<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Washim Charter of Vindhyasakti II</title>
            <title type="alt">Washim Plates of Vindhyasakti II, Basim Plates of Vindhyasakti II, Vatsagulma Copper-plate Grant of Vindhyasakti</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator"/>
               <persName ref="part:daba">
                  <forename>Dániel</forename>
                  <surname>Balogh</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00176.xml</idno>
            <!-- 
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier> 
-->
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc>
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
                  <idno/>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents>
                  <summary/>
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p/>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
		<body>
			<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">

				
<lb n="01"/><ab>dr̥ṣṭa<unclear>M</unclear></ab><!-- 
dr̥ṣṭaM is in line with l1 of the body, but in the margin on the left. The text of l1 begins with an indent, so there is a space of 1-2 characters between the two blocks. 
--><lb n="02"/><ab>siddhaM</ab><!-- 
siddhaM is also in the left margin, but clearly comprises a block separate from dr̥ṣṭam. It is near, but slightly above, line 3. Line 3 is not indented. In all likelihood both dr̥ṣṭam and siddham were inscribed after the body text, but while there was space left for dr̥ṣṭam at the top left, siddham was engraved in the left margin, which is quite spacious. 
--><p><pb n="1v"/><lb n="1"/>vatsagulmād dharmma-mahārājasyāgniṣṭomāptoryyāma-vājapeya-jyoti<lb n="2" break="no"/><unclear>ṣṭo</unclear>ma-br̥haspati-sava-sādyaskra-catur-aśvamedha-yājinas samrāja<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> <sic>vr̥</sic><lb n="3" break="no"/><sic>ṣṇ<unclear>i</unclear></sic><space type="binding-hole"/>vr̥ddha-sagotrasya <space/> hāritī-putrasya <space/> śrī-pravarasena-pautrasya
<lb n="4"/>dharmma-mahārājasya <space/> śrī-sarvvasena-putrasya <space/> dharmma-mahārājasya
<lb n="5"/>vākāṭakānā<unclear>M</unclear> śr<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>-vindhyaśakter vvacanāT<!-- 
The name vr̥ṣṇivr̥ddha in l2-3 must, as editors note, be a mistake for viṣṇuvr̥ddha which is consistent in other Vākāṭaka inscriptions and is also the form attested in standard gotra lists (#Mirashi_1963:93). The i of ṣṇi is not at all clear in the facsimile. 
--><!-- 
In l5 Mirashi reads vākāṭakānāṁ followed by a superfluous punctuation mark. I see no anusvāra, and the mark is too low down in my opinion to be punctuation, so I believe it's a damaged halanta M. Sircar in SI agrees. 
--></p>
<p><!-- 
Do we want to mark up the language change, maybe with @lang added to p? 
--><!-- 
Throughout the Prakrit bit, my spacing and compound analysis is uncertain and open to revision. 
-->nāndīka<unclear>c</unclear>asa <subst><del rend="corrected">dā</del><add place="overstrike">u</add></subst>ttara-magge
						<pb n="2r"/><!-- 
The plate bears a numeral 2 on the recto in the margin before l8 (not really visible in the facsimile, but reported by DM and Mirashi). Mark up in fw? Plate 1 has no foliation, but plates 3 and 4 also bear numbers on the recto. 
