dXXXVII. Upajāti
babandha yatnān mahatā nr̥devān
a(abhyarcya?) samyag ghaṭitopalena|
ba-jāti-duṣṭa¿m? prathitaṁ taṭākaṁ
csudarśanaṁ śāśvata-kalpa-kālaM|
dXXXVIII. Mālinī
⟨22⟩ Api ca sudr̥ḍha-setu-prā(nta?)-vinyasta-śobha-
a- ratha-caraṇa-samāhva-krauṁca-haṁsāsa-dhūtaM|
bvimala-salila [–––⏑––⏑––]
cbhuvi ta [⏑⏑⏑–––] da[.](ā)rkaḥ śaśī ca|
dXXXIX. Mālinī
⟨23⟩ nagaram api ca bhūyād vr̥ddhimat-paura-juṣṭaṁ
advija-bahu-śata-gīta-brahma-nirnaṣṭa-pāpaṁ|
bśatam api ca samānām īti-durbhikṣa [–⏓]
c[⏑⏑⏑⏑⏑⏑–––⏑––⏑––] [||]
d(iti suda)rśana-taṭāka-saṁskāra-graṁtha-racanā (sa)māptā||
Apparatus
Translation by Doe and Devadatta N.d.
Bibliography
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Junagadh Rock Inscription 1 of the Time of Skandagupta</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Original EpiDoc Encoding for Siddham</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp>Conversion of encoding for DHARMA</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp>intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>DHARMA</authority>
<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00032</idno>
<!--
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier>
-->
<availability>
<licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit thttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.</p>
<p>Copyright (c) 2019-2025 by Dániel Balogh.</p>
</licence>
</availability>
<date from="2019" to="2025">2019-2025</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<msDesc>
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/>
</msIdentifier>
<msContents>
<summary/>
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p/>
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<projectDesc>
<p>The project DHARMA has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC)
under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant
agreement no 809994).</p>
</projectDesc>
<schemaRef type="guide" key="EGDv01" url="https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02888186"/>
<listPrefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="bib" matchPattern="([a-zA-Z0-9\-\_]+)" replacementPattern="https://www.zotero.org/groups/1633743/erc-dharma/items/tag/$1">
<p>Public URIs with the prefix bib to point to a Zotero Group Library named
ERC-DHARMA whose data are open to the public.</p>
</prefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="part" matchPattern="([a-z]+)" replacementPattern="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/DHARMA_IdListMembers_v01.xml#$1">
<p>Internal URIs using the part prefix to point to person elements in the
<ref>DHARMA_IdListMembers_V01.xml</ref> file.</p>
</prefixDef>
</listPrefixDef>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
<change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
<change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">
<p><lb n="1"/><g type="mangala"/> <unclear>s</unclear>iddhaM</p><!--
Bhandarkar says there is an 'oṁ' at the beginning, expressed by a symbol and omitted by Fleet. Agrawala does not print it and I see nothing on the facsimile, but added <g> markup. siddham is written out in letters; I'm not sure if the final m is a halanta form but what else could it be?
--><lg n="1" met="mālinī">
<l n="a">śriyam abhimata-bhogyāṁ naika-kālāpanītāṁ</l>
<l n="b">tridaśa<unclear>pa</unclear>ti-sukhārtthaṁ yo <unclear>ba</unclear>ler ājahāra|</l>
<l n="c">kamala-nila<unclear>ya</unclear>nā<unclear>yā</unclear>ḥ śāśvataṁ dhāma lakṣmyāḥ</l>
<l n="d"><lb n="2"/>sa jayati vijitārttir vviṣṇur atyanta-jiṣṇuḥ||<!--
I'm not sure about the daṇḍas in this inscr. Bhandarkar prints most of the verse-final double daṇḍas as supplied along with the verse numbers, but prints the double daṇḍa at the end of v2 separately as unclear, and adds in a note that it's indicated by two horizontals. He also prints most, but not all, of the half-verse-final single daṇḍas as supplied. Agrawala prints most single and double daṇḍas as original (except the single daṇḍa at the half of v4, which I've marked up as supplied; also, from v13 onward, both Bhandarkar and Agrawala print single original daṇḍas at ends, supplying double daṇḍas). The facsimile is too blurred to decide for certain. This should be checked in the original, or at least a good photo.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="2" met="mālinī">
<l n="a">tad-anu jayati śaśvaT śrī-<unclear>pari</unclear>kṣipta-vakṣāḥ<!--
Note no saṁdhi at caesura, halanta (small subscript) T in śaśvat*śrī.
