<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Wurare</title>
         	<respStmt>
         		<resp key="contributor">EpiDoc encoding</resp>
         		<persName ref="part:argr">
         			<forename>Arlo</forename>
         			<surname>Griffiths</surname>
         		</persName>
         	</respStmt>
         	<respStmt>
         		<resp key="creator">intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
         		<persName ref="part:argr">
         			<forename>Arlo</forename>
         			<surname>Griffiths</surname>
         		</persName>
         	</respStmt> 
         <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder></titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Lyon</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSIDENKWurare.xml</idno>
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc><!-- only the handDesc can be filled in at this stage -->
            <msDesc><!-- //// NB: the msIdentifier had to be added for validation purposes ///. It will be edited later with the metadata spreadsheet -->
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>as per external metadata</repository>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents><!-- describe the intellectual content of an inscription -->
                  <summary><!-- //// NOT MANDATORY  ////--></summary>
                  <!-- offers the possibility to give a summary of the inscription's content -->
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p><!-- The script name(s) will be inserted here at a later stage from the metadata spreasheet. At this stage, you can mention here in a free-text paragraph any characteristics of the writing observed more than once in this inscription that seem unusual/uncommon or otherwise noteworthy given the general characteristics of the script in question. See EG 11.2. --></p>
                     <!-- If you need to identify individual hands (EG §7.5/) in addition to one or more paragraphs of general palaeographic description, wrap <summary> around the <p> or <p>s above, and, outside <summary>, create <handNote> elements for each hand as follows:
						<summary><p><p/></summary>
						<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand1"></handNote>
						<handNote xml:id="Pallava00001_hand2"></handNote>
					 -->
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
	  	<change who="part:argr" when="2025-01-23" status="draft">added bibl items and rough encoding of translation</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2020-11-03" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:argr" when="2020-04-14" status="draft">resolved issue #17</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2020-03-27" status="draft">adding the handDesc template</change>
         <change who="part:argr" when="2020-02-05" status="draft">initial encoding of the file</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
      <body>
         <div type="edition" xml:lang="san-Latn" rendition="class:38769 maturity:83213">
         	<lg n="1" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><milestone unit="column" n="A"/><lb n="1"/>// Ādau namāmi sarba-jñaṁ,</l> 
		<l n="b">jñāna-kāyan tathāgataṁ,</l>
		<l n="c">sarvva-skandhātiguhya-sthaṁ,</l>
		<l n="d">sad-asat-pakṣa-varjjitaṁ, <num value="1">1</num>, //</l>
	</lg>
         	<lg n="2" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="2"/>// Anv atas sarvva-siddhim vā,</l> 
		<l n="b">vande ’haṅ gauravāt sadā,</l>
		<l n="c">śaka-kālam idaṁ vakṣye,</l>
		<l n="d">rāja-kīrtti-prakāśanaṁ<!-- anusvāra seems to be normal here -->, <num value="2">2</num>, //</l>
	</lg>
        	<lg n="3" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="3"/>// <choice><sic>yo</sic><corr>yaḥ</corr></choice> purā paṇḍitaś śreṣ<choice><orig>ṭ</orig><reg>ṭh</reg></choice>a,</l>
		<l n="b">Āryyo bharāḍa-saṁjñakaḥ,</l>
		<l n="c" enjamb="yes">jñāna-siddhiṁ samāgamyā,</l>
		<l n="d">bhijñālābho munīśva<space type="defect" quantity="1" unit="character"/>raḥ, <num value="3">3</num>, //</l>
	</lg>
       	<lg n="4" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><milestone unit="column" n="B"/><lb n="4"/>// mahā-yogīśvaro dhīraḥ,</l> 
		<l n="b">satveṣu karuṇātmakaḥ,</l>
		<l n="c">siddhācāryyo mahā-vīro,</l>
		<l n="d">rāgādi-kleśa-varjjitaḥ, <num value="4">4</num> , //</l>
	</lg>
       	<lg n="5" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="5"/>// ratnākara-pramāṇān tu,</l> 
