<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_Schema.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erc-dharma/project-documentation/master/schema/latest/DHARMA_SQF.sch" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
<?xml-model href="https://epidoc.stoa.org/schema/latest/tei-epidoc.rng" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="eng">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Palepangan charter (828 Śaka)</title>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="contributor">EpiDoc encoding</resp>
               <persName ref="part:argr">
                  <forename>Arlo</forename>
                  <surname>Griffiths</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt>
            <respStmt>
               <resp key="creator">intellectual authorship of edition</resp>
               <persName ref="part:argr">
                  <forename>Arlo</forename>
                  <surname>Griffiths</surname>
               </persName>
            </respStmt> 
         <funder>European Research Council (ERC), grant agreement no 809994</funder></titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <authority><ref target="https://dharmalekha.info">DHARMA</ref></authority>
            <pubPlace>Lyon</pubPlace>
            <idno type="filename">DHARMA_INSIDENKPalepangan.xml</idno>
            <availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>
            <date from="2019" to="2026">2019-2026</date>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc><!-- only the handDesc can be filled in at this stage -->
            <msDesc><!-- //// NB: the msIdentifier had to be added for validation purposes ///. It will be edited later with the metadata spreadsheet -->
               <msIdentifier>
                  <repository>as per external metadata</repository>
               </msIdentifier>
               <msContents><!-- describe the intellectual content of an inscription -->
                  <summary><!-- //// NOT MANDATORY  ////--></summary>
                  <!-- offers the possibility to give a summary of the inscription's content -->
               </msContents>
               <physDesc>
                  <handDesc>
                     <p>The basic punctuation sign takes the shape of a raised circle.
<!-- The script name(s) will be inserted here at a later stage from the metadata spreasheet. At this stage, you can mention here in a free-text paragraph any characteristics of the writing observed more than once in this inscription that seem unusual/uncommon or otherwise noteworthy given the general characteristics of the script in question. See EGD 11.2. --></p>
                  </handDesc>
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <p>Encoded in TEI/EpiDoc according to the <ref target="https://hal.science/halshs-02888186">DHARMA Encoding Guide for Documentary Editions, version 2</ref></p>
      </encodingDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change who="part:wjsa" when="2025-03-24" status="draft">Added new reading for toponym Syukan</change>
         <change who="part:wjsa" when="2024-05-01" status="draft">Fixed an error in the de Casparis blockquote</change>
         <change who="part:argr" when="2021-02-04" status="draft">further revisions to various parts of the file</change>
         <change who="part:argr" when="2021-01-21" status="draft">integrated some corrigenda of the reading proposed by Marine Schoettel</change>
         <change who="part:argr" when="2021-01-20" status="draft">finished initial encoding of the inscription</change>
         <change who="part:axja" when="2020-11-03" status="draft">Updating toward the encoding template v03</change>
         <change who="part:argr" when="2020-09-22" status="draft">started initial encoding of the inscription</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text xml:space="preserve">
      <body>
         <div type="edition" xml:lang="kaw-Latn" rendition="class:38769 maturity:83213">
<pb n="1r"/>
<!-- empty -->
<p><pb n="1v"/><lb n="1v1"/><g ref="sym:doubleBar" type="punctuation">.</g> <g ref="sym:circle" type="symbol">*</g> <g ref="sym:doubleBar" type="punctuation">.</g> svasti śaka-varṣātīta <num value="828">828</num> punaḥ-śravaṇa-māsa, tithi Aṣṭami kr̥ṣṇa-pa<space type="binding-hole"/>kṣa, <abbr>ha</abbr>, <abbr><choice><sic>va</sic><corr>pa</corr></choice></abbr>, <abbr>śu</abbr>, vāra, Irikā divasa rāmanta I paL̥paṅan makabehan·, I<lb n="1v2" break="no"/>nanugrahān· vineḥ makmitana prasasti de rakryān· mapatiḥ I hino pu dakṣottama bāhubajra-pratipakṣakṣaya,</p> <p>samvandhanya saṅkā I tan patūtnikanaṁ
<lb n="1v3"/>rāma lavan· saṁ n<choice><orig>a</orig><reg>ā</reg></choice>yaka bhagavanta jyotiṣa,<!-- comma ignored by Boechari --> Ikana savaḥnya sinaṅguḥ lamvit· <num value="2">2</num> kinon ta ya modhāra, pirak· <abbr>dhā</abbr> <num value="6">6</num> I satampaḥ-satampaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">,</supplied> kunaṁ sa<space type="descender"/>ṅkā ri