--></l>
<l n="b">sva-bhuja-janita-vīryo rājarājā<unclear>dhirā</unclear>jaḥ|</l>
<l n="c"><unclear>na</unclear>rapati<lb n="3" break="no"/>-<unclear>bh</unclear>ujagānāṁ māna-darppotphaṇānāṁ</l>
<l n="d">pratikr̥ti-<unclear>ga</unclear>ruḍājñā<unclear>ṁ</unclear> nirvviṣī<unclear>ṁ</unclear> cāvakarttā||</l><!--
This nirvviṣī bit is not convincing at all. Need a look at the stone, but can't this be nirvviśeṣavakarttā or something else.
--></lg>
<lg n="3" met="mālinī">
<l n="a">nr̥pati-guṇa-niketaḥ skandaguptaḥ pr̥thu-śrīḥ</l>
<l n="b">catur-udadhi-<unclear cert="low">jal</unclear>āntāṁ sphīta-paryanta-deśāM|</l>
<l n="c"><lb n="4"/>Avanim avanatāri<sic>r y</sic>a<sic>ḥ c</sic>akārātma-saṁsthāṁ<!--
Both Bhandarkar and Agrawala print single rya, so I've kept it and marked up as sic.
--></l>
<l n="d">pitari sura-sakhitvaṁ <unclear>prāpta</unclear>vaty ātma-śaktyā||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="4" met="āryā">
<l n="ab">api ca jitam <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->e</supplied>va tena prathayaṁti yaśāṁsi yasya ripavo pi <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->|</supplied><!--
For api, Fleet prints āpi, which seems to make no sense and is unmetrical (unless availing of muta cum liquida licence at prathayaṁti). Sircar notes this and prints āpa instead, remarking that it "practically" says jitameva tena iti. Bhandarkar just prints api without any note; so does Agrawala. I assume that āpi is a typo in Fleet.
--></l>
<l n="cd">āmūla-bhagna-darppā niva<supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->rttitā</supplied> mleccha-deśeṣu||<!--
Bhandarkar prints darpā, but Agrawala has rpp.
--><!--
The conjecture nivarttitā is from Bhandarkar. Fleet's conjecture is nirvacanā, which Sircar also adopts. Agrawala prints niva[#santyo]; I don't know what this is supposed to agree with.
--><!--
Agrawala also notes that "mleccha-deśeṣu" is "not quite distinct" in Fleet's facsimile, but "quite certain" in Indraji's eye-copy.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="5" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="5"/>krameṇa buddhyā nipuṇaṁ pradh<unclear>ārya</unclear></l>
<l n="b">dhyātvā ca kr̥tsnān guṇa-<unclear>doṣa-hetūn</unclear>|</l>
<l n="c">vyap<unclear>e</unclear>tya sarvān manujendra-putrāṁl</l>
<l n="d">lakṣmīḥ <unclear>svayaṁ</unclear> yaṁ varayāṁ cakāra||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="6" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><unclear>ta</unclear>smin nr̥pe <unclear>śā</unclear>sati naiva kaścid</l>
<l n="b">dha<unclear>rmmā</unclear>d apeto manujaḥ prajāsu|</l>
<l n="c"><lb n="6"/><unclear>ārtto</unclear> daridro vyasanī kadary<unclear>o</unclear></l>
<l n="d">daṇḍena vā yo bhr̥śa-pīḍitaḥ <unclear>s</unclear>yā<unclear>t</unclear>||<!--
For daṇḍena vā, Fleet's original reading, adopted by Agrawala, was daṇḍ(yo) na vā. #Agrawal_1940:59 (possibly also Agrawal_1986a:28, but this needs rechecking) says daṇḍyo is Fleet's but there is no subscript y (he examined the original stone). He argues for daṇḍena, which is more than plausible.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="7" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><unclear>e</unclear>vaṁ sa jitvā pr̥thivīṁ samagrāṁ</l>
<l n="b">bhag<unclear>nā</unclear>gra-da<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->rppān</supplied> dviṣataś ca <unclear>kr̥</unclear>tv<unclear>ā</unclear>|<!--
Both Bhandarkar and Agrawala print darpān with single p, and Agrawala only marks n as unclear, nothing as supplied. I take it this is all quite unclear and stick with a supplied double p.
