<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Aphsad Inscription of Ādityasena</title>
            <title type="alt">Aphsad Stone Inscription of Ādityasena</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator"/>
               <persName ref="part:daba">
                  <forename>Dániel</forename>
                  <surname>Balogh</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00209.xml</idno>
            <!-- 
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier> 
-->
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc>
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
                  <idno/>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents>
                  <summary/>
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p/>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
		<body>
			<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">

				<ab><lb n="1"/><g ref="sym:unclassified" type="symbol">*</g></ab><!-- 
Previous editions referred to: Mitra_1866 (M), Fleet_1888 (F), Thaplyal_1985 (Th). Thaplyal seems to copy Fleet all or most of the time and will only be referred to if his reading differs from Fleet's. Mitra's readings will only be referred to if they are different from and not inferior to Fleet's. 
--><!-- 
I don't have any decent image of this inscription when I'm doing the markup. Many things will need to be rechecked and supplied after getting BM photos and/or Fleet's rubbing. I'll use $ signs to show these. 
--><!-- 
L1. $mangala symbol 
--><lg n="1" met="śārdūlavikrīḍita">
<l n="a">āsīd danti-sahasra-gāḍha-kaṭako vidyādharādhyāsitaḥ</l>
<l n="b">sad-vaṁśaḥ sthira Unnato girir iva śrī-kr̥ṣṇagupto nr̥paḥ|</l><!-- 
L1. $Punctuation signs transcribed as a single daṇḍa 
-->
<l n="c">dr̥ptārāti-madāndha-vāraṇa-ghaṭā-kumbha-sthalīḥ kṣundatā</l>
<l n="d">yasyāsaṁkhya-ripu-pratāpa-jayinā doṣṇā mr̥gendrāyitaṁ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="2" met="āryā">
<l n="ab">sakalaḥ kalaṅka-rahitaḥ <lb n="2"/>kṣata-timiras toyadheḥ śaśāṅka Iva|</l><!-- 
L2. Fleet prints timira-toyadheḥ, which is unmetrical. M's timiras is metrically correct and makes better sense. 
-->
<l n="cd">tasmād udapādi suto devaḥ śrī-harṣagupta Iti||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="3" met="sragdharā">
<l n="a">yo yogyā-kāla-helāvanata-dr̥ḍha-dhanur-bhīma-<sic>v</sic>āṇaugha-pātī</l><!-- 
L2. Fleet translates "(his) firm bow that was bent with ease at the befitting proper time", but yogyā (f) exercise, gymnastics, drill. He is probably also wrong about the bit with Lakṣmī, but this needs consideration, and the reading seems doubtful too. [There seem to be plenty more problems with Fleet's translation and I'm not checking it systematically.] 
-->
<l n="b">mūrt<unclear>t</unclear>aiḥ sva-svāmi-lakṣmī-vasati-vimukhitair īkṣitaḥ sāsrupātaṁ|</l>
<l n="c">ghorāṇām ā<lb n="3" break="no"/>havānāṁ likhitam iva jayaṁ ślāghyam āvirddadhāno</l><!-- 
L3. F prints āhavānaṁ, a typo as pointed out by Th. 
-->
<l n="d">vakṣasy uddāma-śastra-vraṇa-kaṭhina-kiṇa-granthi-lekhā-cchalena||</l><!-- 
L3. Note the intertextual allusion to %IN00001:18 and %IN00094:2. 
--></lg>
<lg n="4" met="āryā">
<l n="ab">śrī-jīvitagupto bhūt kṣitīśa-cūḍāmaṇiḥ sutas tasya|</l>
<l n="cd">yo dr̥pta-vairi-nārī-mukha-nalina-vanaika-<choice><sic>śeśe</sic><corr>śiśi</corr></choice>ra-karaḥ||</l><!-- 
L3. M reads vairī, emending to vairi. 
