Our interpretation assumes that talāṅ and jamalaṅ are precursors of the toponyms Tà Làng and Xamơ (Samo) that designate places near the site of the inscription until this day. The word tauṅ has so far only been encountered in expressions of duration of time, but here seems to express extent of space. The reading and meaning of the penultimate word are uncertain, but we must be dealing with a noun countable with object classifier vauh, derived with infix -an- from a base katāy or kanāy. It seems that ño must be variant of the third-person pronoun that is ñū elsewhere in Old Cham (67-69).
The inscription was tentatively deciphered, though not translated, in . It is re-edited here from photographs and after autopsy of the stone in March 2026.
14-15B