<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Rithapur Charter of Bhavattavarman</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator"/>
               <persName ref="part:daba">
                  <forename>Dániel</forename>
                  <surname>Balogh</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham01001.xml</idno>
            <!-- 
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier> 
-->
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc>
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
                  <idno/>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents>
                  <summary/>
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p/>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
		<body>
			<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211"><!-- 
Comments below by Csaba Kiss and Dániel Balogh (BD) are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly researched or considered opinion. 
--><!-- 
Rithapur/ r̥iddhapur copper plates of Bhavattavarman.
Typed in from:
Gupte, Y.R., 'Rithapur plates of Bhavattavarman',
Epigraphia Indica, vol. XIX, (1927-28), pp. 100-104.
The ID is arbitrary and might change. 
--><pb n="1v"/><p><lb n="1"/>siddha<unclear>M</unclear>||
svasti<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> nandivarddhanāT<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> maheśvara-mahāsenātisr̥ṣṭa-
<lb n="2"/>rājya-vibhavaḥ nala-nr̥pa-vaṁśa-prasūtaḥ
tri-patākā-dhvajaḥ śrī-mahārāja-
<lb n="3"/>bhavatta-varmmā
kadamba-giri-grāme <subst><del rend="corrected"><unclear>p</unclear></del><add place="overstrike">b</add></subst>rāhmaṇa-purog<unclear>āN</unclear><!-- 
b seems to be a correction from p 
-->samaha<surplus>r</surplus>ttara<!-- 
The [general] Ed.'s FN: "The plate reads samahartta(tta)r[ā]N, N being incised below RĀ." 
--><lb n="4" break="no"/>-kuṭumb<choice><sic>ī</sic><corr>i</corr></choice>naḥ samājñāpayati</p>
<p>yūyam asmābhiḥ bhagavataḥ prajāpat<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>e</corr></choice>ḥ
</p>
<p><lb n="5"/>prasāda-siddha-kṣetre gaṅgā-yamunayos saṁvv<choice><sic>ai</sic><corr>e</corr></choice>dye prayāga-sthitair udaka-pūrvvakaṁ
					<pb n="2r"/><lb n="6"/>mama cācap<choice><sic>ī</sic><corr>i</corr></choice><!-- 
I am not sure if I understand cācapī. FN. 5 here says, probably with reference to (pi): "Superfluous." This probably means that the ()s here mean: deleted by the editor. The [general] Ed. adds: "Or perhaps APICA is meant." 
--><!-- 
BD: I'm not sure what the "superfluous" is meant to apply to, but I think it concerns the whole cācapī thing, which the editor suggests may have been meant for api ca. I think both are wrong, and we have the queen's name here. (I have no idea if the name of this guy's queen is attested anywhere - I may be completely wrong.) Both the c-s in cācapī could well be v-s (actually I think v is more likely than c), and the p could be ṣ, though p is more likely. We may or may not have ca between mama and the beginning of c. Neither combination yields a very convincing name, but perhaps mama+ca+āvuṣī is the least implausible. 
-->bhaṭṭ<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>rikāyāś ca d<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice><surplus>ṁ</surplus>mpa<surplus>ṁ</surplus>tyasyāsmākam anugrahārttha<choice><sic>M</sic><corr>ṁ</corr></choice> parāśara-sa<lb n="7" break="no"/>gotrāya mātrāḍhyāryyāya putrāṇāṁ cāsyāṣṭānā<sic>M</sic> yathā devāryyasya<!-- 
BD: Minimal correction, M to ṁ. Also, I would not correct, only flag as sic. 
--><lb n="8"/>deva<add place="below">da</add>ttāryyasya<!-- 
"DA is added below the line by way of interlineation. The two horizontal lines in the margin may be noticed." = numeral 2 used for foliation 
-->kumāradattāryyasya <choice><sic>vi</sic><corr>vī</corr></choice>radattāryyasya vasuda<lb n="9" break="no"/>ttāryyasya <choice><sic>go</sic><corr>gau</corr></choice>ridattāryyasya dhruvadattāryyasya durgga<choice><sic>tthā</sic><corr>dattā</corr></choice>ryyasya cety evaM<!-- 
BD: I disagree with the editor though; I think it's probably the same as in devadatta above: it isn't ttha, but tta with a da added below. But the facsimile is unclear so I'm not sure.) 