--></lg>
<lg n="5" met="śārdūlavikrīḍita">
<l n="a" enjamb="yes"><lb n="4"/>muktāmukta-payaḥ-pravāha-śiśirāsūttuṅga-tālīvana</l><!-- 
L4. For F's muktāmukta (which he translates "flowing and ebbing currents of water"), M reads muktāgarbha, which may be superior, with garbha in the sense of "hiding". 
-->
<l n="b">-bhrāmyad-danti-karāvalūna-kadalī-kāṇḍāsu velāsv api |</l>
<l n="c">ścyotat-sphāra-tuṣāra-nirjhara-payaḥ-śīte pi śaile sthitān</l>
<l n="d">yasyoccair dviṣato mumoca <lb n="5"/>na mahā-ghoraḥ pratāpa-jvaraḥ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="6" met="āryā">
<l n="ab">yasyātimānuṣaṁ karmma dr̥śyate vismayāj janaughena|</l>
<l n="cd">Adyāpi kośa-varddhana-taṭāt p<unclear>l</unclear>utaṁ pavana-jasyeva||</l><!-- 
L5. F and M agree on the reading of l6, but I can't make sense of the bit around kośa-varddhana. M translates "This superhuman act of his-the leap from the shore of the sea where dwells all wealth, to the top of the Himalaya,-in chase of his enemies..." Fleet, staying closer to the text, translates "...like the leap of (the monkey Hanumat) the son of the Wind from the side of (the mountain) Kośavardhana." He adds (Fleet_1888:205n3) that he only knows of one reference to a mountain called Kośavardhana, in l17 of the Shergadh (Kota) Buddhist inscription (IA 14 p46), where it seems to denote the hill on which Shergadh fort now stands. "This may, or may not, be one of the mountains from which Hanumat took one of his flights through the air." 
--></lg>
<lg n="7" met="āryā">
<l n="ab">prakhyāta-śaktim ājiṣu puraḥ-saraṁ śrī-kumā<lb n="6" break="no"/>raguptam iti|</l>
<l n="cd">Ajanayad ekaṁ sa nr̥po hara Iva śikhi-vāhanaṁ tanayaṁ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="8" met="sragdharā">
<l n="a">utsarppad-vāta-helā-calita-kadalikā-vīci-mālā-vitānaḥ</l>
<l n="b">prodyad-dhūlī-jalaugha-bhramita-guru-mahā-matta<lb n="7" break="no"/>-mātaṁga-śailaḥ|</l><!-- 
L7. For F's mātaṁga, M reads (or prints) mātaṅga. $check 
-->
<l n="c">bhīmaḥ śrīśānavarmma-kṣitipati-śaśinaḥ sainya-dugdhoda-sindhur</l><!-- 
L7. For śrīśānavarmma, Fleet says, "The lower part of the ī, and all except the extreme end of the r, either were left unfinished or have been broken away. But enough remains to shew clearly what the akṣara really is." $this is not really intelligible to me; what's present and what's not? 
-->
<l n="d">llakṣmī-saṁprāpti-hetuḥ sapadi vimathito mandarī-bhūya yena||</l><!-- 
L7. For F's saṁprāpti, M reads (or prints) samprāpti. $check 
--></lg>
<lg n="9" met="anuṣṭubh"><!-- 
L7. v9 is a vipulā śloka. 
-->
<l n="a">śaurya-satya-vrata-dharo</l>
<l n="b">yaḥ prayāga-gato dha<lb n="8" break="no"/>ne</l><!-- 
L7-8. Th emends dhane to dhanī. Fleet finds no problem with dhane, translating "Cherishing heroism and adherence to the truth, (even) in (the possession of) wealth." He takes the rest of the verse to mean that Kumāragupta was cremated at Prayāga, but not necessarily that he went alive to his pyre. M also keeps dhane and translates "was engaged in the performance of ceremonies for the relief of the needy" which implies that he understood it as adhane [he does not print an avagraha, which he does elsewhere; but neither does he print a space before dhane] and that he did not take Prayāga as a place name. He adds that the bit about fire may be a reference to a pañca-tapa penance. 