--></l>
<l n="c">sarvveṣu deśeṣu vidhāya gopt<choice><sic>r̥</sic><corr>r̥̄</corr></choice>n</l>
<l n="d">saṁcintayā<unclear>m ā</unclear>sa bahu-prakāraM||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="8" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">syāt ko nurūpo <lb n="7"/>matimān vin<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>to</l>
<l n="b">medhā-smr̥tibhy<unclear>ā</unclear>m anape<unclear>ta-bhā</unclear>vaḥ|</l>
<l n="c">satyārjav<unclear>au</unclear>dārya-nayopapa<unclear>nno</unclear></l>
<l n="d"><unclear>mādhurya</unclear>-dākṣiṇya-<unclear>ya</unclear>śonvitaś ca||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="9" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">bhakto nurak<unclear>to</unclear> nr̥-v<unclear>i</unclear>ś<unclear>e</unclear>ṣa-yuktaḥ</l>
<l n="b">sarvvopadhābhiś ca viśuddha-buddhiḥ|</l>
<l n="c">Anr̥ṇya-bhāvopagat-āntarātmā<surplus>ḥ</surplus></l>
<l n="d">sarvvasya lokasya hite pravr̥ttaḥ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="10" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="8"/>nyāyārjane rthasya ca kaḥ samarthaḥ</l>
<l n="b">syād arjitasyāpy atha rakṣaṇe ca|</l>
<l n="c">gopāyitasyāpi <unclear>ca</unclear> vr̥ddhi-hetau</l>
<l n="d">vr̥ddhasya pātra-pratipādanāya||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="11" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">sarvveṣu bhr̥tyeṣv api saṁhateṣu</l>
<l n="b">yo me praśiṣyān nikhilān surāṣṭrāN|</l>
<l n="c">Aṁ jñātam ekaḥ khalu parṇadatto</l>
<l n="d">bhārasya tasyodvahane samarthaḥ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="12" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="9"/>Evaṁ viniścitya nr̥pādhipena</l>
<l n="b">naikān aho-rātra-gaṇān sva-matyā|</l>
<l n="c">yaḥ saṁniyukto rthanayā kathaṁcit</l>
<l n="d">samyak-surāṣṭrāvani-pālanāya||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="13" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">niyujya devā varuṇaṁ pratīcyāṁ</l>
<l n="b">svasthā yathā nonmanaso babhūvu<unclear>ḥ</unclear>|</l>
<l n="c">pūrvvetarasyāṁ diśi parṇadattaṁ</l>
<l n="d">niyujya rājā dhr̥timāṁs tathābhūT|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="14" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="10"/>tasyātmajo hy ātmaja-bhāva-yukto</l>
<l n="b">dvidheva cātmātma-vaśena nītaḥ|</l>
<l n="c">sarvvātmanātmeva ca rakṣaṇīyo</l>
<l n="d">nityātmavān ātmaja-kānta-rūpaḥ|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="15" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">rūpānurūpair lalitair vicitraiḥ</l>
<l n="b">nitya-pramodānvita-sar<sic>v</sic>a-bhāvaḥ|<!--
Both Bhandarkar and Agrawala print sarva with single v.