--><lb n="10"/>Ātma-navamāya mātrāḍhyāryyāya
da<choice><sic>ttā</sic><corr>tto</corr></choice> yata EteṣāM brāhmaṇā<supplied reason="omitted">nā</supplied><sic>M</sic> vi<!-- 
Is the last one really "omitted"? 
--><!-- 
BD: UNIMPORTANT: I disagree with the editor's correction of dattā to datto. The grammatical subject is yūyam in l4 above, not a supplied "ayaṁ grāmaḥ". 
--><!-- 
BD: Funny how the editor does not correct eteṣāM to eteṣāṁ, but corrects the following M to ṁ. 
--><!-- 
end of side 01 of plate 02 
--><pb n="2v" break="no"/><lb n="11" break="no"/>ṣa<unclear>yo</unclear>citāḥ hira<choice><sic>ṇya</sic><corr>ṇyā</corr></choice>dayaḥ sarvva-pratyāyāḥ dātavyāḥ śuśrūṣā <choice><sic>cca</sic><corr>ca</corr></choice> kartta-<lb n="12" break="no"/>vyā||<!-- 
|| here stands for a double horizontal line in the inscription. 
--></p>
<p>eṣa ca grāmaḥ Ācandra-tārikayā sthityā sarvva-kara-visarjjitaḥ <choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>bha<lb n="13" break="no"/>ṭa-praveśaḥ Avahaḥ Aśulk<choice><sic>ai</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>ḥ sarvva-vāda-par<choice><sic>ī</sic><corr>i</corr></choice>hīnaḥ ciñcāla-pa<!-- 
BD: FYI. This is very interesting, I've never seen the like. The reading aśulkaiḥ is incorrect (but since that's what the editor reads, your text is fine, except that I'd use minimal correction). It's actually aśuklaḥ, and in addition to what looks like an ai mātrā, there's also a curving line below it. I think that these curves above and below the character must have been proofreader's marks, meaning that kla should be inverted to lka. (Please leave my note in your final version.) 
--><lb n="14" break="no"/>lāśa-padraka-maryyādayā na <add place="below">ki</add>ñcid vaktavyaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> yo vā kaś <choice><sic>ci lo</sic><corr>cil lo</corr></choice>bhād rāgād vā kara<!-- 
BD: The correction of kaści lobhād is a tricky one, and subjective. I would probably just add an l BEFORE the original l, but possibly I'd put the whole of kaści (which I would not space, like kiñcid above) within the correction, along with the whole of lobhād. Or, to vacillate further, perhaps I would correct by adding a halanta T after kaścit, assuming that the original scribe had intended that, without saṁdhi. 
--><lb n="15" break="no"/>-pravarttanaṁ bhūmi-lo<choice><sic>pa</sic><corr>paṁ</corr></choice> <choice><sic>vvā</sic><corr>vā</corr></choice> kuryyāT sa pañcabhir mmahā-pātakais saṁyukto bha<lb n="16" break="no"/>veT<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Asmābhiś ca sa-daśa-nivarttanikaḥ sa-halaḥ sa-vāṭakaḥ
					<pb n="3r"/><lb n="17"/>grāmo yaM dattaḥ yata Etadarttha<sic>M</sic> na <choice><sic>ka</sic><corr>ke</corr></choice>na ciT kiñ ciT vaktavyaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> <choice><sic>si</sic><corr>sī</corr></choice>mā cāsya
<lb n="18"/>grāmasya Uttareṇa parvvataḥ viṣaya<choice><sic>si</sic><corr>sī</corr></choice>māntiko karmmantakena saha mā-<lb n="19" break="no"/>luka-virakaḥ madhuka-lati<add place="below">kā</add> piṇḍiraka-vr̥kṣeṇa bakasāmala<choice><sic>kaM</sic><corr>kaṁ</corr></choice> trimandara<lb n="20" break="no"/>ś ca virakaḥ rājya<choice><sic>si</sic><corr>sī</corr></choice>meti<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied><!-- 
TODO One verse in āryā metre from aikādaśetha below,
(how to separate it?)
but svamukhājñāyā- should be retained (original/authentic?)