-->
<l n="c">ambhasīva karīṣāgnau</l>
<l n="d">magnaḥ sa puṣpa-pūjitaḥ||</l><!-- 
L8. For F's sa puṣpa (which Th adopts), M reads sat-puṣpa. Given that F translates "honourably decorated with flowers," the lack of the t may be a typo in Fleet. $check 
--></lg>
<lg n="10" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">śrī-dāmodaragupto bhūt</l>
<l n="b">tanayas tasya bhūpateḥ|</l>
<l n="c">yena dāmodareṇeva</l>
<l n="d">daityā Iva hatā dviṣaḥ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="11" met="vasantatilakā">
<l n="a">yo maukhareḥ samitiṣūddha<lb n="9" break="no"/>ta-hūṇa-sainyā</l>
<l n="b">valgad-ghaṭā vighaṭayann uru-vāraṇānāṁ|</l>
<l n="c">saṁmūrcchitaḥ sura-vadh<choice><sic>u</sic><corr>ū</corr></choice>r varaya<choice><sic>ṁ</sic><corr>n</corr></choice> mam eti</l><!-- 
L9. F: saṁmū; M: sammū. $check 
-->
<l n="d">tat-pāṇ<unclear>i</unclear>paṅkaja-sukha-sparśād vi<sic>v</sic>uddhaḥ||</l><!-- 
L9. As F and M both note, sparśād is unmetrical; we need two short syllables instead of one long. I'm sure it was meant to be pronounced spariśād. 
--></lg>
<lg n="12" met="āryā">
<l n="ab">guṇavad-<supplied reason="omitted">d</supplied>vija-kanyānā<unclear>ṁ</unclear> nān-ālaṁkāra-yauvana<lb n="10" break="no"/>vatīnāṁ|</l><!-- 
L9. F prints guṇavadvija, adding an editorial second d; M reads ddvi as original. $check 
--><!-- 
L9. F prints the anusvāra of kanyānāṁ as supplied, M as original. I settle for an unclear one. $ 
--><!-- 
L9. F: °ālaṁkāra; M: ṅkā $ 
-->
<l n="cd">pariṇāyitavān sa nr̥paḥ śataṁ nisr̥ṣṭ-āgrahārāṇāṁ||</l><!-- 
L10. F prints pariṇāyitavan, probably a typo, as noted by Th. 
--><!-- 
L10. M reads bhūpaḥ (unmetrical) instead of nr̥paḥ. 
--></lg>
<lg n="13" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">ś<unclear>rī</unclear>-mahāsenagupto bhūt</l>
<l n="b">tasmād vīrāgraṇī<unclear>ḥ</unclear> sutaḥ|</l><!-- 
L10. M reads dhīrāgraṇīḥ. 
-->
<l n="c">sarvva-vīra-samājeṣu</l>
<l n="d">lebhe yo dhuri vīratā<unclear>ṁ</unclear>||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="14" met="śārdūlavikrīḍita">
<l n="a">śr<unclear>ī</unclear>mat-susthitavarmma-yuddha-vijaya<lb n="11" break="no"/>-ślāghā-padāṅkaṁ muhur</l>
<l n="b">yasyādyāpi vi<sic>v</sic>uddha-kunda-kumuda-kṣu<unclear>ṇṇ</unclear>-āccha-hāra<seg met="-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/></seg>ta<unclear>ṁ</unclear>|</l><!-- 
L11. M reads kṣiptendudāmāyitam for the end of 14b. (He consistently prints halanta M-s for Fleet's final anusvāras.) 
-->
<l n="c" enjamb="yes">lohityasya taṭ<unclear>e</unclear>ṣu ś<unclear>ī</unclear>tala-tal<unclear>e</unclear>ṣūtph<unclear>u</unclear>l<unclear>l</unclear>a-nāgadr<unclear>u</unclear>ma</l><!-- 
L11. M: lauhityasya. Cf. sojanya in l12. 
