<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Mandhal Charter of Pṛthivīṣeṇa II, Year 10</title>
            <title type="alt">Mandhal Plates of Prithivishena II / Govasahika Grant</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator"/>
               <persName ref="part:daba">
                  <forename>Dániel</forename>
                  <surname>Balogh</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00190.xml</idno>
            <!-- 
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier> 
-->
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc>
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
                  <idno/>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents>
                  <summary/>
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p/>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
		<body>
			<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">

				<div type="textpart" n="A"><head xml:lang="eng">Seal</head><!-- 
The primary source for this edition is Shastri_1975-76b (S). Shrimali (Shri) differs in some points, possibly being a reprint of Shastri's edition in VSMA (1977). I only refer to Shri separately where that edition differs from S. 
--><lg n="1" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><lb n="1"/>narendrasena-sat sūnoḥ</l>
<l n="b"><lb n="2"/>bhartu<unclear>r</unclear> vā<unclear>k</unclear>ā<unclear>ṭa</unclear>ka-śriyaḥ</l><!-- 
L.ii. rv seems to be single, not rvv. S reads rv, Shri reads v, emending to rv. I cannot see if there is an r or not. 
--><!-- 
L.ii. Parts of the line are faint in the rubbing; the rivet hole in the centre is where one would expect the descender of ka. 
-->
<l n="c"><lb n="3"/>p<choice><sic>ri</sic><corr>r̥</corr></choice>thiv<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>ṣe<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>ṇ</corr></choice>a-nr̥pateḥ</l>
<l n="d"><!-- 
L.iii. I follow S's reading of vī, but the vowel mātrā is not visible at all in the rubbing. 
--><!-- 
L.iii. S prints the visarga of nr̥pateḥ as supplied, but it is totally clear in the rubbing. 
--><lb n="4"/><surplus>rj</surplus>jig<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>ṣor jjaya-śāsana<supplied reason="omitted">M</supplied></l><!-- 
L.iv. S prints jigiṣor, but rjji is perfectly clear (in spite of the visarga at the end of the previous line). Shri reads as I do, and emends by deleting the visarga and keeping rjj. 
--></lg>
				</div>
				
				
				<div type="textpart" n="B"><head xml:lang="eng">Plates</head>
<ab><pb n="1v"/><lb n="01"/>d<choice><sic>ri</sic><corr>r̥</corr></choice>ṣṭa<unclear>ṁ</unclear></ab><!-- 
S and Shri put driṣṭam in line 1, and it is fairly well aligned with that line, but it's definitely a block of its own, probably engraved at a later time, and l1 had been started with an indent of about 3 characters. S reads no anusvāra, Shri reads one as clear. I see a dot in the rubbing, but it is not quite in the position where I'd expect an anusvāra to be. 
--><p><lb n="1"/>be<unclear>ṇṇā</unclear>taṭa-sthānād-agniṣṭ<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>ṣ</corr></choice>m<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>ptoryyāmo<choice><sic>t</sic><corr>k</corr></choice>thya-ṣoḍaśy-atirātra-vājapeya-
<lb n="2"/>br̥haspati-sava-sādyaskra-catur-aśva-<choice><sic>vo</sic><corr>me</corr></choice>dha-yāj<choice><sic>e</sic><corr>i</corr></choice>naḥ viṣ<choice><sic>o</sic><corr>ṇu</corr></choice>vr̥ddha-sagotrasya<surplus><unclear>|</unclear></surplus><!-- 
L2. According to S, the hook of the ha of br̥haspati "is formed by extending to right the top line of the box. It looks more like pā". The headline of the box is certainly extended a bit to the right, but I'm not at all sure it connects to the hook. 
--><!-- 
L2. There may be a double dot (or double crescent) at the end of l2. There are similar marks at the end of many lines (though not of "most" as Shastri claims in his introductory text). All editorially deleted punctuation marks (clear and unclear) below are of this type. Shastri says these "two almost semi-circular strokes placed one below the other" were meant "perhaps to indicate the conclusion of the lines". I have no better guess. Some may be space fillers, but some are stuck at the very edge of the plate where there's no space to fill. 
