<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Manawar Charter of Bhuluṇḍa (II), Year 107 (57?)</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator"/>
               <persName ref="part:daba">
                  <forename>Dániel</forename>
                  <surname>Balogh</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00534.xml</idno>
            <!-- 
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier> 
-->
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc>
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
                  <idno/>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents>
                  <summary/>
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p/>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
		<body>
			<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211"><!-- 
Alternative opinions: M for Mirashi 1981; W for Wakankar 2002; J for Jain 1981. M is generally the best. Version of January 2019. Comments below by Dániel Balogh are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly researched or considered opinion. 
--><p><lb n="1"/>svas<choice><sic>y</sic><corr>t</corr></choice>i valkhāḥ parama-bhaṭṭāraka-pādānudhyāto mahārāja-bhuluṇḍas sam<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>jñāpayati sa<unclear>r</unclear>v<unclear>vā</unclear>
<lb n="2"/>n evāsma<supplied reason="omitted">t</supplied>-santakān <unclear>ā</unclear>yuktakā<unclear>n v</unclear>ijñātam a<unclear>s</unclear>tu vaḥ samanujānīm<unclear>o</unclear> <supplied reason="subaudible">’</supplied><unclear>s</unclear>ya k<unclear>āś</unclear>yapa-sag<unclear>o</unclear><!-- 
L2. M: (nvi)śātam, probably a typo since jñā is clear. 
--><lb n="3"/><choice><sic>ś</sic><corr>t</corr></choice>ra-harīṣa-<unclear>b</unclear>r<unclear>ā</unclear>hmaṇa<unclear>s</unclear>ya kāṇanaka-grām<unclear>o</unclear>daka-s<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>māyā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> <unclear cert="low">na</unclear>ṭṭa-taṭa-taṭe <choice><sic>ṇetrapava</sic><corr>kṣetra-pada</corr></choice><!-- 
L3. M: harija, W: hārila; J: hari(datta). Harīṣa is quite certain and was probably intended for harīśa. 
--><!-- 
L3. M: rānetaka; J: ranetakā; W: rāṭenaka. Again, kāṇanaka is certain from the photo. Some strokes (such as the arms of k) were not filled in with chalk or whatever the white substance is, and are thus not visible in the rubbings the others used. 
--><!-- 
L3. M: (grāmottara)sīmāyāṁ; J. grāmādadhīsīmāyāṁ; W: grāme darau(ka)samayā. Mirashi's reading has merits as a likely emendation. 
--><!-- 
L3. M: (bha)ṭṭi ... metat kṣetrapa(da); J. nāṭyātaṭataṭe ne(kṣe)trapada; W: naddī-taṭa-taṭe tnetrāpava (sic). My reading is quite secure; I assume naṭṭa-taṭa to be a toponym and the second taṭa as a common noun. Mirashi and Jain are probably correct that the unintelligible ṇetrapava was meant for kṣetrapada. 
--><!-- 
L3-4. The phrasing here resembles IN00523, Rudradāsa year 70 and IN00529 Bhuluṇḍa 57. 
--><lb n="4"/>m brāhmadeya<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> ś<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice><unclear>ś</unclear>vatam a-bhāgam a-bhaṭa-prā<unclear>v</unclear>e<unclear>ś</unclear>yam āca<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>drārk<surplus>t</surplus>a-graha-na<choice><sic>nda</sic><corr>kṣa</corr></choice>tra-<choice><sic>sa</sic><corr>tāra</corr></choice><!-- 
L4. M: grahana(kṣe)tra ta. J: grahāvanyamratā(ra). W. graha-ṇanda-tāra. The ligature definitely looks like nda (or nva); probably an engraver's mistake for a clumsily pre-drawn kṣa. At the end, sa is clear in the photo; I assume it is again a carver's mistake for a pre-drawn tāra. 
--><lb n="5"/>kā-kāl<unclear>ī</unclear>na<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> putra-p<choice><sic>o</sic><corr>au</corr></choice>trān<choice><sic>d</sic><corr>v</corr></choice>aya-<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>bh</corr></choice>ojya<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> bho<choice><sic>t</sic><corr>g</corr></choice>ā<choice><sic>pe</sic><corr>yai</corr></choice><choice><sic>d</sic><corr>v</corr></choice>am idān<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>m asy<choice><sic><unclear>e</unclear></sic><corr>ai</corr></choice><unclear cert="low">va</unclear> <unclear>brā</unclear><!-- 
L5. W. bhāgadeyaṁ for bhogāyaivaṁ 
--><!-- 
L5. W. asya sarvva (and bra in the next line, which is wrong); M. asyeda brā, em. asyaidaṁ brā. 