- - . - . - - - . . - - . . . . - - - 30
. . - . - . . . - . . . . - - . - - . 26/27 
--><!-- 
BD: This is a bit messy, but some of the mess is the editor's.
2. He is wrong, the correct reading is ekādaśe (with full vowel e), not caikādaśe. The yā, which is above the e, may perhaps go here (as an introduction before the verse), but I think that is unlikely. All interlinear corrections so far have been BELOW, not ABOVE the place where they go. I can't find a good place for yā in the previous line, but I still think that is more likely than that it belongs in this line. Perhaps the intended reading was madhuka-latikayā, i.e. this yā goes with the kā preceding it, and that kā was meant to be ka.
4. IMPORTANT. The verse needs full verse markup as per the input guide.
6. For svamukhājñāyā, type and mark up the original and the correction as you would normally (correcting only the wrong ā to a). The original is unmetrical, but that is OK. ALSO, yā is an insertion below the line and needs markup. (Ah, now I see. It is what the general editor notes, saying it looks like sā. The text's editor just printed yā, forgetting to note that it's below; the journal editor noted that there's something below, but didn't notice that there is no yā in the line.) 
-->yā</p><!-- 
To decide where this yā goes! 
--><lg n="1" met="āryā">
<l n="ab"><choice><sic>cai</sic><corr>e</corr></choice>kādaśe tha varṣe kārttika-māsasya bahula-
<lb n="21"/>saptamyāM</l>

<l n="cd">sva-mukhājñ<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>yābhilikhi<choice><sic>taḥ</sic><corr>tā</corr></choice><!-- 
"YĀ is written above the line." 
--><!-- 
"A letter like SĀ seems to be written below the symbol for BHI, apparently as a correction. Ed." 
--><!-- 
BD: I disagree with the editor about emending taḥ to tā: he only does that because he wants to read yā at the beginning of this verse. Reading that yā elsewhere (even if I don't know where) also makes it unnecessary to emend here. 
-->rahasi niyukte<choice><sic>ṇa</sic><corr>na</corr></choice> cullena|| </l>
</lg>
<p>śrī-mahārā-<lb n="22" break="no"/>jārtthapati-bhaṭṭārakeṇa Ātmanaḥ mātā-pitroḥ puṇya-kīrtti-varddhana-dharmma-sthān<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>aṁ</corr></choice><!-- 
end of side 01 of plate 03 
--><pb n="3v"/><lb n="23"/><unclear>putrāṇāṁ Aṣṭāṇā</unclear><unclear>m ā</unclear>candrārkka-sthiti-kā<unclear>li</unclear>ka<choice><sic>ś ca</sic><corr>m a</corr></choice><unclear>vi</unclear>cālyaṁ bhavatv iti Ātma<!-- 
"The correct reading seems to be kā[li]kama[vi] cālyaṁ bhavatv iti - Ed." 
--><lb n="24" break="no"/><choice><sic>na</sic><corr>nā</corr></choice> āryyaka-pāda-prasādānugr̥hītena tā<choice><sic>mbra</sic><corr>mra</corr></choice>-śāsanam etaT kāritam i-<lb n="25" break="no"/>ti<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> svasti go-brāhmaṇa-prajābhyaḥ</p>
<p>siddhir <choice><sic>astuḥ</sic><corr>astu</corr></choice>||
<lb n="26"/>paddo<choice><sic>pa</sic><corr>pā</corr></choice>dhyāya-putrasya putreṇa boppadeve<choice><sic>ṇa</sic><corr>na</corr></choice> kṣatam ida<supplied reason="omitted">M</supplied>
</p><!-- 
Is it kr̥tam ida[M*]? 
--></div>
				<div type="apparatus">
			<listApp>
				<app loc="line">
				<lem/>
				<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
				</app>
			</listApp>
		</div>
		<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
		</div>
		<div type="commentary">
		</div>
		<div type="bibliography">
            <p><bibl><ptr target="bib:Gupte1927-1928_01"/></bibl> , <bibl><ptr target="bib:Bakker1997_01"/><citedRange>54</citedRange></bibl></p>
            <p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN01001</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
   <bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