--><lb n="3"/>samrā<unclear cert="low">Ṭ</unclear> vākāṭakānām mahārāja-śrī-pravarasenasya sūnoḥ sūnoḥ Atya<surplus>|</surplus><!-- 
L3. S only reads samrā, emending to samrājo. There is certainly something after mrā; it looks rather like a visarga, but it may perhaps be a very small halanta Ṭ (or Ḍ) with a line above it. 
--><lb n="4" break="no"/>nta-svāmi-<space type="binding-hole"/>mahā-bh<unclear>ai</unclear>rava-bhaktasya Aṁsa-bhāra-sanniveśita-śiva-l<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>i</corr></choice>ṅgo<!-- 
L4. S reads bhairava; I only see bhe, not bhai. 
--><!-- 
L4. Shri reads sinniveśita and liṁgo; Shastri has the correct readings sa° and laṅgo. 
--><!-- 
L4. S, in turn, reads sanneveśita. The vowel of nni is attached to the left of the boxhead rather than above it, because sū hands down from the line above; still, I'm certain it was meant for i and not an e. 
--><lb n="5" break="no"/>dvahana-<space type="binding-hole"/>śiva-suparituṣṭa-samutpādita-rāja-vaṁśānām parākkra<!-- 
L5. Shri prints parākka; probably a typo. r is clear. 
--><lb n="6" break="no"/>mādhigata-bhāgīratthy-<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr> a</corr></choice>mala-jala-mūrddhābhiṣiktānā<sic>n</sic> da<unclear>śā</unclear>śvamedh-āvabhr̥tha-s<unclear>n</unclear>ā<lb n="7" break="no"/>tānām bhāraśivānām mahārāja-śrī-bhavanāga-dauhitrasya gautamī-putrasya<surplus>|</surplus>
						<pb n="2r"/><lb n="8"/>putrasya vākāṭakānām mahārāja-śrī-r<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>u</corr></choice>drasenasya sūnoḥ Atya<unclear>nta-mā</unclear>heśvarasya<surplus>|</surplus>
<lb n="9"/>satyārjjava-<choice><sic>kārāṇḍa</sic><corr>kāruṇya</corr></choice>-śauryya-vikkrama-naya-vinaya-māhātmya-dh<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice><choice><sic>p</sic><corr>m</corr></choice>a<sic>tv</sic>a-pātra-gata-<choice><sic>v</sic><corr>bh</corr></choice>aktitva-
<lb n="10"/>dharmma-<surplus>vajayi</surplus>vijayitva-mano-nairmmalyādi-gu<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>ṇ</corr></choice>a-samuditasya varṣa-śatam abhivar<choice><sic>vr</sic><corr>ddh</corr></choice>a<surplus>|</surplus><lb n="11" break="no"/>māna-ko<space type="binding-hole"/>śa-daṇḍa-sādhana-santāna-putra-pautriṇaḥ yudhiṣṭhira-vr̥tte<surplus>|</surplus><lb n="12" break="no"/>r vvākāṭakānā<space type="binding-hole"/>m mahārāja-śrī<surplus>ḫ</surplus>-p<choice><sic>ri</sic><corr>r̥</corr></choice>thivīṣe<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>ṇ</corr></choice>asya sūn<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>o</corr></choice>ḥ bhagavataś cakkrapāṇ<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>eḥ</corr></choice><surplus>|</surplus>
<lb n="13"/>prasādopārjjita-śrī-samudayasya vākāṭakānām mahārāja-śrī-rudrasenasya<surplus>|</surplus>
<lb n="14"/>sūnoḥ pūrvva-rāj<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>nuvr̥tta-mārggānusāriṇaḥ sunaya-bala-parākkram<choice><sic>e</sic><corr>o</corr></choice>cch<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>i</corr></choice>nna-sarvva<surplus>|</surplus><!-- 
L14. The repha of sarvva is weird, looking almost like an ī mātrā attached to the top right corner. S also notes this (comparing it to an i mātrā). 