--></l>
<l n="c">prabuddha-padmākara-padmavaktro</l>
<l n="d">nr̥ṇāṁ śaraṇyaḥ śaraṇ-āgatānāM|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="16" met="mālabhāriṇī">
<l n="a"><lb n="11"/>Abhavad bhuvi cakrapālito sāv</l>
<l n="b">iti nāmnā prathitaḥ priyo janasya|</l>
<l n="c">sva-guṇair anupaskr̥tair udātt<unclear>ai</unclear>ḥ</l>
<l n="d">pitaraṁ yaś ca viśeṣayāṁ cakāra|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="17" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">kṣamā prabhutvaṁ vinayo nayaś ca</l>
<l n="b">śauryaṁ vinā śaurya-mah<supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ā</supplied>rccanaṁ ca|</l>
<l n="c"><unclear cert="low">vākya</unclear>ṁ damo dānam adīnatā ca</l>
<l n="d">dākṣiṇyam ānr̥ṇyam aś<unclear>ū</unclear>nyatā ca|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="18" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">sauṁdaryam āryetara-nigrahaś ca</l>
<l n="b">Avismayo dhairyam udīrṇatā ca|</l>
<l n="c"><lb n="12"/>Ity evam ete tiśayena yasminn</l>
<l n="d">avipravāsena guṇā vasanti|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="19" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">na vidyate sau sakale pi loke</l>
<l n="b">yatropamā tasya guṇaiḥ kriyeta|</l>
<l n="c">sa Eva kārtsnyena guṇānvitānāṁ</l>
<l n="d">babhūva n<choice><sic>r̥</sic><corr>r̥̄</corr></choice>ṇām upamāna-bhūtaḥ|<!--
Note that nr̥ṇām is legitimate (and was left uncorrected above), but here it would be unmetrical and nr̥̄ṇām is required for the metre.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="20" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">ity evam etān adhikān ato nyān</l>
<l n="b">guṇān par<unclear>ī</unclear>kṣya svayam eva pitrā|</l>
<l n="c">yaḥ saṁniyukto nagarasya rakṣāṁ</l>
<l n="d">viśiṣya pūrvān pracakāra samyaK|<!--
L12. The facsimile is useless, so I can only assume that we have a halanta K here.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="21" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="13"/>Āśritya v<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>ryaṁ <unclear cert="low">sva-bhuja</unclear>-dvayasya<!--
Bhandarkar reads (uncertainly) subhuja. Agrawala (Sircar?) has svabhuja, which is far more plausible.
--></l>
<l n="b">svasyaiva nānyasya narasya darpaṁ|</l>
<l n="c">nodvejayām āsa ca kaṁcid evam</l>
<l n="d">asmin pure caiva śaśāsa <choice><sic>duṣṭāḥ</sic><corr>duṣṭān</corr></choice>|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="22" met="upajāti"><!--
Agrawala (but not Bhandarkar) gives indravajrā as the metre of this verse, but I prefer to just use upajāti even for pure indra/upendra metres, especially in such a long upajāti passage. Also, v21 above is also indravajrā in the first 3 lines, but the 4th is an upendra line - so Chabra's conjecture is metrically sound.
-->
<l n="a">viśrabdham alpena śaśāsa yo smin</l>
<l n="b">kālena lokeṣu sa-nāgareṣu|<!--
I follow Bhandarkar's reading here. Agrawala (Sircar?) reads visraṁbham alpe na śaśāma yo smin kāle na lokeṣu. Need to CHECK original; what seems most plausible to me would be to read viśrambham (note ś vs s and m vs ṁ), and follow Bhandarkar in interpreting the rest.