--><lb n="6"/><choice><unclear>bh</unclear><unclear>t</unclear></choice>ākā-lakkhoppakābbhāse <space/> Ākāsapaddesu Amha-santakā sāvvāyoga-ni<lb n="7" break="no"/>yuttā <space/> Āṇatti-bhaḍā sesā ya sāñcaranta-<choice><sic>ra</sic><corr>ku</corr></choice>la-puttā bhāṇitavvā<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Āmhehiṁ
<lb n="8"/>dāṇi <space type="binding-hole"/> Āpuṇo vijaya-vejayike <space/> Āyu-bala-vaddhaṇike svasti-
<lb n="9"/>śānti-vācane <space/> Ihāmuttike <space/> dh<sic>ā</sic>mma-tthāṇe Etthaṅ-gāme <space/> Ādhivvaṇika-cara<lb n="10" break="no"/>ṇassa <space/> Āddhaka<surplus>|</surplus> bhālandāyaṇa-sagottesi<surplus><unclear>|</unclear></surplus> <unclear>jivu</unclear>jjesi kāpiñjala-
						<pb n="2v"/><lb n="11"/>sagottesi<unclear>ṁ</unclear><surplus>|</surplus> ruddajjesi<surplus>|</surplus> śrāviṣṭhāyaṇa-sagottesi<surplus>|</surplus> bhāṭṭidevajjesi
<lb n="12"/>kosi<unclear>ka</unclear>-sagottesi<surplus>|</surplus> deAjjesi<surplus>|</surplus> kosika-sagottesi<surplus>|</surplus> veṇhujjesi<surplus>|</surplus>
<lb n="13"/>kos<choice><sic>ī</sic><corr/></choice>ka-<space type="binding-hole"/>sagottesi<surplus>|</surplus> vidhijjesi<surplus>|</surplus> paippalādi-sagottesi <space/> pitu<lb n="14" break="no"/><sic>j</sic>esi <space/> bhālandāyaṇa-sagottesi<surplus>|</surplus> cānda<sic>j</sic>esi <space/> kosika-sagottesi jeṭṭha<sic>j</sic>e<lb n="15" break="no"/>si<surplus>|</surplus> paḍehi dohi<surplus><unclear>|</unclear></surplus> bhālandāyaṇa-sagottesi buddha<sic>j</sic>esi<surplus><unclear>|</unclear></surplus> kosika-sagottesi<surplus>|</surplus>
						<pb n="3r"/><!-- 
The plate bears a numeral 3 on the recto in the margin before l18. Mark up in fw? Plate 1 has no foliation, but plates 2 and 4 also bear numbers on the recto. 
--><lb n="16"/>bhā<unclear>ddi</unclear>lajjesi<surplus>|</surplus> kosika-sagottesi<surplus>|</surplus> sivajjesi<surplus>|</surplus> kosika-sagottesi
<lb n="17"/>hariṇṇa<sic>j</sic>esi tti <space/> Etāṇa bāmhaṇāṇa bhāgā ti<unclear>ṇṇi</unclear> <num value="3">3</num> kosika-sagottesi
<lb n="18"/>revatije<space type="binding-hole"/>si<surplus>|</surplus> bhāgo <num value="1">1</num> caUttho tti <space/> Ācandādicca-kālako Apuv<unclear>v</unclear>a-da<lb n="19" break="no"/>ttīya datto|<!-- 
Mirashi reads the name at the end of l5 as nāndīkaḍa. Deshpande & Mahajan (DM) read nāndikaṭa. Sircar prints nāndīkaḍa, but talks about nāndīkaṭa in his footnote. I think ī is certain, and ḍ is unlikely; ṭ is not very likely either; I'd read it as c on account of its similarity to c in acārasiddhika in l22, though it looks more like v than c. 
--><!-- 
At the beginning of l6, DM and Sircar read bhākā, Mirashi reads tākā. I think bh is a bit more likely, but e.g. the t of majjātā in l19 is very similar too. 
--><!-- 
DM, Sircar and Mirashi agree on lakkhoppakābbhāse (except that Sircar has ppā instead of ppa, but this is probably a typo), so I retain the reading. The kh of kkho could be something else, but nothing Prakritish (e.g. ktro). The ā of kā is not visible in the facsimile. Bbhā does not look very convincing: the upper part looks like p (though the b of bala in l8 is not much different), and the lower part like d. Still, taken together, bbhā (or bbha) is probably the best guess. (Or could this be something corrected to dde, to give us °oddese? But o attached to the preceding k is even less likely than a.) 
--><!-- 
Sircar prints ākāśa in l6, but this must be a typo. 
