Damodarpur Charter 2 of Budhagupta
Version: (e9ba9b6), last modified (914ca07).
Edition
Seal
⟨1⟩ […]
Plates
⟨Page 1r⟩
⟨1⟩ [****] phālguna di 10 (5) parama-daivata-parama-bhaṭṭāraka mahārājādhirāja-śrī-(vudha)[gu]pt[e pr̥thivī]-
⟨2⟩ -[patau tat-pā]da-parigr̥hītasya puṇḍravarddhana-bhuktāv uparika-mahārāja-jayadattasya bhogenānu(vahamā)-
⟨3⟩ nake (ko)ṭi(varṣṣa)-viṣaye ca tan-niyuktaka Āyuktaka-bhaṇḍake Adhiṣṭhānādhikaraṇa[ṁ] nagara-śreṣṭhi-ribhu-
⟨4⟩ pāla-sārttha-vāha-vasumittra-prathama-kulika-varadatta-prathama-kāyastha-viprapāla-puroge ca sa(mv)y(a)vaharati
⟨5⟩ Anena śreṣṭhi-¿ri?bhupālena vijñāpitaṁ⟨.⟩ himavac-chikhare kokāmukha-svāminaḥ catvāraḥ kulya-vāpāḥ (śve)ta-va-
⟨6⟩ rāha-svāmino pi sapta kulya-vāpāḥ Asmat-phalāśa¿n?sinā pu¿n?yābhivr̥ddhaye doṅgāgrāme pūrvvaṁ mayā
⟨7⟩ Apradā Atisr̥ṣṭakās⟨.⟩ tad aha¿n? tat-kṣettra-sāmīpya-bhūmau tayor ādya-kokāmukha-svāmi-śvetavarāha-
⟨8⟩ -svāminor-nā(ma)l-liṅga-(kṣoṇī)-deva-kula-dvayam etat koṣṭhikā-dvayañ ca kārayitum icchāmy⟨.⟩ Arhatha vāstuno
⟨9⟩ ṣaṭ-(kulya)-vāpān yathā-kraya-maryyādayā dātum iti yataḥ pustapāla-viṣṇudatta-vijaya(nandi)-sthā¿n?u-
⟨10⟩ nandinām avadhāraṇayāvadhr̥tam asty anena himavac-chikhare tayoḥ kokāmukha-svāmi-śvetavarā(ha)-svāmi(noḥ)
⟨11⟩ Apra(dāḥ) kṣetra-kulya-vāpā Ekādaśa dattakās⟨.⟩ tad-artthañ ceha deva-kula-koṣṭhikā-karaṇe yukta(m e)ta(d vijñā)-
⟨12⟩ (pitaṁ kra)meṇa tat-kṣe(ttra)-sāmīpya-bhūmau vāstu dātum ity anuvr̥tta-tri-dīnārikya-ku(lya-vā)pa-vikraya-(maryyā)da-
⟨Page 1v⟩
⟨13⟩ [yā] […] rā kulana […] (rā ga ra) […]
⟨14⟩ […] pu(ṣkari)ṇī pū(rvveṇa) ribhu(pā)la-pū[rvva-datta-kṣetraṁ] (dakṣiṇena) [pañca]
⟨15⟩ [kulya-vāpā] dattāḥ⟨.⟩ (ta)d uttara-kālaṁ (saṁ)vyavahāribhir ddeva-bha(ktyā)numantavyā⟨ḥ⟩⟨.⟩ (Uktaṁ) vyāsena sva-dattāṁ para-dattā-
⟨16⟩ (m vā) (yo hareta) vasundharāM sa viṣṭhā(yāṁ) k¿ri?mi(r bbhūtvā) pi(tr̥)bhis sa(ha pacyate) pūrvva-dattāṁ dvijātibhyo
⟨17⟩ (yatnād rakṣa yu)dhiṣṭhira mahīṁ (mahīmatāṁ) śreṣṭha dā(nāc chreyo nu)pālanaṁ (bahu)bhir vvasu(dhā da)ttā
⟨18⟩ (rājabhiś ca) punaḥ punaḥ (ya)sya (ya)sya yadā bhūmi(s) (tasya tasya) ta(dā) phalam iti
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Damodarpur Charter 2 of Budhagupta</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Original EpiDoc Encoding for Siddham</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp>Conversion of encoding for DHARMA</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp>intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>DHARMA</authority>
<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00046</idno>
<!--
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier>
-->
<availability>
<licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit thttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.</p>
<p>Copyright (c) 2019-2025 by Dániel Balogh.</p>
</licence>
</availability>
<date from="2019" to="2025">2019-2025</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<msDesc>
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/>
</msIdentifier>
<msContents>
<summary/>
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p/>
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<projectDesc>
<p>The project DHARMA has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC)
under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant
agreement no 809994).</p>
</projectDesc>
<schemaRef type="guide" key="EGDv01" url="https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02888186"/>
<listPrefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="bib" matchPattern="([a-zA-Z0-9\-\_]+)" replacementPattern="https://www.zotero.org/groups/1633743/erc-dharma/items/tag/$1">
<p>Public URIs with the prefix bib to point to a Zotero Group Library named
ERC-DHARMA whose data are open to the public.</p>
</prefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="part" matchPattern="([a-z]+)" replacementPattern="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/DHARMA_IdListMembers_v01.xml#$1">
<p>Internal URIs using the part prefix to point to person elements in the
<ref>DHARMA_IdListMembers_V01.xml</ref> file.</p>
</prefixDef>
</listPrefixDef>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
<change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
<change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">
<div type="textpart" n="A"><head xml:lang="eng">Seal</head><!--
The seal inscription was probably similar to that of IN00056.