<lb n="1v4"/>hə:tnya tan· vnaṁ modhāra samaṅkana,<!-- comma ignored by Boechari --> ya ta mataṁṅ yan panamvaḥ rā<space type="descender"/>manta I rakryān· mapa<space type="descender"/>tiḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">,</supplied></p> <p>kinonakan· savaḥnya U<unclear>k</unclear>uran· Iṁ tampaḥ haji, sinaṅguḥ
<lb n="1v5"/>tampaḥ haji,<!-- comma ignored by Boechari --> sātus· ḍpa sihvā pañjaṁnya,<!-- comma ignored by Boechari --> s<unclear>ə</unclear>ṅkə:nya tluṁ puluḥ ḍpa sihvā,<!-- comma ignored by Boechari --> kinon· maṅukura vadvā rakryān· I hino saṁ brahmā muAṁ rovaṁ <abbr>samgat·</abbr> priṁ sa<unclear>ṁ</unclear> kañcur·
<lb n="1v6"/>mijilakan ya lamvit· <num value="1">1</num> tampaḥ <num value="7">7</num> blaḥ <num value="1">1</num> Ikana samaṅkana ya ta kinon· mo<unclear>dhāra,</unclear> pirak· <abbr>dhā</abbr> <num value="6">6</num> I satampaḥ-satampaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">,</supplied></p> <p>jari rāmanta matahil· pirak· <space type="descender"/> <abbr>dhā</abbr>
<lb n="1v7"/><num value="6">6</num> I satampaḥ-satampaḥ<supplied reason="subaudible">,</supplied> piṇḍa pirak· patahil·<!-- corr. satahil? --> rāmanta rikanaṁ savaḥ lamvit· <num value="1">1</num> tampaḥ <num value="7">7</num> blaḥ <num value="1">1</num> pirak· <abbr>kā</abbr> <num value="5">5</num> <abbr>dhā</abbr> <num value="5">5</num> len· saṅkā ri pilih<!-- Boechari piliḥ--> mas· muA<unclear>ṁ</unclear> kaṭik· prāṇa,
<lb n="1v8"/><num value="8">8</num> mara I bhaṭāra prāṇa <num value="4">4</num> I saṁ n<choice><orig>a</orig><reg>ā</reg></choice>yaka prāṇa <num value="4">4</num> piṇḍa savaḥni<!-- thus Sarkar and Boechari — or read -niṁ --> kaṭik· lamvit· <num value="1">1</num> tampaḥ <num value="1">1</num> suku <num value="1">1</num> kinabehanya, savaḥ rāmanta lamvit· <num value="1">1</num> blaḥ <num>1</num> katuhala<lb n="1v9" break="no"/>san· tampaḥ <num value="2">2</num> kapkanan· tampaḥ <num value="1">1</num> nāhan· pratyekani savaḥ rāmanta sampunyan inukur· I<!-- supply a lost anusvāra here? see 1v4 --> tampaḥ haji, len· sumaṅkā rika hana ta savaḥ bhaṭāra kmitan· rā<lb n="1v10" break="no"/>manta lamvit· <num value="1">1</num> dmak·ni p<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ū</corr></choice>ja<unclear cert="low">,</unclear> mūla lamvit· <num value="1">1</num> tan inukur· Ikā Āpan· h<choice><orig>i</orig><reg>ī</reg></choice>nanyan· svabhāvanya,<!-- comma ignored by  Boechari --> muAṁ lañjān·<!-- Boechari lañjan· --> pirak· <abbr>dhā</abbr> <num value="14">14</num> patukan· pirak· <abbr>dhā</abbr> <num value="4">4</num><g ref="sym:doubleBar" type="punctuation">.</g> panurat· pira<lb n="1v11" break="no"/>k· <abbr>mā</abbr> <num value="4">4</num><unclear><g ref="sym:doubleBar" type="punctuation">.</g></unclear><!-- punctuation ignored in previous editions  --> Umijil· ri māgha vinava saṁ Umikul· vali bhaṭāra, pavḍus· pirak· <abbr>mā</abbr> <num value="8">8</num> Umijil· ri sasāṅan·, nāhan· Anugraha rakryān· mapatiḥ I rāmanta I paL̥pa<lb n="1v12" break="no"/>ṅan· sapasug banu<choice><sic>Ā</sic><corr>A,</corr></choice></p> <p>tatra sākṣī<!-- S B: saksī--> <abbr>samgat·</abbr> priṁ<!-- B: pri --> ḍapunta Udāra Anak vanuA I srāṅan· pumpunanni bihāra Iṁ pahai, Amasaṅakan· <space type="descender"/>I rakryān· mapatiḥ <unclear>d</unclear>y<unclear>aḥ</unclear> <unclear>va</unclear><lb n="1v13" break="no"/>no Anak vanuA I syutan·<!-- ū? k? kh? --> vatək· tiru raṇu, tuha kalaṁ rikaṁ kāla pu baruṇa, pu palinī, tuha banuA pu kmir·, pu gamana, pu gambir·, gusti pu karṇa, pu Aruṇa, pu
<lb n="1v14"/><unclear>vā</unclear>ri, guru pu tarañja<space type="descender"/>l·, parujar· pu pradhāna, maṁraṁkpi pu kuḍut·, vinkas· pu sādha, tuha banuA I lampahan· pu gammar·, variga pu bur·, huler pu bay·, nā<lb n="1v15" break="no"/>han· kvaiḥnira maṅagam· kon·,<!-- comma ignored by Sarkar Boechari --> kumayatnākan· Uja<choice><orig>r</orig><reg>r r</reg></choice>akryān· mapatiḥ I hino, likhitapātra citralekha <abbr>samgat·</abbr> priṁ</p>
         </div>
         <div type="apparatus">
           <!--apparatus encoded as per EGD §9.1, basic elements for apparatus below-->
               <listApp>
<!-- 1v3 		Ikana — Ikanaṁ Sarkar and Boechari:
		sinaṅguḥ — siaṅguḥ PKMN 
-->
<app loc="1v1">
                     <lem source="bib:Damais1955_01 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01"><num value="828">828</num> punaḥ-śravaṇa-māsa</lem>
                     <rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02">848 <gap reason="illegible" unit="character" quantity="4"/>-māsa</rdg>
	       <!--<rdg source="bib:Sarkar1939_01">828 <gap reason="illegible" unit="character" quantity="4"/>-māsa</rdg>-->
                  </app>
<app loc="1v1">
	<lem source="bib:Damais1955_01 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">kr̥ṣṇa-pa<space type="binding-hole"/>kṣa</lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02">śukla-pakṣa</rdg>
</app>	
<app loc="1v1">
<lem><abbr><choice><sic>va</sic><corr>pa</corr></choice></abbr></lem>