--><!-- 
DM read paṭṭesu in l6; I believe Sircar's and Mirashi's paddesu is more likely. 
--><!-- 
Mirashi prints ihābhuttike instead of ihāmuttike in l9; this is definitely a typo. 
--><!-- 
The superfluous punctuation character in l10 (as well as all other editorially deleted punctuation characters unless otherwise noted) is a small vertical, bulging to the left like an opening bracket, below the baseline. Some of the others look more like a mirrored J or even an U. Also, though I delete these marks for standardisation, they are clearly not random but mark the items of a list. 
--><!-- 
Mirashi prints an anusvāra after bhālandāyaṇa-sagottesi in l10. I do not see it, nor do DM or Sircar read it. 
--><!-- 
I accept Mirashi's reading of jivujjesi in l10. DM read situjjesi, Sircar follows. The first character could be just about anything from the facsimile and it probably, but not certainly, has an i mātrā. The second character could be a number of things with u (tu looks more likely in fact than vu), but it could also be ka or A/Ā. 
--><!-- 
Mirashi again reads an anusvāra after the first sagottesi in l11, noting that it "is very faint, but it is there". Sircar and DM do not read this. I see a definite dot to the _left_ of the i mātrā (practically above tte) which may or may not be what Mirashi saw as an anusvāra. 
--><!-- 
Like Mirashi and Sircar, I mark up the ka of kosika in l16 as unclear. The intent is clearly ka, but the shape is strange; possibly tu was inscribed first, then corrected to ka by inverting the hook, but the character still has no right arm, perhaps not added because the following sa is very close. 
--><!-- 
For deAjjesi in l12, DM and Sircar read desujjesi. I believe Mirashi must be right, deajjesi sounds more plausible. Compare the uncertain jivujjesi in l10, which in my opinion may also be X-Ajjesi. 
--><!-- 
The punctuation mark after deAjjesi is actually below the si, not after it, though there is some space. The punctuation mark of the following sagottesi is likewise under the si. 
--><!-- 
I think veṇhujjesi in l12 may in fact be viṇhujjesi. There is a dot above the apparent ve, which together with the apparent e mātrā may be remnants of an i mātrā. (Though cf. vaṇhu in l30, where there is definitely no i mātrā.) 
--><!-- 
Mirashi emends paḍehi in l15 to paṭehi. DM actually read paṭehi. 
--><!-- 
Only Mirashi reads the numeral 1 in l18. DM read nothing here, while Sircar reads a punctuation mark. Since all other punctuation marks so far have been quite different (this one is a short dash at midline-height), Mirashi must be right in seeing it as a numeral, which also makes very good sense. 
--><!-- 
caUttho in l18 is our first instance of aü/aï diaeresis in the corpus. I just use the capital U to show that this is a full vowel, but perhaps ü should be used to reduce ambiguity? 
--></p>
<p>puvva-rāyāṇumate ya se cātuvvejja-ggāma-majjātā-parihāre vita<lb n="20" break="no"/>rāma<unclear>|</unclear> taṁ jathā <space/> A-raṭṭha-saṁvviṇayika<surplus>|</surplus> A-lavaṇa-keṇṇa-kkhataka<surplus>|</surplus> A-hiraṇṇa-dha<unclear>ṇṇa</unclear>-
						<pb n="3v"/><lb n="21"/>ppaṇaya-ppadeya<surplus>|</surplus> A-puppha-kkh<sic>i</sic>ra-ggahaṇi<surplus>|</surplus> A-p<sic>a</sic>rampara-go-balivardda
<lb n="22"/>A-cāra-siddhika<surplus>|</surplus> A-cammaṅgālaka<surplus>|</surplus> A-bha<choice><unclear>ḍ</unclear><unclear>ṭ</unclear></choice>a-ppāvesa<surplus>|</surplus> A-khaṭṭ<unclear>ā</unclear>-collaka-veṇe<lb n="23" break="no"/>sika<surplus>|</surplus> <space type="binding-hole"/> a-karada<surplus>|</surplus> A-vaha<surplus>|</surplus> sa-nidhi<surplus>|</surplus> sopanidhi<surplus>||</surplus> sa-kutuppanta<surplus>|</surplus>
<lb n="24"/>sa-mañca-mahākaraṇa<surplus>|</surplus> sāvvajāti-parihāra-parihitañ ca<!-- 
For saṁvviṇayika in l20, DM read saṁvvaineyika, while Sircar has saṁvviṇeyika. Neither seems correct from the facsimile; I follow Mirashi's reading. 