--></l>
<l n="c">yo lālayām āsa ca paura-vargān</l>
<l n="d"><seg met="=+-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg> putrān su-parīkṣya doṣāN|<!--
For the lacuna, Bhandarkar (Fleet?) conjectures svān eva, which doesn't look very good (eva for iva?). His editor (Chabra?) offers piteva instead, which is plausible. Agrawala (Sircar?) conjectures svasyeva, which is OK but feels a bit awkward.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="23" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">saṁraṁjayāṁ ca prakr̥tīr babhūva</l>
<l n="b">pūrva-smitābhāṣaṇa-māna-dānaiḥ|</l>
<l n="c"><lb n="14"/>niryantraṇānyonya-gr̥ha-praveśai<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ḥ</supplied></l>
<l n="d">saṁvarddhita-prīti-gr̥hopacāraiḥ|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="24" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">brahmaṇya-bhāvena pareṇa yuktaḥ</l>
<l n="b">śaklaḥ śucir dāna-paro yathāvaT|</l>
<l n="c">prāpyān sa kāle viṣayān siṣeve</l>
<l n="d">dharmārthayoś cā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->py a</supplied>virodhanena|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="25" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">yo <seg met="+-++--"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg> parṇadattāt</l>
<l n="b">sa nyāyavān atra kim asti citraṁ|</l>
<l n="c">muktā-kalāpāmbuja-padma-śītāc</l>
<l n="d">candrāt kim uṣṇaṁ bhavitā kadāciT|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="26" met="vaṁśastha">
<l n="a"><lb n="15"/>Athā krameṇāmbuda-kāla Āgat<unclear>e</unclear><!--
Bühler 1891:220-221n3 argues for reading āgato, taking ambudakāla as nominative. He feels toyaṁ cannot be the subject of an intransitively used vavarṣa, but admits that varṣaṁ varṣati is attested in such a construction.
--></l>
<l n="b">n<unclear>i</unclear>dāgha-kālaṁ pravidārya toyadaiḥ|</l>
<l n="c">vavarṣa toyaṁ bahu saṁtataṁ ciraṁ</l>
<l n="d">sudarśanaṁ yena bibheda cātvarāT|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="27" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">saṁvatsarāṇām adhike śate tu</l>
<l n="b">triṁśadbhir anyair api ṣaḍbhir eva|</l>
<l n="c">rātrau dine prauṣṭhapadasya ṣaṣṭhe</l>
<l n="d">gupta-prakāle gaṇanāṁ vidhāya|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="28" met="vaṁśastha">
<l n="a"><lb n="16"/>Imāś ca yā raivatakād vinirgatā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ḥ</supplied></l>
<l n="b">palāśinīyaṁ sikatā-vilāsinī|</l>
<l n="c">samudra-kāntāḥ cira-bandhanoṣitāḥ</l>
<l n="d">punaḥ patiṁ śāstra-yathocitaṁ yayuḥ|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="29" met="vaṁśastha">
<l n="a">avekṣya varṣāgama-jaṁ mahodbhramaṁ</l>
<l n="b">mahodadher ūrjayatā priyepsunā|</l>
<l n="c">Aneka-tīrānta-ja-puṣpa-śobhito</l>
<l n="d"><lb n="17"/>nadīmayo hasta Iva prasāritaḥ|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="30" met="vaṁśastha">
<l n="a">viṣādya<unclear>mānāḥ khalu sarvato ja</unclear>nāḥ</l>
<l n="b">kathaṁ kathaṁ kāryam iti pravādinaḥ|</l>
<l n="c">mitho hi pūrvāpara-rātram utthitā</l>
<l n="d">vicintayāṁ cāpi babhūvur utsukāḥ|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="31" met="vaṁśastha">
<l n="a">apīha loke sakale sudarśanaṁ</l>
<l n="b">pumā<choice><sic>ṁ</sic><corr>n</corr></choice> hi durdarśanatāṁ gataṁ kṣaṇāT|</l>
<l n="c"><lb n="18"/>bhaven nu sāmbho-nidhi-tulya-darśanaṁ<!--
Instead of sāmbhonidhi, Sircar reads so [+']mbhonidhi. I myself would expect yo [+']mbhonidhi but an autopsy is needed for this.
--></l>
<l n="d">su-darśanaṁ <seg met="+--+-+-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg> <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->||</supplied></l>
</lg>
<lg n="32" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><seg met="-+-++-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg> vaṇe sa bhūtvā</l>
<l n="b">pituḥ parāṁ bhaktim api pradarśya|</l>
<l n="c">dharmaṁ purodhāya śubhānubandhaṁ</l>
<l n="d">rājño hitārthaṁ nagarasya caiva|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="33" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">saṁvatsarāṇām adhike śate tu</l>
<l n="b"><lb n="19"/>triṁśadbhir anyair api saptabhiś ca|</l>
<l n="c">pra <seg met="+-++--"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg> śāstra-vettā<!--
Fleet read cettā here. Bhandarkar, Sircar and Agrawala all go for vettā, plausibly.