--><ab><lb n="1"/><gap reason="illegible" extent="unknown" unit="character"/></ab>
</div>
<div type="textpart" n="B"><head xml:lang="eng">Plates</head>
<p><pb n="1r"/><lb n="1"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="4" unit="character"/> phālguna di <num value="15"><g type="numeral">10</g> <unclear>5</unclear></num> parama-daivata-parama-bhaṭṭāraka mahārājādhirāja-śrī-<unclear>vudha</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->gu</supplied>pt<supplied reason="lost">e pr̥thivī</supplied><lb n="2" break="no"/>-<supplied reason="lost">patau tat-pā</supplied>da-parigr̥hītasya puṇḍravarddhana-bhuktāv uparika-mahārāja-jayadattasya bhogenānu<unclear>vahamā</unclear><lb n="3" break="no"/>nake <unclear>ko</unclear>ṭi<unclear>varṣṣa</unclear>-viṣaye ca tan-niyuktaka Āyuktaka-bhaṇḍake Adhiṣṭhānādhikaraṇa<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ṁ</supplied> nagara-śreṣṭhi-ribhu<lb n="4" break="no"/>pāla-sārttha-vāha-vasumittra-prathama-kulika-varadatta-prathama-kāyastha-viprapāla-puroge ca sa<unclear>mv</unclear>y<unclear>a</unclear>vaharati<!--
In line A.3 instead of tanniyuktaka āyuktaka, Basak (Agrawala likewise) reads tanniyuktakehāyuktaka. Basak emends to tanniyuktaka ihāyuktaka (or °ke ihā°); Agrawala remarks that this is unnecessary. Does Agrawala want to construe tanniyuktaka in compound with iha? Would be strange. The facsimile is illegible; I follow Bhandarkar.
--><!--
Still in A3, I again follow Bhandarkar in reading bhaṇḍaka. Basak reads śaṇḍaka and notes that it could also be gaṇḍaka (Agrawala likewise). See also line A.4 of %IN00056.
--><!--
For the supplied anusvāra after adhikaraṇa, again see %IN00056, line A.4.
--></p>
<p><lb n="5"/>Anena śreṣṭhi-<sic>ri</sic>bhupālena vijñāpitaṁ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> himavac-chikhare kokāmukha-svāminaḥ catvāraḥ kulya-vāpāḥ <unclear>śve</unclear>ta-va<lb n="6" break="no"/>rāha-svāmino pi sapta kulya-vāpāḥ Asmat-phalāśa<sic>n</sic>sinā pu<sic>n</sic>yābhivr̥ddhaye doṅgāgrāme pūrvvaṁ mayā <lb n="7"/>Apradā Atisr̥ṣṭakās<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> tad aha<sic>n</sic> tat-kṣettra-sāmīpya-bhūmau tayor ādya-kokāmukha-svāmi-śvetavarāha<lb n="8" break="no"/>-svāminor-nā<unclear>ma</unclear>l-liṅga-<unclear>kṣoṇī</unclear>-deva-kula-dvayam etat koṣṭhikā-dvayañ ca kārayitum icchāmy<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Arhatha vāstuno <lb n="9"/>ṣaṭ-<unclear>kulya</unclear>-vāpān yathā-kraya-maryyādayā dātum iti<!--
In A6, Agrawala has asmatphalāśansino instead of °śansinā. Basak's reading is °no, emended to °nā. Bhandarkar translates "hoping for eternal benefit" (qualifying mayā), but where does eternal come from? Basak's translation is "in the hope of benefit to myself." The characters a and sma look quite illegible to me; tpha is quite clear (did Agrawala read śaśvatphala?).
--><!--
About ādya in A7, Bhandarkar (1981:343) notes that it may imply that the gods in question were natural rock formations. He may be right, but to me ādya seems more likely to mean "the above," i.e. to those same gods, sort of like eva.
