Gift of Lōkama at Bhairavakoṇḍa
Version: (4f56646), last modified (dde297c).
Edition
⟨1⟩ sŕī goyindapoṟēri manmaṟāḷu
⟨2⟩ [*]japoṟēri kuntuṞ (lō)kama
⟨3⟩ nilpina stānaṁbu
Apparatus
⟨1⟩ goyindapoṟēri • K. M. Sastri enumerates this name in the list of orthographical errors in the inscriptions. He regards gōyindapōṟēri to be the correct spelling (Sastri 1969, p. 277).
Translation by Sastri 1969
The gift endowed by Lōkama, daughter of ..japoṟēri, and grand-daughter of Śrī Goyindapoṟēri.
Translation
The place (stānaṁbu) (was) established by Lōkama, the daughter of (Kū)japōṟēru (and) grand-daughter of Gōyindapōṟēru.
Bibliography
The inscription was noted in the Annual Report and first published by J. Ramayya Pantulu without translation and picture. K. M. Sastri republished the inscription based on Ramayya Pantulu’s edition together with a translation.
Primary
[S] Sastri, Korada Mahadeva. 1969. Historical grammar of Telugu with special reference to Old Telugu c. 200 B.C. - 1000 A.D. Anantapur: Sri Venkateswara Univ. Pages 283–284, item 5.
Secondary
ARIE 1921–22. Annual report on Indian epigraphy for the year 1921-1922. Edited by G. Venkoba Rao. Madras: Government Press, 1923. Appendix C/1922, page 79, item 281.
Ramayya Pantulu, Jayanti. 1948. South-Indian inscriptions (texts). Volume X: Telugu inscriptions from the Madras Presidency. South Indian Inscriptions 10. Delhi: Manager of Publications. Page 20, item 56.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Gift of Lōkama at Bhairavakoṇḍa</title>
<respStmt>
<resp key="contributor">EpiDoc Encoding</resp>
<persName ref="part:jeth">
<forename>Jens Christian</forename>
<surname>Thomas</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
<respStmt>
<resp key="creator">intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
<persName>
<forename>J.</forename>
<surname>Ramayya Pantulu</surname>
</persName>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
<pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
<idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSTelugu00011.xml</idno>
<availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
<date from="2019" to="2025">2019-2025</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><!-- only the handDesc can be filled in at this stage -->
<msDesc><!-- //// NB: the msIdentifier had to be added for validation purposes ///. It will be edited later with the metadata spreadsheet -->
<msIdentifier>
<repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
<idno/>
<!-- don't modify this -->
</msIdentifier>
<msContents><!-- describe the intellectual content of an inscription -->
<summary>The inscription refers to a donation that was given by Lōkama, daughter of (Kū)japōṟēru and grand-daughter of Gōyindapōṟēru.</summary>
<!-- offers the possibility to give a summary of the inscription's content -->
</msContents>
<physDesc>
<handDesc>
<p><!-- The script name(s) will be inserted here at a later stage from the metadata spreasheet. At this stage, you can mention here in a free-text paragraph any characteristics of the writing observed more than once in this inscription that seem unusual/uncommon or otherwise noteworthy given the general characteristics of the script in question. See EGD 11.2. --></p>
<!-- If you need to identify individual hands (EGD §7.5/) in addition to one or more paragraphs of general palaeographic description, wrap <summary> around the <p> or <p>s above, and, outside <summary>, create <handNote> elements for each hand as follows:
<summary><p><p/></summary>
<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand1"></handNote>
<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand2"></handNote>
-->
</handDesc>
</physDesc>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change who="part:jeth" when="2021-02-19" status="draft">Adding missing entries of template v03, minor additions</change>
<change who="part:axja" when="2020-11-03" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
<change who="part:jeth" when="2020-05-26" status="draft">Creation of the file</change>
<change who="part:jeth" when="2020-06-05" status="draft">Changes of the commentary</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:space="preserve">
<body>
<div type="edition" xml:lang="tel-Latn">
<p>
<lb n="1"/>sŕī goyindapoṟēri manmaṟāḷu
<lb n="2"/><gap reason="undefined" quantity="1" unit="character"/>japoṟēri kuntuṞ <unclear>lō</unclear>kama
<lb n="3"/>nilpina stānaṁbu
</p>
</div>
<div type="apparatus">
<listApp>
<app loc="1">
<lem>goyindapoṟēri</lem>
<note>K. M. Sastri enumerates this name in the list of orthographical errors in the inscriptions. He regards <foreign>gōyindapōṟēri</foreign> to be the correct spelling (<bibl><ptr target="bib:Sastri1969_01"/><citedRange unit="page">277</citedRange></bibl>).</note>
</app>
</listApp>
</div>
<div type="translation" source="bib:Sastri1969_01">
<p>
The gift endowed by Lōkama, daughter of ..japoṟēri, and grand-daughter of Śrī Goyindapoṟēri.
</p>
</div>
<div type="translation" resp="part:jeth">
<p>
The place (<foreign>stānaṁbu</foreign>) (was) established by Lōkama, the daughter of (Kū)japōṟēru (and) grand-daughter of Gōyindapōṟēru.