		<l n="b">dvaidhī-kr̥tya yavāvanīm̐,</l><!-- special ṁ! -->
		<l n="c" enjamb="yes">kṣiti-bhedana-sāmarthya,</l>
		<l n="d">kumbha-bajrodakena vai, <num value="5">5</num><!-- no comma written here — should I supply one? --> //</l>
	</lg>
       	<lg n="6" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="6"/>// paraspara-virodhena,</l> 
		<l n="b">nr̥payor yuddha-kāṁkṣiṇoḥ,</l>
		<l n="c">Etasmāj jāṅgalety eṣā,</l>
		<l n="d">paṁjalu-viṣayā<!-- is might be possible to read vijayā; would it also be desirable? cf. paṅjalu jayati on MNI stela --> smr̥tā, <num value="6">6</num><!-- again, no comma written --> //</l>
	</lg>
       	<lg n="7" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="7"/> // kin tu yasmāt· rarakṣemām̐,</l><!-- special ṁ! --> 
		<l n="b">jaya-śrī-viṣṇu<space type="defect" quantity="2" unit="character"/>varddhanaḥ,</l>
		<l n="c">śrī-jayavarddhanī-bhāryyo<!-- no comma written here --></l>
		<l n="d">jagannāthottamaḥ prabhuḥ, <num value="7">7</num><!-- no comma written here --> //</l>
	</lg>
       	<lg n="8" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><milestone unit="column" n="C"/><lb n="8"/><!-- no // written here — should I supply? -->Ājanmapariśuddhāṅgaḥ,</l> 
		<l n="b">kr̥pāluḥ dharmma-tatparaḥ,</l>
		<l n="c">pārthivānandanaṅ kr̥tvā,</l>
		<l n="d">śuddha-kīrtti-parākramāt· <num value="8">8</num> //<!-- no commas before and after // --></l>
	</lg>
 	<lg n="9" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="9"/><!-- no // written here -->Ekī-kr̥tya punar bhūm<choice><orig>ī</orig><reg>i</reg></choice>m̐,</l><!-- special anusvāra! --> 
		<l n="b">prīty-arthañ jagatāṁ<!-- normal anusvāra? --> sadā,</l>
		<l n="c">dharmma-saṁrakṣaṇārtham vā,</l>
		<l n="d">pitrādi-sthāpanāya ca, <num value="9">9</num><!-- no comma here --> //</l>
	</lg>
 	<lg n="10" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="10"/><!-- no // written here -->yathaiva kṣiti-rājendra,ś</l> 
		<l n="b">śrī-harivarddhanātmajaḥ,</l>
		<l n="c">śrī-jayavarddhanī-putraḥ,</l>
		<l n="d">catur-dvīpeśvaro muniḥ, <num value="10">10</num> //</l>
	</lg>	
	<lg n="11" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="11"/>Aśeṣa-tatva-sampūrṇno,</l> 
		<l n="b">dharmma-śāstra-vidām varaḥ,</l>
		<l n="c">jīrṇnoddhāra-kriyodyukto,</l>
		<l n="d">dharmma-śāsana-deśakaḥ, <num value="11">11</num><!-- no comma here --> //</l>
	</lg>	
	<lg n="12" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><milestone unit="column" n="D"/><lb n="12"/>śrī-jñānaśivabajrā<choice><orig>k</orig><reg>kh</reg></choice>ya,ś </l> 
		<l n="b">citta-ratna-vibhūṣaṇaḥ,</l>
		<l n="c">prajñā-raśmi-viśuddhāṅga,s</l>
		<l n="d">sambodhi-jñāna-pāragaḥ, <num value="12">12</num> //</l>
	</lg>	
	<lg n="13" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="13"/>subhaktyā tam̐<!-- special ṁ! --> pratiṣṭhāpya,</l> 
		<l n="b">svayam pūrvvam pratiṣṭhita<unclear>m̐</unclear><!-- can the special anusvāra be confirmed on the stone? -->,</l>
		<l n="c">śmaśāne vurare-nāmni,</l>
		<l n="d">mahākṣobhyānurūpataḥ, <num value="13">13</num> //</l>
	</lg>	
	<lg n="14" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="14"/>bhava-cakre śakendrābde,</l> 
		<l n="b">māse cāsuji-saṁjñake,</l>
		<l n="c">pañcamyām̐ śukla-pakṣe ca,</l>
		<l n="d">vāre pa-ka-bu-saṁjñake, <num value="14">14</num> //</l>
	</lg>	
	<lg n="15" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="15"/>sinta-nāmni ca parvve ca,</l> 
		<l n="b">karaṇe viṣṭi-saṁskr̥te,</l>
		<l n="c">Anurādhe ’pi nakṣatre, </l>
		<l n="d">mitre māhendra-maṇḍale, <num value="15">15</num> //</l>
	</lg>	
	<lg n="16" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><milestone unit="column" n="E"/><lb n="16"/>saubhāgya-yoga-sambandhe,</l> 
		<l n="b">somye caiva muhūrttake,</l>
		<l n="c"><choice><orig>k</orig><reg>kh</reg></choice>yāte kuvera-parvveśe,</l>
		<l n="d">tulā-<unclear>rāśy-a</unclear>bhisaṁyute <lb n="16*" rend="tb-upright"/><!-- this value of @n to be validated and perhaps explicitly allowed in EG --> <num value="16">16</num></l>
	</lg>	
	<lg n="17" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="17"/>hitāya sarba-satvānām̐<!-- special anusvāra -->,</l> 
		<l n="b">prāg eva nr̥pates sadā,</l>
		<l n="c">sa-putra-potra-dārasya,</l>
		<l n="d">kṣity-ekībhāva-kāraṇāt·,<!-- presence of comma to be confirmed --> <num value="17">17</num> //</l>