<note>The need to make this correction was first pointed out by <bibl><ptr target="bib:Damais1955_01"/></bibl> and confirmed by <bibl><ptr target="bib:Eade+Gislen2000_01"/></bibl>.</note>
</app>
<app loc="1v3">
	<lem>Ikana</lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">Ikanaṁ</rdg>
</app>
<app loc="1v4">
                     <lem>U<unclear>k</unclear>uran·</lem>
                     <rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">Uturan</rdg>
	<note>The reading <foreign>Ukuran</foreign> was proposed by <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sarkar1939_01"/><citedRange unit="page">126</citedRange><citedRange unit="note">6</citedRange></bibl>.</note>
                  </app>
<app loc="1v4">
	<lem>s<unclear>ə</unclear>ṅkə:nya</lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">siṅkrənya</rdg>
	<note>The prevous editors have misunderstood the length-mark (<foreign>tarung</foreign>) as <foreign>r</foreign> (<foreign>cakra</foreign>).</note>
</app>
<app loc="1v5">
	<lem>sa<unclear>ṁ</unclear> kañcur·</lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">sakañcur·</rdg>
	<note>The reading with <foreign>anusvāra</foreign> to yield <foreign>saṁ</foreign> was proposed by <bibl><ptr target="bib:Damais1970_01"/><citedRange unit="page">324</citedRange></bibl>.</note>
</app>
<app loc="1v6">
	<lem>mijilakan ya</lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">mijilakanya</rdg>
</app>
<app loc="1v6">
	<lem source="bib:Bosch1917_02">blaḥ <num>1</num></lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">blaḥ I</rdg>
</app>
                  <app loc="1v9">
                     <lem>katuhala<lb n="1v9" break="no"/>san·</lem>
                     <rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">katuha lavan·</rdg>
                  </app>
<app loc="1v9">
	<lem source="bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">tampaḥ <num value="2">2</num></lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02">tampaḥ 4</rdg>
</app>
<app loc="1v10">
	<lem>dmak·ni p<choice><sic>a</sic><corr>ū</corr></choice>ja<unclear cert="low">,</unclear> mūla </lem>
	<!-- <lem>p<choice><sic>aj</sic><corr>ād</corr></choice>amūla</lem> -->	
	<rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">dmak·ni pajamūla</rdg>
	<note>The presence of a punctuation sign before <foreign>mūla</foreign> is very uncertain. If there is none, then an alternative way to edit the segment might be  <foreign>p<choice><sic>aj</sic><corr>ād</corr></choice>amūla</foreign>, with reference to the <ref target="DHARMA_INSIDENKTigaRon.xml">Tiga Ron</ref> inscription, lines 6–7: <foreign>vuAra mas· su 10 Akṣayiṇi kmitanni rāma I vuru tuṅgal· parbhaktya<supplied reason="lost">nya</supplied>  <unclear>pā</unclear>damūla</foreign> <q>It has 10 <foreign>suvarṇa</foreign> of permanent gold  kept by the elders of Vuru Tuṅgal, as endowment for the temple manager</q>. The idea that <foreign>dmak·ni paja</foreign> is a mistake for <foreign>dmak·ni pūja</foreign> is supported by the mention of a <foreign>savaḥ dmak· caruA saṁ hyaṁ vināya</foreign> <q>endowment wet-ricefield for offerings to god Vināya</q>. The word <foreign>mūla</foreign> is then assumed to stand at the head of a new phrase, as is often seen in inscriptions of this period.</note>
</app>
<app loc="1v10">
	<lem>Ikā Āpan·</lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">Ika Āpan·</rdg>
</app>
<app loc="1v11">
	<lem>sasāṅan·</lem>
	<rdg source="bib:Bosch1917_02 bib:Boechari1985-1986_01"><unclear>vata</unclear>ṅan·</rdg>
</app>
<app loc="1v13">
<lem source="bib:Damais1970_01">syukan·</lem>
<rdg source="bib:Boechari1985-1986_01 bib:Bosch1917_02">syutan·</rdg>
<note>The reading <foreign>syukan·</foreign> offered by Damais (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="Damais1970_01"/><citedRange unit="page">517</citedRange></bibl>) seems clear, as the shape of the <foreign>akṣara</foreign> differs notably from that of <foreign>ta</foreign> found elsewhere on the plate. The toponym Syukan is well-known from boundary stone inscriptions of the Lokapāla period, likewise associated with the <foreign>vatək</foreign> Tiru Raṇu (<bibl><ptr target="bib:TitiSurtiNastiti2018_01"/><citedRange>204-206</citedRange></bibl>).</note>
</app>
<app loc="1v14">
<lem source="bib:Bosch1917_02">lampahan·</lem>
<rdg source="bib:Boechari1985-1986_01">lampapan·</rdg>
</app>
               </listApp>
         </div>
         <div type="translation" resp="part:argr">
 	<p n="1v1-1v2">Hail! Elapsed Śaka year 828, intercalary month of Śravaṇa, eighth <foreign>tithi</foreign> of the waning fortnight, Haryaṅ, Vās, Friday. That was the time that the elders of Palepangan were collectively granted the privilege of being allowed to keep a charter by the lord minister of Hino, <foreign>pu</foreign> Dakṣottama Bāhubajra Pratipakṣakṣaya.</p>