--><pb n="2v"/><lb n="15"/><choice><sic>v</sic><corr>d</corr></choice>vi<choice><sic>p</sic><corr>ṣ</corr></choice>aḥ mahārāj<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>dhirāja-śrī-devagupta-sut<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice><choice><sic>p</sic><corr>y</corr></choice>m prabhāvat<sic>i</sic>gupt<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>yām utpanna<!-- 
L15. S reads rājā, but the curving top mātrā is not ā, since it is attached to the top prong of j, not the middle one. It looks identical to the i of the following dhi. 
--><lb n="16" break="no"/>sya vākāṭaka-vaṁśālaṅkāra-bhūtasya mahārāja-śrī-pravarasenasya sūnoḥ<!-- 
L16. As S notes, śambhoḥ prasāda-dhr̥t{{!i!}{=a=}}-kārtta-yugasya is missing after utpannasya, and vākāṭakānām is more common than vākāṭaka-vaṁśālaṅkāra-bhūtasya (but that is also what the Mahurjhari plates have). 
--><lb n="17" break="no"/>pūrvv-ādhigata-<sic>guṇavaddayādāpahr̥ta</sic>-va<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>śa-śriya<unclear>ḥ</unclear> kosalā-mekalā-m<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>lavā<!-- 
L17. I retain guṇavaddayādāpahr̥ta without emendation. S emends to dāyādāpahr̥ta, Shri to viśvāsād apahr̥ta. Compare IN00175:27 
--><lb n="18"/>dhipati<supplied reason="omitted">bhi</supplied>r a<space type="binding-hole"/>bhyarc<unclear>c</unclear>ita-śāsanasya vākāṭak<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice><unclear>nā</unclear>m mahārāja-śrī-nar<unclear>e</unclear>ndra<!-- 
L18. There is a pair of dots before the beginning of the line, which may be a pagination number 2. I see no discernible pagination on any of the other plates. 
--><!-- 
L18. For adhipatibhir, see also #IN00175:28. We have some extra scratches on the plate here which are probably damage; ra looks more like rra or rre (with a superscript repha and perhaps an e mātrā at the top of that). 
--><lb n="19" break="no"/>senasya <space type="binding-hole"/> sūno<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> kuntalādhipati-sutāyāṁ mahādevyā<unclear>m ajjhita</unclear><choice><sic><space/></sic><corr>bha</corr></choice>ṭ<unclear>ṭ</unclear>āri<surplus>|</surplus><!-- 
L19. Much of the name of ajjhitabhaṭṭārikā is unclear. There definitely doesn't seem to be a bha in it, but there is space sufficient for a narrow character such as bha - could this character have been completely effaced? S just reads ajjhi(ta)ṭṭārikāyām, noting that "A superfluous stroke was incised above this letter and later cancelled". I don't know which letter he refers to; the not is anchored after the supplied bha. He also notes (at the same place) that the subscript jh is "unusual and imperfectly formed". I might add to this that the expected ma looks more like a partially erased ja; the subscript ṭ is not visible at all, and there are some scratches to the top right of ṭā (which may be what Shastri's first note refers to). 
--><lb n="20" break="no"/>kāyām-ut<unclear>p</unclear>an<unclear>n</unclear><choice><sic><unclear>u</unclear></sic><corr>a</corr></choice>s<unclear>y</unclear>a At<unclear>y</unclear>anta-bhāgavatasya teja<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied>-kṣamā-<choice><sic>y</sic><corr>s</corr></choice>a<unclear>nni</unclear>dhā<choice><sic><unclear>t</unclear></sic><corr>n</corr></choice>a-<unclear cert="low">bhūtasya</unclear><!-- 
L20. I accept S's reading and emendation for tejaḥ-kṣamā-sannidhāna-bhūtasya, which seems to be based on the Mahurjhari plates. He prints everything as clear (as usual); in fact, bhūtasya is completely invisible in the rubbing, and the rest is quite unclear too. The wrong character in nnidhāta looks more like nnidābha to me. 