	</lg>	
	<lg n="18" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="18"/>Athāsya dāsa-bhūto ’haṁ<!-- apparently a normal anusvāra -->,</l> 
		<l n="b">nādajño nāma kīrttitaḥ,</l>
		<l n="c">vidyā-hīno ’pi sammūḍho,</l>
		<l n="d">dharmma-kriy<supplied reason="omitted">ā</supplied><!-- the long ā invisible on estampage; can it be confirmed on the stoe -->sv atatparaḥ, <num value="18">18</num> //</l>
	</lg>	
	<lg n="19" met="anuṣṭubh">
		<l n="a"><lb n="19"/>dharmmādhyakṣatvam āsādya,</l> 
		<l n="b">kr̥payaivāsya tatvataḥ,</l>
		<l n="c"><choice><orig>s</orig><reg>ś</reg></choice>aka-kālaṁ<!-- presence of ā to be verified on stone --> samu<unclear>ddhr̥tya</unclear>,</l>
		<l n="d">mad-rājānujñayā punaḥ, <num value="19">19</num> ||</l>
	</lg>
         </div>
         <div type="apparatus">
         <listApp>
                  <app loc="2">
                     <lem source="bib:Kern1917_27">śaka-kālam</lem>
                     <rdg source="bib:Poerbatjaraka1922_02">śāka-kālam</rdg>
                  </app>
	<app loc="3">
                     <lem>śreṣ<choice><orig>ṭ</orig><reg>ṭh</reg></choice>a</lem>
                     <rdg source="bib:Kern1917_27 bib:Poerbatjaraka1922_02">śreṣṭha</rdg>
	<note>All previous editions silently correct <foreign>ṭ</foreign> to <foreign>ṭh</foreign>. Cf. st. XIII for two clear cases of a proper <foreign>ṣṭh</foreign>, and XV for a clear case of <foreign>ṣṭ</foreign>. There is no doubt the lapicide here engraved <foreign>ṣṭ</foreign>. See also the remarks of Damais (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Damais1955_01"/><citedRange unit="page">58</citedRange><citedRange unit="note">1</citedRange><citedRange unit="page">79</citedRange><citedRange unit="note">3</citedRange></bibl><!-- how to handle such separate page numbers with separate note numbers? -->) on the distinction <foreign>ṣth/ṣṭ</foreign> in Javanese inscriptions.</note> 
	</app>
<app loc="3">
               <lem>bharāḍasaṁjñakaḥ</lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Kern1917_27 bib:Poerbatjaraka1922_02">bharāḍ abhijñataḥ</rdg>
	<note>Kern notes that the reading of <foreign>i</foreign> (in <foreign>bhi</foreign>) is uncertain, and that the whole word is suspect. Indeed one would expect <foreign>bharāḍābhijñataḥ</foreign>, since the figure’s known name is <foreign>bharāḍa</foreign>, but this would be unmetrical. The stone clearly shows <foreign>saṁ</foreign> instead of <foreign>bhi</foreign> and <foreign>ka</foreign> and instead of <foreign>ta</foreign>, and these new readings solve the textual problem here. The same expression °<foreign>saṁjñaka</foreign> is used by the poet twice in st. XIV.</note>
</app>
<app loc="5">
<lem>sāmarthya</lem>
<note>Kern (n. 3) observes <quote>Het casus-teeken ontbreekt</quote>. It would be possible to read <foreign>°sāmarthyaṁ</foreign> although the hole in the stone that could represent anusvāra can equally be treated as a cavity in the stone. However, it is seems unproblematic to consider that the whole of pāda c forms the initial part of a long compound ending with <foreign>kumbhabajrodakena</foreign> in d.</note>
</app>
<app loc="5">
	<lem>bajrodakena</lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Kern1917_27 bib:Poerbatjaraka1922_02">vajrodakena</rdg>
</app>
<app loc="6">
<lem>kāṁkṣiṇoḥ</lem>
<rdg source="bib:Kern1917_27 bib:Poerbatjaraka1922_02">kāṅkṣiṇoḥ</rdg>
</app>
<app loc="6">
<lem>Etasmāj</lem>
<rdg source="bib:Kern1917_27">Atasmāj</rdg>
<rdg source="bib:Poerbatjaraka1922_02">Estasmāj</rdg>
<note><bibl><ptr target="bib:Bosch1919_01"/></bibl> suggested the reading adopted here. Poerbatjaraka seems to have intended to adopt Bosch' reading but to have become confused, as he wavers in spelling this word (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Poerbatjaraka1922_02"/><citedRange>434</citedRange></bibl>).</note>
</app>
<app loc="7">
<lem source="bib:Poerbatjaraka1922_02">kin tu</lem>
<rdg source="bib:Kern1917_27">dina</rdg>
</app>
               </listApp>         
         </div>
         <div type="translation" resp="part:argr">
<p rend="stanza" n="1">First I bow to the Omniscient Knowledge-Body, the Tathāgata, who resides in the concealment beyond all skandhas, who transcends the positions of being and non-being,</p>
	<!-- A reference to the presence of the Buddha in the vulva? 
	This position discussed by Sanderson 2009.
	 -->