--><lb n="6"/>hmaṇasyo<choice><sic>c</sic><corr>c</corr></choice>itena brahmadeya-krame<unclear>ṇait</unclear>at-kṣetra-padam bhuñjataḫ kr̥ṣata<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied><!-- 
L6. M: hmaṇasyocitena brahmadeva kr̥tmatvotkṣetraṁ padambhu(jji)taṁ kr̥ṣata(ḥ), em. brahmadeyaṁ; tatkṣetraṁ. J: hmaṇasyocitena brahmadeya-krame(rṇa) tat kṣetrapadambhuṁjata(śco)pabho. W. brahmaṇasvai vitane brahmadeya kratmatvota pakṣatraṁ padambhūjitamkr̥ṣata. brahmadeva is probably a typo since ya is clear in his rubbing. My reading is quite secure. ṇai in krameṇaitat actually looks like a v with two vowel marks at the top and one on the left of the body; it may have been corrected from va to ṇe/ṇai or vice versa. 
--><!-- 
L6. The ñja in bhuñjataf looks like jā, but there is a very similar one that must also be meant for ñja in l5 of the NM charter of Svāmidāsa, year 65. 
--><lb n="7"/>vapataś ca sarvvair e<unclear>v</unclear>āsmat-pak<unclear>ṣ</unclear>a-ta<unclear>t</unclear>-kul<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>nārakṣik<choice><sic>e</sic><corr>ai</corr></choice><supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> preṣa<unclear>ṇa</unclear>ka-bhaṭa<!-- 
L7. M reads karṣayataśca, emending to karṣayatayaśca (sic!). vapataśca, as read by W, is clear in M's own rubbing. 
--><!-- 
L7. W. āsmat-sakr̥ta-kulīnārakṣake preṣṇika bhaṭa. M reads °ārakṣika (presumably in compound) and presaṇika, emending to ṣa. 
--><lb n="8"/>cchatra-dāṇḍapāśakādibhis <choice><sic>y</sic><corr>s</corr></choice>amanu<choice><sic>janvata</sic><corr>mantavyaṁ</corr></choice>|| baspa bhaṭṭ<unclear>ā</unclear>raka-mah<unclear>ā</unclear>r<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>j<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice><sic>ṇva</sic><!-- 
L8. J. °bhissamanujanvataḥ| yastu bhaṭṭāraka-mahārājānu W. cchatra candralaṣakādibhisya manujānvataḥ bappa bhaṭṭāraka-mahārājanva. M reads °janvataḥ|| (em. mantavyaṁ), but the two short horizontals are either a visarga or a punctuation mark; latter seems more likely; not both, at any rate. M does not read baspa/bappa. M reads the final nva (which seems clear in his rubbing) as (ṇā)(nu), whatever that may mean. 
--><lb n="9"/>dattaka<sic>pūktāśasaḥ p<unclear>r</unclear>ābheṇabh<unclear cert="low">ū</unclear>luka vijñāya<unclear cert="low">t sa</unclear>bu<unclear cert="low">ha</unclear></sic> va<unclear>r</unclear>ṣe <num value="107"><unclear><g type="numeral">100</g></unclear> 7</num> m<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice><unclear>gha</unclear><!-- 
L9.
M: da(jñā) ta .. .. prā bhā(mā)ṇa(pi) kaloka - (kā dva) vi jñāya saka (kaṁ) (|×) varṣe 107 ma 30. × probably indicates editorial addition.
J: (da)ttaka praṇāśasaḥ pabhavakālika vijñāyasa varṣe 100 7 māgha.
W. dattaka-pratiśasa prabhānakalika vijñāyavarṣa 50 7 māgha.
The above is my reading of the photo. 100 seems more likely to me than 50. 30 cannot be excluded at the end, but since these guys normally use tithis, I don't think it's possible in the context. Hence I prefer gha. There may have been a now obliterated 1 or other simple numeral at the end. No trace of śu or ba.
My best guess at the gibberish is that it was meant for something like this:
yaś ca bhaṭṭāraka-mahārājena dattaka-[/mahārājānudattaka-]bhūbhāgaḥ sa pūrvveṇa bhūmiko vijñeyas sabrahma
but this is still uniterpretable. What is important, however, is that this grant of 107(?) mentions a mahārāja bhaṭṭāraka, of whom we have grants in 102 and 127. And whatever the exact meaning of this is, it seems to speak about land granted earlier by Bhaṭṭāraka. 
--></p>
				
				
					<ab><lb n="01"/>mah<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>r<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice><unclear>ja</unclear>-bhuluṇḍasya<!-- 
margin: the text is in the left margin running top to bottom, characters rotated 90° right. 
--></ab>
				
			</div>
				<div type="apparatus">
			<listApp>
				<app loc="line">
				<lem/>
				<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
				</app>
			</listApp>
		</div>
		<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
		</div>
		<div type="commentary">
		</div>
		<div type="bibliography">
            <p>First edited by <bibl><ptr target="bib:Mirashi1981_03"/><citedRange>228-230</citedRange></bibl> and independently(?) by <bibl><ptr target="bib:Jain1981_01"/></bibl> and <bibl><ptr target="bib:Wakankar2002_01"/><citedRange>45</citedRange></bibl>. <bibl><ptr target="bib:Balogh2026_01"/></bibl> notes that the date is probably 107, not 57.</p>
            <p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00534</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
   <bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
