Maṇḍapa pillar from site 12 at Nagarjunakonda

Editors: Anonymous editor.

Identifier: DHARMA_INSEIAD00069.

Language: Prakrit.

Repository: Early Andhra (tfb-eiad-epigraphy).

Version: (9fa90aa), last modified (35386f0).

Edition

⟨1⟩ [3+]⟨Fragment left⟩[1×][2+](sa) ⟨Fragment right⟩[3+] ⟨2⟩ [2+][da]⟨Fragment left⟩tasa saṁvachara(ṁ) ⟨Fragment right⟩[3+] ⟨3⟩ gīmhapakhaṁ bitiyaṁ divasaṁ paḍhamaṁ 1(s)[i]⟨4⟩ripavate vijayapuriya puvadisābhā⟨5⟩ge vihāre cu(la)dhaṁmagiriyaṁ °acaṁtarājā⟨6⟩cariyānaṁ sakasamayaparasamaya(su)-

Apparatus

⟨1⟩ [2+][1×][2+](sa)…. Sircarm.

⟨3⟩ gīmhapakhaṁ ⬦ gimhapakhaṁ Sircarm.

⟨3-4⟩ (s)[i]ripavate ⬦ (si)ripavate Sircarm.

⟨6⟩ sakasamayaparasamaya(su)- ⬦ sakasamayaparasamayasa Sircarm.

Translation

In year ? of ...data ..., in the second fortnight of summer, on the first — 1st — day. In Siripavvata (Śrīparvata), in the monastery on the Culadhamma hill in the eastern part of Vijayapurī, to the supreme teachers of kings, (who distinguish?) well (between?) their own standpoint (samaya) and the standpoint of others …

Commentary

The inscription abruptly ends at the end of l. 6 and the other two sides of the pillar (the fourth side is hollowed and stood against a wall) do not contain any inscribed text.

(5) °acaṁtarājā-1

(6) sakasamayaparasamaya-2

Bibliography

First edited by Sircarm. Re-edited here from the available documentation and after autopsy of the stone.

Secondary

No name. 1887–. Annual report on Indian epigraphy. Madras; Calcutta; New Delhi: Government of Madras; Archaeological Survey of India. Pages 1954–55: B.10.

No name. N.d. Indian Archaeology: a review. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India. Pages 1954–55: 22.

Rama_Rao1955b

Srinivasan1979a

Raghunath2001

Soundara_Rajan2006

Tournier2018

Notes

  1. 1. See our note on this word under EIAD 20, l. 1.
  2. 2. Sircarm, who reads sakasamayaparasamayasa- suggests to reconstruct -samyakpāraga-, which is unlikely. He also did not identify literary parallels to this expression. Our understanding of this pair of notions is informed by the passage shared by Visuddhimagga 522 and Vibhaṅga-aṭṭakathā 130, and discussed in Cousins2001. For a lenghtier discussion, see Tournier2018, who argues this series of titles point to Theriya-Vibhajjavādins monks.