<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Dhanaidaha Charter of Kumāragupta I</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator"/>
               <persName ref="part:daba">
                  <forename>Dániel</forename>
                  <surname>Balogh</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder>
</titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Berlin</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSSiddham00023.xml</idno>
            <!-- 
If this file is moved into a named DHARMA corpus, retain the Siddham identifier as <altIdentifier> 
-->
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc>
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>DHARMAbase</repository>
                  <idno/>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents>
                  <summary/>
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p/>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2023-05-15" status="draft">Additional global changes for compatibility with DHARMA</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2021-07-06" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:daba" when="2020-08-04" status="draft">Initial import: harmonising file structure with DHARMA inscription template v02. Text and comments as inherited from the Siddham archive of January 2019, unless otherwise indicated (by a name and date in the comment). Comments are offered "as is" and do not represent a thoroughly considered or researched opinion.</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
		<body>
			<div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:83225 maturity:83211">
<p><lb n="1"/><supplied reason="lost" cert="low">siddhaM| catur-udadhi-salilāsvāditayaśaso mahārājādhirāja-śrī-kumāraguptasya</supplied> <supplied reason="lost">sa</supplied>mvatsara-śa<supplied reason="lost"><!-- CHECK if <unclear> applies better.-->te</supplied> trayodaśotta<!-- 
I adopt Sircar's conjecture for the beginning except hypothesising siddham instead of his oṁ. 
--><lb n="2" break="no"/><supplied reason="lost">re</supplied> <gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="23" unit="character"/><!-- 
Sircar's conjecture for the beginning of this line is saṁ 100+10+3 (after re, I guess, though he may have read re at the end of the first line - which I consider very unlikely) 
--></p>
<p><supplied reason="lost">asyā</supplied><sic>n</sic> d<unclear>i</unclear>vasa-pūrvvāyāṁ parama-daivata-para<lb n="3" break="no"/><supplied reason="lost">ma-bhaṭṭāraka-</supplied><supplied reason="lost" cert="low">mahārājādhirāja-śrī-kumāragupte pr̥thivīpatau</supplied> kuṭu<unclear>mbi</unclear> <gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="3" unit="character"/> brāhmaṇa-śivaśarmma-nāgaśarmma-maha<!-- 
The conjectural filling-up is from Lielukhine, i.e. probably Sircar. Compare the Damodarpur plates. Bhandarkar reads ā(?) before kuṭumbi, I see nothing (not even kuṭumbi), but this could be part of an au mātrā. The broken-off gap after kuṭumbi is 2 or 3 characters in size, but I can't make out brāhmaṇa either on the facsimile, nor anything else really, except what may be śi of śivaśarmma. 
--><lb n="4" break="no"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="19" unit="character"/>vakīrtti-kṣemadatta-goṣṭhaka-varggapāla-piṅgala-śuṅkuka-kāla<!-- 
Lielukhine (naming no source) proposes Śivakīrtti for the partially lost name and says Banerji reads kṣamavanta, presumably for kṣemadatta. 
--><lb n="5" break="no"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="20" unit="character"/><unclear cert="low">pa</unclear>viṣṇu-<unclear>deva</unclear>śarmma-viṣṇubhadra-khāsaka-rāmaka-gopāla<!-- 
Lielukhine says Banerji reads viṣyabhadra instead of viṣṇubhadra. 
--><lb n="6"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="18" unit="character"/><unclear cert="low">sasu</unclear> śrībhadra-somapāla-rāmā<unclear cert="low">dyāḥ</unclear> grāmāṣṭa-kulādhikaraṇañ ca<!-- 
Bhandarkar reads Rām-ādyāḥ(?); no way to tell if the question mark is meant just for the visarga or for more. Lielukhine (Sircar?) has rāmādyaka, also with a question mark. 
--><!-- 
Lielukhine also has °karaṇaśca at the end. 
--><!-- 
And while we're at it, Bhandarkar's sa(?) su(?) may represent two alternatives rather than two successive characters? I can't make out anything on the photo. 
--><lb n="7" break="no"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="15" unit="character"/>viṣṇu<unclear cert="low">nā</unclear> vijñāpitā Iha khādā<unclear cert="low">ṭa</unclear>pāra-viṣaye nuvr̥tta-maryyādā-sthi<unclear>ti</unclear><!-- 
again, the ? after viṣṇunā may refer to more than just the nā. Lielukhine also has ṇā in brackets with a question mark, probably meaning that the original text may have ṇā. 
--><!-- 
Lielukhine says Banerji read mahākhuṣāpāra instead of khādā(?ṭa)pāra. 
--><lb n="8"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="15" unit="character"/>nīvī-dharmma-kṣayeṇa labhya<unclear>te</unclear><!-- 
Sircar reads nīvīdharmmākṣayeṇa rather than kṣayeṇa; Bhandarkar mentions his interpretation of kṣaya in his introduction of this inscr. 
--></p>
<p><unclear>ta</unclear>d arhatha mamādyānenaiva kkrame<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>ṇ</corr></choice>a dā<unclear>tuṁ</unclear>
<lb n="9"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="14" unit="character"/>samety<unclear cert="low">ā</unclear>bhihitai<unclear cert="low">ḥ</unclear> sarvvam eva <unclear cert="low">jñā</unclear>kara-prative<unclear cert="low">śi</unclear>-kuṭumbibhir avasthāpya ka<!-- 
Sircar restores Bhandarkar's (jñā?)kara as kṣetrakara. 