<p rend="stanza" n="2">I praise him alternatively as Omnipotent, for he is eternally venerable. After that I shall proclaim this illumination of the king’s glory in the Śaka-age.</p>
<!-- 	Several other translations could be imagined for this stanza, but this one seems to make most sense, and is best in agreement with the actual structure of the text that follows. It avoids assuming the grammatical error of forcing idaṁ (n.) to agree with śakakālam (masc.) that Kern accepts, but to do so it must assume that the -m in śakakālam is the hiatus breaking -m- known in lower registers of Sanskrit, which allows translating as though the text had śakakāla (for śakakāle). Maybe the error of gender assumed by Kern is after all the lesser improbability.
	Rather take ‘localized’ meaning of śakakāla ‘inscription/decree’ as in Kebon Kopi and Batu Tulis inscriptions. Check meaning of sangkakala in Javanese. -->

<p rend="stanza" n="3">He who (yo) was the most excellent sage of former times, called Ārya Bharāḍa (= Bharāla/Bhaṭāra); [who] was the best of sages insofar as he had gained perfection of wisdom [and] attained the supernatural faculties (of a Buddha: abhijñā).</p>
<!-- This stanza and the next I take as responses to the announcement in st. I-II that the Tathāgata would be praised in his aspects ‘Omniscient’ (sarvajña) and ‘Omnipotent’ (sarvasiddhi). They simultaneously introduce the human figure Bharāḍa as an embodiment of the Buddha.
	See Griffiths, Inscriptions of Padang Lawas, on the word bharāḍa (< bhaṭāra); see Hadi Sidomulyo 2009 on this figure. -->

