<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Sanchi Railing Inscription of GE 131</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator"/>
               <persName ref="part:daba">
                  <forename>Dániel</forename>
                  <surname>Balogh</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00075.xml</idno>
            <!-- 
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier> 
-->
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc>
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
                  <idno/>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents>
                  <summary/>
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p/>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
		<body>
			<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">

				
					<ab><lb n="01"/><unclear>siddhaM</unclear></ab><!-- 
Siddham is written on the left margin before the beginning of line 1. Said by Fleet to be very faint; not visible at all in my facsimile (unless the blotch at the very edge of the rubbing is a subscript halanta m). 
--><p><lb n="1"/>Upāsaka-sanasiddha-bhāryyayā Upāsik<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>-harisvāminyā mātā<lb n="2" break="no"/>pitaram uddiśya kākanādaboṭa-śrī-mahāvihāre cāturddiśā<unclear>yā</unclear>ryya-saṁ<!-- 
vihāre in fact looks like vihāro 
--><!-- 
Agrawala prints °diśārrya. This is probably a typo. The yā is unclear in the facsimile, but there certainly is a character there. 
--><lb n="3" break="no"/>ghāyā <unclear>A</unclear>kṣaya-nīvī dattā dīnārā dvādaśa<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Eṣāṁ dīnārāṇāṁ yā vr̥ddhi<!-- 
Fleet notes that the (a) after saṁghāyā is badly formed and runs into the yā, and thinks that an initially engraved saṁghāyākṣaya may have been "corrected" to saṁghāya akṣaya. Agrawala proposes the opposite, i.e. ancient correction of ya akṣa to yākṣa. The latter explanation is more plausible imo. 
--><lb n="4" break="no"/>r upajāyate tayā divase divase saṁgha-madhya-praviṣṭaka-bhikṣur ekaḥ bhoja<lb n="5" break="no"/>yitavyaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> ratnagr̥he pi dīnāra-trayaṁ dattaṁ <supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ta</supplied><unclear>d-dīnā</unclear>ra-trayasya vr̥<unclear>ddhyā</unclear> ratnagr̥he<!-- 
Fleet reads vr̥dhyā, emending to vr̥ddhyā. (MF likewise.) Agrawala thinks "there is a d formed in an unusual manner and added sidewise before dhyā". I see no such thing, and the facsimile is far from clear, but I think the original is really ddhyā (compare vr̥ddhyā in l7), but the top of the glyph has been damaged and only the left and bottom part of the d component is visible. 
--><lb n="6"/>bhagavato buddhasya divase divase dīpa-trayaṁ prajvālayitavyaṁ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> catur-buddhāsa<!-- 
Agrawala (an oversight?) has prajvalitavyaṁ, which is wrong. 
--><lb n="7" break="no"/>ne pi dattaḥ dīnāra Ekaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> tasya vr̥ddhyā catur-buddhāsane bhagavato buddhasya<lb n="8"/>divase divase dīpaḥ prajvālayitavyaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Evam eṣākṣaya-nīvī<!-- 
As in l6 above, Agrawala has prajvalitavyaḥ. 
--><lb n="9"/>Ācandrārkka-śilā-lekhyā svāminī-sanasiddha-bhāryyayā<lb n="10"/>Upāsik<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ā</corr></choice>-harisvāminyā pravarttitā Iti</p>
<p><lb n="11"/>saṁvvaT <num value="131"><g type="numeral">100</g> <g type="numeral">30</g> 1</num> Aśvayug di <num value="5">5</num> ||<!-- 
The halanta t is a reduced subscript form with line above. 
--><!-- 
Agrawala reads (or at least prints) āśvayug; there are so many dots and scratches that this can'T be eliminated, but a (as per Fleet) seems more likely to me. 
--><!-- 
The punctuation is a double vertical, with a left hook at the top of the first one. 
--></p>
				
			</div>
				<div type="apparatus">
			<listApp>
				<app loc="line">
				<lem/>
				<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
				</app>
			</listApp>
		</div>
		<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
		</div>
		<div type="commentary">
		</div>
		<div type="bibliography">
            <p>First reported (with eye copy “most impartially taken before any attempt had been made to read it”, and transcript by Pt. Rāma Govinda) in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Prinsep1837_02"/><citedRange>457-459</citedRange></bibl> (inscription 2). Discussed in Cunningham1854:192-193. Edited in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Fleet1888_01"/></bibl>.</p>
            <p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00075</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
   <bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Fleet1888_01"/><citedRange unit="item">62</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Bhandarkar1927-1936_01"/><citedRange unit="item">1274</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Agrawala1983_01"/><citedRange unit="item">65</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Tsukamoto1996_01"/><citedRange unit="item">IV. Sāñcī 103</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Goyal1993_01"/><citedRange unit="item">190-192</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
