Đại Hữu pedestal fragment (C. 171)
Editors: Arlo Griffiths, Dániel Balogh.
Identifier: DHARMA_INSCIC00171.
Hand description:
Languages: Old Cham, Sanskrit.
Repository: Campa (tfc-campa-epigraphy).
Version: (f09bb86), last modified (14faddc).
Edition
⟨A1⟩
[ca. 5+]
I. Āryā
[4|4|4|4|4|4|4|⏕]
ab[4|4|4|4|⏕](ca)ñcalā buddhiḥ
cdII. Vasantatilakā
yasya prajāsu sutarāṁ kr̥⟨A2⟩[⏑–⏑–⏓]
a[––⏑–⏑⏑⏑–⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
b[––⏑–⏑⏑⏑–⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
c[––⏑–⏑⏑⏑–⏑⏑–⏑–⏓]
dIII. Anuṣṭubh
[bhā]ṇḍāgārādhikāro ’yaṁ
atasya bhr̥tyaḥ prasā⟨A3⟩[–⏓]
b[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓]
c[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
dIV. Anuṣṭubh
[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓]
a[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
b[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓]
c[⏑]nt(aṁ) yat puṇyavarddhanam·◯
dV. Anuṣṭubh
ratnalokeśvaro yena
a⟨B1⟩ sthāpito rajatātmakaḥ
bvr̥ddhe ratnapure śā[⏓]
c[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
dVI. Anuṣṭubh
[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓]
a[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
b[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓]
c[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
dVII. Anuṣṭubh
[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓]
a⟨B2⟩ hjai-traṅ·-kṣetraṁ juṅā-pure
bcvaḥ-sirāla(ya)[––⏓]
c[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
dVIII. Anuṣṭubh
[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓]
a[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
b[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑––⏓]
c[⏓⏓⏓⏓⏑–⏑⏓]
d⟨B3⟩ ⟨⟨◯⟩⟩m an-upama-matiḥ śrīmāñ jayasiṅhavarmmadevo (’ya)[…]
Apparatus
⟨A2⟩ tasya ⬦ tasyā FG.
⟨A3⟩ nt(aṁ) yat ⬦ ntayat FG • It seems the stone has suffered a little bit of damage at the left extremity, so that the akṣara ntaṁ is now entirely lost, and can be read only from the estampage.
⟨B2⟩ cvaḥ ⬦ (dvaḥ?) FG.
⟨B3⟩ ⟨⟨◯⟩⟩m anupama- ⬦ manupāma- FG • A symbol, ignored by Finot & Goloubew, seems to be squashed below the ma at line opening.
Translation
Bibliography
First edited by Finot & Goloubew (1925). Re-edited and here by Dániel Balogh & Arlo Griffiths from the estampages EFEO n. 507 and photographs of the stone.
Primary
[FG] Finot, Louis and Victor Goloubew. 1925. “Fouilles de Đại-hưu.” BEFEO 25, pp. 469–475. DOI: 10.3406/befeo.1925.3065. [URL]. Pages 472–474.