--><!-- 
For keṇṇa in l20, Sircar reads (kle)ṇṇa, which seems unwarranted. 
--><!-- 
The word kkhataka in l20 seems clear in the facsimile. DM and Mirashi read kkhanaka, while Sircar has khātaka (sic). While kkhanaka would be expected, the character in question is ta, not na. Sircar's omission of the initial k is probably a typo; I see nothing like an ā mātrā here. (Unless, perhaps, Sircar read the k, of which only the right arm is visible, as an ā mātrā? But then the rest of the letter doesn't really make a kh.) 
--><!-- 
Mirashi notes that the i of ggahaṇi in l21 may have been deleted. It is certainly damaged. 
--><!-- 
DM and Sircar read pārampara in l21; I follow Mirashi in reading parampara as there doesn't seem to be an ā mātrā. 
--><!-- 
DM and Sircar read avāra in l22; I accept Mirashi's acāra which seems more likely next to the bit about acammaṅgālaka. The character does look more like v than c. 
--><!-- 
I accept Mirashi's and Sircar's khaṭṭā in l22, though I see no ā mātrā (unless the next character is cā instead of co). DM read khaṭṭa. 
--><!-- 
Mirashi prints acammaṅgālika in l22; the li is probably a typo. 
--><!-- 
The punctuation sign after sopanidhi is a double vertical; otherwise it is like the others: small and below baseline. 
--><!-- 
Sircar reads kutuppānta in l23; this may be a typo. 
--><!-- 
The punctuation sign after mahākaraṇa in l24 is also below the last letter of the word. 
--></p>
<p>jato Upari-li
<lb n="25"/>khita<surplus>|</surplus> śāsaṇa-vādam pamāṇaṁ karettā rakkhadha rakkhāpedhaya pariharadha
						<pb n="4r"/><!-- 
The plate bears a numeral 4 on the recto in the margin before l8 (not really visible in the facsimile, but reported by DM and Mirashi). Mark up in fw? Plate 1 has no foliation, but plates 2 and 3 also bear numbers on the recto. 
--><lb n="26"/>pariharāpedha ya<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> jo <unclear>bu</unclear> <unclear cert="low">ā</unclear>bādhaṁ karejja katavva Anuma<del><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="character"/></del><unclear>ṇṇat</unclear>i
<lb n="27"/>tissa <unclear>e</unclear>tehi<surplus>|</surplus> uparilikhitehi<surplus>|</surplus> bāmhaṇehi<surplus>|</surplus> pari<unclear>ñña</unclear>pite sa-<unclear>da</unclear>ṇḍa-
<lb n="28"/>nigraha<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> <space type="binding-hole"/> karejjāmetti<!-- 
For śāsaṇa-vādam pamāṇaṁ in l25, DM read śāsana cādamyamāṇa. Mirashi expresses indebtedness for his reading to B. Ch. Chabra. 
--><!-- 
For bu in l26, DM and Mirashi read (or at least print) vu, which seems unlikely. Sircar reads bu, noting that perhaps tu or vā was intended. For another thought, this may be a or ā corrected to vā. Perhaps the scribe began to engrave ābādhaṁ, then realised that he missed a letter? 
--><!-- 
For the next word, DM, Mirashi and Sircar all read ābādhaṁ, with Sircar alone marking the ā as unclear. The character looks like sa (with the right limb atrophied): there is no hook whatsoever. There is, however, a little curve way below the character, atop the te of likhitehi in the next line, which may be the bottom of the hook of ā, so I accept the reading. 