	<p n="1v2-1v4">The occasion for it was due to the elders not being in accord with the <foreign>nāyaka</foreign>, <supplied reason="explanation">namely</supplied> the reverend Jyotiṣa <supplied reason="subaudible">that</supplied> their wet ricefield is considered as <supplied reason="subaudible">measuring</supplied> 2 <foreign>lamvit</foreign>. They were ordered to excise <supplied reason="explanation"><foreign>udhāra</foreign></supplied> 6 <foreign>dhāraṇa</foreign> of silver for every single <foreign>tampah</foreign>. But due to its deficiency <supplied reason="explanation">compared to said estimate</supplied> they were not able to excise that much. That is why the elders petitioned <supplied reason="explanation"><foreign>sambah</foreign></supplied> the lord minister.</p>
 	<p n="1v4-1v6">Their wet ricefield was ordered to be measured by the royal <foreign>tampah</foreign>. The royal <foreign>tampah</foreign> is considered to be a hundred <foreign>ḍpa sihvā</foreign> in length, thirty <foreign>ḍpa sihvā</foreign> in breadth. The assistant of the lord of Hino, <supplied reason="explanation">namely</supplied> <foreign>saṅ</foreign> Brahmā, as well as the officiant of Priṅ's companion <supplied reason="explanation">called</supplied> <foreign>saṅ</foreign> Kañcur, were ordered to measure. They produced <supplied reason="subaudible">as result</supplied> 1 <foreign>lamvit</foreign>, 7 <foreign>tampah</foreign>, 1 <foreign>blah</foreign>. As much as that <supplied reason="explanation">aforementioned sum</supplied> they <supplied reason="explanation">namely the elders</supplied> were ordered to excise: 6 <foreign>dhāraṇa</foreign> of silver for every single <foreign>tampah</foreign>.</p> 
	<p n="1v6-1v12">Thereupon <supplied reason="explanation"><foreign>jari</foreign></supplied>, the elders contributed in <foreign>tahil</foreign> <supplied reason="explanation">tax</supplied> 6 <foreign>dhāraṇa</foreign> of silver for every single <foreign>tampah</foreign>. The total amount of silver serving the elders to contribute <foreign>tahil</foreign> on the ricefield of 1 <foreign>lamvit</foreign>, 7 <foreign>tampah</foreign>, 1 <foreign>blah</foreign>, was 5 <foreign>kāṭi</foreign> and 5 <foreign>dhāraṇa</foreign> of silver<!-- 105 dharana / 6 = 17.5 tampah -->, besides <foreign>pilih mas</foreign> and 8 laborers <supplied reason="explanation"><foreign>kaṭik</foreign></supplied>, 4 of them for the deity, 4 of them for the <foreign>nāyaka</foreign>. The total amount of wet ricefield of the laborers was 1 <foreign>lamvit</foreign>, 1 <foreign>tampah</foreign>, 1 <foreign>suku</foreign> held in common. The wet ricefield of the elders was 1 <foreign>lamvit</foreign>, 1 <foreign>blah</foreign>; the <supplied reason="subaudible">wet ricefield</supplied> of the forest inspector was 2 <foreign>tampah</foreign>; the <supplied reason="subaudible">wet ricefield</supplied> of the surveyor of markets was 1 <foreign>tampah</foreign>. Such was the specification of the wet ricefields after they had been measured in <foreign>tampah haji</foreign>.
	Besides them there was 1 <foreign>lamvit</foreign> of wet ricefield of the deity kept by the elders as endowment for the cult <supplied reason="explanation"><foreign>pūja</foreign></supplied> — the value <supplied reason="explanation"><foreign>mūla</foreign></supplied> of 1 <foreign>lamvit</foreign> was not measured, because of the destituteness of its condition — with the income from subletting <supplied reason="explanation"><foreign>lañjān</foreign></supplied> of 14 <foreign>dhāraṇa</foreign> of silver; the <foreign>patukan</foreign> of 4 <foreign>māṣa</foreign> of silver; the <foreign>panurat</foreign> of 4 <foreign>dhāraṇa</foreign> of silver. They are due <supplied reason="explanation"><foreign>umijil</foreign></supplied> in Māgha <supplied reason="subaudible">and</supplied> taken by the ones who carry the deity's offerings <supplied reason="explanation"><foreign>bali</foreign></supplied> by <foreign>pikul</foreign>. The <foreign>pavḍus</foreign> of 4 <foreign>māṣa</foreign> of silver is due in the Ninth <supplied reason="subaudible">month</supplied> <supplied reason="explanation">Caitra</supplied>. Thus was the grant of the lord minister of Hino to the elders of Palepangan with all the village inhabitants.</p>
	<p n="1v12-1v15">The witnesses to it were:
<list>
<item>the officiant of Priṅ <supplied reason="subaudible">named</supplied> <foreign>ḍapunta</foreign> Udāra, native of the village of Sraṅan, domain of the monastery at Pahai, teaming up  (?) with the lord minister <foreign>dyah</foreign> Vano, native of the village of Syutan, district of Tiru Raṇu;</item> 
<item>the Kalaṅ overseers at the time <supplied reason="explanation">named</supplied> <foreign>pu</foreign> Baruṇa <supplied reason="subaudible">and</supplied> <foreign>pu</foreign> Palinī;</item> 
<item>the village overseers <foreign>pu</foreign> Kmir, <foreign>pu</foreign> Gamana <supplied reason="subaudible">and</supplied> <foreign>pu</foreign> Gambir;</item> 
<item>the <foreign>gusti</foreign>s: <foreign>pu</foreign> Karṇa, <foreign>pu</foreign> Aruṇa, <foreign>pu</foreign> Vāri;</item> 
<item>the teacher <foreign>pu</foreign> Tarañjal;</item> 
<item>the herald <foreign>pu</foreign> Pradhāna;</item> 
