amita-vala-mahā-vajra-paryyaṅka-vaddhaḥ rakṣatv āmūla-siṅho bhavaja-bhavacarātyanta-saṁkru matara-hitottuṅga-śaila-stha-śūro yat saj-jīvāpara-smāra-valam akhila . vara-vaśa-vatāsāditādharmma-vr̥ndān· lokānāṁ laukya-vuddhair agaditam atula cchidam akhila-bhava-vyādhi-bhaiṣajyam agraṁ sad-dharmaṁ yukti-cittaḥ praṇamati . t kāruṇyam agrañ jagati gati-śatānanta-duḥkhābhibhūte bhakti-svīyā mānām· prītyā rājā tale danda-dhara-tula-mahājñāna-puṇya-prasūti tām vandya-vandyaḥ . śrīmat-samasta-sugatais sasutaiḥ parāntyaiḥ nīrukta tsu taruṇām atha duḥkhiteṣu satvttveṣu vuddha-cariteṣu garīyasīñ ca . śraddhāñ ca tan-maṇḍalāgra-guṇavad-gaṇam atyavāśi lebhe vigūḍha-manujendra-gaṇān mahiṣyam· śailendra-vaṁśa-tilaka . vistīrṇṇa-saṅga-pyananāmvu-pūrṇṇa -prauḍha-dviṣad-vikasitāmvuja-locanāni tan-maṇḍalāgra nitya-smr̥tāni sahasaiva samākucanti . caṇḍa-pratāpa-paritāpita-bhūri-bhūpaḥ santāpa-pāvanam a guṇo ’pi hira-pīta-karo ’vadātaḥ sācātirānubhava-toṣa-vivikta-cittaḥ . śrīmān asau samaratuṅga Iti kṣitīndraḥ śavidhām adharo mahīyān· tasyātivallabhatarā duhiteha cakre grāme jinālayam araṁ . mi-bhūpa-guṇa-śīla-vibhūṣanākhyā straiṇāgamāvirahitā karuṇātmikā ca rārajyate na titārya rānta-viśayeṣu karoti bhaktim· . sā kāntiñ candramaso gatiñ ca haṅsāt svarañ ca kalaviṅkāt·
 seṇāṁ harati śrīmat-pramodavarddhanī khyātā . śākaindryāṁ rasa-sāgara-kṣitidharair yyāntyāṁ sa māse śucau ca rāma-pakṣa-vasato kāṣṭā-tithau tatra ca tuṁlai-nāma-Umānis-ākhya-sahite vāre purāṇād gurau pte śrīghana-nātham āryya-sahitaṁ prātiṣṭhipan mandire . tacchc cendu-vimva-śakala-pratimaṁ vibhāti rāhor bhiyā sapadi sampatitaṁ dharitryāṁ tasyānuguṇyam athavedam udeti śubhraḥ vuddhais sakr̥tya-taruṇair uṣitaṁ manojñam· . śrīmad-veṇuvanābhikhyam vidhāya jina-mandiraṁ yat puṇyam āptam etena daśadāpnotu saugatam· . padam atyanta-duṣprāpam anuttaram agocaraṁ tat-sutānāṁ mayā yuktaṁ tūrṇṇam eva labheya yat· . Aurvvāgnir yāvad uṣṇa-śvasana-vaśa-gatākṣanyadam bodhi-dr̥ṣṭyā yāvat prāntā dharitrī vivudha-gaṇa-samākrānta-mūrttiś ca meruḥ yāvat khe svān gabhastīn daśa-śata-gaṇanām ujjhati vyoma-cakre sugata-guṇa-gaṇas tāvad āstām vihāraḥ .

. svasti śaka-varṣātīta 746 jyeṣṭa-māsa daśami kr̥ṣṇa-pakṣa tuṁlai Umanis vr̥haspati-vāra tatkāla rakai patapān· pu palar· saṁ laki-laki pu pasaṁ saṁṅ ānakabi mavaiḥ savaḥ sīmā Arikiva luAṁ Iṁ babadan· lmaḥ ri tpu mapak· viniḥnya ha 3 I kisir· lmaḥ ri kayumvuṅan· viniḥnya ha 1 vha 1 I rasti karuṁ lmaḥ I ptir· viniḥnya ha 6 Iṁ kaliruṅan· viniḥnya ha 3 Iṁ kuliṁ viniḥnya ha 3 lmaḥ ri tri haji Ekapiṇḍa viniḥ ha 14 vha 1

tatra sākṣī si ravan· si siḥ vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 simsim· 1 suhan·-suhan· 1 si maṇḍakṣa saṁ luA paṇḍak· Anak banva I ji vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 simsim· 1 tasintanamu saṁ kaniryyan· Anak banva I valiṁbiṁ vatak· si C.la 1 vadvā saṁ makudur· kinaun· Umadagga saṅ anak banva magavai ri havuryyan· ra pa lar hyaṁ vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 si bahas· ramani mai ......... vi ...... ............ kalima si habak· ............ ..................... hlai 1 kalamvi 1 punukan· 1 su ............ mañjan· ramani pagar· vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 juru si jati ramani svara vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 I sukun· si madhava ramani bhavana vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 I variṅin· juru si lañcaṁ ramani nari vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 I vuAtan· kalima si maṅga ramani napal· vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 I paṇḍakyan juru si rindaṁ ramani gunuṁ vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 I ptir juru si vikrama ramani dhara vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 rama si piṅul ramani Ambari vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 kalima si kunvurama ramani taji vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 putiḥ hlai 1 kalambi 1 punukan· 1 suhan-suhan· 1 I lva paṇḍak· kalima si kalap· ramani nanta vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 putiḥ hlai 1 kalamvi 1 punukan· 1 suhan·-suhan· 1 juru si danaka ramani darā vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 parvuvus· si hūm· ramany avak· vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 I tri haji rāma si pañca ramani tīrtha vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 siliḥ juru si śaṅkhara ramani carmi vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 parvuvus· si gunuṁ ramani nasat· vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 parvuvus· si kutil· ramani buvi vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 variga si sumbut· ramani siddha vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 juru matuha sy avit· ramani Ayat· vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 kalima si sampū ramani bamuṁ vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 si pañca ramani hrəṁ vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 putiḥ hlai 1 kalamvi 1 lukai 1 punukan· 1 vaduṁ 1 patuk· kr̥s· 1 parvuvus· saṁ kayumvuṅan· si haras· ramani vikramī Anak banva I tyusan· vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 parvuvus· saṁ mantyāsih saṁ kīrti puntani nabha Anak banva ri tri haji vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 parvuvus· saṁ lva paṇḍak· si kbal· ramani jamin· Anak banva ri tri haji vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 tuhalas· ri hulu luvaṁ si silpa ramani yaḍa vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 tuhalas· ri kaṇḍaṅan· lamvas· si saruḥ ramani kutiṁ vinaiḥ takuraṁ yu 1 kinaun· rakai patapān·