--><!-- 
L11. M: °ṣūtphulla-netrodgamaiś chāyā° 
-->
<l n="d">-cchāyā-supta-vi<sic>v</sic>uddha-s<unclear>i</unclear>ddha-m<unclear>i</unclear>thun<unclear>ai</unclear>ḥ sph<unclear>ī</unclear>taṁ yaśo gīyate||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="15" met="āryā">
<l n="ab">vasudevā<lb n="12" break="no"/>d iva tasmāc chrī-s<unclear>e</unclear>vana-<unclear cert="low">śo</unclear>bh<unclear>o</unclear>dita-caraṇa-yugaḥ|</l><!-- 
L12. M: tasmāc chūrais sarvvata uccair-datta-caraṇa-yugaḥ. 
-->
<l n="cd">śrī-mādhava-gupto bhūn mādhava Iva vikramaika-rasa<unclear>ḥ</unclear>||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="16" met="śārdūlavikrīḍita">
<l n="a"><seg met="+++-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="4" unit="character"/></seg><seg type="component" subtype="consonant"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="component"/></seg><unclear>a</unclear>nusm<unclear>r̥</unclear>to dhuri raṇ<unclear>e</unclear> ślāghāvatām agraṇ<unclear>ī</unclear>ḥ</l><!-- 
L12. M: dhatte sadbhir anusmr̥tāṁ. 
-->
<l n="b">s<choice><sic>o</sic><corr>au</corr></choice>janyasya nidhānam artha-ni<choice><sic>dha</sic><corr>ca</corr></choice><lb n="13" break="no"/>ya-tyāg-o<supplied reason="omitted">d</supplied>dhurāṇāṁ dhara<unclear>ḥ</unclear>|</l><!-- 
L12. M reads sau as original. Compare lohitya in l11. 
--><!-- 
L12. I retain F's emendation of nidhaya to nicaya, but much of the verse is problematic. 
--><!-- 
L12. M: nidhāna-sarva-nicaya-tyāge dhurāṇāṁ dhuraM 
--><!-- 
L13. I likewise retain F's tyāgoddhurāṇāṁ. He also emends dharaḥ to varaḥ. 
-->
<l n="c">lakṣm<unclear>ī</unclear>-sa<unclear>tya-sa</unclear>rasvatī-kulagr̥ha<unclear>ṁ</unclear> dharmasya setur dr̥ḍhaḥ</l><!-- 
L13. M: lakṣmī-satva-sarasvatīṁ. 
-->
<l n="d"><unclear cert="low">pūjyo</unclear> nās<unclear>t</unclear>i sa bh<unclear>ū</unclear>tal<unclear>e</unclear> <seg met="---+++-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="7" unit="character"/></seg>l<seg met="+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/></seg> sad-guṇ<unclear>aiḥ</unclear>||</l><!-- 
L13. For pūjyo, Th notes that pū could be pra, and jyo is very doubtful. M also reads pūjyo. 
--><!-- 
L13. M. bhūtale guṇa-gaṇair agresaraḥ sad-guṇaḥ. 
--></lg>
<lg n="17" met="śārdūlavikrīḍita">
<l n="a">cakra<unclear>ṁ</unclear> pāṇi-talena so py udavahat tasyāpi śārṅga<unclear>ṁ</unclear> dhanu<lb n="14" break="no"/>r</l><!-- 
L13. M reads vajraḥ instead of cakraṁ. Unlikely; a series of comparisons to Viṣṇu makes sense. 
-->
<l n="b">nāśāyāsuhr̥dā<unclear>ṁ</unclear> sukhāya suhr̥dām tasyāpy asir nandakaḥ|</l>
<l n="c">prāpte vidviṣatāṁ vadhe pratihat<unclear>aṁ</unclear> tenāp<unclear>i</unclear> <seg met="++-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="4" unit="character"/></seg></l><!-- 
L14. F reads (or prints) pratihat= tenāpa; pratihat(aṁ) tenāp(i) is from Th. 
--><!-- 
L14. M reads nothing after vidviṣatāṁ and before what corresponds to F's ḍharima. 
