Tugu Boulder Inscription of Pūrṇavarman (ca. 6th c. CE) EpiDoc encoding Arlo Griffiths intellectual authorship of edition Arlo Griffiths Emmanuel Francis European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994 DHARMA Lyon DHARMA_INSIDENKTugu.xml CC BY-SA 4.0 2019-2026 as per external metadata

Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2

 started encoding the inscription
@ purā rājādhirājena guruṇā pīna-bāhunā khātā khyātāṁ purīṁ prāpya candrabhāgārṇṇavaṁ yayau || pravarddhamāna-dvāviṅśad -vatsara śrī-guṇaujasā narendra-dhvaja-bhātena śrīmatā pūrṇṇavarmmaṇo || prārabhya phālguṇe māse khātā kr̥ṣṇāṣṭamī-tithau caitra-śukla-trayodaśyāM dinais siddhaikaviṅśakaiḥ || Āyatā ṣaṭ-sahasreṇa dhanuṣāṁ saśatena ca dvāviṅśena nadī ramyā gomatī nirmalodakā || pitāmahasya rājarṣer vvidāryya śibirāvaniM brāhmaṇair go-sahasrenāṇa prayāti kr̥ta-dakṣiṇā || ... || @ || ... ||

Kern's readings, fully accounted for by Vogel, are not taken into account here any longer. There are several small differences of reading between Vogel, Chhabra and Sarkar. Chhabra indicates no source for his readings, or variants from his predecessors. Sarkar (p. 5) claims to base his on the facsimile published by Vogel. Yet both seem partly to copy Vogel, because they ignore the fact that in the system of transliteration used in POD 1, roman m stands for anusvāra: only this can explain why they misread m for ṁ several times. The text constituted below is based on consultation of POD 1, plate 27 (= OD XXX?).

??????