<item>the <foreign>maṅraṅkəpi</foreign> <foreign>pu</foreign> Kuḍut;</item> 
<item>the <foreign>vinkas</foreign> <foreign>pu</foreign> Sādha;</item> 
<item>the village overseer of Lampahan: <foreign>pu</foreign> Gəmar;</item> 
<item>the astrologer <foreign>pu</foreign> Bur;</item> 
<item>the irrigation head: <foreign>pu</foreign> Bay.</item>
</list>
Thus was the total of those holding office, who devoted their full attention to the words of the minister of Hino.</p>
<p n="1v15">Written by the officiant of Priṅ as calligrapher.</p>
         </div>
         <div type="commentary">
            <!--commentary encoded as per section §9.3 -->
	<p n="3">On the <foreign>nāyaka bhagavanta</foreign> Jyotiṣa, J. G. de Casparis observed: <cit><quote>From the high title of the <foreign>nāyaka</foreign> (<foreign>Bhagawanta</foreign> is derived from Sanskrit <foreign>bhagavant</foreign>), we may conclude that the <foreign>nāyaka</foreign>s were by no means always lower-class people; their position may have been in relation with the authorities in whose name they acted.</quote><bibl rend="default"><ptr target="bib:Casparis1956_01"/><citedRange unit="page">228</citedRange><citedRange unit="note">65</citedRange></bibl></cit> However, it is also possible that the words mean <q>the <foreign>nāyaka</foreign> of the reverend Jyotiṣa</q>.</p>
	<p n="3-6">The term <foreign>modhāra</foreign>, here tentatively translated as <q>to excise</q>, has not so far been properly explained. Sarkar (n. 14 = n. 16) states: <q>The text has <foreign>modhāra</foreign>, whereof the root appears to be <foreign>u(d)dhara</foreign>. The term therefore appears to have the same significance as <foreign>soddhara</foreign> in <foreign>soddhara haji</foreign> (= <foreign>dravya haji</foreign>).</q> The latter thus seems to mean <q>all royal excise</q>. A helpful parallel passage is found in the <ref target="DHARMA_INSIDENKLuitan.xml">Luitan</ref> charter (823 Śaka), 1v2: <foreign>Umajarakan· parṇaḥnikanaṁ savaḥ kmitanya tan· vnaṁ maṅisī Uddhāra, saṁkhā ri hə:tnikanaṁ sinaṅguḥ satampaḥ</foreign>. In OJED, under <foreign>uddhāra</foreign>, only the verb form <foreign>aṅuddhāra</foreign> meaning <q>to make selections</q> is recorded. Money-related meanings are however recorded for the original Sanskrit word, also borrowed into several other Indian languages, in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sircar1966_01"/><citedRange>348</citedRange></bibl> (<q>borrowed on trust or credit</q>).</p>
	<!--MW: '<uddhaara>    m. (in some senses perhaps from 1. <uddh.r>), the act of raising, elevating, lifting up; drawing out, pulling out Gaut. MBh. Comm. on B.rAArUp.; removing, extinction, payment (of a debt); taking away, deduction; omission Mn. Comm. on Yaaj;n.; selection, a part to be set aside, selected part; exception TS. "SBr. AitBr. Mn. &c.; selecting (a passage), selection, extract (of a book) Comm. on Kir. x, 10; extraction, deliverance, redemption, extrication MBh. Prab. &c.; a portion, share; a surplus (given by the Hinduu law to the eldest son beyond the shares of the younger ones) W.; the first part of a patrimony W.; the sixth part of booty taken in war (which belongs to the prince) W.; a debt (esp. one not bearing interest), KaatyDh.; obligation Da;s.; recovering property; refutation Car. Comm. on Nyaayad.; (<aa>) f. the plant Cocculus Cordifolius L.; (<am>) n. a fire-place L.-->
	<!--Sircar, IEG, p. 348: uddhāra (LP), borrowed on trust or credit; cf. udhār. (IE 8-5), same as udranga; cf. Tamil uttāra*
	uddhāra-proddhāra (LP), taking on credit ; cf. Marathi udhār-pādhār.
	uddhārya (LP), 'may be debited'; cf. Gujarat! udhāravuṁ.
	uddhārya-vyavahāra (LP), the business of lending money. -->
<p n="6">On <foreign>jari</foreign>, cf. my notes in translation file for Kinewu. OJED's suggestion <foreign>thereupon</foreign> s.v. <foreign>jarīya</foreign> works well here.</p>
<p>Wisseman Christie 2004: 92: "20 dharana ... = 1 kati".</p>
<p>"There were apparently 4 suku or 2 blah in 1 tampah, and 10 tampah in 1 lamwit." Barrett Jones 1984: 145 comes to a different conclusion.</p>
<p>On <foreign>kaṭik</foreign>, see Stutterheim 1925: 241 f n. 61. Barrett Jones 1984: 128 and Tiga Prasasti Jaman Balitung p. 41 n. 10. Connection with <foreign>patik</foreign>?</p>
<p>On <foreign>h<choice><orig>i</orig><reg>ī</reg></choice>nanyan svabhāvanira</foreign>, see Sarvadharma 3r3–4 <foreign>ya tikānmahakən trāsanya, An tinitiḥ byət· deniṁ thāni bala, pinisakitan· tan kinavruhan h<choice><orig>i</orig><reg>ī</reg></choice>nanya</foreign> <q>That resulted in their fear of being heavily imposed by the Thāni Bala; that they would be tormented without their misery being known</q>.</p>
<p n="10-11">The emendation of <foreign>paja</foreign> to <foreign>pūja</foreign> makes it possible to imagine a meaningful connection with the mention of <foreign>vali</foreign> (Sanskrit <foreign>bali</foreign>) in the next line, as <foreign>pūjā</foreign> and <foreign>bali</foreign> are two fundamental categories of Hindu worship. 