--><lb n="10" break="no"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="14" unit="character"/>ri <gap reason="illegible" precision="low" quantity="1" unit="character"/> kana <gap reason="illegible" precision="low" quantity="1" unit="character"/> yad ito <gap reason="illegible" precision="low" quantity="2" unit="character"/> <unclear>ta</unclear>d avadhr̥tam iti yatas tatheti pratipādya
<lb n="11"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="11" unit="character"/> <supplied reason="lost">aṣṭaka-na</supplied>vaka-nalā<unclear>bhyā</unclear>m apaviñchya kṣetra-kulya-vāpam ekaṁ dattaṁ tataḥ Āyuktaka-
<lb n="12"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="14" unit="character"/><unclear cert="low">bhrā</unclear>tr̥-kaṭaka-vāstavya-chandoga-brāhmaṇa-varāhasvāmino dattaṁ taddha<unclear cert="low">va</unclear><lb n="13" break="no"/><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="16" unit="character"/>bhūmyā dā<unclear>nākṣe</unclear>pe ca guṇāguṇam anucintya śarīra-k<unclear>ā</unclear>ñcanakasya ci<lb n="14" break="no"/><supplied reason="lost">ra-cañcalatvaṁ</supplied> <gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="10" unit="character"/> <seg type="component" subtype="consonant"><gap reason="illegible" quantity="1" unit="component"/></seg>ā<!-- 
the conjecture ra-cañcalatvaṁ is present in Sircar (probably his own?) and Agrawala, but not mentioned at all in Bhandarkar. 
--><!-- 
ā after the lacuna is only found in Bhandarkar. I assume he saw a diacritical ā, not a full vowel. 
--></p>
<p><unclear>u</unclear>ktañ ca bhagavatā dvaipāyanena
</p>
<lg n="1" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">svadattām para-dattām vā</l>
<l n="b"><lb n="15"/><supplied reason="lost">yo hareta vasundharām</supplied></l>
<l n="c"><supplied reason="lost">sa viṣṭhāyāṁ kr̥mir bhūtvā</supplied></l>
<l n="d"><supplied reason="lost">pitr̥</supplied><unclear>bhiḥ</unclear> saha pacyate</l>
</lg>
<lg n="2" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a">ṣaṣṭiṁ varṣa-sahasrā<choice><sic>n</sic><corr>ṇ</corr></choice>i</l>
<l n="b">svargge modati <unclear>bhū</unclear>midaḥ</l>
<l n="c"><lb n="16"/><supplied reason="lost">Ākṣeptā cānumantā ca</supplied></l>
<l n="d"><supplied reason="lost">tāny eva narake vaset</supplied></l>
</lg>
<lg n="3" met="anuṣṭubh">
<l n="a"><unclear>pū</unclear>rvva-dattāṁ dvijātibhyo</l>
<l n="b">yatnād rakṣa yudhiṣṭhira</l>
<l n="c">mahīṁ <unclear>mahī</unclear><supplied reason="lost">matāñ cchreṣṭha</supplied></l>
<l n="d"><lb n="17"/><supplied reason="lost">dānāc chreyo nupālanam</supplied></l>
</lg>
<p><gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="10" unit="character"/>ya<unclear>ṁ</unclear> <unclear cert="low">su</unclear>śrībhadrena Utkīrṇṇaṁ sthambheśvaradāse<unclear>na</unclear> <gap reason="lost" precision="low" quantity="5" unit="character"/><!-- 
Sircar restores the lacuna as likhitā paṭṭikeyaṁ amātyabhadreṇa (Bhadra as the name, not preceding the other -bhadra). He also says traces of ka are visible before ya(ṁ). Bhandarkar follows Basak in reading suśrībhadreṇa. 
--><!-- 
Bhandarkar corrects the other name to stambheśvara-; Sircar reports Banerji as reading sthahṇeśvara (while Lielukhine reports Basak as reading so); Agrawala reads or conjectures Sthāṇvīśvara. 
--><!-- 
note that the final 5 lost characters are only there if the line extends to the edge of the plate, but there isn't really anything else expected here 
--></p>
			</div>
				<div type="apparatus">
			<listApp>
				<app loc="line">
				<lem/>
				<rdg source="bib:AuthorYear_01"/>
				</app>
			</listApp>
		</div>
		<div type="translation" source="bib:AuthorYear_01"><!--Indicate @resp or change @source when a translation is added -->
		</div>
		<div type="commentary">
		</div>
		<div type="bibliography">
            <p>First noticed and edited in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Bandyopadhyaya1909_01"/><citedRange>459-461</citedRange></bibl>. Re-edited in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Basak1923-1924_01"/></bibl>. Discussed in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Basak1925_01"/></bibl>.</p>
            <p>Originally encoded for Siddham in the project Beyond Boundaries (Grant Agreement No. 609823) by Dániel Balogh (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Balogh2019_03"/><citedRange unit="item">IN00023</citedRange></bibl>). Encoding updated to DHARMA conventions by Dániel Balogh.</p>
<listBibl type="primary">
   <bibl n="siglum"><ptr target="bib:AuthorYear_01"/></bibl>
</listBibl>
<listBibl type="secondary">
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Bhandarkar1981_01"/><citedRange unit="item">19</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Bhandarkar1927-1936_01"/><citedRange unit="item">1267</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1965_02"/><citedRange unit="book">III</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">16</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Agrawala1983_01"/><citedRange unit="item">22</citedRange></bibl>
   <bibl><ptr target="bib:Goyal1993_01"/><citedRange unit="item">150-155</citedRange></bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>