-->
<l n="d"><seg met="++--+-+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="7" unit="character"/></seg><unclear cert="low">ḍharima</unclear><seg met="++"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg>nyāḥ praṇemur jjanāḥ||</l><!-- 
L14. M: harimaṁsā dhanyāḥ praṇemur. aṁ is unmetrical, but reading hari may be a good idea. 
--></lg>
<lg n="18" met="vasantatilakā">
<l n="a">ājau mayā vinihatā va<lb n="15" break="no"/>lino dviṣan<unclear>taḥ</unclear></l>
<l n="b">kr̥tya<unclear>ṁ</unclear> na m<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->e</supplied> sty aparam ity avadhārya vīraḥ<unclear>|</unclear></l>
<l n="c">śrī-harṣadeva-nija-sa<unclear>ṁ</unclear>gama-vāñchayā <unclear cert="low">ca</unclear></l><!-- 
L15. M: nijasāttamasā pramāde. 
-->
<l n="d"><seg met="++-+---+--+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="14" unit="character"/></seg><unclear>||</unclear></l>
</lg>
<lg n="19" met="vasantatilakā">
<l n="a" enjamb="yes">ś<unclear>r</unclear>īmān <sic>v</sic>abhūva dalitāri-karīndra-kumbha</l><!-- 
L15. M: śrīmān varendra. 
-->
<l n="b">-muktā-rajaḥ<lb n="16" break="no"/>-paṭala-pāṁsula-maṇḍalāgraḥ|</l>
<l n="c" enjamb="yes">Adityasena Iti tat-tanayaḥ kṣitīśa</l>
<l n="d">-cūḍāmaṇ<unclear>i</unclear>r dda<seg met="--+--+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="9" unit="character"/></seg><unclear>||</unclear></l><!-- 
L16. M: cūḍāmaṇir ya udayādi... 
--></lg>
<lg n="20" met="śārdūlavikrīḍita">
<l n="a"><seg met="+++--+-"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="7" unit="character"/></seg> m āgatam ari-dhvaṁsottham āptaṁ yaśaḥ</l><!-- 
L16. Th cites R. B. Pandey as reading dhvaṁso 'samāptaṁ. 
-->
<l n="b">ślāghyaṁ <lb n="17"/>sarvva-dhanuṣmatāṁ pura Iti ślāgh<unclear>ā</unclear>ṁ parāṁ <sic>v</sic>ibhratī|</l>
<l n="c">Aśīrvvāda-paraṁparā <unclear cert="low">ci</unclear>ra-sa<unclear cert="low">kr̥</unclear>d<seg met="++-++-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="7" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="++-++-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="7" unit="character"/></seg> yāmāsa<unclear cert="low">ma</unclear>||</l><!-- 
L17. M: māyā samaḥ. 
--></lg>
<lg n="21" met="sragdharā">
<l n="a">ājau sveda-cchalena dhva<lb n="18" break="no"/>ja-paṭa-śikhayā mārjjato dāna-paṅkaṁ</l>
<l n="b">khaḍgaṁ kṣuṇṇena muktā-śakala-sikatil<unclear cert="low">īkr̥tya</unclear><seg met="++-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg></l><!-- 
L18. M: śakalasi kalitaṁ nyasya. 
-->
<l n="c"><seg met="++++-++------+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="14" unit="character"/></seg> mat<unclear>t</unclear>a-māta<unclear>ṁ</unclear>ga-ghātaṁ</l>
<l n="d">tad-gandhākr̥ṣṭa-sarppad-<sic>va</sic><lb n="19" break="no"/>hala-parimala-bhrā<choice><sic>t</sic><corr>n</corr></choice>ta-mattāli-jālaṁ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="22" met="vasantatilakā">
<l n="a" enjamb="yes">ā<sic>v</sic>addha-bhīma-vikaṭa-bhrukuṭī-kaṭhora</l><!-- 
L19. M: bhauma ... kaṭosiṁ 
-->
<l n="b">-sa<unclear>ṁ</unclear>g<unclear>r</unclear>āma<seg met="+---+--+-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="11" unit="character"/></seg>|</l>
<l n="c" enjamb="yes"><seg met="++-+--"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg>va-vallabha-bhr̥tya-vargga</l>
<l n="d">-goṣṭhīṣu peśa<lb n="20" break="no"/>latayā parihāsa-śīlaḥ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="23" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">satya-bhattr̥-vratā yasya</l>
<l n="b">mukhopadh<unclear>ā</unclear>na-tāpasī|</l><!-- 
L20. M: mukhopavanatopamā 
-->
<l n="c">par<unclear>i</unclear>hās<seg met="=-++="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="====-+-="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="8" unit="character"/></seg><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->||</supplied></l><!-- 
L20. M: parihāsāya pa ... 
