<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Riddhapur Charter of Prabhāvatīguptā</title>
            <title type="alt">Riddhapur Plates of Prabhāvatīguptā, Rithpur Copper-plate Inscription of Prabhāvatīguptā</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator"/>
               <persName ref="part:daba">
                  <forename>Dániel</forename>
                  <surname>Balogh</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00164.xml</idno>
            <!-- 
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier> 
-->
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc>
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
                  <idno/>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents>
                  <summary/>
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p/>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
		<body>
			<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">
<p><pb n="1v"/><lb n="1"/><unclear><g ref="sym:unclassified" type="symbol">*</g></unclear> jita<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> bhagavatā|| rāmagiri-svāminaḫ pāda-mūlād guptān<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>m ādi-
<lb n="2"/>rājo mahārāja-śrī-ghaṭotkacas tasya putro mahārāja-śrī-candra<lb n="3" break="no"/>gupta<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> <space type="binding-hole"/> tasya putras tat-pāda-parigr̥h<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>ta<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> licchavi-dauhitro
<lb n="4"/>mahādevyā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> kumāradevyām utpanno mahārāja-śrī-samudraguptas tasya putra<lb n="5" break="no"/>s tat-pādānuddhyāto nyāyāgatāneka-go-hiraṇya-koṭi-sahasra-pradas sarvva-rājo<pb n="2r" break="no"/><lb n="6" break="no"/>cchettā pr̥thivyām apratirathaḫ parama-bhāgavato mahādevyā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> dattadevyām u<lb n="7" break="no"/>tpan<supplied reason="omitted">n</supplied>o mahārājādhirāja-śrī-candraguptas tasya duhitā dhāraṇa-sagotrā
<lb n="8"/>nāga-kulo<space type="binding-hole"/>tpannāyā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> kuber<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>nāga<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>-devyām utpannā Ubhaya-kulāla<lb n="9" break="no"/>ṅkārabhūtā <space type="binding-hole"/> vākāṭakānā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> mahārāja-śrī-rudrasenasyāgra-mahiṣī
<lb n="10"/>vākāṭakānām mahārāja-śrī-dāmodarasena-pravarasena-jananī bhagava<lb n="11" break="no"/>t-pādānuddhyātā sāgra-varṣa-śata-<unclear>j</unclear>īva-putra-pautrā
śr<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ī</corr></choice>-mahādevī-prabh<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>vat<sic>ī</sic><pb n="2v" break="no"/><lb n="12" break="no"/>guptā|| kośika-<space/>mārgg<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>e</corr></choice> aśvattha-nagare <space/>
sa-<choice><sic>brahaṁṇa</sic><corr>brāhmaṇa</corr></choice>-pur<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>o</corr></choice>ga-grāma-mahattarā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>ś ca
<lb n="13"/>kuśalam uktvā sam<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>jñāpayat<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>i</corr></choice><!-- 
The unclear mangala sign at the beginning is shown in Sircar's edition, but not mentioned in any way in others. The first line begins with an indent of about 1 akṣara and there are some lines in the blank space which may be a mangala symbol. Alternatively, perhaps some space was left here for inscribing driṣṭam at a later time - if this was omitted, then maybe the plates were never issued? Editors do point out the surprising absence of driṣṭam. 
--><!-- 
Punctuation signs transcribed as double daṇḍas are double short verticals, floating at about mid-character height. 
--><!-- 
The space in l12 after kośika (which, by the way, looks more like kāśika in the rubbing) is not noted by editors and I cannot think of an explanation for it. No traces are visible in the space, neither punctuation nor a deleted character. Perhaps the space was meant to be after mārgga? 