--><!--
In A8, Basak reads nāmalliṅgam ekaṁ and translates "(and?) one nāmaliṅgam(?)".I follow Bhandarkar, who translates "with the subtile Earth-bowing (in front)". The hyphen may be a typo here. He explains (p343) that the location may have been held to be the one where Varāha pulled the earth out with his tusk, hence the earth is described as liṅga, subtile. Sounds tacky, and he does not explain why nāmat means namat, nor does he emend. I have nothing better though; on the facsimile I can't make out anything before devakula, except the I of svāminor. Agrawala notes that Sircar emends to °liṅgam etad.
--><!--
In A8-9, Basak reads vāstuno saha kulya° and translates "kulyavāpas with vāstu (building-grounds)". Bhandarkar translates "six kulyavāpas of building site." A number would certainly be expected here and I find saha+genitive strange.
--></p>
<p>yataḥ pustapāla-viṣṇudatta-vijaya<unclear>nandi</unclear>-sthā<sic>n</sic>u<lb n="10" break="no"/>nandinām avadhāraṇayāvadhr̥tam asty anena himavac-chikhare tayoḥ kokāmukha-svāmi-śvetavarā<unclear>ha</unclear>-svāmi<unclear>noḥ</unclear> <lb n="11"/>Apra<unclear>dāḥ</unclear> kṣetra-kulya-vāpā Ekādaśa dattakās<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> tad-artthañ ceha deva-kula-koṣṭhikā-karaṇe yukta<unclear>m e</unclear>ta<unclear>d vijñā</unclear><lb n="12" break="no"/><unclear>pitaṁ kra</unclear>meṇa tat-kṣe<unclear>ttra</unclear>-sāmīpya-bhūmau vāstu dātum ity anuvr̥tta-tri-dīnārikya-ku<unclear>lya-vā</unclear>pa-vikraya-<unclear>maryyā</unclear>da<pb n="1v" break="no"/><lb n="13" break="no"/><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->yā</supplied> <gap reason="illegible" extent="unknown" unit="character"/> rā kulana <gap reason="illegible" extent="unknown" unit="character"/> <unclear>rā ga ra</unclear> <gap reason="illegible" extent="unknown" unit="character"/>
<lb n="14"/><gap reason="illegible" extent="unknown" unit="character"/> pu<unclear>ṣkari</unclear>ṇī pū<unclear>rvveṇa</unclear> ribhu<unclear>pā</unclear>la-pū<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->rvva-datta-kṣetraṁ</supplied> <unclear>dakṣiṇena</unclear> <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->pañca</supplied>
<lb n="15"/><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->kulya-vāpā</supplied> dattāḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> <unclear>ta</unclear>d uttara-kālaṁ <unclear>saṁ</unclear>vyavahāribhir ddeva-bha<unclear>ktyā</unclear>numantavyā<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied><supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> <unclear>Uktaṁ</unclear> vyāsena</p>
<lg n="1" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">sva-dattāṁ para-dattā<lb n="16" break="no"/><unclear>m vā</unclear></l>
<l n="b"><unclear>yo hareta</unclear> vasundharāM</l>
<l n="c">sa viṣṭhā<unclear>yāṁ</unclear> k<sic>ri</sic>mi<unclear>r bbhūtvā</unclear></l>
<l n="d">pi<unclear>tr̥</unclear>bhis sa<unclear>ha pacyate</unclear><!--
Basak prints viṣṭāyāṁ. Agrawala does likewise and emends to viṣṭhāyāṁ. Bhandarkar just prints the latter and I agree; I don't think the plates are in a good enough condition for us to assume an erronenous spelling. At the end of this line, clear vs unclear characters are shown in almost the exact opposite way in Basak (similarly Agrawala) than they are in Bhandarkar. I follow Basak; myself, I can't make out anything.
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="2" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">pūrvva-dattāṁ dvijātibhyo</l>
<l n="b"><lb n="17"/><unclear>yatnād rakṣa yu</unclear>dhiṣṭhira</l>
<l n="c">mahīṁ <unclear>mahīmatāṁ</unclear> śreṣṭha</l>
<l n="d">dā<unclear>nāc chreyo nu</unclear>pālanaṁ</l>
</lg>
<lg n="3" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><unclear>bahu</unclear>bhir vvasu<unclear>dhā da</unclear>ttā</l>
<l n="b"><lb n="18"/><unclear>rājabhiś ca</unclear> punaḥ punaḥ</l>
<l n="c"><unclear>ya</unclear>sya <unclear>ya</unclear>sya yadā bhūmi<unclear>s</unclear></l>
<l n="d"><unclear>tasya tasya</unclear> ta<unclear>dā</unclear> phalam</l>
</lg>
<ab>iti</ab>
</div>
</div>
<div type="apparatus">
<listApp>
<app loc="line">
<lem/>
<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
</app>
</listApp>
</div>
<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
</div>
<div type="commentary">
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<p/>
<listBibl type="primary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
<bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>