-siṅho -ṣimho De Casparis printing error, corrected in . nīrukta- It seems that the expected ni has been written nī to fit the meter. vigūḍha- 18739: Damais (1955: 43, n. 1) expressed strong doubt about de Casparis’ reading vigūḍha ... noting that the -ḍha appears to be a -gha. Can we read vidhūya? Or vibhūya? 19712 suggests aviguṇān, but this would be unmetrical. tan-maṇḍalāgra- tan-maṇḍalā- The akṣara gra is visible on the Leiden plastercast. Cf. also st. V, pāda b. nitya- nītya- De Casparis printing error, not corrected in . seṇāṁ seṇāṁ It seems that the indication ⏕⏓– in De Casparis' text was a misprint for ⏕⏕. Sarkar reads sekṣaṇe mr̥gīṇāṁ without any note indicating a departure from De Casparis' edition, and a conjectural one too. His proposal is unmetrical. -pramodavarddhanī -prāmodavarddhanī De Casparis' reading prā instead is required by the meter but 327, rightly points out that it is not what is engraved on the stone: Nous ne savons pourquoi De C. transcrit (p. 37, ligne 5 et passim) le nom de la Princesse « Prâmodawardhanī » alors que l'inscription a nettement praāmodawarddhan(ī) avec une brève. A la note 5 de la p. 46, il déclare : « On se serait attendu à Prâmodya (qui augmente la joie); ... ». Pourquoi s'attendre à un autre mot que celui qui se trouve dans l'inscription, praāmoda, qui est bien connu en sanskrit ? Damais answers his own question in his n. 2: En fait, il doit y avoir 30 morae à chaque vers. Mais si sa transcription peut bien donner ce total pour le second vers, c'est parce qu'il interprète prāmoda° alors que l'inscription a pra°. De Casparis seems to have corrected pra to prā for metrical reasons and then to have forgotten that this reading is an emendation. purāṇād Perhaps read purāṇaṅ? tacchc cendu- tacchendu-vimva-śakala-pratimaṁ All previous scholars have silently assumed that tacchendu- stands for tac cendu-. We see no better solution, but the rather bad spelling error has to be noted. tasyānuguṇyam tasyānupuṇyam athavedam atha vedim We adopt the reading proposed by 194. śubhraḥ bhūbhr̥t· We adopt the reading proposed by 194, although it might not be impossible to read śubhraṁ. vuddhais vr̥ddhais We adopt the reading proposed by 194. -vanābhikhyam It seems that the plastercast shows -vanābhikhyām. tat-sutānāṁ Perhaps read tat sutarāṁ? labheya labbeya De Casparis printing error, corrected in . -cakre-vr̥traḥ lva paṇḍak· lupaṇḍak· Cf. Damais 1968: 328. darā dara hūm· hr̥m· rāma rama śaṅkhara śaṅkara nasat· rasal· kutil· katil· hrəṁ 912 noted: Translitération précise hr̥̄ à prononcer hərəŋ. The statement about the precise transliteration is unreliable. vikramī vikrami si kbal· 1 kbal· Cf. Damais 1968: 328. luvaṁ si silpa luvas si silpa Cf. Damais 1968: 328. yaḍa yada kinaun· kinon· Cf. 321, 328.

That temple shines as wide as a slice of the Moon instantly fallen to the earth as though for fear of Rāhu. Or rather, the white one śubhra masc., i.e., the Moon rises above this lovely temple that shares features with Him, inhabited by Buddhas both ... and young.

Once it is concentrated upon by me, may I just quickly reach that stage, extremely difficult to attain for his sons i.e, bodhisattvas, that is ultimate, beyond the senses.

De Casparis believed the text not to have reached its completion by line 51; Damais (1968: 332) the text comes at its end here.-argued against this.

Metri causa spellings: nīrukta- for nirukta-. Places where a metric causa spelling would have been required: prāmoda- for pramoda-.

The text on two out of five fragments edited by J. L. A. Brandes (); the text of all three preserved fragments edited, with Dutch translation and extensive study, by J. G. de Casparis (). This work generated a number of important scholarly reactions, notably those of F. D. K. Bosch () and L.-Ch. Damais (). The publications by H. B. Sarkar () and M. Long () offer digests of research up to their dates of publication as well as translations into English (Long only of the Sanskrit portion of the text) but no original text editions. This digital edition has been prepared from the available visual documentation and with systematic collation only of the reading published by De Casparis.

IV4-6 III24-50 A1026-27 111-114 317-331 4432 IX64-75 I1374-75 122-123 167-212