Secondary
Golzio, Karl-Heinz. 2004. Inscriptions of Campā: Based on the editions and translations of Abel Bergaigne, Étienne Aymonier, Louis Finot, Édouard Huber and other French scholars and of the work of R. C. Majumdar; newly presented, with minor corrections of texts and translations, together with calculations of given dates. Aachen: Shaker Verlag. Page 93.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Đại Hữu pedestal fragment (C. 171)</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>EpiDoc encoding</resp>
<persName ref="part:argr">
<forename>Arlo</forename>
<surname>Griffiths</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp>intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
<persName ref="part:argr">
<forename>Arlo</forename>
<surname>Griffiths</surname>
</persName>
<persName ref="part:daba">
<forename>Dániel</forename>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>DHARMA</authority>
<pubPlace>Lyon</pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSCIC00171</idno>
<availability>
<licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported
Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to
Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View,
California, 94041, USA.</p>
<p>Copyright (c) 2019-2025 by Arlo Griffiths & Dániel Balogh.</p>
</licence>
</availability>
<date from="2019" to="2025">2019-2025</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><!-- only the handDesc can be filled in at this stage -->
<msDesc><!-- //// NB: the msIdentifier had to be added for validation purposes ///. It will be edited later with the metadata spreadsheet -->
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/>
<!-- don't modify this -->
</msIdentifier>
<msContents><!-- describe the intellectual content of an inscription -->
<summary><!-- //// NOT MANDATORY ////--></summary>
<!-- offers the possibility to give a summary of the inscription's content -->
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p><!-- The script name(s) will be inserted here at a later stage from the metadata spreasheet. At this stage, you can mention here in a free-text paragraph any characteristics of the writing observed more than once in this inscription that seem unusual/uncommon or otherwise noteworthy given the general characteristics of the script in question. See EGD 11.2. --></p>
<!-- If you need to identify individual hands (EGD §7.5/) in addition to one or more paragraphs of general palaeographic description, wrap <summary> around the <p> or <p>s above, and, outside <summary>, create <handNote> elements for each hand as follows:
<summary><p><p/></summary>
<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand1"></handNote>
<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand2"></handNote>
-->
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<projectDesc>
<p>The project DHARMA has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC)
under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant
agreement no 809994).</p>
</projectDesc>
<schemaRef type="guide" key="EGDv01" url="https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02888186"/>
<listPrefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="bib" matchPattern="([a-zA-Z0-9\-\_]+)" replacementPattern="https://www.zotero.org/groups/1633743/erc-dharma/items/tag/$1">
<p>Public URIs with the prefix bib to point to a Zotero Group Library named
ERC-DHARMA whose data are open to the public.</p>
</prefixDef>
<prefixDef ident="part" matchPattern="([a-z]+)" replacementPattern="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/DHARMA_IdListMembers_v01.xml#$1">
<p>Internal URIs using the part prefix to point to person elements in the
<ref>DHARMA_IdListMembers_v01.xml</ref> file.</p>
</prefixDef>
</listPrefixDef>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:argr" when="2020-11-16" status="draft">finished initial encoding of the inscription — translation remains to be added</change>
<change who="part:axja" when="2020-11-03" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
<change who="part:argr" when="2020-10-20" status="draft">started initial encoding of the inscription</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83233 maturity:00000">
<lb n="A1"/><ab><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="5" precision="low"/></ab>
<lg n="1" met="āryā"><certainty match="../@met" locus="value"/>
<l n="ab"><seg met="4|4|4|4|4|4|4|2"><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="30" precision="low"/></seg></l>
<l n="cd"><seg met="4|4|4|4|2"><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="12" precision="low"/></seg><unclear>ca</unclear>ñcalā buddhiḥ<space/></l>
</lg>
<!-- argr2daba: unsure
- how to encode the gap and the meter of this presumptive first stanza,
- whether I should indeed add the totally lost prose <ab> before it, though I think you're right there must have been one
-->
<!--daba2argr:
2. I see no harm in encoding the hypothetical lost prose and discussing this in the commentary for human readers. If you wanted to be really meticulous, you could add a <certainty match=".." locus="name"/> inside that gap as per EGD §5.4.6, but then we'd have to change the EGD to permit this not only for whole lines but also for other possible gaps.
-->
<lg n="2" met="vasantatilakā"><!-- ––⏑–⏑⏑⏑–⏑⏑–⏑–⏓ -->
<l n="a">yasya prajāsu sutarāṁ kr̥<lb n="A2" break="no"/><seg met="-+-+="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="5"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="++-+---+--+-+="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="14"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="++-+---+--+-+="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="14"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="++-+---+--+-+="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="14"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="3" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><supplied reason="lost">bhā</supplied>ṇḍāgārādhikāro ’yaṁ<space/></l>