--></lg>
<lg n="24" met="sragdharā">
<l n="a"><seg met="++++-+"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="6" unit="character"/></seg>jñaḥ sakala-ripu-<sic>v</sic>ala-dhvaṁsa-hetur ggarī<lb n="21" break="no"/>yān</l><!-- 
L20. M: ...bhijñaḥ 
--><!-- 
L20. Th: hettur em. hetur. 
-->
<l n="b">nistriṁśotkhāta-ghāta-śrama-janita-jaḍo py ūrjjita-sva-pratāpaḥ|</l><!-- 
L21. M: jato for jaḍo. 
-->
<l n="c">yuddhe matt-ebha-kumbha-stha<unclear>la</unclear><seg met="----++-++-+="><gap reason="illegible" quantity="12" unit="character"/></seg></l>
<l n="d"><seg met="++"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></seg> śv<unclear>e</unclear>tātapattra-sthagita-vasumatī-maṇḍalo lo<lb n="22" break="no"/>ka-pālaḥ||</l><!-- 
L21. M: ...putras tasyāmita-vasumatī 
--></lg>
<lg n="25" met="śārdūlavikrīḍita">
<l n="a">ājau matta-gajendra-kumbha-dalana-sphīta-sphurad-dor-yugo</l>
<l n="b">dhvastā<unclear cert="low">neka</unclear>-ripu-prabhāva-v<seg met="--+++"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="5" unit="character"/></seg> yaśo-maṇḍalaḥ|</l><!-- 
L22. M reads vilasat khyātāṁ (sic) for the lacuna. 
-->
<l n="c">nyastāśeśa-narendra-mauli-caraṇa-sphāra-pratāpāna<lb n="23" break="no"/>lo</l>
<l n="d">lakṣmīvān samarābhimāna-vimala-prakhyāta-kīrttir nr̥paḥ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="26" met="śārdūlavikrīḍita">
<l n="a">yen eyaṁ śarad-indu-<sic>v</sic>im<sic>v</sic>a-dhavalā prakhyāta-bhūmaṇḍalā</l>
<l n="b">lakṣmī-saṁgama-kāṁkṣayā su-mahatī kīrttiś ciraṁ kopitā|</l>
<l n="c">yātā sā<lb n="24" break="no"/>gara-pāram adbhutatamā sāpatnya-vairād aho</l><!-- 
L24. F: āho (unmetrical). Th: aho. 
-->
<l n="d">ten edaṁ bhavanottamaṁ kṣiti-bhujā viṣṇoḥ kr̥te kāritaṁ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="27" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">taj-jananyā mahādevyā</l>
<l n="b">śrīmatyā kārito maṭhaḥ|</l>
<l n="c">dhārmikebhyaḥ svayaṁ dattaḥ</l>
<l n="d">sura-lo<lb n="25" break="no"/>ka-gr̥hopamaḥ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="28" met="śārdūlavikrīḍita">
<l n="a">śaṁkhendu-sphaṭika-prabhā-pratisama-sphāra-sphurac-chīkaraṁ</l><!-- 
L25. M: pratima for sphaṭika. 