	It seems unnatural to give to <foreign>mūla</foreign> any of the meanings recorded in OJED. The meaning <q>value</q> assumed in my translation is attested in Old Khmer (<ref target="http://sealang.net/oldkhmer/">http://sealang.net/oldkhmer/</ref>) and is found also in some other contemporary inscriptions of Java, notably in the <ref target="DHARMA_INSIDENKLanda.xml">Landa</ref> inscription. That same inscription is relevant for our understanding of the term <foreign>lañjān</foreign>, not recorded in OJED. It  occurs three times in that inscription, in contexts which are very comparable to the present one. (Another possible occurrence is found in <ref target="DHARMA_INSIDENKRumwiga.xml">Rumwiga</ref> 1r3.) While no word <foreign>lañjān</foreign> or base <foreign>lañja</foreign> is recorded in OJED, or even in any dictionary of Modern Javanese that I have been able to consult, the word <foreign>lañja</foreign> is attested in Old Sundanese where it means <q>layer</q> and is also used as verb meaning <q>to layer, to apply as a layer</q>, normally applied to precious metal or gems, as for instance in the <title>Siksa Kandaṅ Karəsian</title>. 
<!--Ini dari SKK: kaliṅana ta(358), sri ma ṅaranya(359) omas, kitu na omas, lamunna(360) hamo dilañja(361), pələk rupana, lamunna(362)  kalañja(363) ma, cenaṅ rampes(364) ja kaopeksa(365),
Artinya, sri berarti emas. Begitulah emas, jika tidak dilapisi/disepuh, jelek bentuknya, jika terlapisi/tersepuh, berkilau bagus sebab terpelihara. -->
But in Modern Sundanese the base <foreign>lanja</foreign> is used in connection with <foreign>sawah</foreign>. See <bibl><ptr target="bib:Hardjadibrata2003_01"/><citedRange unit="entry"><foreign>lanja</foreign></citedRange></bibl>: <q><foreign>vi. ngalanja</foreign> (unc.) add a second layer to the first one, cover in (over/up) st.; repeat a job or action; take a second one to a woman; take a second one to a moneylender/supplier; <foreign>ngalanja sawah</foreign> (of a landowner) get rice-fields under his management in order to sublet them to small farmers; <foreign>ngalanjakeun</foreign> give management of (rice-fields) to sublet them to a third party (esp. by a village head to a trusted person, middleman/agent between the owner and cultivator); <foreign>jual lanja</foreign> s.m. <foreign>tutung duit</foreign> (see <foreign>tutung</foreign>)</q>. It is on this basis, and on the basis of what can be extrapolated from the present context, to I propose to interpret the derived form <foreign>lañja-an</foreign> as meaning <q>income from subletting</q>.</p>
<p n="11"><foreign>sasaṅan</foreign>: the morphological pattern of this designation for the Ninth month does not seem to have been described yet for OJ. In Modern Sundanese, there is <foreign>lilikuran</foreign> meaning <q>(of the month) between the 20th and the 30th (particularly during the fasting month)</q>.</p>
<p>It seems that here, as in other cases, the first witness is also the scribe, though the last sentence could equally be translated <q>Written by the calligrapher of the officiant of Priṅ</q>.</p>
<p n="12"><foreign>amasaṅakan i</foreign>: the same usage is found in the <ref target="DHARMA_INSIDENKAlasantan.xml">Alasantan</ref> charter.</p>
         </div>
        <div type="bibliography">
           <p>First published by F. D. K. Bosch (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Bosch1917_02"/></bibl>), without translation; reading of the date revised by Bosch (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Bosch1924_02"/></bibl>); text republished by H. B. Sarkar (<bibl n="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Sarkar1939_01"/></bibl>), who offered no new readings but did add an English translation (this article was republished as part of <bibl><ptr target="bib:Sarkar1971-1972_01"/></bibl>, without significant changes); the dating formula was re-edited and analyzed by L.-Ch. Damais (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:Damais1955_01"/></bibl>); a slightly revised reading of the whole text was included in <bibl><ptr target="bib:Boechari1985-1986_01"/></bibl>; a new English translation was offered by Wisseman Christie (<bibl rend="omitname"><ptr target="bib:WissemanChristie1998_02"/></bibl>, App. 3). The text is re-edited here by Arlo Griffiths based on the photos EFEO_GROB03804 and OD-5197, with a new translation into English. While the edition of Bosch (and after him, that of Sarkar) entirely ignored the basic punctuation signs in the original, Boechari represents them but does so haphazardly. The apparatus offered here does not record any diference of reading punctuation signs vis-à-vis prevous editions. Since Sarkar's editions are entirely derivative from Bosch' work, his readings are not recorded in the apparatus either.</p>
        	<listBibl type="primary">
		<bibl n="B"><ptr target="bib:Bosch1917_02"/></bibl>
		<bibl n="S1"><ptr target="bib:Sarkar1939_01"/></bibl>
		<bibl n="S2"><ptr target="bib:Sarkar1971-1972_01"/><citedRange unit="volume">2</citedRange><citedRange unit="page">55-59</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">68</citedRange></bibl>
		<bibl n="Boe"><ptr target="bib:Boechari1985-1986_01"/><citedRange unit="page">124-126</citedRange> <citedRange unit="item">E.63</citedRange></bibl><!-- with b&w photo on p. 124 -->
	</listBibl>
           <listBibl type="secondary">
	<bibl/><bibl><ptr target="bib:Krom1919_02"/><citedRange unit="item">I</citedRange></bibl>
<!-- Krom 1919: demonstration that terms used are incompatible with a date in 848 and explanation of why number signs 2 and 4 are liable to be confused. Conclusion: date is 829. -->
	<bibl/><bibl><ptr target="bib:Bosch1920_02"/><citedRange unit="item">1</citedRange><citedRange unit="page">98-101</citedRange></bibl>
<!-- Bosch 1920: rejection of Krom's arguments on these grounds: "Niets belet ons te gelooven, dat de kanselarij-stijl op Midden-Java tot in het midden der 9de Çaka-eeuw ouderwetsche allures behouden heeft en dientengevolge de tekst van de midden-Javaansche plaat van 848 meer overeenkomst vertoont met de kwart-eeuw oudere edicten dan met de gelijktijdige Oost-Javaansche. Een feit, dat voor deze verklaring pleit, vindt men in de Jayapattra van 849, welke eveneens midden-Javaansche oorkonde een even korte, even ,,ouderwetsche" dateering bevat als de plaat van 848.