</p>
</div>
<div type="commentary">
<p>
It is not entirely clear whether the spelling <foreign>kuntuṞ lōkama</foreign> in Ramayya Pantulu's edition represents a <foreign>halanta</foreign> ‹Ṟ› or is a simplified visual representation of a compound character.
Although there is no picture of the inscription in the edition and K. M. Sastri's republication the reading could be altered on the grounds of attested forms in other inscriptions.
If the element <foreign>gōyinda</foreign> is a variant of skt. <foreign>govinda</foreign> the length of the ‹ō› is probable.
The reading pōṟēri may be correct due to 1) similar attestations and 2) the etymology. Because of the absence of a graphemic differentiation between /o/ and /ō/ the spelling is ambivalent. 1) The element appears as part of names in <foreign>vasantipōṟi</foreign> (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:NilakantaSastri+Venkataramayya1947-1948_01"/><citedRange unit="page">235</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">42 G</citedRange></bibl>), <foreign>maṁkhipoṟṟiyāru</foreign> (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:NilakantaSastri+Venkataramayya1947-1948_01"/><citedRange unit="page">239</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">42 I</citedRange></bibl>), and <foreign>kūcapōṟiyāri</foreign>, <foreign>kūcapōṟiki</foreign> (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:NilakantaSastri+Venkataramayya1947-1948_01"/><citedRange unit="page">244</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">42 K</citedRange></bibl>).
Via Zvelebil’s rule the spelling <foreign>poṟṟi</foreign> indirectly points towards <foreign>pōṟi</foreign> as well. 2) The word <foreign>pōṟi</foreign> means ‘young’ (probably originally gender neutral) and corresponds to forms with long vowel in modern Telugu (like <foreign>pōṟigāṁḍu</foreign> ‘young man, boy’(<bibl><ptr target="bib:Sītārāmācāryulu1922_01"/><citedRange unit="page">534</citedRange></bibl>).
The incomplete name -japōṟēri could perhaps be complemented as *kūjapōṟēri; confer <bibl><ptr target="bib:NilakantaSastri+Venkataramayya1947-1948_01"/><citedRange unit="page">244</citedRange><citedRange unit="line">8-9</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">42 K</citedRange></bibl>. The female donor’s name is <foreign>lōkama</foreign> with the suffix -ama, probably from <foreign>amma</foreign> ‘mother’.
The inscription was found <cit><quote>[o]n top of a niche containing a liṅga</quote><bibl><ptr target="bib:ARIE1921-1922"/><citedRange unit="page">79</citedRange></bibl></cit>. This niche is probably referred to by <foreign>stānaṁbu</foreign>. The inscription is one of the fewer that mention a woman as donor.
</p>
</div>
<div type="bibliography">
<p>
The inscription was noted in the Annual Report and first published by J. Ramayya Pantulu without translation and picture.
K. M. Sastri republished the inscription based on Ramayya Pantulu's edition together with a translation.
</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
<bibl n="S"><ptr target="bib:Sastri1969_01"/><citedRange unit="page">283-284</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">5</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
<bibl><ptr target="bib:ARIE1921-1922"/><citedRange unit="appendix">C/1922</citedRange><citedRange unit="page">79</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">281</citedRange></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:RamayyaPantulu1948_01"/><citedRange unit="page">20</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">56</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>
Commentary
It is not entirely clear whether the spelling kuntuṞ lōkama in Ramayya Pantulu’s edition represents a halanta ‹Ṟ› or is a simplified visual representation of a compound character. Although there is no picture of the inscription in the edition and K. M. Sastri’s republication the reading could be altered on the grounds of attested forms in other inscriptions. If the element gōyinda is a variant of skt. govinda the length of the ‹ō› is probable. The reading pōṟēri may be correct due to 1) similar attestations and 2) the etymology. Because of the absence of a graphemic differentiation between /o/ and /ō/ the spelling is ambivalent. 1) The element appears as part of names in vasantipōṟi ([1956] 1947–1948, p. 235, № 42 G), maṁkhipoṟṟiyāru ([1956] 1947–1948, p. 239, № 42 I), and kūcapōṟiyāri, kūcapōṟiki ([1956] 1947–1948, p. 244, № 42 K). Via Zvelebil’s rule the spelling poṟṟi indirectly points towards pōṟi as well. 2) The word pōṟi means ‘young’ (probably originally gender neutral) and corresponds to forms with long vowel in modern Telugu (like pōṟigāṁḍu ‘young man, boy’(Sītārāmācāryulu 1922, p. 534). The incomplete name -japōṟēri could perhaps be complemented as *kūjapōṟēri; confer Nilakanta Sastri & Venkataramayya [1956] 1947–1948, p. 244, ll. 8-9, № 42 K. The female donor’s name is lōkama with the suffix -ama, probably from amma ‘mother’. The inscription was found “[o]n top of a niche containing a liṅga” (ARIE 1921–22, p. 79). This niche is probably referred to by stānaṁbu. The inscription is one of the fewer that mention a woman as donor.