-->
<l n="b">nakra-krānti-calat-taraṅga-vilasat-pakṣi-pranr̥tyat-timi|</l><!-- 
L25. M: prakṣipta-nr̥tyat 
-->
<l n="c">rājñyā khānitam adbhutaṁ su-tapasā pepīyamānaṁ <lb n="26"/>janais</l><!-- 
L26-28. As F notes, l26 (and subsequent lines) must have begun with a substantial indent. Nothing is lost at the beginning of l26, where ja is below ndu, so the indent is about 8 characters (or 9 according to Fleet). 9 characters are completely lost at the beginning of l27 and 2 more are damaged, which means that l27 began at the regular margin, not with an indent. L28 again began with an indent and quite a large one; Fleet's estimate of 16 characters seems correct. There's also a rather strong line that separates the end of v28 from everything further on, extending above l26 from this point and back from this point below l26. I'm not sure what this is, $autopsy, but it certainly isn't natural. Can it be that the inscription originally ended after v28? l26 may have been indented with the intent of centring this line (though that would need a much bigger indent). The raised border may have been there right after this bit, and removed later to add vv29-30. It's even possible that there was a different, shorter colophon after v28, which was chiselled off to engrave v29. (This theory works without assuming that the raised border was originally wider. The original inscription would have ended in the present l26, with some space left blank. The blank space was later utilised for 2 additional lines; the last line is crammed into very little vertical space.) 
-->
<l n="d">tasyaiva priya-bhāryayā narapateḥ śrī-koṇadevyā saraḥ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="29" met="śārdūlavikrīḍita">
<l n="a">yāvac candra-kalā harasya śirasi śrīḥ śārṅgino vakṣasi</l>
<l n="b"><sic>v</sic>rahmāsye ca sarasvatī kr̥ta<lb n="27" break="no"/>-<seg met="-+++-++-="><gap reason="lost" quantity="9" unit="character"/></seg>|</l>
<l n="c"><supplied reason="lost">bh</supplied><unclear>o</unclear><supplied reason="lost">g</supplied><unclear>e</unclear> bhūr bhujagādhipasya ca taḍid yāvad ghanasyodare</l>
<l n="d">tāvat kīrttim ihātanoti dhavalām ādityaseno nr̥paḥ||</l>
</lg>
<lg n="27" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">sūkṣmaśivena gauḍena</l>
<l n="b">praśastir vvikaṭākṣarā||</l>
<l n="c"><lb n="28"/><seg met="==="><gap reason="lost" quantity="3" unit="character"/></seg><unclear cert="low">mā</unclear>mitā samyag</l>
<l n="d">dhārmmikeṇa sudhīmatā||</l><!-- 
L28. M reads the beginning of l28 as nyastā guṇamitā. In the present state of the stone, there is only a hook (that may be the top right of mā or ṇa) before mitā. Did Mitra conjecture this, or does the early rubbing have more text here? 
--></lg>
			</div>
				<div type="apparatus">
			<listApp>
				<app loc="line">
				<lem/>
				<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
				</app>
			</listApp>
		</div>
		<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
		</div>
		<div type="commentary">
		</div>
		<div type="bibliography">
            <p>First reported in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Cunningham1863_01"/><citedRange>xxxviii-xxxix</citedRange></bibl>, reprinted in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Cunningham1871_01"/><citedRange>40</citedRange></bibl>. (There may be an earlier report by Kittoe but this has not been traced.) Transcript (as produced by Kittoe) and translation in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Mitra1866_01"/><citedRange>272-277</citedRange></bibl>. Correction by Cunningham in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Cunningham1882_01"/><citedRange>11</citedRange></bibl> and by Bhagwanlal Indraji in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Cunningham+Garrick1883_01"/><citedRange>79</citedRange></bibl>. Discussion and details of the object’s modern history in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Willis2005_01"/></bibl>, particularly p149 and n91.</p>
            <p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00209</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
   <bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Fleet1888_01"/><citedRange unit="item">42</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Bhandarkar1927-1936_01"/><citedRange unit="item">1552</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1983_01"/><citedRange unit="book">I</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">9</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Thaplyal1985_01"/><citedRange unit="item">II.2</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