--><lb n="21"/><supplied reason="omitted">ma</supplied>g<choice><sic><unclear>g</unclear></sic><corr>n</corr></choice>-va<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied><unclear>śoddha</unclear><supplied reason="omitted">r</supplied><unclear>t</unclear><unclear cert="low">u</unclear><supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> <unclear cert="low">vākāṭakānām mahārāja-śrī</unclear><surplus><unclear>ḫ</unclear></surplus> <unclear>p</unclear><choice><sic><unclear>r</unclear>i</sic><corr>r̥</corr></choice><unclear>th</unclear>i<unclear>v</unclear><choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice><unclear>ṣ</unclear>e<unclear>nas</unclear><unclear cert="low">y</unclear><unclear>a</unclear> <unclear cert="low">vacanā</unclear><supplied reason="omitted">T</supplied><!-- 
L21. Again I accept S's readings and emendations. Most of this line is entirely invisible in the facsimile, as reflected in my markup. S of course prints all as clear. 
--></p>
<p><pb n="3r"/><lb n="22"/>Uttarapaṭṭe śulkavaṭ<unclear>ā</unclear>nām aparataḥ kur<unclear>u</unclear>bhe<unclear>jña</unclear>kasyottarataḥ <unclear>beṇṇā</unclear>-nadyā<!-- 
L22. Shri reads vaṭanām; I think S is right in readin ṭā. 
--><!-- 
L22. S (and Shri) reads kurubhejñaka, noting only that "the form of jña is unusual". In fact it looks like there is both a subscript y (or cursive v) on the left, and a subscript ñ on the right below j. It does not appear that either is a correction of the other. Could this have been meant for jyña?? In addition, ru comes with a clear e mātrā in addition to the u. Compare kurubhajjaka in IN00189:17-18. 
--><lb n="23" break="no"/>ḫ pūrvvataḥ piḍerikāyā dakṣiṇataḥ govasāhikā nāma <surplus>nāmnā</surplus> grāmaḥ sva-s<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice><lb n="24" break="no"/>mā-paricchadenānya-grāma-s<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>m<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>-varjjaḥ beṇṇātaṭaka-k<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>au</corr></choice>tsa-sagotra-maheśvara<!-- 
L24. S (but not Shri) emends paricchadena° to paricchedena°, which sounds plausible, but I'm not sure about it. Identical reading in #I0189:19. 
--><lb n="25" break="no"/>svāmine <space type="binding-hole"/> etat-sagotra-brahmasvāmine ca tat-sagotra-harasvāmine<!-- 
L25. Shri reads ca tat for both occurrences of etat. S reads etat; the first could perhaps be ca but the second is perfectly clear. 
--><lb n="26"/>varāhasvā<space type="binding-hole"/>mi<choice><sic>neti</sic><corr>na Iti</corr></choice> aihikāmuṣmike dharmma-sthāne dattaḥ</p>
<p>yato sma<lb n="27" break="no"/>t-<choice><sic>y</sic><corr>s</corr></choice>antakā<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> sarvvāddhyakṣa-niyoga-niyuktāj<unclear>ñ</unclear>ā-sa<unclear>ṁ</unclear><choice><sic>gv</sic><corr>c</corr></choice>āri-kula-putrādhikr̥ta-bhaṭ<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice><!-- 
L27. S prints sarvādhyakṣa; Shri, correctly, has ddhya. 
--><!-- 
L27. S reads sagvāri, emending to sañcāri. I think there is an anusvāra over the sa, and the character that looks like gv was meant for śc; I think saṁścāri for saṁcāri is a more plausible mistake than sagvāri for sañcāri or gv for ñc. 