<p rend="stanza" n="4">[He was also known as] the intelligent Great Lord of Yogins, by nature compassionate with living beings; the Teacher of Siddhas, the Great Hero, free of afflictions such as covetousness.</p>

<!-- Now I assume that the ‘illumination of the king’s glory in the Śaka-age’ begins. -->
<p rend="stanza" n="5">After the division of the land of Yava, that is endowed with mines of jewels, by use of Jar- and Vajra-water, powerful enough to effect the division of the earth,</p>
	<!-- Cf. the Canggal inscription, st. VII (about dvīpavaraṁ yavākhyam): sampannaṁ kanakākarais. 
	vajrodaka ‘Vajra-water’ seems to be a common ritual element in Buddhist tantric texts.
	Cf. Ahirbudhnyasaṁhitā 47-36: homaante kumbhodakena raaj~no.abhi.seka.h / homakarma.ni nirv.rtte tattatkumbhodakaistata.h | yantrapii.the samaaropya raajaanamabhi.secayet || 
	Cf. Ma;nju;sriimuulakalpa kama.n.daluvidhaana; Vajraavalii, Kalaśādhivāsanavidhi; Sarvavajrodaya, f.52r;
	SDPT oṁ vajrodaka huṁ ity anenāṣṭottarasahasrābhimantritaṁ caturhuṁkāreṇa cāṣṭaśatābhimantritaṁ kr̥tvā bhagavato vajrahuṁkārasyāgrataḥ saṁsthāpya / praveśadvārābhimukhaṁ ca bahir dvitīyaṁ kalaśaṁ caturhuṁkāreṇāṣṭaśatajaptaṁ sthāpayet / tenodakenātmaśiṣyābhiṣekaṁ kr̥tvā / praveśamudrāṁ baddhvā na bandhayed vā / pravālaṁ jātarūpaṁ ca śaṁkhaṁ muktāmaṇis tathā / sarvaratnāni siṁhīvyāghrīgirikarṇāsahadevāś ceti sarvauṣadhayaḥ / tilān māṣān yavān dhānyān godhūmāṁś cāpi pañcamān / śabdena sarvavrīhīṇāṁ pañca tān upalakṣayet / tad anu catuḥpraṇāmādipūrvakaṁ saṁvaraṁ grāhayitvā vajrayakṣeṇa nīlavastrāṇi parijapya sattvoṣṇīṣeṇa vastraṁ dvārapālair mukhaveṣṭanaṁ vajrakavacenottarīyam ābaddhoṣṇīṣādika ācāryaḥ krodhaterintiryā nīlapuṣpam ādāya / -->

<p rend="stanza" n="6">and working towards opposite ends, of two kings lusting for war, this province of Paṅjalu was for this reason called [the land of] Jāṅgala.</p>
	<!-- The feminine paṁjaluviṣayā I explain as due to attraction with jānġalā [bhūmir] eṣā. Alternatively, the point of the stanza may be to give the two names of the lands resulting from the split of Yava-land. In that case, the translation might be something like: ‘..., there suddenly was this [land of] Jāṅgala, [and on the other hand the land] said to have Pangjalu as territory’.
	Or: ... for this reason this Jāṅgalā was considered to have Pangjalu as a province (viṣaya). -->

<p rend="stanza" n="7">But since the king Jayaśrī Viṣṇuvardhana, excellent earth-ruler who had Śrī Jayavardhanī as spouse, protected this [land],</p>

<p rend="stanza" n="8">he whose limbs were pure right from birth, who was compassionate, totally devoted to dharma —, he has caused the delight of (vassal) kings due to his pure glory and valor,</p>

<p rend="stanza" n="9">and has united the land once again — whether it be for the eternal pleasure of the world or for protecting dharma, or again for installing (?) his ancestors, etc.</p>
	<!-- In this and the preceding verse, I translate the absolutives as finite verbs, as seems to be demanded by the absence of any real finite verb to terminate the sentence, and as sanctioned by the common use of absolutives in this manner in certain registers of Sanskrit. Cf. also st. XVIII-XIX below.
	Instead of °sthāpanāya, should we emend °stavanāya? Cf. the Maribong inscription: svapitāmahāstavanābhinnāśrantalokapālaka (about Viṣṇuvardhana). -->

<p rend="stanza" n="10">So that (? yathaiva) the sage king of kings (Kr̥tanagara), son of Śrī Harivardhana (i.e. Viṣṇuvardhana) and son of Śrī Jayavardhanī, ruler of the four ‘islands’ (i.e. the whole world),</p>
	<!-- On the use of synonyms for names, such as Hariv. = Viṣṇuv., see De Casparis, “Date of the Grahi Buddha”, p. 36, where this example is mentioned. -->

<p rend="stanza" n="11">accomplished in all Tattvas (?), best of Dharmaśāstra scholars, intent upon the accomplishment of (monastery/temple) restorations (jīrṇoddhāra), issuer [solely] of edicts in conformity with dharma,</p>

<p rend="stanza" n="12">called Śrī Jñānaśivavajra, endowed with the jewel of intelligence (?, <foreign>cittaratnavibhūṣaṇa</foreign>), whose limbs were purified by the rays of insight, expert in the knowledge of enlightenment,</p>
	<!-- On the name attributed to the ruler here, see Damais, EEI p. 137 n. 5. -->

<p rend="stanza" n="13">devotedly installed him (i.e., Bharāḍa), who had previously been established (<foreign>pratiṣṭhita</foreign>) [here] himself, at the cremation ground called Vurare, modelled after Mahākṣobhya,</p>
	<!-- The pronoun taṁ here takes up the relative pronoun yo in st. III. This connection has not been seen by previous scholars, who were hence misled into thinking that the pronoun referred to the son of Viṣṇuvardhana, i.e. Kr̥tanagara. -->