--></p>
<p>aihikāmutrikam asmin nagare svapuṇyāpyā<unclear>yan-ā</unclear><supplied reason="omitted">r</supplied>ttha<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>
<lb n="14"/>parāśara-sagotrāṇā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> t<surplus>t</surplus>aittirīya-brāhmaṇānām <sic>apyaputrāputrāṇā<unclear>ṁ</unclear></sic> abhya<lb n="15" break="no"/>ntara-pura-<space type="binding-hole"/>niveśane<supplied reason="omitted">na</supplied>
saha karṣaka-nive<add place="below">śa</add>nāni ca <sic>catvāra<unclear>ḥ</unclear></sic>
<lb n="16"/>bhukt<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>kābhoga-kṣetram udaka-pūrvva<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> <sic>śāsanenosatibaddhaṁ</sic>| Ucitāṁ<surplus>ś</surplus> cāsya
<lb n="17"/>pūrvva-rājānumatā<choice><sic>ñ</sic><corr>ṁ</corr></choice> cāturvv<choice><sic>i</sic><corr>ai</corr></choice>d<unclear>y</unclear>a-grāma-maryyādā<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>ṁ</corr></choice> vitarāmas<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> tad yathā <space quantity="3" unit="character"/>
					<pb n="3r"/><lb n="18"/>A-kara-dāy<choice><sic>ī</sic><corr>i</corr></choice> <space/> a-bhaṭa-cch<sic>a</sic>tra-prāveśya<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> <space/> a-puṣpa-kṣīra-sandohaṁ A-cārā<lb n="19" break="no"/>sana-carmmāṅgāra<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> <space/> a-lavaṇa-klinna-kreṇi-khanaka<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> <space/> sarvva-vi<choice><sic>sv</sic><corr>ṣṭ</corr></choice>i-parihār<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>-
<lb n="20"/>parihr̥ta<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> <space type="binding-hole"/> sa-nidhānaṁ sopanidhānaṁ <space/> sa-k<choice><sic>la</sic><corr>l̥</corr></choice>ptopak<choice><sic>li</sic><corr>l̥</corr></choice>ptam <choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>candrā<lb n="21" break="no"/>ditya-kālī<space type="binding-hole"/>ya<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> <space/> putra-pautrānugāmi <space/> bhuñjatā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> na kenacid vyāghāta<lb n="22" break="no"/>ẖ karttavyaḥ sarvva-kriyābhis saṁrakṣitavyaḫ parivarddhayitavyaś ca<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> yaś c<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>sm<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice><lb n="23" break="no"/>c-chāsanam agaṇayamāna<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> svalpām api paribādhā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> kuryyāt <choice><sic>kārayita</sic><corr>kārayeta</corr></choice> vā tasya
					<pb n="3v"/><lb n="24"/>brāhmaṇ<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ai</corr></choice>r āveditasya <space/> sa-daṇḍa-nigrahaṁ kariṣyāmaḥ<!-- 
Mirashi prints taittirīya in l14 with a single initial t. Gupte and Sircar, correctly, read ttai. 
--><!-- 
In l14 Mirashi apparently reads apyaputrāputrāṇā without an anusvāra, and emends to saputrāputrāṇā, also without a final anusvāra unless it was lost in my scan [in fact, he probably does print an anusvāra in both his original and his emended reading; Lielukhine's digital text has an anusvāra]. He also emends the preceding m of °nām to anusvāra. He translates "to the Brāhmaṇas ... of the Parāśara gotra and the Taittirīya śākhā, whether they have or do not have sons"; footnote to ...: names omitted inadvertently. I have no better solution, but all this seems rather cheesy. The words of the whole passage seem jumbled up. Could the intent have been saputrapautrāṇām for this particular bit? 
--><!-- 
In l15 Mirashi omits pura. His translation is "together with a farm-house situated in it"; this does not reveal whether he read pura and the omission is a typo, or if he overlooked the word somehow. Gupte and Sircar do not omit the word. 
--><!-- 
In l15 I emend niveśane to niveśanena with Mirashi and Sircar. Gupte, however, keeps niveśane and reads saha in compound with karṣaka-niveśana. He translates abhyantarapuraniveśane as "while our camp is located here", which is strange; and he takes catvārabhuktakābhoga to be the name of the field that was donated. 
--><!-- 
After saha in l15 there seems to be a punctuation dot (short dash), or if this is a random dot, then there is a space of about half a character. Not noted by Mirashi and not transcribed here by me, but I note it because it may be a clue to this obscure passage. 
--><!-- 
None of the previous editors note that the śa of niveśanāni in l15 is added below the line, between ve and nā. 
--><!-- 
Mirashi notes that the ca in l15 is superfluous. He may be right, but the intent was probably something like "together with an abhyantarapuraniveśana _and_ four karṣaka-niveśanas". 
--><!-- 
All previous editors read catvāra without a visarga in l15, Mirashi and Sircar emending to catvāri and Gupte taking catvārabhuktakābhoga to be the name of the field that was donated. 
--><!-- 
For śāsanenosatibaddhaṁ in l16, Mirashi reads this without an anusvāra (unless it's lost in my scan). I can't see what he wants to emend to; in his notation it is śāsaneno[na] sati(ni)baddha(ddhaM). There is certainly no unclear na after the no, so he probably meant na as an emendation of no, in which case his emended text would be śāsanena sanibaddhaM, which doesn't seem to make much sense. Sircar suggests the emendation śāsanena pratibaddhāni; I don't see why he wants a plural. I think the original intent was most likely śāsanenopanibaddhaṁ. (Or, it's a very big blunder for śāsanenātisr̥ṣṭaṁ...) 
--><!-- 
The punctuation sign in l16 is a dash, not very short, near baseline height. So are others transcribed as single daṇḍas. 
--><!-- 
In l17 Mirashi reads cāturvidya and maryādān; rvv and ryy are both clear in the facsimile. 
--><!-- 
Line 17 does not reach the margin, but the scribe clearly didn't want to begin the list in such a short space, preferring to keep it as one chunk. 