--><!-- 
L27-28. I adopt S's emendations and lack thereof, since this is the least interference that gives as a workable phrase. Still, the intent was probably niyuktāḥ ā° and putrādhikr̥tā. 
--><lb n="28" break="no"/><choice><sic>c</sic><corr>ś</corr></choice> chātrāś cāddhyuṣita-pūrv<unclear>v</unclear>ā mamā<subst><del rend="corrected"><unclear>yā</unclear></del><add place="overstrike">jña</add></subst>yāj<unclear>ñā</unclear>payitavyā<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied><supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> viditam astu vaḥ yathāsmā<unclear cert="low">bhi</unclear><!-- 
L28. The reading cāddhyuṣita-purvvā is here quite clear. (Cf. IN00189:24) 
--><!-- 
L28. The jña in mamājñayā seems to be a correction, probably from yā engraved too early, though it could have been sa. 
--><pb n="3v" break="no"/><lb n="29" break="no"/>r ātmano dha<unclear>r</unclear>mmāyu<unclear>r</unclear>-bbala-vijay<unclear>ai</unclear>śva<unclear>r</unclear>yya-vivr̥ddhaye<choice><sic>ḥ<space/></sic><corr>I</corr></choice>hāmutra-hitār<unclear>t</unclear>tham ātmā<!-- 
L29. I transcribe the bit after vivr̥ddhaye as I see it in the facsimile. Shri reads °yeḥ ihā°, while S reads ye (i)hā. The pair of dots could be punctuation instead of a visarga; I don't think they form part of a damaged initial I, because there is too much more space after them. 
--><lb n="30" break="no"/>nugrahāya vaijayi<supplied reason="omitted">ke</supplied> dharmma-sthāne A-bha<choice><sic>ḍ</sic><corr>ṭ</corr></choice>a-cch<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>tra-prāveśyaḥ A-pārampara<!-- 
L30. The phrasing is jumbled: we had (aihikāmuṣmike) dharmma-sthāne in l26, and we get the bit about ucita maryyādās only in l37-38 below. 
--><lb n="31" break="no"/>-go-<choice><sic><unclear>kh</unclear></sic><corr>b</corr></choice>al<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>vardda<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> A-pu<choice><sic>m</sic><corr>ṣ</corr></choice>pa-kṣīra-sandoha<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> A-cārāsa<unclear>na-ca</unclear>r<unclear>mmāṅgā</unclear>ra<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> A-lavaṇa-kkri<unclear>ta</unclear><!-- 
L31. Shri reads govalavardda, which seems more logical, but I follow S's reading of kha, since the second character doesn't look like va at all. 
--><!-- 
L31. At the end of the line S reads kkrine, Shri reads kkriṇa. The latter seems sort of plausible as an error for kiṇva or klinna, but what is visible in the rubbing looks like ta. Note that kkreṇi is omitted altogether. 
--><lb n="32" break="no"/>-khanaka<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> sa<space type="binding-hole"/>rvva-v<choice><sic>e</sic><corr>i</corr></choice>ṣṭi-parihāra-parih<unclear>r̥</unclear>ta<unclear>ḥ</unclear> sa<surplus>pari</surplus>k<choice><sic>li</sic><corr>l̥</corr></choice>ptopapa<surplus>r<unclear>i</unclear></surplus><!-- 
L32. Shri prints parihārahr̥taḥ; S reads parihr̥taḥ correctly. 
--><lb n="33" break="no"/>k<choice><sic>li</sic><corr>l̥</corr></choice>pta<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> <surplus><unclear>krikha</unclear></surplus> <choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice><unclear>ca</unclear>ndr-āditya<surplus>ḥ</surplus>-kāl<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>ya<unclear>ḥ</unclear> <unclear cert="low">pu</unclear><unclear>t</unclear>ra-p<unclear>au</unclear>trānugām<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice> bhu<unclear>ñja</unclear>tā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> na<surplus>|</surplus><!-- 
L33. Shri prints "किल क्लृ(प्त)" at the beginning of the line, which is probably a typo for kli corrected to kl̥. 