	Zoolang dus niet de onomstootelijke bewijzen geleverd zijn, dat de 4 van het jaartal 848 op eene H even onbegrijpelijke als onvergeefelijke vergissing van den
graveur berust, 6f overtuigend is aangetoond, dat in een bepaalde periode der Javaansche epigraphie het teeken voor de 4 ook voor de 2 gebruikt is, meenen wij
aan de verlokkingen van het jaartal 828 — met zijn eenvoudige oplossing van het vraagstuk — weerstand te moeten bieden en ons te blijven houden aan 848 onder
aanvaarding van alle tegenstrijdigheden en moeielijkheden, die het in het leven heeft geroepen."
	A short rejoinder is offered by Krom in a footnote on the last page. He maintains his position. -->
	<bibl/><bibl><ptr target="bib:Muusses1923_01"/><citedRange unit="page">105</citedRange></bibl>
<!-- simple listing of this inscription -->
	<bibl/><bibl><ptr target="bib:Bosch1924_02"/><citedRange unit="page">229</citedRange><citedRange unit="note">1</citedRange></bibl>
<!-- "De pseudo 4, die bij de bespreking van de oorkonde van Mpu Sindok van 828 schrijver dezes parten heeft gespeeld (Zie Oudh. Versl. 1917, Bijlage M; Dr. Krom, Bijdr. Kon. Inst. 75 p. 8 vlg.; Oudh. Versl. 1920 Bijl. I, met noot van Dr. Krom op p. 100) is hiermede, hopen we, voor goed ontmaskerd."  -->
	<bibl/><bibl><ptr target="bib:Krom1931_01"/><citedRange unit="page">186</citedRange></bibl>
              <bibl/><bibl><ptr target="bib:Stutterheim1937_02"/><citedRange unit="page">154</citedRange></bibl>
	<!--  p. 154: "No. E66 is een koperen plaat, waarop de oorkonde uit 906 A.D. gegrift is, welke in O.V. 1917 pag. 88 is gepubliceerd. Lezing van het origineel neemt de onzekerheid omtrent het tweede cijfer (Bosch: 848 Çaka, Krom: 828 Çaka) weg; er staat inderdaad 828." -->
	<bibl/><bibl><ptr target="bib:JBG04_1937"/><citedRange unit="page">160</citedRange></bibl>
	<!-- p. 160: "E66 Koperen oordkondeplaat met 15 regels Oud-Javaansch schrift aan een zijde. Aan den bovenkant in het midden een rond gat. Randen geschonden. Afm. 36 × 16.5 × 0.1 cm. Uit de coll. Heerenburg te Semarang, naar zeggen uit de omgeving van den Baraboeḍoer."  -->
<bibl>
		<ptr target="bib:Damais1951_01"/>
		<citedRange unit="page">59</citedRange>
<!-- "Il n'est pas impossibnle a priori que Balitung ait encore été vivant car on connaît une autre inscription, datée de 828 Çaka = 15 août 906 EG et émanant de Daksa qui porte dans ce document le titre de Rakryan Mapatih i Hino sans que le souverain régnant, Balitung, soit mentionné (4)." 
	note 4: "II s'agit de la plaque de Palĕpangan trouvée à proximité du Bårå Budur et qui a été publiée par Bosch dans OV, 1917, 88 et suiv. Le millésime est dans cette publication lu à tort 848. Il existe une autre transcription de cette inscription avec traduction anglaise par H. B. Sarkar dans JGIS, VI, 1929, 124-130. La date est bien lue ici 828, mais d'autres erreurs n'ont pas été corrigées."
-->
	</bibl>
<bibl>
		<ptr target="bib:Damais1952_01"/>
		<citedRange unit="page">46-47</citedRange>
		<citedRange unit="part">A</citedRange>
		<citedRange unit="item">80</citedRange>
<!-- with n. 3: "Bien que Stutterheim ait déjà fait remarquer que le millésime de cette inscription est indubitablement 828 (JBG, 1937, 154), nous attirons l'attention sur le fait que la discussion que l'on trouve à ce sujet dans OV, 1920, 98-100, repose sur un malentendu. Si nous signalons cet article, c'est qu'il contient quelques dessins de chiffres vieux-javanais et que trop de discussions paléographiques n'ont été accompagnées d'aucune reproduction. 