--><!-- 
In l21 Sircar reads paitrānugāmī (emending to pautrā°). I go with Gupte and Mirashi and think the third stroke of au is visible as a dot near the bottom right of p. 
--><!-- 
Line 23, the last on the page, is squeezed into rather less vertical space than needed, so some of the bottoms of characters are at the extreme edge, while many of the vowel mātrās are compressed and/or interfere with the bottoms of characters in the previous line. 
--></p>
<p>asmi<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>ś ca dharmmādara-
<lb n="25"/>karaṇe A<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>t</corr></choice>ītāneka-rāja-datt<choice><sic>ā</sic><corr>a</corr></choice>-sañci<supplied reason="omitted">n</supplied>tana-paripālanaṁ puṇyānukīrttana-
<lb n="26"/>parihārā<space type="binding-hole"/>rtthaṁ na kīrttayāmaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> saṅkalpā<choice><sic>dh</sic><corr>bh</corr></choice>iyoga-parākkramopaji<lb n="27" break="no"/>tān varttamā<space type="binding-hole"/>nā<choice><sic>m</sic><corr>n</corr></choice> ājñāpayāmaḥ| vyāsa-gītaś cātra ślokaḫ pramāṇaṁ<!-- 
Mirashi prints the ji of °opajitān at both the end of l26 and the beginning of l27. There is no ji at the beginning of l27 (as printed correctly by Sircar). 
--></p>
<lg n="1" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><lb n="28"/>sva-dattā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> para-dattāṁ vā</l>
<l n="b">yo hareta vasundharāM</l><!-- 
The halanta M in l28 is a reduced and simplified subscript character. 
-->
<l n="c">gavāṁ śata-sahasrasya</l>
<l n="d"><lb n="29"/>hantuḫ pibati duṣkr̥tam</l><!-- 
The punctuation mark in l29 is unclear; it may be two short verticals or something more complex. 
--></lg>
<p>iti|| vākāṭakānā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> mahārāja-śrī-pravara<pb n="4r" break="no"/><lb n="30" break="no"/>senasya rājya<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied> praśāsata<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> sa<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied>v<surplus>v</surplus>vatsare <choice><sic>ekunaviṁśatime</sic><corr>ekonaviṁśatitame</corr></choice> kārttika-mā<lb n="31" break="no"/>sa-śukla-pakṣa-dvādaśyā<supplied reason="omitted">ṁ</supplied><supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied><space/> dūtaka<supplied reason="omitted">ḥ</supplied> devanandasvāmī<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> l<choice><sic>ī</sic><corr>i</corr></choice>khitaṁ
<lb n="32"/>prabhusi<sic>ṅgh</sic>ena||<!-- 
Mirashi prints the mā of māsa at the beginning of l31. It is in fact at the end of l30, very close to the edge (correct in Sircar). 
--><!-- 
Mirashi notes that Gupte reads the name in l31 as vevanandasvāmī in both his editions. Mirashi feels the character is clearly d; I largely agree. A damaged v cannot be ruled out, but seems unlikely; this is probably a recurring typo in Gupte's text. 
--><!-- 
Mirashi prints līkhitaṁ in l31 as clear, so I follow him. But in the rubbing, there is no clear anusvāra, only a faint dot above the ta; there is, however, a pair of dots that looks very much like a visarga after the ta. 
--><!-- 
The punctuation sign at the end of the document seems to be a pair of very short verticals, like a colon or a visarga, and the top one seems to be connected with a horizontal stroke to the ta. This is probably why Sircar reads līkhitā, but I think if this were an ā mātrā, then it would be connected to the very top of t, and not to the middle of the box-head. 
--></p>
			</div>
				<div type="apparatus">
			<listApp>
				<app loc="line">
				<lem/>
				<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
				</app>
			</listApp>
		</div>
		<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
		</div>
		<div type="commentary">
		</div>
		<div type="bibliography">
            <p>First reported and edited by Y. R. Gupte in Marathi in <title>Bhārata Itihāsa Saṃśodhaka Maṇḍala Quarterly</title>, vol. III (nos. 2-4), p89ff (untraced). Reported in English in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Gupte1924_01"/></bibl> and <bibl><ptr target="bib:Gupte1924_03"/></bibl>. Re-edited in English in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Gupte1924_02"/></bibl>, and re-edited again in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Mirashi1963_01"/></bibl>. Correction in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Agrawal1941_01"/><citedRange>58-59</citedRange></bibl> and <bibl><ptr target="bib:Agrawal1986_01"/><citedRange>27-28</citedRange></bibl>. Discussed in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Shastri1997_01"/><citedRange>20-23</citedRange></bibl>.</p>
            <p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00164</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
   <bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Bhandarkar1927-1936_01"/><citedRange unit="item">1706</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1965_02"/><citedRange unit="book">III</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">61</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Goyal1993_01"/><citedRange unit="item">375-376</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Mirashi1963_01"/><citedRange unit="item">8</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
