svasti śrīmasarvvalōkuAsraya sraya śrī viṣṇuvarddhana-mahārājulaku pravarttamāna-vijayarājya-saṁvachsarambuḶ muppadimūnṟ-akun ēṇḍu śrī veḷaḷūru raṭṭagoḍlu mayindaṟaga rāmuṇḍaluganu kaṇaṁbuna vāru Acca muṟutalēṟa Unṟi Icciri svasti śrī jūvipōṟiki Irugaṇḍaku Āṟla paṭṭu nēla Icciri tīniki vakraṁbu vaccinavāriki pāranāsiki vēvuru pāṟanu kavilaḷanu caṁpina tīniki vakraṁbu vaccinavāri tīniki vaṁjanaṁbu lu muḻaki yūra āḍla paṭṭu poloṁbuduggara vrasinavāru

svasti śrīmasarvvalōkuAsraya svasti śrīsarvvalōkā sraya Lakshminarayan Rao states in a note that these two letters are reduntant. mahārājulaku mahārājula °vachsarambuḶ muppadimūnṟ-akun ēṇḍu °vatsaraṁbuṇḍu śrī veḷaḷūru raṭṭagoḍlu mayindaṟaga rāmuṇḍaluganu kaṇaṁbuna vāru Acca muṟutalēṟa Unṟi śrī veḷaḷūru raṭṭagokaṁnōbuna vāru śrī jūvipōṟiki Irugaṇḍaku Āṟla śrīIgaruṇḍu pāranāsiki vēvuru pāṟanu kavilaḷanu caṁpina° paranāsiki vēvuruponukaviḷalanu caṁpinanu tīniki vakraṁbu vaccinavāri tīniki vakraṁbu vaccinavāriki tīniki vaṁjanaṁbu lu muḻaki tīnikiḷuvanātaniki yūra āḍla paṭṭu poloṁbuduggara śahapaḷuṟnāru vrasinavāru vrasinavaru

The width of the missing parts follows the number of dots in the editions (one akṣara per dot); this, however, is but a very approximate value. Interestingly, the line numbering differs between the two editors, the first line being split into two by J. Ramayya Pantulu who omits line 10 according to N. Lakshminarayan Rao.

The inscription was noted in A. R. No. 169 of 1917 and first published by J. Ramayya Pantulu with few metadata and without translation and picture (112217). The reading was improved by N. Lakshminarayan Rao (xliv).

A. R. No. 169 of 1917 112217 xliv