--><!-- 
As Mirashi notes, tissa in l27 is probably meant to be tassa. 
--><!-- 
Mirashi in CII prints brāhmaṇehiṁ in l27. bāmha is clear, so his brāhma may be a typo. I see no anusvāra (of which he also prints one with likhitehi). 
--><!-- 
For pari(ñña)pite in l27, DM read parikūpite. Sircar has pariñapita, while Mirashi gives parikupite, emending to "parikupitehi veditassa" which is imaginative but a bit wild. I am quite certain the solution is pariññapite. 
--></p>
<p><!-- 
Sircar reads the number in l29 as 5. Mirashi's and DM's 4 seems more likely, though the symbol is not identical to the one used for foliation. 
--><!-- 
In l29 DM read samupāṇatthi. Sircar reads samuhāṇṇatthi, to mean sva-mukhājñapta, noting that the reading is not beyond doubt. There is definitely no double ṇṇ, only a single ṇ; Sircar's ṇṇ may be a typo. Mirashi reads samupāsatthi and translates "given by Us personally"; I am not sure how he arrives at that (unless he translates Sircar's reading instead of his own). Mirashi is the only one to note that we have correction here; he believes that the last three akṣaras of his samupāsatthi "are incised over others which have been cancelled." I see no recognisable trace of correction in tthi, while after it there is a pretty clear śā that none of the previous editors note. I am far from sure, but I prefer Sircar's version. I don't know if tthi is plausible; I'd expect tti. In fact, now that I think about it, the character may be tthi corrected to tti. Also, perhaps it is not sva-mukhājñapta but sa-mukhājñapti, a CP accompanied by oral orders? 
--><!-- 
The pa of seṇāpatiṇā in l29 may be a correction from va or sa. DM and Sircar read seṇa; I believe Mirashi is right in readin ṇā. 
--><!-- 
The punctuation symbols transcribed as double daṇḍas in l30 are long double verticals, like modern double daṇḍas. 
--><!-- 
The ornamental glyph in l30 is a four-petalled flower. The closer is a horizontal dash. 
-->sāvvaccharaṁ <num value="37"><g type="numeral">30</g> 7</num> hemanta-pakkhaṁ paḍhamaṁ
<lb n="29"/><unclear>d</unclear>i<unclear>v</unclear>a<subst><del rend="corrected">ma</del><add place="overstrike">sa</add></subst> <num value="4">4</num> <unclear>|</unclear> sa-mu<subst><del rend="corrected"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="2" unit="character"/></del><add place="overstrike"><unclear>hāṇa</unclear></add></subst>tthi<del>śā</del><unclear>|</unclear> <space/> likhitam imaṁ śāsanaṁ seṇā<unclear>pa</unclear>tiṇā
<lb n="30"/>vaṇhuṇa Iti|| siddhir astu || <space quantity="3" unit="character"/> <g ref="sym:flourish" type="symbol">*</g> <space/> || <g ref="sym:unclassified" type="symbol">*</g>
</p>
				
			</div>
				<div type="apparatus">
			<listApp>
				<app loc="line">
				<lem/>
				<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
				</app>
			</listApp>
		</div>
		<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
		</div>
		<div type="commentary">
		</div>
		<div type="bibliography">
            <p>First reported and edited with facsimile in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Deshpande+Mahajan1940_01"/></bibl>. Re-edited in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1941_01"/></bibl>, <bibl><ptr target="bib:Mirashi+Mahajan1941-1942_01"/></bibl> and in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Mirashi1963_01"/></bibl>. Discussed in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1940_01"/></bibl>, <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1942_02"/></bibl>, <bibl><ptr target="bib:Shastri1997_01"/><citedRange>37-40</citedRange></bibl>.</p>
            <p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00176</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
   <bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1965_02"/><citedRange unit="book">III</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">59</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Mirashi1963_01"/><citedRange unit="item">23</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