	Le dessin 1 reproduit un chiffre qui ne pourrait guère être qu'un 3 d'ailleurs tardif et n'a aucun rapport ni avec un 2 ni avec un 4. Les dessins 2 et 3 ne peuvent représenter à la période ancienne que des 2. Ce n'est qu'aux XIIIe et XIVe siècles Śaka que des signes ressemblant à ceux-ci (bien que la partie supérieure ne soit alors jamais si arrondie et que la partie médiane diffère car elle est dans les anciens 2 toujours en pointe et dans les 4 à partir du Xllle siècle, toujours arrondie), sont des 4, le 2 ayant évolué dans une autre direction. A la note 1 de la page 100, le chiffre reproduit est en effet un 2 parfaitement normal et non, comme le dit Krom, un 2 «qui par sa queue assez longue ressemble à s'y méprendre à un 4». Il est curieux que Krom, tout en ayant raison dans son interprétation du millésime de cette inscription, méconnait le véritable caractère du chiffre 2. Nous avons pu consulter à Djakarta la plaque elle-même et nouis avons pu constater que l'inscription contient quatre chiffres 4 (d'ailleurs transcrits 4 par Bosch, lignes 8, 10 et 11) bien qu'ils diffèrent totalement des chiffres 2, transcrits également 4. Ce document nous fournit presque tous les chiffres, seuls 3, 9 et 0 manquent. Les 6 sont en partIculier très caracténstIques.
	A propos des données calendériques, il est à noter que cette inscription a été gravée dans un mois intercalaire (punaḥ śrawaṇa) [voir EEI, I, 9]. L'examen direct de la plaque nous a permis de fixer ce détail peu net sur la photographie OD 5197." -->
	</bibl>
	<bibl n="D1">
		<ptr target="bib:Damais1955_01"/>
		<citedRange unit="page">178-180</citedRange>
<!-- "Nous donnons la transcription telle que nous avons pu la compléter en 1946 après avoir consulté la plaque elle-même. Mais nous avons fait les calculs de réduction d'après la photographie OD. 5197 où une partie de la ligne 1 est très peu lisible et où pratiquement rien du māsa ne peut être distingué. Un seul détail nous avait frappé : l'espace disponible était bien grand et il y avait place pour plus de cinq aksara. Ajoutons que nous lisons nettement kr̥ṣṇa et non śukla comme dans la transcription publiée." 
	Then a long discussioin justifying reading of month name and the resulting date conversion.
-->
	</bibl>
   <bibl n="D2"><ptr target="bib:Damais1970_01"/>
      <citedRange unit="page">51, 517</citedRange> 
      <citedRange unit="item">133</citedRange>
      <citedRange unit="entry">syukan</citedRange>
   </bibl>
	<bibl><ptr target="bib:Casparis1956_01"/><citedRange unit="page">228</citedRange><citedRange unit="note">65</citedRange></bibl>
<!-- "Perhaps the most interesting locus with reference to the function of nāyakas in Old Javanese society is the Barabudur copper-plate dated 906 A.D., published by Bosch, Oudh. versI., 1917, p. 88; cf. Krom, Geschiedenis2, p. 186. In more recent times, the plate was discussed and translated by H. Bh. Sarkar, J.G.I.S., VI (1939), pp. 124-130. Sarkar's interpretation of the text as a whole is the correct one: „The inscription records a difference of opinion between the rāmantas of Palĕpangan and the nāyaka, viz., bhagawanta Jyotiṣa" (ibid., p. 124). The difference of opinion concerned the amount of taxes (of different kinds). The village elders, considering the amount too high, applied to the rakryān Mapatih and by order of the latter, the grounds were re-estimated with the result that the taxes were lowered. From the high title of the nāyaka (Bhagawanta is derived from Sanskrit bhagavant), we may conclude that the nāyakas were by no means always lower-class people; their position may have been in relation with the authorities in whose name they acted." -->
	<bibl><ptr target="bib:Nakada1982_01"/><citedRange unit="page">92-95</citedRange><citedRange unit="part">1</citedRange><citedRange unit="item">93</citedRange></bibl>
<!-- Barret-Jones 1984: 59, 64-65, 78, 99, 102, 107-109, 127, 129-130, 132, 134-135, 140 -->
	<bibl><ptr target="bib:WissemanChristie1998_02"/><citedRange unit="page">160-161</citedRange></bibl>
	<bibl><ptr target="bib:Eade+Gislen2000_01"/><citedRange unit="page">34-36</citedRange></bibl>
           </listBibl>
        </div>
      </body>
  </text>
</TEI>
<!-- physical features:
	hole at top of page: 
-->
<!-- 
Nomor inventaris: E. 66.
Tempat temuan: Daerah Borobudur, kabupaten Magelang, Jawa Tengah.
Angka tahun: 828 Śaka (15 Agustus 906).
Nama raja: (Tidak ada, tetapi menyebut nama Rakryān Mapatiḥ i Hino Pu Dakṣottama Bāhubajra Pratipakṣakṣaya.
Satu lempengan tembaga berukuran 36,5 x 17,3 cm, di bagian atas tengah ada lubang bundar kecil. Bertulisan 15 baris di satu sisinya. Huruf dan bahasanya Java Kuna.
Photos	EFEO GROB03804 <https://collection.efeo.fr/ws/web/app/collection/record/265709>
	OD-5197
	PKMN p. 124
-->
