<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Nalanda Seal Legend of Budhagupta</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator"/>
               <persName ref="part:daba">
                  <forename>Dániel</forename>
                  <surname>Balogh</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00049.xml</idno>
            <!-- 
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier> 
-->
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc>
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
                  <idno/>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents>
                  <summary/>
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p/>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
		<body>
			<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">
<p><lb n="1"/><!-- 
Bhandarkar does not supply the lost portions. I follow Agrawala in reconstructing them. Bhandarkar notes that there is room for two characters after ghaṭo at the end of the legible part of line 1, but Agrawala puts only tka here, and I agree that it's more likely to be just one character. Throughout the inscription, the positions of line breaks seem to be pretty arbitrary choices by editors based on how they count flyspeck characters. This should be reconsidered before publication. 
--><supplied reason="lost">sarvva-rājocchettuḥ pr̥thivyām apratirathasya mahārāja-</supplied>śrī-gupta-prapaut<unclear>t</unclear>rasya mahārā<unclear>ja-ś</unclear>rī-ghaṭo<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->tka</supplied><lb n="2" break="no"/><supplied reason="lost">ca-pauttrasya mahārājādhirāja-śrī-candragupta-puttrasya liccha</supplied>v<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->i</supplied>-d<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->au</supplied>h<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->i</supplied>trasya mahādevyāṁ kum<unclear>ā</unclear>ra<unclear>devyām utpa</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->nna</supplied><lb n="3" break="no"/><supplied reason="lost">sya mahārājādhirāja-śrī-samudraguptasya putras tat-pari</supplied>gr̥h<unclear>īto</unclear> mah<unclear>ā</unclear>d<unclear>e</unclear>vyā<unclear>ṁ</unclear> dattad<unclear>e</unclear>vyā<unclear>m utpannas svayaṁ</unclear> <!-- 
Here Agrawala puts svayañ cāpratirathaḥ in the next line. I can't read the photograph, but by the number of characters I judge Bhandarkar's line break to be better. 
--><lb n="4"/><supplied reason="lost">cāpratirathaḥ parama-bhāgavato mahārājādhirāja-</supplied><unclear>śrī-candraguptas tasya puttras tat-pādānudhyāto</unclear>
<lb n="5"/><supplied reason="lost">mahādevyāṁ dhruvadevyām utpanno mahārājādhirāja-</supplied><unclear>śrī-kumāraguptas tasya puttras tat-pādā</unclear><lb n="6" break="no"/><supplied reason="lost">nudhyāto mahādevyām anantadevyām utpanno ma</supplied><unclear>hārājādhirāja-śrī-pur</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->u</supplied><unclear>gu</unclear><choice><sic><unclear>tpa</unclear></sic><corr>pta</corr></choice><unclear>s tasya puttra</unclear><lb n="7" break="no"/><supplied reason="lost">s tat-pādānudhyāto mahādevyāṁ</supplied><unclear>ca</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->ndra</supplied><unclear>devyā</unclear><supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->m utpannaḥ</supplied> <!-- 
Here Agrawala restores [#mahādevyāṁ śrī]-(?mahī)devyām utpannaḥ and notes that earlier scholars have suggested mahādevyām (apparently as the name). I follow Bhandarkar with candradevī. 
--><lb n="8"/><supplied reason="lost">parama-bhāgavato mahārājādhirāja-</supplied><unclear>śrī</unclear>-budhagup<unclear>taḥ</unclear>
</p>
			</div>
				<div type="apparatus">
			<listApp>
				<app loc="line">
				<lem/>
				<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
				</app>
			</listApp>
		</div>
		<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
		</div>
		<div type="commentary">
		</div>
		<div type="bibliography">
            <p>Briefly noticed in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sastri1931-1932_01"/><citedRange>77</citedRange></bibl> (postscript). Edited (with plate) in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sastri1942_01"/><citedRange>64</citedRange></bibl>. Discussed in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1943_03"/><citedRange>272-275</citedRange></bibl>.</p>
            <p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00049</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
   <bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Bhandarkar1981_01"/><citedRange unit="item">42</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1965_02"/><citedRange unit="book">III</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">36A</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Agrawala1983_01"/><citedRange unit="item">45</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Goyal1993_01"/><citedRange unit="item">304-305</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
