<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Damodarpur Charter of Xgupta</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator"/>
               <persName ref="part:daba">
                  <forename>Dániel</forename>
                  <surname>Balogh</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00056.xml</idno>
            <!-- 
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier> 
-->
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc>
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
                  <idno/>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents>
                  <summary/>
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p/>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
		<body>
			<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">

				<div type="textpart" n="A"><head xml:lang="eng">Seal</head>
					<ab><lb n="1"/>koṭivarṣādhiṣṭhānādhi<unclear>karaṇa</unclear>sya</ab>
				</div>
				<div type="textpart" n="B"><head xml:lang="eng">Plates</head>
<p><!-- 
Conjectures for the name lost at the end of line A.1 include: Bhānugupta (#Basak_1919-20:142n1); Kumāragupta (Rao Bahadur H. Krishna Sastri in editorial note in #Dikshit_1923-24:193n1; #Sircar_1965:347n5 says Basak had suggested Budhagupta (but unless Basak made this suggestion somewhere other than #Basak_1919-20, Sircar is wrong about this). Sircar (ibid.) himself notes that Upagupta is also a possibility. #Agrawala_1983:123n6 mentions Viṣṇugupta along with the above possibilities; #Bhandarkar_1981:361 argues for Viṣṇugupta, with which #Goyal_1993:324-328 concurs. 
--><pb n="1r"/><lb n="1"/>sa<unclear>mva</unclear> <num value="224"><g type="numeral">200</g> <g type="numeral">20</g> 4</num> bhādra di <num value="5">5</num> parama-daivata-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-ma<unclear>hā</unclear>rājādhirāja-śrī-<supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->viṣṇu</supplied><lb n="2" break="no"/>gupte pr̥thivīpatau tat-pāda-parigr̥hīte puṇḍravarddhana-bhuktāv upari<unclear>ka-mahārāja</unclear>sya<lb n="3"/>rājaputtra-deva-bhaṭṭārakasya hasty-aśva-jana-bhogenānuvahamā<unclear>na</unclear>ke ko<unclear>ṭiva</unclear>rṣṣa-viṣa<unclear>ye</unclear> ca ta<lb n="4" break="no"/>n-<choice><sic>niyuktakeha</sic><corr>niyuktaka Iha</corr></choice> viṣayapati-svayambh<choice><unclear>u</unclear><unclear>ū</unclear></choice>deve Adhiṣṭhānādhikaraṇa<supplied reason="lost" cert="low"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->m</supplied> āryyya-<unclear>na</unclear>gara-<unclear>śreṣṭhi</unclear>-<sic><unclear>ri</unclear></sic><unclear>bhu</unclear>pāla<lb n="5"/>sārttha-vāha-sthāṇudatta-prathama-kulika-matidatta-prathama-kāyastha-skandapāla-puroge <unclear>sa</unclear>ṁvya<unclear>vaha</unclear>rati<!-- 
Agrawala has a "restored" [#mahā-] at the end of line A.2. This is not found either in Basak or in Bhandarkar and Agrawala does not cite any evidence for this. I can't tell from the facsimiles if there may have been any further characters; I stick with Bhandarkar. 
--><!-- 
The correction of niyuktakeha in A.4 is doubtful. Agrawala notes that Basak had suggested °yuktake iha but this is "unnecessary." See also line A.3 of IN00046. 
--><!-- 
In A.4 Bhandarkar reads svayambhū. Agrawala reads svayambhu and notes that Basak had suggested correcting to svayambhū. Given the condition of the plate, I'm noting this as an ambiguous reading. 
--><!-- 
The m supplied after adhikaraṇa in A.4 is probably an editorial addition, not a guess at an illegible character. Compare line A.3 of IN00046. Leaving it as conjecturally read rather than as added for the time being. 
--></p>
<p><lb n="6"/>Āyo<unclear>dhya</unclear>ka-kula-puttrak<sic>a-A</sic>mr̥tadevena vijñāpitam<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> iha viṣaye samudaya-bāhyāprahata-khila-<unclear>kṣe</unclear>ttrā<lb n="7" break="no"/>ṇāṁ tri-dīnārika-kulya-vāpa-vikrayo nuvr̥ttaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> tad arhatha matto dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya man-mātuḥ <unclear>pu</unclear>ṇyā<lb n="8" break="no"/>bhivr̥ddhaye Atrāraṇye bhagavataḥ śvetavarāha-svāmino deva-kule khaṇḍa-phuṭṭa-prati<unclear>saṁ</unclear>skā<unclear>ra-ka</unclear><lb n="9" break="no"/>raṇāya bali-caru-sa<sic>tr</sic>a-pravarttana-gavya-dhūpa-puṣpa-prāpaṇa-madhuparkka-dīpādy-upa<unclear>yo</unclear>gā<unclear>ya</unclear> ca<lb n="10"/>Apradā-dharmmeṇa tāmrapaṭṭīkr̥tya kṣetra-stoka<sic>n</sic> dātum iti<!-- 
For phuṭṭa see also IN00061 and IN00062. 
--><!-- 
In A.7 Bhandarkar prints tridīnārika; Agrawala prints tridīnārikya and emends to traidīnārikya. Need to check this on a good facsimile or the original. 