<l n="b">tasya bhr̥tyaḥ prasā<lb n="A3" break="no"/><seg met="+="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="2"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="4" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="-"><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="1"/></seg>nt<unclear>aṁ</unclear> yat puṇyavarddhanam·<g type="eye">.</g>
<!-- argr2daba: do you have a suggestion for naming this punctuation sign? -->
<!--daba2argr: seems to be a perfect case of "circleConcentric" as per the current Taxonomy. We've let that lie, but I still think we should aim for relatively small number of species in that taxonomy (such as "circle" in this case), instead of a large number of imaginative names such as "eye".-->
<!-- argr2daba: see image and comment pasted into taxonomy file--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="5" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">ratnalokeśvaro yena</l>
<l n="b"><lb n="B1"/>sthāpito rajatātmakaḥ<space/></l>
<l n="c">vr̥ddhe ratnapure śā<seg met="="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="1"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="6" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="7" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><lb n="B2"/><foreign xml:lang="ocm-Latn">hjai-traṅ·</foreign>-kṣetraṁ <foreign xml:lang="ocm-Latn">juṅā</foreign>-pure<space/></l>
<l n="c"><foreign xml:lang="ocm-Latn">cvaḥ-sirā</foreign>la<unclear>ya</unclear><seg met="++="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="3"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<lg n="8" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="b"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="c"><seg met="====-++="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="lost" unit="character" quantity="8"/></seg></l>
</lg>
<p><lb n="B3"/><add place="below"><g type="eye"/></add>m an-upama-matiḥ <space/> śrīmāñ jayasiṅhavarmmadevo <unclear>’ya</unclear><gap reason="lost" extent="unknown" unit="character"/></p>
</div>
<div type="apparatus">
<listApp>
<app loc="A2">
<lem>tasya</lem>
<rdg source="bib:Finot+Goloubew1925_01">tasyā</rdg>
</app>
<app loc="A3">
<lem>nt<unclear>aṁ</unclear> yat</lem>
<rdg source="bib:Finot+Goloubew1925_01">ntayat</rdg>
<note>It seems the stone has suffered a little bit of damage at the left extremity, so that the akṣara <foreign>ntaṁ</foreign> is now entirely lost, and can be read only from the estampage.</note>
</app>
<app loc="B2">
<lem>cvaḥ</lem>
<rdg source="bib:Finot+Goloubew1925_01"><unclear cert="low">dvaḥ</unclear></rdg>
</app>
<app loc="B3">
<lem><add place="below"><g type="eye"/></add>m anupama-</lem>
<rdg source="bib:Finot+Goloubew1925_01">manupāma-</rdg>
<note>A symbol, ignored by Finot & Goloubew, seems to be squashed below the <foreign>ma</foreign> at line opening.</note>
</app>
</listApp>
</div>
<div type="translation">
<!--translation encoded as per EGD §9.2 -->
</div>
<div type="commentary">
<p>Finot & Goloubew observe that <q xml:lang="fra">Le texte subsistant ne doit guère représenter que le quart de l'inscription totale</q> and that <q>Il paraît être rédigé en çlokas</q> (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Finot+Goloubew1925_01"/><citedRange unit="page">472</citedRange></bibl>). The second claim is not confirmed by the more precise metrical analysis presented here. Our reconstruction of the lost text is based on the assumption that the text would have been more or less symmetrically distributed over the two sides of a pedestal, the conduit for libation fluids marking the transition from the first part (A) to the second (B). Part A of the text would have begun on either near the middle of the vertical face straight across the pedestal from the conduit, or in the far left corner viewed from the conduit; part B would have ended on back at the same point on the vertical face across the conduit, or in the far right corner. One line of text would, in each part, have extended over about 65 akṣaras. ]</p>
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<p>First edited by Finot & Goloubew (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Finot+Goloubew1925_01"/></bibl>). Re-edited and here by Dániel Balogh & Arlo Griffiths from the estampages EFEO n. 507 and photographs of the stone.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
<bibl n="FG"><ptr target="bib:Finot+Goloubew1925_01"/><citedRange unit="page">472-474</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
<bibl>
<ptr target="bib:Golzio2004_01"/>
<citedRange unit="page">93</citedRange>
</bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>
<!--
BTLS Hanoi LSb 21179.
Planches LVIa et LVIb dans BEFEO XXV.
-->
Commentary
Finot & Goloubew observe that “Le texte subsistant ne doit guère représenter que le quart de l’inscription totale” and that “Il paraît être rédigé en çlokas” (1925, p. 472). The second claim is not confirmed by the more precise metrical analysis presented here. Our reconstruction of the lost text is based on the assumption that the text would have been more or less symmetrically distributed over the two sides of a pedestal, the conduit for libation fluids marking the transition from the first part (A) to the second (B). Part A of the text would have begun on either near the middle of the vertical face straight across the pedestal from the conduit, or in the far left corner viewed from the conduit; part B would have ended on back at the same point on the vertical face across the conduit, or in the far right corner. One line of text would, in each part, have extended over about 65 akṣaras. ]