--></l>
<l n="d"><unclear cert="low">viśve</unclear> py anujñāta-mahā-prabhāvaḥ|<!--
Bhandarkar reads viśvo, uncertainly. Agrawala's (Sircar's?) viśve sounds more logical.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="34" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">ājya-praṇāmai<sic>ḥ</sic> vibudhān atheṣṭvā</l>
<l n="b">dhanair dvijātīn api tarpayitvā|</l>
<l n="c">paurāṁs tathābhyarcya yathārha-mānaiḥ</l>
<l n="d">bhr̥tyāṁś ca pūjyān suhr̥daś ca dānaiḥ|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="35" met="upajāti">
<l n="a"><lb n="20"/>graiṣmasya māsasya tu pūrva-pa<unclear>kṣe</unclear></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="-+-++"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg> <unclear>pra</unclear>thame hni samyaK|<!--
L20. The facsimile is useless, so I can only assume that we have a halanta K here.
--></l>
<l n="c">māsa-dvayenādaravān sa bhūtvā</l>
<l n="d">dhanasya kr̥tvā vyayam aprameyaM|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="36" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">āyāmato hasta-śataṁ samagraṁ</l>
<l n="b">vistārataḥ ṣaṣṭir athāpi cāṣṭau|</l>
<l n="c"><lb n="21"/>Utsedhato nyat puruṣāṇi <unclear cert="low">sapta</unclear></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="-+-+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="4" unit="character"/></seg> <unclear>ha</unclear>sta-śata-dvayasya|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="37" met="upajāti">
<l n="a">babandha yatnān mahatā nr̥devān</l>
<l n="b"><unclear cert="low">abhyarcya</unclear> samyag ghaṭitopalena|<!--
Bhandarkar construes samyag in comp with ghaṭita. Given that samyak seems to be a favourite fillup word of the poet, I think it's just an adverb. I have doubts about nr̥devān abhyarcya though, I'd expect something about construction here, not ritual.
--></l>
<l n="c">a-jāti-duṣṭa<sic>m</sic> prathitaṁ taṭākaṁ</l>
<l n="d">sudarśanaṁ śāśvata-kalpa-kālaM|</l>
</lg>
<lg n="38" met="mālinī">
<l n="a" enjamb="yes"><lb n="22"/>Api ca sudr̥ḍha-setu-prā<unclear cert="low">nta</unclear>-vinyasta-śobha</l>
<l n="b">-
ratha-caraṇa-samāhva-krauṁca-haṁsāsa-dhūtaM|</l>
<l n="c">vimala-salila <seg met="+++-++-++"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="9" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d">bhuvi ta <seg met="---+++"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg> da<seg type="component" subtype="consonant"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="component"/></seg><unclear>ā</unclear>rkaḥ śaśī ca|<!--
Sircar reads ne before rkaḥ. My conjecture would be to read yāvad arkaḥ śaśī ca, but need to check original to see if it fits what we have.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="39" met="mālinī">
<l n="a"><lb n="23"/>nagaram api ca bhūyād vr̥ddhimat-paura-juṣṭaṁ<!--
Bhandarkar construes vr̥ddhimat as separate; I prefer to see it as in compound with paura.
--></l>
<l n="b">dvija-bahu-śata-gīta-brahma-nirnaṣṭa-pāpaṁ|</l>
<l n="c">śatam api ca samānām īti-durbhikṣa <seg met="+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="------+++-++-++"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="15" unit="character"/></seg> <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->||</supplied></l>
</lg>
<p><unclear>iti suda</unclear>rśana-taṭāka-saṁskāra-graṁtha-racanā <unclear>sa</unclear>māptā||
</p>
</div>
<div type="apparatus">
<listApp>
<app loc="line">
<lem/>
<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
</app>
</listApp>
</div>
<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
</div>
<div type="commentary">
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<p/>
<listBibl type="primary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>
Commentary