--></p>
<p>yataḥ prathama-pustapāla-nara<unclear>na</unclear>ndi<lb n="11" break="no"/>-gopadatta-<unclear>bhaṭa</unclear>nandinām-avadhāraṇayā yuktatayā dha<unclear>rmmādhi</unclear>kāra-<unclear>bu</unclear>ddhyā vijṇāpita<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ṁ</supplied> <unclear>no</unclear> kāry<unclear>o</unclear><lb n="12"/>viṣaya-patinā kaścid virodhaḥ keva<unclear>laṁ</unclear> śrī-parama-bhaṭṭāraka-pādānā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ṁ</supplied> dharmma-<unclear>pha</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->la-ṣa</supplied><lb n="13" break="no"/>ḍ-bhā<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->gā</supplied>vāp<unclear>t</unclear>i<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ḥ</supplied><supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied><!-- 
In A.11 Agrawala puts square brackets around the second ta of yuktatayā. Bhandarkar does not show this as unclear, so Agrawala may have intended the brackets as a deletion mark. 
--><!-- 
In A.11-12, I follow Bhandarkar. Agrawala (after Sircar?) has nā[#ttra*] [#vi*]<lb 
/>ṣaya-patinā[#ṁ]. 
--><!-- 
Line A.13 is engraved below the end of line A.12 
--><!-- 
In A.12-13, I again follow Bhandarkar. Agrawala (after Sircar?) has pādena dharmmapa(ra)<lb 
/>(tāvāpti)[#ḥ]. 
--></p>
<p><pb n="1v"/><lb n="14"/>Ity anenāvadhāraṇā-krameṇa Etasmād amr̥tadevāt pañcadaśa dīnārān upasaṁgr̥hya Etan-mātu<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ḥ</supplied> <lb n="15"/>Anugraheṇa svacchandapāṭake <unclear>rddha</unclear>ṭī-prāveśya-lavaṅgasikāyāñ ca vāstubhis saha kulya-vāpa-dvayaṁ <lb n="16"/>sāṭuvanāśramake pi vāstunā saha kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ paraspatikāyāṁ pañca-kulya-vāpakasyotta<unclear>re</unclear>ṇa <lb n="17"/>jamvū-na<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->dyā</supplied>ḥ pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ pūraṇavr̥ndikaharau pāṭaka-pūrvveṇa kulya-vāpa Ekaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Ity evaṁ khila-kṣettra<lb n="18" break="no"/>sya vāstunā saha pañca kulya-vāpāḥ Apradā-dharmmeṇa bhaga<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->va</supplied>te śvetavarāha-svāmine śaśvat-kāla-bhogyā dattāḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> <lb n="19"/>tad uttara-kālaṁ saṁvyavahāribhiḥ devabhaktyānumantavyāḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">.</supplied> Api ca bhūmi-<unclear>dā</unclear>na-saṁvaddhāḥ ślokā bhavanti<!-- 
In B.6 Bhandarkar prints saṁvadhāḥ and corrects to sambaddhāḥ. Agrawala prints samvaddhāḥ and corrects to sambaddhāḥ. The original may have anusvāra or m, and ddh or plain dh - need to check. 
--></p>
<lg n="1" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><lb n="20"/>sva-dattāṁ para-dattām vā</l>
<l n="b">yo hareta vasundharāṁ</l>
<l n="c">sa viṣṭhāyāṁ k<sic>ri</sic>mir <sic>bhbh</sic>ūtvā</l>
<l n="d">pitr̥bhis saha pacyate<!-- 
In B.7 Bhandarkar has krimir bbhūtvā; Agrawala has bhbhūtvā and explicitly corrects to rbbh (not to standard rbh), also noting that Sircar's reading is rbhbhutvā. 
--></l>
</lg>
<lg n="2" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">vahubhir vvasudhā dattā</l>
<l n="b"><lb n="21"/>rājabhis sagarādibhiḥ</l>
<l n="c">yasya yasya yadā bhūmis</l>
<l n="d">tasya tasya tadā phalaṁ</l>
</lg>
<lg n="3" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">ṣaṣ<sic>ṭh</sic>iṁ varṣa-sahasrāṇi</l>
<l n="b">svargge modati bhūmidaḥ <unclear>|</unclear><!-- 
In B.8 I follow Bhandarkar in reading ṣaṣṭhi (which Bhandarkar corrects to ṣaṣṭi); Agrawala just prints ṣaṣṭi. 
--></l>
<l n="c"><lb n="22"/>Ākṣeptā cānumantā ca</l>
<l n="d">tāny eva narake vased</l>
</lg>
<ab>iti</ab>
				</div>
			</div>
				<div type="apparatus">
			<listApp>
				<app loc="line">
				<lem/>
				<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
				</app>
			</listApp>
		</div>
		<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
		</div>
		<div type="commentary">
		</div>
		<div type="bibliography">
            <p>First noticed and edited in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Basak1919-1920_01"/><citedRange>141-145</citedRange></bibl>. Date corrected in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Dikshit1923-1924_01"/></bibl>.  Discussed in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Basak1925_01"/></bibl>.</p>
            <p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00056</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
   <bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Bhandarkar1981_01"/><citedRange unit="item">47</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Bhandarkar1927-1936_01"/><citedRange unit="item">1307</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1965_02"/><citedRange unit="book">III</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">39</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Agrawala1983_01"/><citedRange unit="item">62</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Goyal1993_01"/><citedRange unit="item">324-328</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
