Kanheri Cave 3 Left Pillar Inscription

Editors: Kelsey Martini, Vincent Tournier.

Identifier: DHARMA_INSKI00006.

Hand description:

Language: Middle Indo-Aryan.

Repository: Satavahana (tfb-satavahana-epigraphy).

Version: (a6891e5), last modified (8826945).

Edition

⟨1⟩ [9+]kha(bh)ālakarasu Ādhaṁ⟨2⟩[7+] Aka(sa) c(et)iAsa bha⟨3⟩[5+]lakārasu (ca) (pa)vayitāṇaṁ ya⟨4⟩[3+]Akhayanivi (da)tā sopārakāhāre ha⟨5⟩[lāṇi] (t)[i]3 kālīAṇe Abālikāvihare c(e)ti⟨6⟩[Agha]r(o)pathāṇas(ā)l(ā) Ovarakāni patiṭhāṇe vihā⟨7⟩[re] [1+]ṭigupasada(riya) cetiAgharo ovarakā terasa ⟨8⟩ [10 3] saAkha⟨ya⟩nivik(ā r)ājatalāka paIṭhāṇapathe ⟨9⟩ (A)saṇe culik(api)yakuṭi koḍhi ca khāṇitā sa(ṁ)de⟨10⟩s(e)(ṇu)gha [1+] (rā/ro) saghārāmo saAkhayaniviko kā⟨11⟩rāpito pu[ñaṭha] (ca) deyadhamāṇi ca Ānāni pi (k)[ā](r)[i]tāni

Apparatus

⟨1⟩ Ādhaṁ ⬦ Adha B+B; Adha G.

⟨2⟩ [7+] Aka(sa)[5+] Aka[1×] B+B; [5+] Aka[2×] G • It is unclear if the -sa in this sequence and the following cetiAsa is the genitive singular ending or the particle sa- “together with”.

⟨3⟩ [5+]lakārasu (ca)[5+]lakāresu (ca) B+B; [5+]lakārasa[1×] G.

⟨4⟩ ha⟨5⟩[lāṇi][3+] B+B.

⟨5⟩ kālīAṇe ⬦ kāliAṇe B+B; kāliAṇe G. — ⟨5⟩ c(e)ti⟨6⟩[Agha]r(o)pathāṇas(ā)l(ā)ce ti [3+] Upathāṇasāl(ā) B+B; cetiUpathāṇasāl(ā) G • The reading Upa is entirely impossible for the bottom of the -ra- is still visible today. The o-mātra of the proposed ro is partly preserved on the eye copy.

⟨6⟩ patiṭhāṇe ⬦ paIṭh(ā)ṇe G. — ⟨6⟩ vihā⟨7⟩[re] [1+]ṭigupasada(riya)vihā [2+] tigupasadari(ya) B+B; vihātigupasadari(ya) G.

⟨8⟩ >[10 3][3+] B+B • G does not acknowledge these missing akṣaras. — ⟨8⟩ (r)ājatalāka • It is tempting to understand here rājatalāke.

⟨9⟩ (A)saṇe ⬦ [1×]saṇa B+B; saṇa G • The e-mātra is clear on both the eye copy and photographs, however the first akṣara could be a ka/ra as only the hooked bottom is preserved on the eye-copy. It is also possible that another akṣara preceded it. — ⟨9⟩ culik(api)yakuṭi ⬦ culika [1×] ya kuṭi B+B; culika [1×] ya kuṭi G. — ⟨9⟩ khāṇitā ⬦ coṇitā B+B; khanita G. — ⟨9⟩ sa(ṁ)de⟨10⟩s(e)(ṇu)gha [1+] (rā/ro)sadasevājuya (vihā)re B+B; sadasevājuya (vihā)re G.

⟨11⟩ pu[ñaṭha] (ca)pu[ñaṭha] B+B; pu[ñaṭha] G.

Translation

(1–5) … amongst the …khabhālakaras, half … of the shrine (cetiya) … And for the ya[3+] renunciants amongst the …lakāras an akṣayanīvī is given: In the Sopāraka district, three – 3 – ha[la]s

(5–6) At the Abālikavihāra in Kalyan, an apsidal shrine cetiyaghara, entrance hall, and cells.

(6–8) At the vihāra in Patiṭhāṇa, at [1+]ṭigupasadarī (or in the +ṭipasadarī vihāra), an apsidal shrine [as well as] thirteen – 13 – cells – which are [provided] with a akṣayanīvīs.

(8–9) At Asana, at the royal tank on the path to Païṭhāṇa, a small hut for allowable goods and store room (koḍhi) were excavated.

(9–11) At Sandesa, the vāṇugha+ramonastic compound saṅghārama – which is [provided] with an akṣayanīvī — was caused to be built.

(11) And [these] meritorious gifts and others were caused to be made for the purpose of [acquiring] merit.

Commentary

Bibliography

Primary

[B+B] Burgess, James and Georg Bühler. 1883. Report on the Elura cave temples and the Brahmanical and Jaina caves in Western India: Completing the results of the fifth, sixth, and seventh seasons' operations of the Archaeological survey, 1877–78, 1878–79, 1879–80. Vol. 5. Archaeological Survey of Western India. London: Trübner & Co. Page 76, item 5.

[G] Gokhale, Shobhana. 1991. Kanheri inscriptions. Pune: Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute. Page 52, item 6.

Secondary

Naik, A. V. 1948. “Inscriptions of the Deccan: an epigraphical survey (Circa 300 B.C.-1300 A.D.)” BDCRI 9 (1/2), pp. 1–160. [URL]. Page 19.

Lamotte, Etienne. 1958. Histoire du bouddhisme indien: des origines à l'ère Śaka. Bibliothèque du Muséon 43. Louvain: Université catholique de Louvain, Institut Orientaliste. Page 569.

Njammasch, Marlene. 1971. “Akhayanivi-Schenkungen an Klöster Und Tempel Im Dekhan Unter Den Sātavāhanas.” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 24 (2), pp. 203–215. [URL]. Page 213.

Njammasch, Marlene. 1972. “Dorfverleihungen und Landschenkungen im Dekhan vom 1. bis zum 5. Jahrhundert u. Z.” Klio 54 (54), pp. 251–308. DOI: 10.1524/klio.1972.54.54.251. [URL]. Pages 262–263.

Hettiarachchy, Jayadevanandasara. 1973. “Buddhism in the Northern Deccan under the Śātavāhana Rulers (c. 30 B.C. - 225 A.D.)” Doctoral Thesis, University of London. London. Page 114.

Damsteegt, Theo. 1978. Epigraphical Hybrid Sanskrit: Its rise, spread, characteristics and relationship to Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit. Orientalia Rheno-Traiectina 23. Leiden: Brill. Page 335 n. 51.

Habib, Irfan and Faiz Habib. 1990. “A Map of India, B.C. 200 -- A.D. 300, Based on Epigraphic Evidence.” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress 51, pp. 103–114. [URL]. Pages 108, 111.

Dehejia, Vidya and Peter Rockwell. 2016. The unfinished: Stone carvers at work on the Indian subcontinent. New Delhi: Roli books. Page 65.

Strauch, Ingo. 2021. “Money for rituals: akṣayanīvī and related inscriptions from Āndhradeśa.” In: Power, presence and space: South Asian rituals in archaeological context. Edited by Henry Albery, Jens-Uwe Hartmann and Himanshu Prabha Ray. Archaeology and Religion in South Asia. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 193–214. Page 206.