--><!-- 
L33. I wonder if characters "krikha" (or kritha?), dismissed as unnecessary by S and Shri, are a corruption of kreṇi, omitted in l31-32. 
--><lb n="34"/>kenacid <choice><sic>dy<unclear>ā</unclear>hā<unclear>t</unclear>a</sic><corr>vyāghāta</corr></choice>ẖ karttavyaḥ sarvvakkriyābhis saṁrakṣitavya<unclear>ḥ</unclear> par<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>i</corr></choice>varddhayitavyaś-ca<surplus>|</surplus><!-- 
L34. S reads dyāhāna instead of my dyāhāta (Shri has dayahāna, probably only because his printer couldn't compose a ddya ligature). The first ā is not really visible in the rubbing but I accept it; their na looks like a passable ta to me. 
--><!-- 
L34. Shri has sarvvavikrayābhis, a typo. 
--><lb n="35"/>yaś cāsmac-chāsanam aga<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>ṇ</corr></choice>ayamānaḥ svalpām api paribādhā<choice><sic><unclear>n</unclear></sic><corr>ṅ</corr></choice> kuryyā<surplus>|</surplus><pb n="4r" break="no"/><lb n="36" break="no"/>t <choice><sic>kārayitā</sic><corr>kārayeta</corr></choice> vā tasya brāhmaṇ<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ai</corr></choice><supplied reason="omitted">r</supplied> vv<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>e</corr></choice>d<choice><sic>e</sic><corr>i</corr></choice>tasya sadaṇḍaṁ <choice><sic>ṇ</sic><corr>n</corr></choice>igrahaṁ kuryy<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>ma|<!-- 
L36. S reads kuryyamaḥ and supplies punctuation (Shri reads neither visarga nor a punctuation mark); I prefer to read original punctuation instead of a visarga, though the sign is probably just for the end of the line, not for the semantic boundary. 
--><lb n="37"/>A-pūrvva-datt<supplied reason="omitted">y</supplied>ā Udaka-pūrvvam atisr̥ṣṭaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Ucitā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>ś cāsya pūrvva-rājānuma<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>t</corr></choice>ā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied><surplus>|</surplus><!-- 
L37-38. These two lines should come in l30 above. 
--><lb n="38"/>ś cāturvvaidya-grāma-maryyādā-parihārān vitarāmaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> tad yathā A-kara<choice><sic>v</sic><corr>d</corr></choice>āy<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice><surplus>|</surplus>
<lb n="39"/>daṇḍa-<choice><sic>ṇ</sic><corr>n</corr></choice>igra<space type="binding-hole"/>haṁ kuryyāma| Api ca dharmmādhikaraṇ<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>e</corr></choice> at<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>tāneka-rā<!-- 
L39. The beginning of the line is a repetition of l36. 
--><!-- 
L39. S reads kuryyāmaḥ (Shri likewise, but he emends to kuryyāma, which S doesn't do). I prefer to read original punctuation here too. 
--><!-- 
L39. I emend only as far as dharmmādhikaraṇe; most other plates have dharmmādara-karaṇe, but their majority is not overwhelming. 
--><lb n="40" break="no"/>ja-datt<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>-sa<choice><sic>syā</sic><corr>ñci</corr></choice>nt<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>na-paripālan<supplied reason="omitted">aṁ kr̥ta-puṇyānukīrttana-parihār</supplied>ārttha<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ na</supplied> kīrttayāmaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> <sic>eṣyatat</sic>-kāla-prabhaviṣ<supplied reason="omitted">ṇ</supplied>u<surplus>|</surplus>-
<lb n="41"/>gauravād bhaviṣyān vij<supplied reason="omitted">ñ</supplied>āpayāmaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> vyāsa-g<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>t<choice><sic>o</sic><corr>au</corr></choice> cātra ślok<choice><sic>o</sic><corr>au</corr></choice> pramāṇī-karttavy<choice><sic>o</sic><corr>au</corr></choice>|<!-- 
L41. Shri reads gauravād vaviṣyān; S has gauravādvadviṣyān, which is probably a typo for Shri's reading. On the rubbing, I see a passable bh. 