<p rend="stanza" n="14">in the year of the Śaka-king [denoted by] Bhava (11) and Cakra (12) (i.e. 1211), in the month called Asuji, on the fifth of the bright fortnight, and the day called Paniruan, Kalivuan, Wednesday,</p>

<p rend="stanza" n="15">during the <foreign>parva</foreign> (i.e., <foreign>wuku</foreign>) called Sinta, under the <foreign>karaṇa</foreign> hallowed by (the Seer?) Viṣṭi, under the constellation Anurādha, with the sun in the orb of Mahendra,</p>

<p rend="stanza" n="16">in connection with an auspicious conjunction, and at a favorable <foreign>muhūrta</foreign>, the deity of the <foreign>parva</foreign> being called Kubera, joined with (?) the zodiac sign Libra,</p>

<p rend="stanza" n="17">for the eternal benefit of all living beings, but above all (<foreign>prāg eva</foreign>) the king with his sons, grandsons and his wife (or: their wives), for the reason that the land had been unified.</p>

<p rend="stanza" n="18">And I, being his servant called Nādajña, devoid of knowledge and full of delusion, without expertise with regard to dharma works,</p>

<p rend="stanza" n="19">have really achieved the position of dharma surveyor only thanks to his compassion, after I have again saved (?, <foreign>samuddhr̥tya</foreign>, reading uncertain) the Śaka-age, by permission of my king.</p>
	<!-- My reading for the second half of this stanza is quite different from the readings of my predecessors. 	Rather take ‘localized’ meaning of śakakāla as in Kebon Kopi and Batu Tulis inscriptions. -->
         </div>
         <div type="commentary">
            <!--commentary encoded as per section §9.3 -->
         </div>
        <div type="bibliography">
           <p>First edited by Kern (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Kern1910_01"/></bibl>), whose article was re-edited with corrections as <bibl><ptr target="bib:Kern1917_27"/></bibl>; edited again by Poerbatjaraka (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Poerbatjaraka1922_02"/></bibl>). The subsequent editions published by Chatterjee &amp; Chakravarti (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Chatterjee+Chakravarti1933_01"/></bibl>, with translation into English) and Sircar (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Sircar1983_01"/></bibl>) ignore Poerbatjaraka's work and most of the secondary bibliography. None of the previous editions accurately represents the punctuation of the original. Re-edited here by Arlo Griffiths directly from the stone and from the EFEO estampages; the apparatus is positive only for the significant variant readings observed in the editions by Kern (1917) and Poerbatjaraka.<!-- EFEO n. 2195-2198 --></p>
		   <listBibl type="primary">
		   	<bibl><ptr target="bib:Kern1910_01"/></bibl>
		   	<bibl n="K"><ptr target="bib:Kern1917_27"/></bibl>
		   	<bibl n="P"><ptr target="bib:Poerbatjaraka1922_02"/></bibl>
		   </listBibl>
           <listBibl type="secondary">
<!-- Verbeek 1891: 10-->
<!-- Brandes NBG 1898 36 81 -->
<!-- Brandes TBG 1906 48 54 -->
<!-- Knebel, ROC 1907: 204, 205 -->
<!-- Krom T. B. G. dl. 52 blz. 191, OV 1914: 206, Krom 1916: 306-307 -->
<bibl><ptr target="bib:OV1913"/><citedRange unit="page">34</citedRange></bibl>
<!-- Bosch T. B. G. 58 blz. 442. -->
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Bosch1919_01"/><citedRange>442-443</citedRange></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Chatterjee+Chakravarti1933_01"/><citedRange unit="page">75-78</citedRange></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Damais1952_01"/><citedRange unit="page">72-73</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">A.174</citedRange></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Damais1955_01"/><citedRange unit="page">79</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">A.174</citedRange></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Nakada1982_01"/><citedRange unit="page">116-117</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">I.202</citedRange></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1983_01"/><citedRange unit="page">700-702</citedRange></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Nihom1986_01"/></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:HadiSidomulyo2011_01"/></bibl>
<bibl><ptr target="bib:Gomperts+al2012_01"/></bibl>
           </listBibl>
        </div>
      </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
<!-- normal anusvāra: crescent shape or circle??? -->
<!-- special anusvāra: circle plus crescent shape -->