--></p>
<lg n="1" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><pb n="4v"/><lb n="42"/>s<supplied reason="omitted">v</supplied>a-dattām para-dattā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>v<surplus>v</surplus>ā|</l>
<l n="b">yo hareta vasundharā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>|</l><!-- 
L42. Most of the punctuation marks in the verse are double dots (or pairs of very short verticals). S reads most of them as unnecessary visargas. The mark at the end of l42 is more complex, apparently consisting of a pair of crescents at midline height, a fairly long vertical below each crescent, and a dot below each vertical. The dots are down almost to the headline of the next line. 
-->
<l n="c">gavāṁ śata-sahasrasya||</l>
<l n="d"><lb n="43"/>hantu<supplied reason="omitted">r</supplied> harati <choice><sic>v</sic><corr>d</corr></choice>uṣkr̥ta<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>|<unclear>|</unclear>|</l><!-- 
L43. The first punctuation mark after duṣkr̥ta may actually be a halanta M. 
--></lg>
<lg n="2" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">ṣaṣṭi-varṣa-sahasrāṇi|</l>
<l n="b">svargge modati bhūmi-da<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied>|</l><!-- 
L43. The punctuation mark at the end of l44 is also more complex, but seems different from that in l42. S reads it as a visarga, but I think that's out of the question. It looks like two pairs of verticals, slanting together toward the centre, sort of like a horizontally compressed X with a hole in the middle. 
-->
<l n="c"><lb n="44"/>Ācchettā cā<space type="binding-hole"/>numantā ca|</l>
<l n="d">tāny eva narak<choice><sic>o</sic><corr>e</corr></choice> vase<supplied reason="omitted">T</supplied>|</l><!-- 
L44. The space is for the top of the hole, but it isn't strictly necessary: even nu would have fit in above the hole. 
--></lg>
<p>sa<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>v<surplus>v</surplus>atsar<choice><sic>o</sic><corr>e</corr></choice> daśame
<lb n="45"/><sic>grihmā</sic>-pa<space type="binding-hole"/>kṣe prathame divase pratha<unclear>m</unclear>e senāpatau<surplus>|</surplus><!-- 
L45. The me of divase prathame is malformed and looks more like ve. 
--><lb n="46"/>v<unclear>i</unclear>ṣṇuda<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>t</corr></choice>te| likhitaṁ śarvvadatteneti||<!-- 
L46. The punctuation mark after dante seems to be a single short horizontal dash around baseline height. 
--><!-- 
L46. The closing punctuation mark is a triple vertical. 
--></p>
				</div>
			</div>
				<div type="apparatus">
			<listApp>
				<app loc="line">
				<lem/>
				<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
				</app>
			</listApp>
		</div>
		<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
		</div>
		<div type="commentary">
		</div>
		<div type="bibliography">
            <p>First reported in <bibl><ptr target="bib:IAR1975-1976"/><citedRange>63</citedRange></bibl> (No. 30) and <bibl><ptr target="bib:ARIE1976-1977"/><citedRange>25</citedRange></bibl> (No. A7); reported with more details in <bibl><ptr target="bib:IAR1976-1977"/><citedRange>60-61</citedRange></bibl> (No. 23). Edited in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Shastri1975-1976_02"/><citedRange>169-180</citedRange></bibl> and  <bibl><ptr target="bib:Shrimali1987_01"/><citedRange>75-78</citedRange></bibl> (probably a reprint of Shastri in VSMA, not <bibl><ptr target="bib:Shastri1975-1976_02"/></bibl>). Discussed in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Shastri1987_01"/><citedRange>58-62</citedRange></bibl>, <bibl><ptr target="bib:Shastri1997_01"/><citedRange>99-103</citedRange></bibl>.</p>
            <p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00190</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
   <bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
